New Research Implicates UK State in Policy of Mass-Euthanasia With Midazolam Using Covid Deaths as Cover

ER Editor: This is one of the many Covid elephants in the room and has yet to break open in many countries – how the elderly and disabled were ‘euthanized’ or murdered by state policy during the earlier days of the pLandemic. Some of these deaths were among the young diagnosed with ‘Spanish flu’. Again, state medical policy (i.e. the treatment) was likely the cause. The policy seems to apply more to certain countries such as the UK.

Here we return to the question of that spike in deaths in April 2020, where Covid was largely absent according to the research discussed below. A reminder that we were all put into lockdown during March 2020.

The podcast to this article lies behind a paywall.

********

BREAKING: New Research Implicates UK State in Policy of Mass-Euthanasia With Midazolam Using Covid Deaths as Cover

WARRIOR CREED Podcast

At the top of this Newszine, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED podcast from yesterday Tuesday 13th February 2024, with a transcript provided: UK State Policy of Mass-Euthanasia With Midazolam Using Covid Deaths as Cover – New Research.

This podcast is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:

The rest of this Newszine is the write-up of our topic and is provided free. Read On.


BREAKING: New Research Implicates UK State in Policy of Mass-Euthanasia With Midazolam Using Covid Deaths as Cover

Radical Dispatch

1) Mandated Midazolam injections Correlate to UK excess death

A new pre-publication academic paper has found a statistically significant, very high correlation between UK excess deaths and the use of death-row drug Midazolam used in NHS end of life care death protocol.

The paper’s author Dr. Wilson Sy pulls no punches, stating that these excess deaths were “wrongly attributed to Covid but statistically correlate instead to health professionals injecting patients with death-row drug Midazolam, in what appears to be “a possible policy of systemic euthanasia of our elderly and disabled in care homes.

No, that is not a typo. Yes, you read that correctly.

Over the last month Radical Media has been addressing the issue of global excess death coupled with increasingly alarming peer-reviewed research papers linking Covid vaccines to multiple serious health problems. When considering the possible causes for this confirmed global excess death, Radical Media presented two options.

Radical Media reports 31st January 2024:

The publication of peer-reviewed research linking Covid vaccines to this excess death has bolstered option (i) above as a possible cause for higher than normal death rates.

The release now of this new Australian paper that finds a correlation between state-mandated Midazolam injections and UK excess death confirms option (ii) as a second cause.

Here is the new research paper in question by Dr Wilson Sy.

And here is Dr Wilson Sy’s summary from the paper’s abstract:

This paper shows that the UK spike in deaths, wrongly attributed to COVID-19 in April 2020, was not due to SARS-CoV-2 virus, which was largely absent, but was due to the widespread use of Midazolam injections which were statistically very highly correlated (coefficient over 90 percent) with excess deaths in all regions of England during 2020.

ER: A reminder that the vaccine rollout didn’t start until Dec. 2020 and January 2021.

As if that part wasn’t shocking enough, Dr Sy continues:

Importantly, excess deaths remained elevated following mass vaccination in 2021, but were statistically uncorrelated to COVID injections, while remaining significantly correlated to Midazolam injectionsThe widespread and persistent use of Midazolam in UK suggests a possible policy of systemic euthanasia.

Here is a screen-grabbed image of the abstract, with the relevant parts highlighted in yellow for any who may doubt what their eyes are reading right now.

At this stage, for those who may be wondering why a correlation between Midazolam injections and excess death is statistically surprising, considering that any vulnerable patients dying from Covid would have been issued ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ (DNR) orders and placed on an ‘end of life care pathway’ regardless, and so would obviously have been administered Midazolam in order to spare them a slow Covid death, this question has also been addressed by Dr. Sy’s research.

Statistically, Covid cases simply do not correspond to Covid deaths. (ER: Huge.)

This begs the question, if not Covid, what exactly was killing all these people in our care facilities? Chillingly, the answer appears to be lethal injections of the death-row drug Midazolam.

Here is a chart used by Dr. Sy plotting the correlation between Midazolam injections and UK excess death. The green line depicts Midazolam monthly injections, and the red line depicts monthly excess deaths. As is evident, and unlike for Covid cases above, these two lines mirror each other in quick succession.

To consider these results alarming is an understatement.

The worrying thing is that – as depicted below – this unusual correlation between Midazolam and UK excess death – and crucially without corresponding Covid cases – only appeared during the state-declared “pandemic”. The isolated red dot in the top right corner represents the period in question. What was the “Covid pandemic” used to conceal?

This new Australian paper is both bold and incredibly frank in its implied conclusions, potentially upending everything people think they understand about what exactly happened during the Covid “pandemic” that never was.

Dr. Sy summarises his findings in the following words:

The extraordinary spike in UK excess deaths in April 2020 was not due to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, because there were relatively few infections and there was no ‘high consequence infectious disease’ as officially declared in March 2020.”

