The Liberty Beacon

The Liberty Beacon




By TLB Contributor: Christina England

Imagine being emotionally blackmailed by your doctor to have your baby vaccinated with a lethal cocktail of 13 vaccines, which included two doses of the DTaP, three doses of the oral rotavirus vaccine and two doses of the polio vaccination. It sounds impossible, doesn’t it?

However, this is exactly what happened to Alisa Neathery when she took her six month-old unvaccinated baby to the doctor for the first time.

She told VacTruth:

“Prior to the shots being given, when the doctor was discussing the pros of getting vaccinated with me, he explained how he was from a village in Africa. That we were lucky in America to have the opportunity to receive vaccines because where he was from, the mothers had to have like 11 kids each, since most would die off from disease because they were not as fortunate to receive vaccines like we are here in America. He really pushed them on me hard. He spent a lot of time convincing me to give Bently the vaccines, but when it was done, we never saw the doctor again.”

According to Alisa, the doctor spent a long time deciding exactly which vaccinations Bently should receive and told Alisa that they shouldn’t give him too many. The doctor eventually decided on a total of 13 vaccinations, which Alisa now believes led to Bently’s death just five days later.

If this were not bad enough, the hospital then decided to blame Alisa for Bently’s death and called child protective services (CPS), who immediately removed her two year-old daughter from the home and gave her to the grandmother to care for her.

Fortunately, her daughter was returned a few months later.

Dr. Offit Says Babies Can Tolorate 10,000 Vaccines In One Day

In 2002, Dr. Paul Offit wrote a paper entitled Addressing Parents’ Concerns: Do Multiple Vaccines Overwhelm or Weaken the Infant’s Immune System? In his paper, he explained to parents that an infant can theoretically tolerate as many as 10,000 vaccinations at any one time and that a neonate could develop the capacity to respond to foreign antigens before they are even born.

He wrote that:

“A more practical way to determine the diversity of the immune response would be to estimate the number of vaccines to which a child could respond at one time. If we assume that 1) approximately 10 ng/mL of antibody is likely to be an effective concentration of antibody per epitope (an immunologically distinct region of a protein or polysaccharide), 2) generation of 10 ng/mL requires approximately 103 B-cells per mL,3) a single B-cell clone takes about 1 week to reach the 103 progeny B-cells required to secrete 10 ng/mL of antibody (therefore, vaccine-epitope-specific immune responses found about 1 week after immunization can be generated initially from a single B-cell clone per mL), 4) each vaccine contains approximately 100 antigens and 10 epitopes per antigen (ie, 103 epitopes), and 5) approximately 107 B cells are present per mL of circulating blood, then each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10 000 vaccines at any one time (obtained by dividing 107 B cells per mL by 103 epitopes per vaccine).”

And he continued by adding:

“Of course, most vaccines contain far fewer than 100 antigens (for example, the hepatitis B, diphtheria, and tetanus vaccines each contain 1 antigen), so the estimated number of vaccines to which a child could respond is conservative. But using this estimate, we would predict that if 11 vaccines were given to infants at one time, then about 0.1% of the immune system would be ‘used up.’” [1]

Dr. Offit used the words estimate and predict throughout his paper, which leads many to believe that this paper was based upon POSSIBLE outcomes and contained very little scientific fact.

Sadly, it appears that Dr. Offit’s words were taken seriously by Bently’s doctor when he decided to vaccinate this previously unvaccinated baby with a total of 13 vaccinations in one day, in what can only be described as a bid to catch up.

The vaccinations included:

  • Two doses of the DTaP – diptheria, tetanus and pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine
  • Hib – haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine
  • IPV- inactivated polio vaccine
  • Pneumococcal vaccine
  • Three doses of oral rotavirus vaccine

Bently was also given three other vaccinations, which appear to be unidentified on his vaccination card, plus the hepatitis B vaccine and oral polio vaccine.

Little Bently died in his mother’s arms just five days later.


Alisa told VacTruth:

“My son Bently was almost 6 months old when I took him to the doctor for a visit and to begin his first round of vaccinations. I had decided to wait on his vaccinations until he was closer to the age when the sudden infant death (SIDS) rate lowers to begin him on the recommended vaccinations.

That day was April 5, 2012. He did have some congestion in his lungs. The doctor stated it was a slight congestion and that everything would be just fine. He was completely healthy and above his percentile for his age.

The doctor gave him 2 rounds of DTaP in one shot. I did not know this at the time. I didn’t find this out until after my son passed away and I went up to the doctor’s office to ask for his medical report from our visit. That particular injection was the worst for him.

As soon as they stabbed him with the needle, he let out a giant scream. After that, he was not the same. This injection actually happened to turn into a hard red knot on his leg where they stabbed him with DTaP. Even until he was laid to rest one month later, he still has the same hard red knot. I was never asked about why it was there.”

She continued by stating:

“He wouldn’t let me touch his leg. He screamed and cried constantly. I knew babies were fussy after vaccines, but this was excessive. His little vein in his head would bulge out when he cried. I didn’t know what to do. I had nothing telling me this was in any way unusual.

Within a few days he stopped making eye contact with us and he began to twitch and jerk. One side of his body began to slump slightly. If he was not being held, he would scream and cry constantly.

On April 10, 2012, my son appeared to be exceptionally well and he and my daughter played and watched TV while I cleaned the house. Around noon, my daughter laid down for a nap. Around 2 o’clock, my son began getting very sleepy. So he and I sat in our big chair and he fell asleep on my chest.

Two hours later, my husband came home from work and thought my son wasn’t moving. He woke me up saying the baby wasn’t breathing. All hell broke loose from that point on. Bently was pronounced dead at 5:35 pm. Five days after receiving his first and only round of vaccinations.”

This leaves many of us to question whether Bently’s doctor acted in the best interests of his patient or whether his actions were totally irresponsible and amounted to medical negligence.

Mother Did Not Give Her Full Informed Consent

In recent weeks, Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic was asked by activist parental groups in Texas and California to write an opinion in support of resisting the bills calling for abolishing all exemptions to vaccinations other than medical. [2]

In answer to their request, she wrote:

“Medical ethics demands that vaccination should be carried out with the participant’s full and informed consent. This necessitates an objective disclosure of the known or foreseeable vaccination benefits and risks. The way in which pediatric vaccines are often promoted by various health authorities indicates that such disclosure is rarely given from the basis of best available knowledge but rather, largely unproven and/or untenable assumptions on both, vaccine safety and effectiveness.”

Bently’s mother told VacTruth that she was never informed by her doctor exactly which vaccinations were going to be given to her son, nor was she informed of any risks associated with these vaccinations.

She told VacTruth that:

“The doctor asked me to bring him in each month after that April 5th visit to receive each round of shots in just a few months. He even stated that he didn’t want to give my sons little body too many. However the decision he made to give him 13 vaccines was completely excessive I believe.

Had I of known that’s what he was doing I would have refused. However he wasn’t completely forthcoming about what he was doing that day. As I said it wasn’t until I picked up his medical record a couple weeks later that I noticed the 3 separate sheets of paper with in his file stating what shots were ordered and I noticed that on each one it said DTaP twice.”

Many people may question the reason why Bently’s mother did not ask exactly which vaccinations her son was being given before her son was vaccinated, but she told VacTruth that she trusted her doctor and believed that he knew what he was doing.

Sadly, Alisa is one of thousands of parents trusting their doctors every day.

Many parents are unaware that every vaccination carries some risk of an adverse reaction and this is a fact that Dr. Tomljenovic made very clear in her letter to the members of the California Senate Committee. She wrote:

“All drugs are associated with some risks of adverse reactions. Because vaccines represent a special category of drugs which are by and large given to healthy individuals, and for prophylaxis against diseases to which an individual may never be exposed, the margin of tolerance for side effects is very narrow (in fact, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concurs with this point [1]) and careful assessment of risks versus benefits essential in deciding whether one should be vaccinated or not. Removing the parental rights to exemptions to childhood vaccinations will put vulnerable but otherwise healthy individuals at risk of serious adverse reactions to vaccinations. Such an outcome should be of concern since serious adverse reactions following routine vaccinations in children, including deaths, permanent neurological damage and disabling autoimmune and/or inflammatory conditions have been clearly described in the scientific literature [2-14]. Notably, cases of seizure attacks and deaths occurring as a result of routine vaccinations have occurred even in children and individuals without any relevant prior medical history [7, 15, 16] and in some cases a direct causal link was established between vaccination and the serious adverse reactions [16].”

In her letter, she referred to a paper written by Ken Tsumiyama et al. and stated that:

“It is further likely that an increasing number of individuals, regardless of their genetic background, will react adversely if exposures to compounds with immune adjuvant properties exceed a certain threshold. This concept has in fact been clearly demonstrated by Tsumiyama et al. [57] who in 2009 showed that repeated immunization with antigen causes systemic autoimmunity in mice otherwise not prone to spontaneous autoimmune diseases.” [2]

Interested by this statement, I decided to research their paper, titled Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity, and discovered that Tsumiyama et al. had concluded:

“Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system’s self-organized criticality.” [3]

If they are correct, then their paper proves that Dr. Paul Offit is incorrect and that multiple vaccinations can overwhelm an infant’s immune system, causing a variety of adverse reactions and, in some cases, death.

In further reference to their paper, Dr. Tomlejenovic stated that:

“It is true that people are exposed constantly to infectious agent in the environment, however, there is a vast difference between natural exposure and that induced by vaccinations. The reason for this is that the immune response induced by vaccination is greatly amplified, owing to the addition of adjuvants with immune-stimulating properties.” [2] (emphasis added)

Her words make absolute perfect sense and parents should ask themselves whether or not their children are being over-vaccinated.

The Lasting Impact Of Bently’s Tragic Loss

I asked Alisa how she and her family have coped with the tragedy of losing a baby at such a young age, and if she had any words that she would like to share with other families. She said:

“I wish he were still here! It kills me daily to see my daughter play ALONE. She shouldn’t have had to go through this kind of loss, none of us should. He was such a sweetheart. He adored his sister, father and I. All of that was stolen from us the day he received all those vaccines.

After that day, he was no longer the same. It completely ripped my entire family apart. Most of my family thought it must have been my fault because infants just don’t die like that, or so they thought.

All his short life he had been a healthy, happy and extremely content little boy. Ahead of his percentiles and then to just die … so, to my family, it must have been my fault somehow. They did not support my husband and I. We did nothing to deserve that and it’s all because some dangerous, ignorant doctor decided to ruin our lives and steal all the joy from us by killing our son.

I know without a doubt Bently WOULD STILL BE ALIVE if it weren’t for the vaccines and that damn doctor and the decisions he made that day. He caused my son to lose his life.

Since that day, my grandma, my mom and my husband’s mom have all died. They went to their graves being on bad terms with my husband and me. Again, something we can never get back, and we feel it’s all due to my son’s death being ruled as unexplained.

It was listed on his death certificate as ‘S.U.D.S. SUDDEN UNEXPLAINED UNEXPECTED DEATH SYNDROME.’ There has been no justice for my son whatsoever. We want answers, answers that we never got! All we have been left with is loss after loss after loss! That is not ok on any level! I will never vaccinate again, period! We cannot afford to lose any more.”


Deciding on whether to vaccinate your baby is never easy. In this case, Alisa decided to hold back on having her baby vaccinated until he was older. She was then emotionally blackmailed and forced into having her baby over-vaccinated with a massive cocktail of vaccines, by whom many would call an overzealous doctor.

She was not offered any information on the vaccinations being given to her baby, she was not given any paperwork and she was not offered any advice on any possible adverse reactions.

Alisa trusted her doctor to do the right thing and was let down in the worse possible way and believes that the doctor should be held accountable for the death of her son. She said:

“No one was ever held accountable for my son Bently’s death. That kills me every day.”

She is now bringing a case against her doctor.

If you would like to help Alisa and her family to get justice, please go to Baby Bently’s Support Campaign.

Baby Bently Neathery


Forced Vaccinations

By TLB Contributor:

If police and/or military and/or medical personnel (or anyone else) come to your door and inform you that they have the authority, and the intent, to inject your children with vaccines (all of which contain poisons documented to sicken, maim, brain-damage, and kill children and adults), you have both the right and the moral duty to resist those persons.

Indeed, you have both the right and the moral duty to stop their unlawful (indeed, insane) proposed actions by any means necessary — including the use of deadly defensive force — even if those persons claim that the injection is “for your children’s good.”

What did I just say?

I just said that:

If, against your wishes, someone forcibly triesto inject your children with documented vaccine poisons, you have the right to stop them, and if they continue to use force to pursue their vaccination agenda, you have the right to injure or kill the would-be injectors in defense of your children’s health and lives.

California Bill SB 277

Although proposed California Bill SB 277 keeps medical exemptions intact, it nixes what the Rothschild-controlled major media dismissively calls the “personal belief” exemption but which is in fact termed the conscientious objection exemption.

Please see this article from the Sacramento Bee for information on the proposed legislation: “California vaccine bill approved by committee on second try” (April 22, 2015).

Conscientious Objection

What is conscientious objection?

Any parent (or anyone else) who researches vaccination well comes to the conclusion that vaccination is:

1) a historical fraud (vaccination has never been shown by science to prevent disease of any kind) and is also

2) in the top two most dangerous medical interventions in history.

Bottle-feeding may have killed more children than vaccination has, but it’s a toss-up as far as the data — which is incomplete — goes.

Yes, it’s true: Science has never shown, in the 218 years since the invention of vaccination by showman and huckster Edward Jenner, that vaccines prevent disease.

So why would anyone subject themselves or their children to the risks of the numerous documented poisons in vaccines?

Of course, no one would.

To make a truly informed decision not to vaccinate, one must become fully informed of the truth about vaccination. This fully informed decision not to vaccinate is known as conscientious objection.

Into the Labyrinth

My eBook (.pdf) documenting the historical fraud of vaccination,
“Into the Labyrinth: Discovering the Truth about Vaccination,” can help persons make an informed decision about vaccination, both for themselves and their children.

“Into the Labyrinth: Discovering the Truth
about Vaccination,” by Jock Doubleday


And you don’t have to pay (the normal price of $2) for it. The eBook has recently been reproduced in full on VacFacts and is available for free:

Here’s a short excerpt from “Into the Labyrinth”:

*  *  *

“Why is it that we don’t have any long-term controlled studies on vaccination?

