
ER Editor: A reminder that the ‘new’ Austrian coalition government, finally formulated many weeks after the original election, EXCLUDES the party which won the most votes, the right-populist FPO. See —
Austria to form new establishment government, right-wing FPÖ will be excluded
A further reminder that Germany’s ‘new’ government under Friedrich Merz, about to be formed as a coalition between globalist right CDU and globalist left SPD, has walked back its immigration promises and has just got a massive spending plan passed in association with the Greens. (At least, that is what we are being led to believe. Seasoned readers of this site know why we are sceptical of these reports. It’s like there is a playbook being enacted to wake people up, which we are hugely sympathetic to, we have to admit. Covid and the vaccines did not sufficiently wake up our sleeping populations.)
It remains to be seen what actions will be taken by the Austrian government on immigration, and how many promises they, too, may walk back.
********
Over 80% Of Austrians Demand Stricter Asylum Measures
Authored by Thomas Brooke via Remix News
A new survey has revealed that an overwhelming majority of Austrians support stricter asylum measures, including a halt to family reunification for asylum seekers.
Conducted by UniqueResearch for ATV, the poll found that more than 80 percent of respondents back tighter asylum regulations, with 59 percent expressing strong support, and an additional 22 percent indicating moderate approval. Only 12 percent of Austrians opposed the policy.
Support for the measure is consistent across the political spectrum, with a majority of voters from all major political parties calling for an asylum crackdown.
Austria’s new government announced it will “temporarily” suspend family reunification for migrants.
The right-wing FPÖ says it’s all smoke and mirrors.
“The quota is supposed to be zero for only half a year, then more people will be reunited.” said FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl. pic.twitter.com/7n807KB4vm
— Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) March 13, 2025
Cynics believe the move is a token gesture to appease supporters of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) — the party that won the most seats in last year’s federal election but is not represented in the new coalition after talks with establishment parties failed.
On Wednesday, the Council of Ministers initiated the first steps towards implementing the policy. The government stated that all “necessary steps” would be pursued at the European level to enforce the halt on reunifications. While the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) has been in government for years (ER: centre-right / globalist), critics argue that previous efforts to impose stricter family reunification policies have stalled, despite mounting pressure from the public and rising concerns over the sustainability of Austria’s asylum policies.
ÖVP voters were the most vociferous in their support of the plan, with 96 percent in favor of a more restrictive policy.
This was followed by FPÖ supporters at 94 percent, with voters of the liberal NEOS even backing the proposal overwhelmingly at 83 percent.
Voters of the Socialists (SPÖ) and the Greens also backed the plans by a majority, with 68 percent and 61 percent in favor respectively.
Political analyst Alexandra Siegl told Heute that while the government’s ability to enforce such a measure at the EU level remains uncertain, the shift in public sentiment toward more restrictive immigration policies is clear.
“It is not surprising that FPÖ and ÖVP supporters overwhelmingly back the halt on family reunifications,” Siegl said. “However, the fact that majorities within the NEOS, SPÖ, and even Green voter bases are in favor highlights how attitudes on immigration have become more restrictive in recent years.”
The government’s push for stricter asylum measures comes in the wake of a contentious political climate. After coalition negotiations between the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) and the ÖVP collapsed, a new alliance was formed between the ÖVP, the Social Democratic Party (SPÖ), and the liberal NEOS. Despite the FPÖ’s strong electoral performance, the establishment parties have once again taken the reins of government.
Following its formation earlier this month, FPÖ leader Herbert Kickl accused the ÖVP of holding “sham negotiations” with his party while simultaneously hashing out talks with the “losing traffic light coalition in back rooms.”
The FPÖ had amassed considerable support for its anti-mass immigration pledges that would have seen deportations ramped up, naturalizations halted, and far stricter measures impacting new arrivals into the country.
Last month, Kickl had proposed extending the current 10-year waiting period for naturalization to 15 years, aiming to prevent migrants who arrived during the 2015 crisis from obtaining citizenship in the near future.
“Asylum means temporary protection! Our citizenship is a high asset, not a gift for everyone,”Kickl said at the time. It would have become the longest residency duration requirement in the European Union.
Source
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply