ER Editor: The tweet shown below from Rocco Galati’s account can be found HERE. We recommend following both him and original tweeter Gary Conway. And here’s the link to the online Merriam-Webster dictionary at the word ‘vaccine’. As it’s not particularly clear below, here is a screenshot of the dictionary entry as of today:
Merriam-Webster Dictionary Redefines Meaning Of ‘Vaccination’
Terms like ‘pandemic’, ‘herd immunity’ and ‘vaccine safety’ have already been re-defined by evil globalists over the past year.
Now, even dictionaries are being re-written to fool people about what the word ‘vaccine’ actually means. Merriam-Webster have been caught red-handed by eagle-eyed reader Gary Conway (image below).
Dumbing down the masses into accepting the COVID19 jab is all part of the plan to make it easier for eugenicists to meet their agenda of mass de-population by brainwashing the gullible. Here we take a look at the evidence.
Merriam-Webster have joined the elite conspiracy on vaccine definition to give the appearance that it is perfectly normal, acceptable medical practice to inject something other than the actual living or dead sample of the disease into the host to stimulate an immune response. Those of us who remember our school science/history lessons will recall how, in 1796, Englishman Edward Jenner administered the first smallpox inoculation, thereby giving birth to the science of immunology.
Jenner had observed that milkmaids, who often contracted cowpox, seemed immune to its much deadlier cousin, smallpox. In a ‘Eureka’ moment Jenner had the idea to inject a tiny amount of infected human tissue into a small boy (guinea pig) and observed the outcome. Jenner saw that the boy did not contract the disease and thus the basis of vaccination theory was established. (ER: Jenner then used his experimental vaccine frequently on both his son and a neighbor’s boy, with the upshot that both died of TB according to Dr. Suzanne Humphries.)
However, what is happening today with mRNA ‘vaccines’ is far removed from the original concept, such that all manner of toxins now make up the ingredients of these experimental potions, as Merriam-Webster’s redefinition shows below:
On the left (see above) is the original definition and the right, the new and ‘improved’ version.
Do you note how we are moving further from the concept of stimulating an immune response by simply introducing a tiny fragment of a disease into our bodies into now inserting an “antigenic preparation” (as per part ‘a’).
In modern medical parlance that simply means a foreign body, any foreign body.
This leads us nicely into the trap set for us in part ‘b’ above, which opens up the possibility that even synthetic, man-made strands of genetic material will also do the job!
In an earlier article, ‘Moderna’s COVID Vaccine Is An ‘Operating System’ – Is This Transhumanism?’ I warned readers where this was all heading.
I wrote at that time:
“Documents obtained from Moderna reveal that the so-called vaccine being peddled by the company is actually an ‘operating system’. This startling admission confirms what vaccine skeptics have claimed – that COVID is about control, not a virus.
It won’t be lost on anyone who has done due diligence over this pandemic to see past the glib claims of paid-off politicians and compliant media that all is not as it seems.
To start, it is no coincidence that one of the key promoters of these new mRNA ‘vaccines’ is none other than Microsoft billionaire, Bill Gates. Bill gave a Ted Talk where he boasted vaccines can help cut global population by 15 percent.
Yes he said cut population. How does that work – by deactivating these vaccine-implanted operating systems in us?”
Let us be clear about this, the COVID19 experimental injections being rolled out by Moderna and Pfizer are nothing similar to traditional vaccines.
These mRNA (messenger RNA) platforms are an “operating system” designed to program human beings and turn their cells into efficient drug delivery systems. Moderna is now going public with the real intentions behind the mRNA platform (read more here).
As I explained to asiapacifictoday.tv last week, Bill Gates and others at the center of this crime against humanity made sure they were granted immunity from criminal prosecution by our governments. Why would they need that? Don’t say you haven’t been warned.
About John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI). John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply