Pro-life activist pleads Not Guilty to Federal Charges
Lawyer blasts DOJ’s ‘political prosecution’. “If he was truly a danger to the community, they wouldn’t have waited a year to prosecute.”
A Pennsylvania pro-life activist has pleaded not guilty to federal charges alleging he used force to interfere with a reproductive health care provider, after a state court previously threw out the case.
In October 2021, Mark Houck “forcefully shoved” Planned Parenthood volunteer Bruce Love, 72, the Department of Justice alleges, according to Fox News. The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act bars the use of force to interfere with or coerce reproductive health providers. Houck on Tuesday pleaded not guilty on two counts.
Peter Breen, Houck’s attorney, contends that an “extremely aggressive” Love was “harassing” Houck’s son prior to the alleged incident, per the outlet. He further decried the DOJ’s decision to wait a full year before pursuing federal charges against his client, calling the effort a “political prosecution.”
“If he was truly a danger to the community, they wouldn’t have waited a year to prosecute,” Breen said, according to Fox. “Serious questions need to be asked of the attorney general. What was he thinking? Why did they do this obscene show of force against a peaceful pillar of the community?”
Breen’s reference to an “obscene show of force” is apparently a nod to the FBI’s arrest of Houck during which, his wife claims, nearly 30 agents arrived at the family’s home and forcefully arrested him at gunpoint. The bureau, however, has hotly contested that account, insisting that the family and their attorney has inflated the number of agents present and significantly exaggerated their conduct.
“FBI agents knocked on Mr. Houck’s front door, identified themselves as FBI agents, and asked him to exit the residence,” the bureau asserted, per Fox. “He did so and was taken into custody without incident pursuant to an indictment.”
The depiction of Houck’s arrest and the categorization of his prosecution as “political” come amid a slew of whistleblower complaints against the DOJ and FBI alleging similar misconduct in other instances. Special Agent Stephen M. Friend, just one of a litany of whistleblowers, has alleged that the bureau violated the rights of Jan. 6 defendants during the investigative process, manipulated crime statistics, and misused SWAT teams to conduct misdemeanor arrests.
Whistleblower lawyers and lawmakers alike have expressed concerns that the DOJ is further working to silence whistleblowers and bury concerns of agency misconduct by suspending agents or blocking security clearances.
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News. Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
Header featured image (edited) credit: Gavel/Getty Images
Emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB) editors
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.