The statement that there was “no high consequence infectious disease as officially declared in March 2020” leaves the question as to what killed all those people glaringly open.

Dr. Sy answers this query immediately, and candidly, in the very next paragraph:

The UK COVID-19 pandemic was iatrogenic (i.e.: deaths caused by the medical intervention itself – Ed.), created with widespread and persistent use of Midazolam injections in all regions of England, particularly in care homes, under a systemic policy of euthanasia. The nature of the euthanasia needs further investigation. Statistically, Midazolam injections were highly correlated with UK excess deaths throughout the pandemic, overwhelming COVID-19 disease or vaccination as other possible explanations for excess mortality.

Dr. Sy does not exclude other possible causes for UK excess death, such as vaccination, though he presents Midazolam as the highly correlating, statistically significant factor.

Midazolam was the common proximal cause of excess deaths in the pandemic, but there were likely many other primary causes including comorbidities, infections and vaccination. The data available are not sufficient to measure the precise impact of vaccination on excess deaths. Vaccination was unlikely to have saved many, if any, lives because the unreliable early data grossly exaggerated COVID deaths, inflating the extent of the SARS-CoV-2 threat which was subsequently assumed and projected in computer models which created illusory benefits.”

Finally, Dr. Sy seems aware that his findings totally disrupt most of what the world thinks it knows about the Covid “pandemic” that never was.

Most global investigations of COVID-19 epidemiology, only based on the relative impacts of COVID disease and vaccination, are probably inaccurate, because their assumptions are generally false due to the significant presence of confounding factors in some countries, such as the UK.

Again, here is a screen-grab from the paper’s conclusion for those who are still digesting the severity of what Dr. Sy’s words imply.

What we are reading here is clearly damning. The implications of Dr. Wilson Sy’s research is that every 2020 death that was marked as Covid was instead a non-Covid death caused by a deliberate state policy of overdosing our elderly and vulnerable with death-row drug Midazolam, so that they would be no longer be a financial burden on the system, the NHS and pension funds.

Knowing this, and having read what you just have, now ask yourselves why so many disabled people died during this same 2020 period in question.

The BBC reports 11th February 2021:

Nearly six out of every 10 people who died with coronavirus in England last year were disabled, figures suggest. Some 30,296 of the 50,888 deaths between January and November were people with a disability, Office for National Statistics (ONS) data shows. It also suggests the risk of death is three times greater for more severely disabled people.

Remember, and as we have shown above from Dr. Sy’s research, Covid case fatality rates do not match the 2020 death results. The only factor that very strongly correlates with these deaths is the nation-wide administration of Midazolam.

As such, the UK case study can only be described as a deliberate state policy of systemic euthanasia in pursuit of eugenicist goals.

The implication here is horrific.

2) Scotland’s Covid inquiry confirms Dr. Sy’s Midazolam findings

Readers will recall that England’s Covid inquiry has been suspiciously postponed until after the general election. Despite this, Scotland’s inquiry has been allowed to continue and – as revealed by Radical Media over the last few weeks, has continued to embarrass the entire UK state over its panicked reaction to Covid. It is amidst Scotland’s Covid inquiry that Dr. Wilson Sy’s latest paper on Midazolam receives further corroboration.

Dr. Sy’s above stated view that “The UK COVID-19 pandemic was iatrogenic (ie: deaths caused by the medical intervention itself – Ed.), created with widespread and persistent use of Midazolam injections..” has just received a surprising confirmation in the recently published Scottish Covid-19 inquiry authored by Dr Ashley Croft.

Here is Dr Croft’s report:

Of interest is Appendix 7, which states that the abnormally high 15% case fatality rate during the early weeks of Covid was probably caused by “harmful treatment protocols (e.g. over-enthusiastic use of intravenous fluids…).”

Here is the relevant passage, in context:

The unusually high mortality in young adults with ‘Spanish flu’ that occurred in some countries (e.g. UK and USA) is now thought to have been in large part due to harmful treatment protocols that were used in those countries (Starko 2009). In the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic the case-fatality rate was reported to be as high as 15%, causing widespread alarm. This high reported rate may likewise have been due, at least in part, to harmful treatment protocols (e.g. over-enthusiastic use of intravenous fluids, nursing patients in the supine rather than the prone position, etc), such as are no longer implemented. The crude case-fatality rate for COVID-19, averaged across all age groups, is now considered to be around 0.5–1% [in Scotland it was 0.29%]; the overwhelming majority of COVID-19 deaths occur in those who are very old, or very sick. In 2020 and 2021 some commentators drew parallels between COVID-19 and the high mortality rates in young people that were reported in some countries during the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic. Arguably, the drawing of these historical parallels was misleading, and contributed to the atmosphere of panic that prevailed in 2020 and 2021 – and that hence facilitated the introduction, in some countries, of repressive and authoritarian response measures against COVID-19 that were often harmful at a societal level, but that were declared as necessary to ‘contain’ SARS-CoV-2.

