So Much for the “Strawman” of Lockdowns

So Much for the “Strawman” of Lockdowns

By: Phillip W. Magness 

The Great Barrington Declaration website went live on October 5, 2020. Over the next four weeks it amassed signatures from over 10,000 health scientists, 30,000 medical practitioners, and 600,000 members of the general public – all calling for an end to lockdowns as the primary tool for mitigating Covid-19. Lockdowns have imposed immense social and economic harms over the last eight months. Meanwhile, surprisingly little evidence exists to support the effectiveness of the lockdown approach.

The response from previous defenders of such policies, both in epidemiology and journalism, sought to both vilify the signers of the Declaration and deny that lockdowns are even on the table as a future policy option.

Gregg Gonsalves, an epidemiologist at Yale University, answered the Declaration on October 5^th: “First, let’s knock down the straw man up front. No one is supporting massive, across-the-board lockdowns everywhere, all the time. This is the foil for these arguments. And it’s a convenient bogeyman.”

William Hanage, an epidemiologist at Harvard University, reacted to the Great Barrington Declaration on October 6^th: “This is a dangerous falsehood. This is a very narrow sample of ‘top scientists’ and certainly not representative of the world. And lockdown is not the alternative.”

Matt Reynolds, a science reporter for Wired UK, wrote on October 7^th: “The kind of lockdown that the Great Barrington Declaration seems to be railing against hasn’t been in place in the UK since mid-June.” He continued, “When the Great Barrington Declaration authors declare their opposition to lockdowns, they are quite literally arguing with the past.”

Gonsalves again wrote on October 12^th: “No one likes lockdowns. No one thinks that they are without secondary harms. And most importantly, NO ONE is arguing for Wuhan-style full-scale lockdowns. No one is. But a straw man argument is being set up by those who want to mislead the American and British publics.”

David Gorski, an oncologist and editor of the Science-Based Medicine blog, wrote on October 12^th: “Straw man arguments [against lockdowns] are the entire basis for #GreatBarringtonDeclaration”

Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University, wrote on October 14^th in response to the Great Barrington Declaration: “Nobody is arguing for full indefinite lockdowns.”

Tyler Cowen, an economist at George Mason University and columnist for Bloomberg, reacted to the Great Barrington Declaration on October 15^th: “The critics who emphasize lockdowns are setting up a straw man.”

John M. Barry, a medical historian at Tulane University, wrote in the New York Times on October 19^th: “Finally, the Great Barrington Declaration aims at a straw man, opposing the kind of large, general lockdown that began in March. No one is proposing that now.”

Hisham Ziauddeen, a neuroscientist and signer of the John Snow Memorandum to the Lancet, wrote on October 26: “Those arguing for a herd immunity strategy and railing against the lockdown strawman they have created (see the Great Barrington declaration).”

The same day Ziauddeen co-authored an article with Deepti Gurdasani, an epidemiologist and Snow Memorandum signer, declaring that the Great Barrington Declaration was arguing against “a strawman that the science is not only not advocating for, but very keen to avoid.”

As of this writing, new national lockdowns have been imposed or announced for the following countries:

• Ireland (10/21)

• Czech Republic (10/22)

• Wales (10/23)

• France (10/30)

• Germany (11/2)

• Belgium (11/2)

• Greece (11/3)

• United Kingdom (remainder of country, 11/5)

Similar returns to lockdown are being actively discussed at the national level across Europe, and on a regional basis in the United States.

The much-derided “straw man” of renewed lockdowns, it would appear, has already sprung to life.

••••

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.