By TLB Contributor: Steve Cook
Jan Eastgate’s wonderful article on child drugging, which I highly recommend you read on the Liberty Beacon (https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/?p=16340), highlights a crucial and venal strand in the plans of the global elite to subdue the herd. It is worth briefly outlining the key role psychiatry plays in the elite’s effort to nullify all freedoms except their own.
The problem faced by any elite (by which I mean a criminal network that just happens to have achieved a position of monetary control) is simply put: when you are up to no good and doing things in your own interests that inhibit the survival efforts of millions of your fellow human beings, how do you control those millions of people so that you can carry on committing your crimes in peace without being torn apart by those who object to being your cattle or slaves?
People aren’t cattle. They have a tendency to have minds of their own and to become uncooperative or downright hostile when their survival is threatened.
If you are a Rockefeller or Rothschild or some other member of the self-appointed elite, this is highly inconvenient, sometimes terrifying and your problem is: how do you turn people INTO the cattle you would like them to be?
John D. Rockefeller ran into this problem in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Unrest among his work force, who objected to pay and conditions that were uncomfortably close to outright slavery, was violently oppressed at his order. But the violence of the oppression attracted too much odium for comfort and Rockefeller started looking around for ways to control human beings without having to continually send in the bully boys with guns.
He found what he was looking for in the upcoming pseudo-science of psychiatry, which was already gaining popularity among the elite classes of the day and which was based conveniently upon the premise that Man is an animal. It proved to be the perfect instrument for population control. If you wish to control populations, it is necessary to crush their vitality and self-respect, destroy their unity so that they fight one another, not you and destroy their capacity for reason.
The massive financial support for psychiatric programmes by the Rockefeller dynasty and other banking/corporate interests is a matter of record. There is a great deal of data anyone can look up for themselves if they wish to track how psychiatry has worked hand-in-glove with the elite for well over a hundred years so as to extend its insidious tendrils of influence through education, mental health, law, political thinking and so forth, right on up through Nazi Germany and into the modern world.
It is also a matter of record and direct observation how everything that psychiatry has touched, every area where it has managed to insinuate itself into a position of influence or “expertise” – particularly those that threaten to elevate Man to greater heights of rational thought or conduct – has been left in ruins: education, man’s religions (always a favourite target for criminals), law and justice, crime and criminal reform, drugs and drug rehabilitation, parenting, morality, social cohesion: you name it.
I’m not going to go into the details here. They are very easy to find if you want to explore the matter. It makes a harrowing but nevertheless illuminating study that brings understanding to the apparent mystery of how so few (a small coterie of criminal robber-barons) were able, with impunity, to bring so much harm to so many. My purpose here, however, is just to provide you with a sketch of the overall scam and how it has worked.
We have had a century and a half of psychiatry advising governments, educators, legislators, parents and so on and the world has gotten worse and worse. Sometimes it has done so very alarmingly, such as through “psychiatric genetics” or “eugenics” in the case of the mental and racial hygiene movements of Nazi Germany or the Balkans. Yet, more often it has progressed through a more gradual, insidious process that has eroded the very soul of our civilization and all but wrecked it. This destruction has been wrought in unholy alliance with an elite with grandiose, venal designs for a utopian tyranny and which lives in terror of the day it will lose its hold over the minds of men and have to answer to humanity for its crimes.
Now in case you were thinking that maybe all this is an accident and not deliberately planned, let me draw your attention to just two of the two key players.
One of these was psychiatrist and British Army colonel John Rawlings Rees, who headed the British psychological warfare unit at the Tavistock Institute in London during World War Two. The effort of that unit was to research and develop ways to cow and defeat an enemy through the use of methods that one could probably loosely describe as mass brainwashing. Considerable expertise was learned on how to destroy groups, primarily through the debilitation of their leaders, the undermining of their moral codes and so on.
After the war, that expertise was then turned upon the populations of Great Britain and other nations still clinging to the vestiges of their freedom.
The Tavistock was – and, I believe, still is – a key establishment in that web of psychiatric subversion, its research extending to ways of destroying western Christian cultures by means of psychological attack on the family and the society. That expertise can be turned – and is being turned – with equal efficacy upon non-Christian cultures such as those of Islam as well as through the secular institutions of the society.
To illustrate the point, I cite here a document written by Rees in October, 1940 entitled “Strategic Planning for Mental Health”. This document talks of “making plans for winning the war and for establishing work for mental health firmly for the future.” It is a fascinating paper that sets out a covert plan to “make mankind healthy” and stating that only psychiatrists are equipped to do so. Of course what Rees means by “healthy” is what you and I would label “docile.”
John A. Stormer, in Chapter IX of “None Dare Call it Treason,” called “Mental Health,” it makes that point very well when he refers to a colleague of Rees, G Brock Chisholm, the Canadian psychiatrist who co-founded with Rees the World Federation of Mental Health (WFMH): “Few legislators who passed these mental health laws realized that . . . Chisholm and his associates defined mental illness as a sense of loyalty to a particular nation, a sense of loyalty to a moral code, and strict adherence to concepts of right and wrong. Chisholm has been obsessed for years with the idea that instilling concepts of right and wrong, love of country and morality in children by their parents is the paramount evil.” (Emphasis added)
Key points in the text of Rees’ above-mentioned 1940 document cover such things as:
- “Infiltration of social organizations”
- “Our attack on the professions”
- “Long term plan of propaganda”
- “Personality tests for Members of Parliament”
- “Keep [this] Council and our true work hidden”
- “. . . don’t mention Mental Hygiene but do use Mental Health and common sense”
- “ . . . Experiment with films . . . the right propaganda . . . “
Essentially it outlines a subversive plan to inflict so-called Mental Hygiene on populations – starting with the British people and society – and if you want to read the entire document, you can find it at this link:http://www.cpexposed.com/sites/default/files/documents/CP_MindControl_ColRees.pdf
But “Mental Hygiene” was an already discredited term and you’ll note that Rees urged his co-conspirators in the psychiatric Fifth Column to avoid it in favour of a new and as yet untarnished word, “mental health”. By it is meant a psychiatric programme to “re-educate” people into their way of thinking.
By 1948, Rees had become the President of the World Federation of Mental Health, which he had co-founded with the aforementioned colleague, Brock Chisholm. Prior to that, psychiatry’s leaders had already proclaimed their intention to infiltrate the field of education and the law and bring about the “re-interpretation and eventually eradication of the concept of right and wrong,” as Chisholm put it.
These men, bluntly and without conscience, told their peers at the time: “If the race is to be freed from the crippling burden of good and evil, it must be psychiatrists who take the original responsibility.”
Well they sure have! The undermining – indeed, the surgical removal – of the moral codes and values that underpin a society, resulting in a deterioration of society and the family unit can be traced back to the influence of psychiatry in these different fields.
This push has been aided and abetted by governments that were eager to implement these new elitist ideas and ideologies, which were given credence by the bogus science of psychiatry. There is no real surprise there because the hold of the bankers and corporate robber barons over Western governments, already strong, had been further bolstered by a war that they and their psychiatric “technicians” had engineered.
In its formative years, the WFMH held conferences in London in 1940 and 1945 where its leaders laid out their goals and objectives. Here are actual recordings of Rees addressing the National Council of Mental Hygiene in October 1940 and Chisholm setting the agendum for psychiatry’s influence and control of every sector of your life. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh6-79wc2Ac
Rees proclaimed: “We can therefore justifiably stress our particular point of view with regard to the proper development of the human psyche, even though our knowledge be incomplete. We must aim to make it permeate every educational activity in our national life . . . We have made a useful attack upon a number of professions. The two easiest of them naturally are the teaching profession and the Church: the two most difficult are law and medicine.”( John Rawlings Rees, “Strategic Planning for Mental Health”, June 18, 1940) [emphasis added]
Chisholm in 1945 proclaimed: “The re-interpretation and eventually (sic) eradication of the concept of right and wrong which has been the basis of child training, the substitution of intelligent and rational thinking for faith . . . are the belated objectives of practically all effective psychotherapy. The fact is that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respectable people have escaped from these moral chains and are able to observe and think freely.”
A year later, Chisholm wrote again about the eradication of right and wrong conduct: “. . . the pretense is made, as it has been made in relation to the finding of any extension of truth, that to do away with right and wrong would produce uncivilized people, immorality, lawlessness and social chaos. The fact is that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respected people have escaped from moral chains and are able to think freely.” Psychiatry: Journal of Biology and Pathology of Interpersonal Relations 9, no. 1, February 1946
Quite what this arrogant twerp meant by “respected people” is anybody’s guess (respected by whom and why?) but it turns out that psychiatrists have indeed “liberated” themselves from moral chains, as evinced, among many other things, by the numbers of them imprisoned for sexual and other abuses of patients, fraud and what-have-you. As for the “pretense” that eradicating human values as to right and wrong (which are, incidentally, almost always derived from an observation of what is pro-survival and non-survival respectively) will severely damage the society, experience has shown that it was not a pretense after all but a one-hundred-percent correct prediction: we are indeed witnessing a resultant social degeneration. Why? Because the ability to distinguish between right and wrong and act accordingly IS a civilized and civilizing ability. It is also a survival point and it is also worth noting that “The inability to distinguish between right and wrong” is a legal definition of insanity.