To which ‘harmful treatment protocols’ delivered intravenously do readers assume that Dr Croft is referring? Dr. Croft is stating here that the abnormally high 15% early case fatality rate may well have been iatrogenic (ie: caused by the medical intervention itself), just as Dr. Wilson Sy concluded above. It all points again to Midazolam.

Here is a screen grab of Appendix 7 with the relevant sections highlighted:

3)The Midazolam murders are becoming common knowledge

Radical Media has supported and platformed victim-family voices who have been raising the alarm about UK Midazolam deaths. Captured by us, the below photograph is from a standing-room only Parliamentary hearing for victim-family members on the topic.

The very difficult to ignore new evidence that has emerged in the form of Dr. Wilson Sy’s paper and Dr. Ashley Croft’s findings have finally aroused interest among other, newer voices. Former Australian member of Parliament and National Director for the United Australia Party Craig Kelly has started to raise the alarm.

Health Thoroughfare reports 11th February 2024.

“…if the data is correct, the only conclusion is that tens of thousands of elderly English were murdered with an injection of the end-of-life drug Midazolam.

“These deaths were then falsely blamed on Covid, which was the basis of the public fear campaigns used to justify the lockdowns and mass-mandated injections of the public (including children) with an experimental medical intervention that had zero long-term safety data.

Along the way, a small group pushing the need for mass-mandated injections made billions.”

Dr Sy has himself confirmed to Radical Media that it was our below conversation with the former global head for respiratory illnesses at Pfizer Dr. Mike Yeadon, two years ago, that initially piqued his curiosity in looking at the Midazolam case.

The Radical Show 12th June 2022:

Maajid Nawaz: “Am I hearing you correctly that your conclusion, as somebody whose PhD focused on morphine, as somebody who was the head of respiratory illnesses for Pfizer globally, and therefore has that respiratory expertise, having looked at Stuart Wilkie’s evidence on Midazolam, that your personal conclusion is that the state deliberately put people on Midazolam and morphine for the purposes of terminating their lives?

Dr. Mike Yeadon: “Yes, yes, there’s no question. They use… they use doses, neither of those drugs would ever be appropriate in an open airway breathing patient. So if someone arrives and they’re able to breathe, even if they’re breathless, you would not repress their respiration, which Midazolam and morphine would do, and also per many bits of information that Stuart Wilkie was able to show us, the doses that were used were between three and five times the recommended initial starting doses, so I wrote them down and I went back to look at my clinical pharmacology books. Indeed, those are doses that you would expect would lead to a fading away of people, certainly if they were given repeatedly day after day. So, I personally am convinced that the excess deaths in care homes is explained by this procedure, substantially, I think we’re looking at six figures, over 100,000 people easily.”

This was back in 2022. The case has only grown stronger since.

4) Covid vaccines as another factor in excess death

As stated above, Radical Media presented two factors that are likely behind this global rise in excess death. One was Midazdolam and the other was Covid vaccines.

Radical Media reports 31st January 2024:

Since then, peer-reviewed papers have been released demanding an immediate and global moratorium on vaccines, while deterministically linking the jabs to increased cases of myocarditis.

British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak didn’t seem to take too well to this news, quickly insisting at Parliament’s dispatch box that the Covid jabs are safe.

PM Rishi Sunak: “We’ve been clear the Horizon scandal is a terrible miscarriage of justice and we’re doing everything that we can to make it right. To what he was more broadly insinuating, let me be unequivocal from this dispatch box that Covid vaccines are safe.

PM Sunak’s intervention clearly outraged those who have been injured by the experimental mRNA injections. A vaccine-injured survivor subsequently managed to challenge the Prime Minister live on GB News.

Vaccine-injured survivor John Watt:

ER: our inserted tweet —

I’ve got so much to say but such little time. My name is John Watt and I’m one of the Covid vaccine injured in this country. I want you to look into my eyes Rishi Sunak and I want you to look at the pain, the trauma and the regret I have in my eyes. We have been left with no help at all. Not only am I in here that’s vaccine injured, there’s another man over there whose life’s been ruined by that Covid-19 vaccine. I know people who have lost legs, amputations. I know people with heart conditions, like myself Rishi Sunak. Why have I had to set up a support group in Scotland to look after the people that have been affected by that Covid-19 vaccine? Why are the people who are in charge who told us all to do the right thing have left us all to rot and left me and the thousands and the tens of thousands in this country to rot?

Rishi Sunak, look me in the eye. When are you going to start to do the right thing?

The Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme is not fit for purpose. In Scotland right now, according to the yellow card system, there are over 30,000 people who have had an adverse reaction to that vaccine and 200 deaths.”

Moderator: “OK. John, thank you very much indeed for your question.”

John Watt: “It’s time for you to start doing the right thing.”

Moderator: “You’ve made a really strong point, John. Prime Minister”.

PM Rishi Sunak: “John, I’m very sorry to hear about your personal circumstances, and you said someone over here also seems to have suffered by a similar thing. Now, obviously, I don’t know about the individual situation that you’re in…

John Watt: “Silenced, Rushie. We’re silenced. On social media and everything, we are silenced. We are the most silenced people in this country.”

Moderator: “Forgive me both, sir, you raise some very valid points, I’ve gotta say though, we haven’t got you a microphone, and I’m sure we can raise your points with the Prime Minister at a later date. But in the meantime, Prime Minister, if you could cover the issue.”

PM Rishi Sunak: “Yeah, no, I’m very happy to. So there is a vaccine compensation scheme that’s in place, as you alluded to, in the NHS. Obviously, everyone individually will work through their cases. It’s difficult for me to comment on anyone’s individual case. I’m sure you’ll appreciate that. I’m very happy to go and look at the cases, and I’m sure you’ll get them to the team here. I’m very saddened and shocked to hear that you’ve been silenced by anybody. That is surprising to me. So please do get your details to Stephen and the team and I will happily take that away. Of course you should be able to speak about your experience, what’s happened to you and as I said we have a compensation scheme in place for that and I’ll make sure that we’re working through that. Obviously I think you’ll appreciate it’s hard for me to comment on your specific circumstances just not knowing them and those things that..

..The last thing I’d say is, you know, we went through a pandemic like everyone else at the points when it came to the vaccine. Those decisions were always taken on the basis of medical advice from our medical experts to tell us as politicians who are obviously not doctors about how best to roll out the vaccine, what was in the public health interest, the priority order, how that should be done, who should be eligible, that was something that the doctors recommended on and that’s something that we followed. Now obviously, if there are individual circumstances which haven’t worked out then that’s why we have the compensation scheme in place and I’ll make sure we follow up on your cases..

But independent MPs like Andrew Bridgen are having none of it.

John Watts’ intervention appears to have finally moved Nigel Farage on Covid vaccines too.

It’s dead right. There’s a lot we need to know. Don’t forget Patrick, we were told, take the vaccine, the so-called vaccine, right, and you won’t catch Covid, take the vaccine you won’t pass Covid on. Both of those things were totally completely untrue. We were told the vaccine was safe in every way, frankly it had not been through anything like the normal testing of any kind of vaccine in terms of trials. And now we learn that the so-called vaccine, do you know there are pensioners, elderly people on their seventh jab, that is not how the vaccine you and I grew up with, where you have a vaccine once, and you’re inoculated for life, so I do think, there needs to be a massive investigation, not just into harms that were caused by the vaccine – and all vaccines cause side effects, we know that but – there do seem to be an alarming number of people, young men in particular who’ve developed Myocarditis and other heart conditions. I’m not getting conspiratorial about this but let’s have it out in the open. I want to know as well why we were lied to. I want to know why they were trying to vaccinate kids of primary school age when Covid posed almost no threat to them whatsoever. And you know, Boris Johnson and his government put in place an absolutely draconian system not just of lockdowns, but of half a billion pounds of tax payers money spent on newspaper wrap arounds, on adverts. Remember ‘can you look into his eyes?’, ‘if you don’t take the vaccine you’ll kill your grandparents.’ It all turned out to be completely untrue. This needs a proper, full public inquiry, Bridgen is 100% right.”

5) These are crimes against humanity

The truth around Midazolam, as well as Covid vaccines, may soon be revealed. As Andrew Bridgen MP states, there are some coroner inquests due to look into Midazolam very soon.

If the coroners’ inquests confirm what Dr Wilson Sy’s research finds and what victim-family testimonies are openly accusing the state of, the temperature of this conversation will suddenly be raised.

The deliberate and systemic mass-killing of our elderly and disabled as policy – using ‘died with Covid’ as cover to conceal the fact – would be a crime on an historic scale.

Two names are firmly in the cross hairs of those who seek justice. Disgraced Tory Health Secretary Matt Hancock, who would have overseen the 2020 UK implementation of the Midazolam protocol NG163.

And Dr Luke Evans MP (Con), who ensured that Matt Hancock had the necessary doses of Midazolam and the syringe drivers ready to dispatch across the country.

Both of these politicians may well be scapegoated over this scandal. But the consequences of this story will be far greater than anything that happens to these two men.

Keep watching.

Source

Featured image source: https://www.bosworthconservatives.org.uk/news/dr-luke-evans-takes-hinckley-x-ray-closure-health-secretary

************

Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*