Maxime Bernier, Brian Peckford challenge COVID jab travel mandates to Canada’s Supreme Court

Featured ImageMaxime Bernier, leader of the People’s Party of CanadaPPC HQ / Twitter

“The public interest in this case is staggering. Canadians need to know whether it is lawful for the federal government to prevent them from travelling across Canada, or from leaving and re-entering their own country, based upon whether they have taken a novel medication,” Allison Pejovic, the JCCF lawyer representing Peckford and Bernier, said.

The decision to take the case to the Supreme Court comes after the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the case as “moot” in November, since the mandates were no longer in effect.

In November 2021, the Liberal government under the leadership of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau introduced COVID jab travel mandates, which remained in place until June 2022.

According to the JCCF, taking the case to the Supreme Court will mean a two-step process. First, Bernier and Peckford must ask if the Court is willing to hear their appeal. If the appeal is granted, the hearing will be scheduled for several months later.

The two say that the case is of “national importance” since emergency orders are not approved by Parliament before being imposed.

If the laws cannot be later challenged in court because they are no longer in effect, Canadians can continually have their rights trampled as long as the government rescinds the orders before legal challenges make it into the courts.

Bernier and Peckford’s lawyers argued that their case had merit despite the travel COVID jab mandates being gone because they could be reintroduced at a moment’s notice.

In February 2022, Bernier, along with Peckford and eight others, filed a court challenge to COVID mandates in place at the time that banned the vaccine-free from air travel. Bernier and Peckford had the help of the JCCF.

The legal challenge made headlines because Peckford is the last living signatory of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which came into force in 1982.

In October 2022, the Canadian federal court deemed Bernier, Peckford, and the others’ court case “moot” in light of the federal government dropping COVID mandates in the same month.

Later, in April 2023, Bernier and Peckford, with the help of the JCCF, along with the others in the case, filed an appeal of the “mootness” ruling.

During the so-called COVID pandemic, Trudeau referred to those who chose not to get the experimental COVID shots as terrible people.

In 2021, Trudeau said Canadians “vehemently opposed to vaccination” do “not believe in science” and are “often misogynists, often racists” and even questioned whether Canada should continue to “tolerate these people.”

Source

Featured image source: https://www.jccf.ca/peckford-bernier-take-travel-restrictions-to-supreme-court-of-canada/

************

Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*