But here are a few more wise words from the lunatics who appointed themselves the helmsmen of our culture:
“The family is now one of the major obstacles to improved mental health, and hence should be weakened, if possible, so as to free individuals and especially children from the coercion of family life.” International Congress on Mental Health, London, 1948. This is perfectly true IF you define mental ill-health, as Stormer pointed out above, quite arbitrarily and without any scientific or rational basis, in terms of having a “sense of loyalty to a particular nation, a sense of loyalty to a moral code, and strict adherence to concepts of right and wrong.”
Nobody at the time sought to ask these fools for evidence or scientific verification that anything they were saying was true, so they were able to go on spewing out this nonsense:
“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas . . .” Chisholm pontificated. This again is perfectly true IF your concept of “achieving world government” means forcing tyrannical control on people without consulting them.
Just to show that Chisholm and Rees were not the only clowns in the psychiatric circus, this gem was quoted by the British philosopher Bertrand Russell, from Johann Gottlieb Fichte, the head of philosophy & psychology who influenced Hegel and others – Prussian University in Berlin, 1810:
“Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished . . . The social psychologist of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at: first, that influences of the home are ‘obstructive’. . . It is for the future scientist to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for more than one generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”
And finally, to show that Rees and Chisholm had taught their acolytes well, here is Benjamin Bloom, psychologist and educational theorist, writing in “Major Categories in the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives”, p. 185, 1956:
“…a student attains ‘higher order thinking’ when he no longer believes in right or wrong. A large part of what we call good teaching is a teacher´s ability to obtain affective objectives by challenging the student’s fixed beliefs . . . a large part of what we call teaching is that the teacher should be able to use education to reorganize a child’s thoughts, attitudes, and feelings.”
I could go on, but I think you get the idea. What kind of people consider these abuses desirable things to do to children?
Here we have a deliberate attack on the foundations of our civilization by utopian tinkerers who have decided they are superior enough to foist unproven theories on the rest of the human race without consultation with those who are to receive this “adjustment”, yet who do not demonstrate in their IQs, personal conduct or interrelations ANYTHING that backs up their claim to be superior to “ordinary” people.
And their authoritative pronouncements are not science: they are opinions without foundation in any science or honest research worthy of the name. The world has been operated upon on the basis of unverified opinions expressed by quacks, by men who have taken a scalpel to society’s core values and civilizing influences and cut them out with reckless disregard for the survival prospects of the organism. You might as well have let the purveyor of leach-cures (who works for the world’s biggest leach farm) design and build your health service.
This attack upon freedom is an attack orchestrated by an interwoven banking, corporate AND PSYCHIATRIC elite, which in the 1950s introduced another weapon in the arsenal leveled against humanity: drugs. Ah, oh what a weapon it turned out to be!
In concert with that elite’s pharmaceutical arm, supported by its financial arm, given legitimacy by its psychiatric arm and aided and abetted by its proxies in government, the drugging of populations got under way.
What better way to debilitate populations further – whilst making pots of money – than drug them? In order to drug them, you need to convince them and their governments that they NEED to be drugged and will actually PAY for the privilege! Once you have done that, you are well on your way to a pill-popping culture. Drugs create dependency; they reduce reaction time and corrupt the normal ability to reason. They also introduce further social decay, crime and misery. By way of illustration: virtually every “random” mass-shooting rampage in America carried out by “crazed” loners – a phenomenon unheard of until the mass-drugging era – was carried out by an individual out of his gourd thanks to psychiatric medications.
If you want a dull population: drug them. If you want to debilitate the society’s future achievers, producers, thinkers and leaders, drug the children.
And so here we are, as Jan Eastgate’s excellent article points out.
The needless and cynical drugging of children for profit and control is a new low point in the engineered downward spiral of our culture. It is a culture that did not FALL to decline; it was pushed and pushed very hard.
A study of the role psychiatry plays, this third strand in the banking-corporate-psychiatric cabal to enslave mankind, throws new understanding on how we have arrived at the phenomenon of malleable “sheeple” who can even be duped into drugging their own children and thereby assist the destruction of their own future.
It may explain too why the activities of the elite appear to becoming increasingly insane. Close association with the deranged Frankensteins and Doctor Strangeloves of psychiatry will drive anyone mad, let alone men who were halfway there already.
Psychiatry, though, is vulnerable. It can’t make people well. Its practitioners commit crimes; its catastrophic failures are plain to see. It is easy to demonstrate that its “science” is false and its stocks-in-trade of lobotomy, electro-shock and drugging are barbarities and, not without good reason, it is instinctively reviled by the vast majority of its prospective victims: “ordinary” people.
There are already a great many good people out there fighting individually and in various groups to end psychiatric abuse. We could help the cause of freedom a great deal by allying ourselves with them, encouraging them to form powerful alliances, forwarding their message and by energetically helping them.
Psychiatrists stand arm-in-arm with the bankers and corporate arch-manipulators as our common enemy.
Let’s get them out of our way and build a world fit for intelligent beings, not cattle.
Steve Cook is a professional author, writer and copywriter based in the UK: