Merrick Garland’s Hunter lies blown up YET AGAIN by IRS whistleblowers

Merrick Garland’s Hunter lies blown up YET AGAIN by IRS whistleblowers

IRS Director of Field Operations Michael Batdorf and DC IRS Special Agent in Charge Darrell Waldon, both vets of the tax agency, added even more wrinkles.

NEW YORK POST

US Attorney General Merrick Garland swears (literally: in sworn testimony) that US Attorney David Weiss was in fact the top dog when it came to charging ne’er do well First Son Hunter Biden — yet senior feds keep blowing up his claims: Two more IRS professionals have now contradicted him.

Garland repeated his claim at a Wednesday hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, saying that “no one had the authority to turn him down,” of Weiss’ alleged power to bring whatever charges the evidence justified against Hunter.

He added that Weiss “had the authority because I promised he would have the authority.”

Yet Garland immediately contradicted himself, saying others in Justice “could refuse to partner with” Weiss.

And IRS Director of Field Operations Michael Batdorf and DC IRS Special Agent in Charge Darrell Waldon — both vets of the tax agency — added even more wrinkles.

“My understanding is that . . . he can’t make that [charging] decision without DOJ Tax authorization,” Batdorf said of Weiss in an earlier hearing — recalling a meet where DOJ tax muckamucks gave static about charging the first son.

Batdorf also OK’d felony charges against Hunter for actions dating back to 2014, including related to his service on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma — charges that Weiss still couldn’t manage to bring before the statute of limitations passed, because someone else wouldn’t sign off.

Funny how such timing issues keep playing out to protect the Bidens.

Waldon said, re: Weiss’s alleged powers, “There was processes that Mr. Weiss would have to work out with the Department of Justice.”

Sure doesn’t sound like actually being in charge to us.

CONTINUE READING

Header featured image (edited) credit: Attorney General Merrick Garland swears that US Attorney David Weiss was in fact the top dog when it came to charging first son Hunter Biden. /Shutterstock

Emphasis added by (TLB)

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.