“We live in an age of scientific studies. Governments and private organizations study anything and everything under the sun.

“Recently, the National Endowment for the Humanities spent $25,000 to study why people lie, cheat, and act rudely on Virginia tennis courts. The National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke spent $160,000 to study whether or not someone can “hex” an opponent by drawing an “X” on their chest. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism spent over a million dollars to find out if drunken fish are more aggressive than sober fish.

“The National Science Foundation awarded a grant of $220,971 to researchers to study why women smile more than men. This study was a follow-up to another study in 1994 on the meaning of smiles in general. The NSF awarded another grant to study the history of the fax machine.

“Everything is being studied all the time. Everything, that is, except vaccination.

“Why is it, do you think, that the pharmaceutical companies, which fund studies, studies, and more studies, have no interest in funding long-term studies on vaccination?”

*  *  *

What is this vaunted thing, a long-term controlled study?

In the case of vaccination, a long-term controlled study is taking two large groups of people and vaccinating one group and not vaccinating the other, and then recording disease incidence over a period of several years.

Short-term studies don’t give us any useful information about vaccine efficacy or safety, for reasons that make themselves clear with thought. But short-term “studies” (usually about two weeks) are what pharmaceutical companies give us before declaring a new vaccine effective and safe.


The right to protect one’s children, and oneself, from harm is a right that exists in every country and has existed for all persons since the beginning of human history. And no amount of anti-science, pro-vaccine (pro-poisons) lawmaking by modern legislators can change that.

Science shows clearly that vaccines can’t and don’t prevent disease. Indeed, epidemiology (the study of disease in populations) shows that vaccination has killed more people than any other medical intervention, except perhaps for bottle-feeding.

The American people are not lawfully subject to precocious and pretentious laws cooked up by the anti-scientific minions of a tyrannical banker-government. American citizens have every right, indeed they have the moral duty, to protect themselves and their children from persons threatening to try to benefit them with vials full of documented vaccine poisons.

Resistance to tyranny is an American tradition, and the 2nd Amendment is the cornerstone of that resistance.

As state and federal anti-scientific, pro-vaccine, and anti-Constitution laws are created out of the thin air of ignorance and malice by frothing lawmakers at the behest of the psychopathic Rothschild bankers, let’s remember our forefathers’ obvious remedy for aggression on the bodies of peaceful persons: the barrel of a loaded gun.

Forced vaccination is not quite yet a reality in America. But the trend is clear, and pro-vax, high-ignorance agitators are on the rampage to force every child by the age of 16 to receive the CDC-recommended schedule of 66 doses of 19 vaccines (??!), “all containing [any of various] toxic chemicals: Aluminum, formaldehyde, Glutaraldehyde, Polysorbate 80, Propylene Glycol, and foreign DNA fragments from human fetuses, monkeys, pigs, guinea pigs, dogs and insects.” (“8 Questions to handle a Pro Vax Assault“)

CDC Recommended Vaccination Schedule, age 1-16

I hope you have a scientific and peaceful day — that is, I hope you don’t have to defend yourself and/or your children against persons using force to inject documented poisons into your or your children’s bodies in the name of “good health” but in fact in the service of eugenicists funded by the House of Rothschild.

Did I say “eugenicists”? I did. (See “End Game” — the most-watched political video on the internet — but only if you want the truth.)


(in order of importance)Jamie Murphy, What Every Parent Should Know about Childhood ImmunizationTim O’Shea, The Sanctity of Human Blood: Vaccination Is Not ImmunizationNeil Z. Miller, Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective?
Robert Mendelsohn, How to Raise A Healthy Child in Spite of Your DoctorWalene James, Immunization: The Reality Behind the MythTedd Koren, Childhood Vaccination: Questions All Parents Should Ask

Randall Neustaedter, The Vaccine Guide: Risks and Benefits for Children and AdultsRaymond Obomsawin, Universal Immunization: Medical Miracle or Masterful Mirage?

Ethel Douglas Hume, Pasteur Exposed: The False Foundations of Modern Medicine

Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fisher, A Shot in the Dark: Why the P in DPT Vaccination May Be Hazardous to Your Child’s Health

Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization: Dangers, Delusions and Alternatives

Harris L. Coulter, Vaccination, Social Violence and Criminality: The Medical Assault on the American Brain

Viera Scheibner, Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research Shows that Vaccines Represent a Medical Assault on the Immune System

Neil Z. Miller, Vaccines, Autism, and Childhood Disorders

Neil Z. Miller, Immunizations: The People Speak!

Catherine J.M. Diodati, Immunization: History, Ethics, Law and Health

Epidemics: Opposing Viewpoints (Opposing Viewpoints Series, Unnumbered) by William Dudley, Ed., Mary E. Williams, Ed., Greenhaven Press (January 1999)



CHILD ABUSE (shaken baby syndrome) AND VACCINES




http://www.impossiblecure.comIMMUNE SYSTEM AND VACCINES (autoimmune disorders) OF UNVACCINATED CHILDREN (list and contact information)



SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome) AND VACCINES





VACCINE BOOK SITES (vaccine-autism connection)




http://www.impossiblecure.comWAIVERS / EXEMPTIONS FOR VACCINES

Recent Links and Quotes

“Funny…I was just realizing something. Even though my children are non-vaccinated, and even though I have a foundational belief that they shouldn’t be vaccinated… I have always had a part of my mind, the scientific part, that saw some validity to vaccines. The scientific part of my mind felt that, while a great majority of vaccines are pointless, maybe, just maybe, a few of them are extremely important.
 But, as the pro-vax camp became increasingly vicious and hateful, as they began throwing insult after insult…I had to do more research, to be able to support my beliefs. And, the more research I did, the more I learned that the entire vaccine industry is a fraud. One giant, and incredibly dangerous and destructive, fraud. The more they make me fight, the more intelligent, with regards to the truth, I become…and the more doltish and asleep they look….like something straight out of Idiocracy.” ~Paul Barley
$cience – all hail the Profit $cience

“The Non-Causal Relationship between Measles Vaccines and their effect of Measles deaths in the US”
This Measles Mortality Rate graph is from Page 85 of the VITAL STATISTICS RATES IN THE UNITED STATES 1940-1960, a CDC document.

“Millions of parents outraged by the ravages of homeopathy! Oops, there aren’t any! — because homeopathic remedies do not make children autistic or give anyone the diseases they were meant to prevent. Thus, we ask ourselves, “Is it really just crazy people who are against vaccines, or is there some reason for people being against them?” And the answer is, of course, the latter . . . as we know from vaccine science.” – Jock Doubleday

“86 Research Papers Supporting the Vaccine/Autism Link” *
(*The list has been updated and now contains 97 citations)

“Homeopathy simply saved my life 25 years ago. So much so that, like many whose lives have been healed and changed through homeopathy, I went back to university and trained to be a homeopath.”

If vaccines are so safe, why is there an entire separate court for vaccine injury claims?

Here’s me at 5:00 a.m. talking about the fraud of vaccination.

Medical doctors say vaccination is a fraud.

How much mercury do you want in children’s bodies?
“Millions of Americans are getting injected every year with 100 times the mercury they’re worried about in fish.”

50,000 ppb of mercury in your flu shot

Parents’ testimonials on the use of colloidal clay for autism.

The only form your family doctor will never sign:
“You Want To Vaccinate My Child? Just Sign This Form”

New Study: Vaccinated Children Have 2 to 5 Times More Diseases and Disorders Than Unvaccinated Children

Pro-vaccine doctor who earns millions of dollars in royalties from the sale of childhood vaccines says we should remove religious exemptions.
“Children Taken Away from Christian Parents to Receive Forced Vaccinations”

“Two People Get Mumps After Receiving MMR Vaccine”

“Measles Outbreak Traced to Fully Vaccinated Patient for First Time”

Spread the death out so no one will know:
“One of the sickest examples of vaccine industry corruption – Wyeth internal memo”

It’s not just that vaccines don’t work and are dangerous, it’s that they have been designed specifically to compromise the immune system.

“Doctors speak out: Vaccines don’t work, but do cause brain damage and death”

Vaccine horrors: Medical mutilation of innocent children exposed in GRAPHIC photos of “safe” vaccines gone horribly wrong

“Under the mandate for aerial spraying for specific vectors that pose a threat to human health, aerial vaccines known as DNA Vaccine Enhancements and Recombinant Vaccine against WNV may be tested or used to “protect” the people from vector infection exposures.”
Australia determined to vaccinate by release of aerosolized GMO vaccine

Oops, the doctor used the word “immunize.” Anyone who researchers vaccination knows that there is no scientific evidence whatsoever that vaccines prevent disease or improve human or animal health in any way. In fact, the opposite is true. Vaccination has released unending misery and death on the human race.

“This Week’s Scream – Febrile seizures following measles and varicella vaccines in young children in Australia”

“DDT, vaccines, cigarettes – all doctor approved!”

“Oregon Senator Mandating Vaccines Gets A Dose of Her Own Hypocrisy Why do we tolerate hypocritical, medical tyrants like her?”

“EXCLUSIVE: caught freezing vaccine choice petition to prevent signatures from reaching 100,000 threshold”

“I really love finding death threats in my mailbox from anonymous sources. When I read them, my heart races and I like to envision I’m sleeping with James Bond (the Ryan Gosling version of James Bond…yes, one day he will play that role, my pitter pattering heart just knows it!). I feel like a secret agent. Sometimes I have to look over my shoulder to make sure my cape isn’t getting caught on anything.”
“This Mother Wants To Thank Pro-Vaxers. How She Does It Is Awesome.”


Jock Doubleday is a writer and independent researcher, and the author of “Into the Labyrinth: Discovering the Truth about Vaccination,” which documents the historical fraud of vaccination.


TLB recommends you visit Waiting For Vaněk for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments HERE


by John Vibes

Hillary Clinton recently announced that she will be appointing long-time Monsanto lobbyist Jerry Crawford as adviser to her “Ready for Hillary” super PAC.

Crawford has mostly worked with Democratic politicians in the past, but has also put his support behind Republican candidates as well. Anyone who was willing to support Monsanto’s goals would receive support from Crawford.

In the past, Crawford has worked with Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry and Bill Northey. Over the years, Crawford has been instrumental in fighting against small farmers in court and protecting Monsanto’s seed monopoly.

Just last week it was reported that Hillary Clinton is attempting to repolish her image and paint herself as a champion of the common people. She is planning to make “toppling the 1%” one of her primary campaign selling points, although she is obviously a part of the same ruling class that she is speaking against, and receives massive contributions from some of the most corrupt aristocratic organizations in the world.

In 2014, Clinton was paid to speak at the Biotechnology Industry Organization where she openly expressed her support for GMO crops.

In her speech, she said that “I stand in favor of using seeds and products that have a proven track record….And to continue to try to make the case for those who are skeptical that they may not know what they’re eating already. The question of genetically modified food or hybrids has gone on for many many years. And there is again a big gap between what the facts are and what perceptions are.”

Her full comments can be viewed below:

John Vibes writes for True Activist and is an author, researcher and investigative journalist who takes a special interest in the counter culture and the drug war.


Read article here:

TLB recommends you visit True Activist for more great/pertinent articles.


by: Ethan A. Huff

Before you rush out to get the MMR vaccine for your child or sign up for the latest statin or antidepressant pharmaceutical pill in obedience to the television, you might want to first consider what several former pill pushers-turned-whistleblowers have to say about how drugs and vaccines are actually approved, marketed and dispensed to the masses in today’s corrupt regulatory paradigm.

“Certified Health Nut” Troy Casey recently interviewed three former drug industry employees who divulged that drug companies routinely break the law in order to reap windfall profits. Most conventional doctors have also become nothing more than legal drug pushers, these whistleblowers revealed, regularly accepting bribes from drug industry reps in exchange for prescribing dangerous drugs to patients.

Mychal Wilson, a former Bristol-Myers Squibb executive who now works as a whistleblower attorney, openly admitted that, while employed at the global biopharmaceutical giant back in the late 1990s and early 2000s, he and his fellow co-workers “did everything across the board that was completely illegal.”

“We bribed physicians, we gave them liquor… anything you could possibly think about giving an inducement to a physician to write a prescription or a drug, we did it,” he explained.

The full 20-minute video containing all three whistleblower interviews is available below:

Doctors and hospitals prescribe dangerous, ineffective drugs for bribe money; also routinely hide unfavorable safety studies

Ed Kalpas, who studied biochemistry, public health, and epidemiology at some of the top Ivy League universities in the country — and who also went to medical school — corroborated this. Doctors and hospitals routinely prescribe drugs, he says, not because they work, but because they make money. Even when better, older drugs would be preferable, many in medicine prescribe newer, less effective drugs instead.

He also admits that the drug industry regularly engages in publication bias, publishing only those studies that show favorable results for a drug while burying the others — whatever will get a drug to commercial market the fastest, regardless of its safety or effectiveness.

“One thing I realized is drugs are marketed… with these little pesky side effects — but there’s really no side effects, they’re all effects,” he stated.

“And then the marketing department kind of shapes the market and decides ‘oh, this is the side effect that we’re going to market this drug for.’ So one drug, one day, might be for glaucoma. The next day they might market it for your eyelashes growing longer. And it’s the same drug.”

Many doctors don’t care one iota about patient health; it’s all about money!

The third whistleblower, who chose to keep her identity a secret, says most of the thousands of doctors she’s worked with over the years don’t really care about patient health. Heavily influenced by bribes involving cash, hookers and even hard drugs like cocaine, many conventional doctors will prescribe whatever they’re told to prescribe by the drug reps that visit them.

The drug industry also has an extremely close relationship with the federal government, and the revolving door between these two entities is constantly spinning, she says.

“Even when a drug is not getting good results, it’s still pushed to market no matter what,” she admitted. “And the highly paid FDA consults know the loopholes for how to do that.”

“People who are in charge of approving drugs then go work for the same companies they were previously supposed to monitor. I truly think it should be illegal for anyone who has ever been employed by the FDA to then consult for a pharmaceutical company, it’s such a conflict of interest, it’s ridiculous.”

