Intro by Fabian Ubiquitus.
This featured article is from Uncoverdc.com, which we highly recommend as an excellent resource for info you won’t find in the pathologically untruthfully corporate media.
It gives you a hair-raising insight into the apparent link between the recent sudden sharp rise in infertility, stillbirths and spontaneous abortions and so forth and the vaxadoodle rollout.
Now, as the propagandists for the vaxadoodles are fond of telling us, this might all be a tragic coincidence and the fact that reproductive problems, among many others, started right after the rollout doesn’t PROVE that the vaccines caused the problem.
True enough, but to take an analogy, imagine you are in a building when the fire alarm goes off. The building’s management first try to pretend it isn’t going off. Then when too many people can hear it going off and they cannot deny the fact that it is going off, they insists that its wailing does not of itself PROVE there’s a fire. It could be a malfunction or false alarm but only a moron would ignore it and fail at least to investigate to see if there is a fire. And certainly if you couple a refusal to investigate with an insistence on enticing or herding people into the building, whose fire exits are locked so nobody can leave once they have entered, you would conclude that the building’s management are at best reckless lunatics and at worst homicidal maniacs.
A similarly with the vaxadoodles. Governments not only studiously and willfully ignore the alarm bells of rising infertility, myocarditis, people dropping dead and neglect the obvious rational step of a full fact-finding investigation, they persist in desperately pushing the vaxadoodles. While they do this one has to conclude that we are witnessing willful negligence at the very least and at worst genocidal intent.
Of course the powers that be might have a very compelling reason for not investigating. If we return to the analogy of the fire alarm, an investigation to discover whether there is a fire would also reveal where it is burning, whether it started by accident or arson and, perhaps, WHO caused it.
All right, so this strongly suggests “something to hide”. But still herding people to the building?
Meanwhile as yet unknown numbers of young people and, indeed, the human race face as yet unknown degrees of fertility problems, stillborn babies and so on. Which is tantamount to us not knowing how many people in the burning building might die. It might not be as bad as we thought, it might be worse than we thought but would it not be reasonable to investigate and find out and in the meantime not shove anyone else into the ruddy building?
Bear in mind too that this is a building that the vast majority of people have no pressing need to be in at all. For the younger people especially the overall risks of the alleged bug are on a par with a catching a cold.
And when we said “the government” earlier, we mean specific politicians, ministers, bureaucrats and “advisors”, people with names and faces who make the decisions and give the orders.
They must be brought to account before they can bring the futures of millions crashing in flames.
What’s Happening?
The Miscarriage of Declining Fertility Rates
Declining global fertility rates have recently been featured in the mainstream news.
At the same time, the mass vaccination campaign (aka ongoing clinical trial) for the experimental COVID-19 jabs continues, carrying an extensive list of adverse reactions, including severe side effects like blood clots, changes in menstrual periods, and miscarriage. Regardless, and based on flawed data, the Biden administration’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) promotes mRNA shots during pregnancy as safe for pregnant women and their unborn children.
Moreover, as evidence continues to surface, Pfizer research documents released under a freedom of information request (FOIA) show that the jab doesn’t remain at the injection site but rather travels throughout the body concentrating in places including the brain and ovaries. Even more troubling, this biodistribution has not been adequately examined, therefore neglecting how much of the mRNA product—its spike protein, lipid nanoparticles, and PEG—crosses the placenta, thus reaching a developing baby. Remember, Pfizer and the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) wanted to keep these documents hidden from all Americans for 75 years.
At the moment, we are gambling with mothers—and their unborn and newborn babies—who, for whatever reason, trusted the unproven and unprecedented COVID “vaccine” narrative and got the experimental jabs.
Unanswered Questions, Frightening Concerns, & Real Declines
Undoubtedly, pressing questions persist. Do the COVID jabs affect fertility rates? Do they cause miscarriages? Do they lower sperm concentration? With well over nine months since the start of the vaccine campaign, it is reckless for the experts pushing the jabs not to examine the potential (and glaringly obvious) connections between the substantial decrease in births in Switzerland, Sweden, Taiwan (with a 23.24% drop), Germany, and other countries, the rise in spontaneous abortions, and the introduction of COVID injections. Yet, even our own government blatantly ignores the task.
But gratefully, a group of 3,000 highly credentialed Volunteers, led by Dr. Naomi Wolf, have been scouring through the internal Pfizer documents released each month thanks to the efforts of attorney Aaron Siri. In late May, Dr. Wolf shared her thoughts on what she and her team have uncovered so far, stating:
I’ve been silent for some weeks. Forgive me. The truth is: I’ve been rendered almost speechless—or the literary equivalent of that—because recently, I’ve had the unenviable task of trying to announce to the world that indeed, a genocide— or what I’ve called, clumsily but urgently, a “baby die-off”—is underway.
The Jab Reaches the Unborn Baby: Revisiting Pfizer’s Cover-Up
Wolf and other experts maintain that as early as December 2020, Pfizer knew its vaccines didn’t work and very likely could reach unborn babies in the womb. The company-appointed scientists were aware that the lipid nanoparticles (the tiny hard fatty casings that contain the mRNA) traverse the amniotic membrane. After all, the lipid nanoparticle itself was initially designed as a vehicle to carry brain cancer drugs across the difficult-to-cross blood-brain barrier. Knowing this, it is astonishing that there is no focused study on the COVID-19 “vaccine’s” ability to cross the placental barrier and enter the fetal environment.
Offering specific examples, Wolf remarked the Volunteers uncovered that a baby died after nursing from a vaccinated lactating mother and was found to have had an inflamed liver. Likewise, with vaccine ingredients and petroleum product PEG showing up in breast milk, many babies nursing from vaccinated mothers were inconsolable. The infants showed agitation, gastrointestinal distress, and failure to thrive. The Pfizer documents also show that some vaccinated mothers experienced suppressed lactation, unable to produce breast milk at all.
Yet, remarkably, the Pfizer documents reveal that company—using its own investors to conduct the trial—determined its COVID jab was perfectly safe for pregnant women and their precious babies by studying 44 pregnant French rats for 42 days. They didn’t allow the rats to give birth. Instead, they terminated the rodent pregnancies, examined the dead fetal rat babies, decided the jabs were fine and continued their mission.
Still, even though Pfizer’s initial trial intentionally excluded pregnant women, Wolf explained that FOIA documents show 270 women became pregnant while enrolled in the trial, but Pfizer “lost about 230 of these women’s records.” She added that 36 vaccinated women gave birth, and the babies of 28 of those women—78 percent—died after their mother’s receipt of the Pfizer mRNA jab. Therefore, both Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) knew by April 2021 that infant mortality was conceivably extremely high when exposed to COVID-19 jabs but chose to stay silent (thank you again, Mr. Siri). The deaths of the 28 babies are categorized as follows:
- 23 spontaneous abortions
- 2 spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death
- 2 premature births with neonatal death
- 1 spontaneous abortion with neonatal death
The Under-reported VAERS Data
According to recent VAERS data (which is vastly under-reported), 57 percent of all the vaccinations that resulted in a baby or fetus dying in roughly the past 25 years occurred when pregnant women started receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Wolf and the volunteers summarized two specific events of concern surrounding the 3,816 babies listed in VAERS who died after their mothers were vaccinated against COVID-19.
First, VAERS data shows that 1,559 fetal deaths occurred within the first ten days after the pregnant women were vaccinated against COVID-19. The babies died from either spontaneous abortion or other fetal disorders. Twenty percent of those babies died the same day their mothers got the jab, and 21 percent died in the following nine days. The other 2,257 babies died after day ten.
Second, for women vaccinated between December 2020 and March 2022 (the timeframe of the 3,816 infant deaths), VAERS reports that nearly 74 percent of the women (2,819) received the Pfizer/BioNTech shot. Roughly 21 percent received the Moderna jab, and less than 5 percent received the Johnson & Johnson jab. The baby deaths were almost equal following the mothers’ first and second shots.
Dr. Peter McCullough, a Voice of Reason
In a June 27, 2022, podcast titled “Nothing is More Natural than Pregnancy without mRNA or Spike Protein,” Dr. Peter McCullough reminded his listeners that “the wondrous biological process of reproduction is the most natural and profound aspect of human biology.” On that note, he said only “the oldest and tried and true” products with a well-established safety profile are allowed in pregnancy, with the CDC recommending only two vaccines during that time—the inactive flu vaccine and the Tdap vaccine. Indeed, early in the CDC/FDA COVID-19 vaccination program, McCullough and fetal loss expert Dr. Raphael Stricker and others declared the jabs were “Pregnancy Category X” (see screenshot below) in a July 2021 publication. McCullough explained:
“Despite this warning, the CDC/FDA COVID-19 vaccination program violated that regulatory standard and, at first gently and later with much force, strongly encouraged pregnant women to take risks and accept one of the COVID-19 vaccines. Brock et al. have demonstrated a 7-8-fold increased risk of stillbirth after COVID-19 vaccination.”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply