Julian Assange Closer To US Transfer –Court Issues Extradition Order

Julian Assange Closer To US Transfer After London Court Issues Extradition Order


WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has just come a major step closer to being transferred into US custody, after on Wednesday a London court issued a formal extradition order during a hearing. All that awaits is higher government approval for the legal ruling, a remaining limited appeals process notwithstanding.

“The order, which brings and end to the years’-long extradition battle closer, comes after the U.K. Supreme Court last month refused Assange permission to appeal against a lower court’s ruling that he could be extradited,” The Associated Press reports. 

Getty Images

“District Judge Paul Goldspring issued the order in a brief hearing at Westminster Magistrates’ Court, as Assange watched by video link from Belmarsh Prison and his supporters rallied outside the courthouse, demanding he be freed,” the AP observed.

This means all that remains is for UK Home Secretary Priti Patel to rubber-stamp the transfer, coming after Assange has languished for years in London’s Belmarsh maximum security prison, where he was sent in April of 2019, following UK police dragging him from the Ecuadorean embassy.

Crucially, Assange’s legal team can still appeal the Wednesday extradition ruling, which will continue to the already long dragged out proceedings.

Axios notes, however, that “Assange still has legal options available to him, but the approval is a blow to his decadelong fight to avoid trial over U.S. charges of violating the Espionage Act and hacking government computers.” He faces 175 years in prison if convicted – which would likely be served at a US federal supermax prison that his supporters say is tantamount to torture given the extreme isolation inmates experience.

The question of whether Assange faces extreme and cruel punishment if transferred to US custody has figured centrally in the legal debate, as the AP report reviews:

A British district court judge had initially rejected a U.S. extradition request on the grounds that Assange was likely to kill himself if held under harsh U.S. prison conditions. U.S. authorities later provided assurances that the WikiLeaks founder wouldn’t face the severe treatment that his lawyers said would put his physical and mental health at risk.

In December, the High Court overturned the lower court’s decision, saying that the U.S. promises were enough to guarantee that Assange would be treated humanely. The Supreme Court in March rejected Assange’s attempt to challenge that ruling.

Assange’s wife Stella Morris addressed supporters Wednesday in the wake of the new extradition ruling…

Chief magistrate Paul Goldspring at the relatively brief hearing at Westminster Magistrates’ Court said, “In layman’s terms, I am duty bound to send your case to the secretary of state for a decision.”

Assange’s defense team has four weeks to make submissions making the case against extradition to Home Secretary Patel, but will also eventually be able to seek appeal to the High Court.


(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as written and compiled by Tyler Durden

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Assange protestors/Getty Image



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.