American healthcare is a “disease system” that makes billions for corporate drug cartels

Wilson, who was fired from Bristol-Myers Squibb in 2004 for raising concerns about corporate drug company corruption, successfully filed a whistleblower suit against his former employer, which settled in 2007 for $515 million. But the racket goes on, with millions of Americans being duped every single day into taking deadly pharmaceuticals that, in many cases, aren’t helping them at all.

“The whole system is really a disease system,” said Kalpas.

“The first thing in medical school you learn is how to diagnose a disease, and then once you have a diagnosis you learn what drug to then give for that diagnosis… and then you have the insurance companies that reimburse based on what diagnosis that patient has, and then they reimburse the drugs — and it’s a whole system, so anything that’s outside of that system is frowned upon.”

And it’s not about curing people, of course, but rather just treating their symptoms, admitted the anonymous whistleblower. Besides constantly reapplying drugs for new indications or creating new formulations in order to hold on to lucrative drug patents, drug companies care only about commercialization at all costs, regardless of the harm to society.

“What the pharmaceutical companies are aiming at right now, for example, in cancer — the goal is not at all to cure the cancer, the goal is to keep the cancer in check only if you’re taking their pills,” she stated.

“The term ‘FDA-approved’ is not synonymous with ‘this is safe for you’… When a lot of people start dying, or if a compound is not that efficacious, there’s never the thought of, ‘well, to respect human life we should stop these trials.’ It’s all about ‘how can we find a way or a loophole to get it to commercialization anyways?'”

Check out “Dollars for Docs” to see if your doctor accepts bribes from Big Pharma

The website, which is devoted to journalism in the public interest, has created a “Dollars for Docs” page where you can search doctors, universities, and other entities that deal with Big Pharma to see if they accept bribe money in exchange for promoting ineffective and dangerous drugs:


Read article here:

TLB recommends you visit Natural News for more great/pertinent articles.


By TLB Contributor & Talk Show Host: Leslie Carol Botha

Many of you must be aware of what I am calling America’s new civil war; the right to protect our medical freedoms and the choice to vaccinate or not vaccinate our children.  Unfortunately, this stand is pitting many parents of vaccine- induced neurologically and physically damaged children against those who believe in the government’s vaccine schedule. Let me backtrack on that. The parents of vaccine injured children also believed in the government’s vaccine schedule… and many continue to keep vaccinating their children post-injury. I mean vaccines are safe, right? That is what we are told, right?

But did you know that less than 1% of children in this country are fully unvaccinated? Even that number is tainted because their parents were probably vaccinated – and the residue was passed in utero. So what is the hullabaloo all about? Are we diverting attention from the real issue – environmental toxins and neurological damage to our children to focus on whether one is pro or anti vaccine?

You just might be aware of the bills being introduced to state legislatures that are eliminating personal exemptions. The poster below offers a visual explanation of why parental rights need to be protected.

Chronic illness in our children is becoming an epidemic – with 54% of our children who are affected. Autism affects 1 in 68 kids – and those numbers are based on CDC data from 2010.  MIT researcher, Stephanie Seneff, PhD believes that by 2025 – one in 2 children will have autism if we continue at the same rate of growth. That is 10 years from now. Seneff’s work focuses on the glyphosate in Roundup – Monsanto’s herbicide – and autism.

At the same time, our food sources have become contaminated as well as our water and air. We are exposed to thousands of chemicals from medications to pesticides – to food preservatives – and no one knows how they interact with each other.  Or how they interact with our biochemistry. I ran across a saying this week that put it bluntly – if you do not recognize the chemical ingredient – your body will not either. PERIOD.

Our immunity is compromised. BPA – is not only contaminating our planet but a recent study has show that it is affecting the fertility in lab mice for three generations.

Autoimmune disorders are on the increase – and many of those disorders are vaccine-related. Especially when girls and boys are being vaccinated during puberty with the HPV vaccine – another very fragile phase of their life involving the neuro-endocrine-immune system.

Stillbirths and miscarriages are on the rise because of autoimmune disorders. The maternal body has become so compromised it is recognizing the fetus as a foreign invader.

There is no hiding.  We are in the midst of a crisis of immense proportions.

This is not an issue of pro-vaccine vs. anti-vaccine as the media would like you to believe. In fact, most of the parents who are wary of vaccinating their children followed their physician’s directives and vaccinated their child. Imagine the horror to see your once healthy child regress in front of your eyes.  These parents were not “anti-” vaccine.  But because of the damage done to their children they have become ‘Vaccine-Educated’ – and there is a big difference.

These parents want to warn others to keep more children from being harmed. All these parent’s want is an independent study on vaccine safety and efficacy.These parents want transparency from our government and the very agencies that were set up to protect us. These parents want to recover their children. Bring them back to life. Recover their families – recover their finances – recover their lives.

