ER Editor: Thuringia and Saxony went to the polls on Sunday. The AfD took first place in Thuringia and a close second behind the CDU in Saxony. But was there some type of election fraud in Saxony, a ‘computer counting error’ as it’s being claimed? Here’s Paul Joseph Watson to explain, with some other tweets. Articles are below —
The AfD were set to win a parliamentary blocking majority, but then a ‘counting miscalculation’ took away the single seat required to do so.
Whoops!
Twitter: @PrisonPlanet
Full video: https://t.co/VljQ5UuJLT pic.twitter.com/F0KFv7qlIt— PJW Shorts (@pjwshorts) September 3, 2024
So suddenly in Saxony, due to a “software error,” the election result has been adjusted, and the AfD loses its 41st seat, which would have given it a blocking minority, an important political tool in, for example, the appointment of judges and the enactment of state laws..
🥴🥴 pic.twitter.com/qdYpSTkIrr— Richard (@ricwe123) September 2, 2024
Translation: After state election: AfD loses blocking minority – State election officer corrects election result Manipulated, definitely!
Nach Landtagswahl: AfD verliert Sperrminorität – Landeswahlleiter korrigiert Wahlergebnis
Manipuliert , auf jeden Fall ! https://t.co/e0R2GaunPU
— Hartmut (@vischer13) September 2, 2024
Here’s the German version of the Epoch Times article linked to above:
After state election: AfD loses blocking minority – regional returning officer Corrected election result
Shortly after the announcement of the preliminary result of the state election in Saxony, there were indications that the calculation of the seats in the new state parliament was incorrect. Now it is official: the AfD has lost a seat and thus an important influence in parliament.
„Due to a software error, an incorrect seat allocation was published tonight according to the preliminary result “, it says in one opinion of the Saxon State Returning Officer from 2nd September. Therefore, the AfD in Saxony has now lost the blocking minority. The regional election management originally announced that the AfD had achieved 41 seats in the state parliament.
After the correction, it is now said: „After the votes won, the Greens and the SPD each have one seat more and the CDU and AfD one seat less than specified. “
The CDU now has 41 seats, the AfD 40 seats, the SPD ten and the Greens seven. …
By this point, we honestly feel, with some good humour, that ‘forces’ out there are making the Establishment look hideous at every touch and turn, conditioning the public to expect this sort of nonsense. Nobody governs this way.
ER: Peter Halligan briefly covers this with an additional article link and makes a connection to stalwart former MP Andrew Bridgen, who curiously tanked in the last UK elections in July:
Germany rigs election results to keep AfD from its ability to “block” the insane policies of the ultra-left wing morons running the country
From here:
‘Wrong’ Party Wins Election, German Govt Now Claims They Miscounted – The Right Briefing
“They see this as another example of how traditional parties might be bending the rules to keep new players off the field. After all, if you can’t beat them in the polls, why not ‘miscount’ them out?
This incident has sparked discussions on election integrity, the fairness of political systems, and whether the establishment truly respects the democratic process when the results don’t swing their way. For some, this isn’t just about Germany; it’s a cautionary tale of what might be happening in democracies worldwide, where the voice of the right is being tampered with, not by outright denial, but through bureaucratic ‘errors’.
🇩🇪 With 33.5% of all votes @AfD just became the largest party in the German federal state of Thuringia and the second largest in Saxony with 31.5%.
Amazing news. If even the Germans stop being intimidated and are rising up; there’s real hope for the rest of Europe. pic.twitter.com/s5HbyWabdH
— Eva Vlaardingerbroek (@EvaVlaar) September 1, 2024
The AfD were set to win a parliamentary blocking majority, but then a ‘counting miscalculation’ took away the single seat required to do so.
Whoops!https://t.co/1LM5jREdCz
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) September 2, 2024
“Many are calling this out as more than just a simple mistake. Why does this matter? Because if it can happen in Germany, with its strict rules and orderly conduct, what’s stopping it from happening elsewhere?”
Germany is in a growing club of those that rig elections!
Spare a thought for Andrew Bridge in the UK.
North West Leicestershire (UK Parliament constituency) – Wikipedia
From the 2019 UK general election.
And from the election on 4 July 2024 (ER: Bridgen had decided to run as an independent by this point, having quit the Conservative party. His riding voted Labour.)
And if you believe that result, you probably need to go get your 12th C19 booster.
Shameful.
Onwards!!!
Source
Featured image source: https://www.krone.at/3512198
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply