McConnell says Capitol security measures not warranted by any ‘serious threats’
Reminds him of Kabul
Top GOP Senator Mitch McConnell has likened stepped-up security in the nation’s capital to his trip to war-ravaged Afghanistan, arguing the measures are excessive and based on a non-existent “threat” to lawmakers. (RT-USA News)
“I’m extremely uncomfortable with the fact that my constituents can’t come to the Capitol. With all this razor wire around the complex, it reminds me of my last visit to Kabul,” the Kentucky Senator told reporters on Wednesday, adding “I just checked earlier this morning. There are no serious threats against the Capitol.” (McConnell pictured from a PBS Screen grab.)
I think we are continuing to overreact based on current threat levels… It looks terrible to have the beacon of our democracy surrounded by razor wire and National Guard troops.
While McConnell acknowledged “some changes” are needed to protocols at the Capitol complex in the wake of the January 6 riot, he nonetheless argued the safety precautions – including a 5,000-troop National Guard deployment – are not necessary.
Democratic Senator Dick Durban (Illinois) leveled similar criticisms against the massive display of security theater on Tuesday, saying a fence circling the Capitol – standing 10 feet tall and topped with razor wire – is “ghastly,”“unacceptable” and an “embarrassment” to the country.
Both Senators’ comments follow a House-commissioned review of the Capitol’s policing and surveillance measures earlier this week, which found numerous staffing and management problems with the Capitol police and issues with the building itself. The review recommended the hiring of more than 850 new Capitol officers and the construction of a permanent “mobile fencing option” surrounding the facility, among other things.
Though the DC National Guard deployment – initially 20,000-strong ahead of Inauguration Day – was scheduled to wind down later this week, a request from local police to retain more than 2,000 troops in the capital for another two months was approved by the Pentagon on Tuesday.
The approval came after an alleged “militia plot” to storm the Capitol prompted House lawmakers to cancel a session last Thursday, though police offered few details about the purported scheme and Senators apparently determined the threat was overblown, as the upper chamber met as usual without incident. Nonetheless, police and some lawmakers continue to sound alarms about the dangers posed by “domestic terrorists” and militia groups, even when unable to point to any specific or credible threat.
(TLB) published this article from RT-USA News with our thanks for the coverage.
Header featured image DC Capitol credit: © Reuters / Jonathan Ernst
Related from The Liberty Beacon:
Pelosi Claims Capitol Is Under Threat From ‘All The President’s Men’ (Trump Supporters)
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.