Josh Hawley is Chief Defender of Medicaid During One Big Beautiful Bill Debate
One Big Beautiful Bill Act would find $880 billion in savings by making various changes and cuts to Medicaid.
BREITBART
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) has become the chief defender of Medicaid while Republicans move to slash hundreds of billions of dollars from the program through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Hawley has staked a clear position: that he will not support a bill that cuts Medicaid benefits. The House-passed version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would find $880 billion in savings by making various changes and cuts to Medicaid.
During the vote on the budget resolution, which creates instructions for committees to find savings for the bill, Hawley joined with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) to introduce an amendment stripping the House budget resolution’s directive to cut the entitlement program by hundreds of billions of dollars. The measure did not pass, although Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) voted for the Hawley-Wyden amendment.
Hawley wrote in a New York Times op-ed that cutting healthcare benefits for the poor “is both morally wrong and politically suicidal.”
“Republicans need to open their eyes: Our voters support social insurance programs. More than that, our voters depend on those programs,” he continued.
The Show-Me State senator said that Republicans should focus on Trump’s directive: Focus solely on “waste, fraud, and abuse” in the program.
“His exact words were, ‘Don’t touch it, Josh.’ I said, ‘Hey, we’re on the same page,’” Hawley said.
The Hill wrote:
Outside observers said Hawley hasn’t suddenly become a defender of ObamaCare, but his Medicaid position reflects the changing politics of the low-income health care program. Lower-income, working-class people on Medicaid are now a major part of the GOP base, which has become more populist since the emergence of Trump.
Missouri is a ruby-red state Trump won handily in 2024, but those voters also overwhelmingly passed a ballot measure in 2020 to expand Medicaid.
Timothy McBride, a health economist at Washington University’s School of Public Health, noted that there are often more people on Medicaid in rural areas than in urban areas.
Stripping the legislation of its provision cutting Medicaid may also upset the delicate balance that led the bill’s passage through the House. Fiscal hawks have already fretted that the House-passed legislation adds too much to the deficit.
CONTINUE READING SOURCE ARTICLE…
Header featured image (edited) credit: Org. post content. Emphasis added by (TLB)
••••
![]()
••••
Stay Tuned…
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Leave a Reply