Loving their servitude

By: Nicholas J. Kaster

It should come as no surprise that the institutions that gave us “safe spaces” to protect students from uncomfortable political beliefs have now embraced a form of therapeutic totalitarianism designed to keep students safe from COVID.

Independent journalist Michael Tracy and Reason editor Robby Soave have each written at length about the “permanent surveillance state” being built by academia. Their findings are disturbing.

For example:

  • Columbia University has forbidden students from hosting guests, visiting residence halls other than their own, and gathering with more than ten people.

  • Connecticut College has imposed a “cautionary quarantine” on its student body and restricted its students to socializing with a maximum of three students, outside, socially distanced, and wearing masks.

  • At Georgetown, students may not remove their masks in class to ask questions or to drink water.

  • At the University of Southern California, students may not eat or drink in the building.

  • Brown University has announced that students are forbidden to gather in groups of more than five, whether indoors or outdoors. They are no longer permitted to eat in the cafeteria, and must instead pick up their meals and eat elsewhere, keeping a mask on at all other times.

Even worse, a snitch culture, reminiscent of East Germany, has taken hold. The Dean at Connecticut College is reported as saying (on a zoom call) that “Moving forward, none of you should be OK with people not having a mask on inside, or not having it properly worn.”

According to Tracy:

Deans at Georgetown University and the University of Southern California have also been sending out these imperious injunctions for students to rat out the alleged violators among them, or as USC Law School Andrew T. Guzman put it in that typically manipulative style: ‘non-compliant members of our community.’ What’s a ‘non-compliant member’ of the USC ‘community,’ exactly? Someone who engages in unsanctioned indoor ‘hydration.’ No, I’m not kidding.”

And bear in mind, all of these institutions require students to be fully vaccinated. Few population cohorts are safer from COVID than vaccinated 18-to-22-year-olds, yet these students are being told that they are at risk of dying if they engage in any amount of socializing or non-masking.

Vaccination was never the gateway to normalcy it was presented to be,” Tracy concludes, “and the only option is apparently to instate ‘Permanent Emergency’ protocols with no cognizable ‘off-ramp’ in sight.”

Most disheartening of all is that the students appear to be accepting these infringements on their liberties with hardly a whimper (and are happily forking over $50,000 a year and up for the privilege).

One might have expected students to rebel against these measures,” Robby Soave writes. “Many campuses contain a loud and active contingent of injustice-minded protesters. But if young people at Columbia, Harvard, and elsewhere are fed up with mandatory masking and social distancing, they certainly aren’t saying so. In fact, some students seem to be eagerly reporting each other for COVID-19 noncompliance. And at campuses where the mitigation efforts are less militant, students have actually protested the lack of enforcement. University of Iowa students recently held a ‘die-in’ to demand that the administration pause ‘all non-essential in person events’ and implement a mask mandate.”

Many have seen parallels in this creeping authoritarianism to George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. But a closer analogy to our current predicament can be found in the novel Brave New World, written by Aldous Huxley, Orwell’s high school French teacher.

Orwell’s novel presents an oppressive state ruled by terror and torture, whereas Huxley’s novel, published 17 years earlier, envisions a subtler way of imposing repression. The world’s rulers, Huxley predicted, will discover that conditioning and medication “are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.”

That appears to sum up the state of academia today: students loving the servitude to their health overlords (“stay safe!”).

And, unfortunately, what happens at the colleges no longer stays there. As Andrew Sullivan famously wrote, “We all live on campus now.” By which he meant that, at one time, students left the cloistered world of academia and had to adjust to the wider world. Now, the wider world has to adjust to them.

If recent history is any guide, Soave writes, “we should be terrified that the current crop of college students might leave campus possessed of the notion that the most insane version of pandemic oppression is perfectly normal and desirable.”

If so, then the next stop is a full police state — e.g., Australia.


This article (Loving their servitude) is republished here under “Fair Use” (see the TLB disclaimer below article) with attribution to the original articles author Nicholas J. Kaster and the website americanthinker.com.

TLB Project recommends that you visit the American Thinker website for more great articles and information.

Read more articles by Nicholas J. Kaster

ImageCredit: Photo in Featured Image (top) – by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay


Read more about College Students today


Click on the image below to visit site:



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.