POTUS Candidate Vivek Ramaswamy wants to Fire ‘at least Half the FED Workforce’
A lot of civil service protections are unconstitutional ~ Ramaswany
By
Arguing that a lot of the U.S. government’s “civil service protections” for federal employees are unconstitutional, entrepreneur and 2024 GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has vowed to end public sector unions.
“I take a strong view of Article Two of the Constitution,” Ramaswamy said in an interview at CPAC. “It says the president of the United States runs the federal government, runs specifically the executive branch of the federal government. That means, I think, a lot of those civil service protections are unconstitutional.”
Article Two allows the U.S. president to “deliver on what the person who runs the country does,” which is to oversee the federal workforce and fire government employees if necessary.
“If somebody works for you, and you can’t fire them, then they don’t actually work for you,” reasons Ramaswamy, author of “Woke, Inc.: Inside America’s Corporate Social Justice Scam.”
“I actually would just proceed with shutting down agencies, with firing a good portion of the federal workforce,” he said. “I think it’s going to be at least half the federal workforce. And will that end up in litigation? It will. But I think this Supreme Court, that this has not always been true, but I think this Supreme Court shares that view of Article Two.
“I think we use that to set judicial precedent to make sure that never again is there a president who’s gobbled up by the administrative state that supposedly works for him, but actually has the relationship the other way around.”
Getty
Ramaswamy is undeterred by the cautionary history of conservative Republicans who’ve tried and failed to eliminate certain federal agencies.
“They defer to Congress,” he said. “The problem is Congress has an institutional bias … The way you run the executive branch is not the purview of Congress. It is the purview of the executive, the person who leads the executive branch of government.”
Ramaswamy proposes eliminating the Department of Education and moving some federal agencies out of Washington, D.C.
“A lot of people from Washington D.C. just won’t want to move,” he said. “I mean, that’s a good way to just get rid of half of them off of voluntary terminations right there — save the severance costs.”
He also wants to shut down the FBI and “replace it with something new,” adding that “we should have done it 60 years ago.”
Ramaswamy responded via Twitter to those who have criticized as partisan his plan to shutter the FBI.
“Far from it,” he wrote. “Liberals once opposed Hoover’s politicized FBI. It’s not so different today: there’s a reason that its HQ is still called the J. Edgar Hoover building. Ground zero of the swamp.”
Ramaswamy is also calling for an end to public sector unions.
“If you’re a public servant and you’re unionizing,” he said, “who exactly are you unionizing against? The very public you intend to serve. I don’t think there needs to be any special protections for public employee unions, full stop, and I don’t think we should hedge about it.”
Ramaswamy was asked what made him say recently that he doesn’t think former President Trump will attack him during the presidential campaign and whether he’s ready for such attacks from Trump should they come.
“Totally, yeah,” he replied. “It’s like trash talk on a basketball court. If you don’t have thick skin to deal with a little bit of trash talking, you probably shouldn’t be the person representing this country in front of Xi Jinping.
“I think we have a deep relationship and mutual respect. We’re both high energy guys. I respect what he did. You know, we’re friends, and so I don’t expect it, but if he wants to trash talk a little on the court, we’ll have some fun with it.”
_________
RELATED
Ramaswamy campaign claims it was offered deal to pay over $100,000 for CPAC straw poll votes, report
*********
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News. Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
Header featured image (edited) credit: Vivek Ramaswamy/Getty Images
Emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB) editors
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Even though i agree with him, whatever percentage of the people in the US that work for the government, will not vote for him. Nor will their families. Now that they hired 87k IRS agents on top of what’s already there, that’s a lot of people.