Until we understand why some children develop neurological and physical disorders post-vaccination – and others who do not – we have no other choice but to raise a red flag – like The Thinking Mom’s Revolution,  and the AutismOne Conference are doing.

The National Vaccine Information Center keeps a state by state list of existing exemptions.

The vaccine issue has been marginalized to separate and divide people… just like the abortion issue separates and divides women and their votes during elections season.

The vaccine issue is part of a much larger issue. And that issue is environmental toxins. And our children are becoming more vulnerable with each passing day.

Think about it.

04.18.15 Personal Exemptions

Click on image to enlarge

Note to self – rest and breathe.


TLB recommends you visit Leslie at Holy Hormones Journal for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments HERE

unborn_baby_smiling 4

By TLB Contributor: Paul Fassa

Before he was born on June 30th, 2014, Leo David Hargreaves smile was captured while he was still in the womb by a four dimension ultra-sound scan taken when his mother Amy Cregg was 31 weeks pregnant. The smile is distinctly there, and his five month old ready smiles were very similar to his prenatal grin. [Above left: Leo in the womb (4D ultra sound scan photo) Above right: Leo out of the womb]


Amy Cregg, 24, and her partner Leighton Hargreaves, of Church, Accrington Lancashire, England, say that baby Leo has been grinning since he was born on June 30. At five months of age is when various ad agencies started contacting her and her partner Leighton to photograph their baby for clothing line stores advertisements, or adverts as the British say.
But at that time, the parents held off putting little Leo into the limelight until perhaps when he is older.

The 4D scan, which captured gender, growth and the weight, was taken at Babybond Ultrasound Direct clinic in Burnley, England. A spokesman for the clinic said: “Our sonographer who scanned Amy and her gorgeous baby was overwhelmed at her smiley baby throughout the entire scan. I think we can safely say that Amy’s baby has been the smiliest baby we’ve ever seen.”

Currently, USA anti-abortionists are pressing for totally eliminating late term abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy on a federal level. Some states already don’t allow it. Evidence has shown that’s when a fetus is sufficiently formed and can experience pain. Maybe they should use baby Leo’s ultra-sound scans to make their point.

Fetal Programming is a Reality

Fetal programming addresses the environmental elements in the womb that can alter the development of the fetus. Even a pregnant woman’s stress reactions can affect the fetus with excess cortisol.

There are chemicals that shouldn’t come into contact with a developing fetus, such as heavy metals from tobacco smoke, alcohol, and agrochemicals, including Roundup and other glyphosate compounds that make their way into our food. Non-GMO conventionally farmed wheat is often sprayed with Roundup to quicken the harvest.

Recent nationwide testing has discovered alarmingly high levels of glyphosates and other chemical agents used in GMO and non-GMO crops in breast milk and in unfiltered drinking water. These chemicals also make their way into the fetus, which along with the others previously mentioned, do impede fetal growth and brain development.

There had never been independent long term animal testing on herbicides intended for GMO farming until Seralini and his intrepid team of French researchers came along and discovered the long term toxicological effects on rats that created quite a stir a couple of years ago.

Serillini and team also discovered the inactive ingredients used to boost the glyphosate created an even more toxic brew than glyphosate alone. Read their findings here. Those inactive ingredients are ignored by regulatory agencies such as the EPA and FDA.

But Seralini and his toxicology team managed to isolate all the components and apply them to human cells in addition to the Roundup used on rats. The toxicity results were as shocking as the large tumors on the rats who drank water with Roundup amounts under the EPA defined limits.

Vaccinations and Pregnancy Don’t Mix

523931_10151419084878998_1685701003_nDr. Russell Blaylock, retired neurosurgeon and author, warns against expectant mothers for receiving any vaccinations of any type, and babies receiving vaccinations are at risk.

In 1999, F. Edward Yazbak MD, FAAP (Fellow in the American Academy of Pediatrics) reported on the children born of six mothers who had been vaccinated with live viruses during early pregnancy and a seventh whose mother was vaccinated prior to pregnancy.

The seventh child had issues that suggested autistic syndrome reactions, while the other six children whose mothers were vaccinated early term were all diagnosed with autism.

yazbakThere have also been many reports of miscarriages among expectant mothers who were vaccinated with flu shots recommended by the CDC. If you want to have a smiling baby, try being happy and just say no to vaccinations while using reverse osmosis filtered water, consuming organic mostly plant based foods, avoiding alcohol and even second hand cigarette smoke.


Paul Fassa is a contributing staff writer for His pet peeves are the Medical Mafia’s control over health and the food industry and government regulatory agencies’ corruption. Paul’s valiant contributions to the health movement and global paradigm shift are world renowned. Visit his blog by following this link and follow him on Twitter here.



TLB recommends you visit Paul at REAL farmacy for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments HERE


by TLB Contributor Dane Wigington

Richard Williams (better known as Prince Ea), is a rapper and activist that has done a great deal to expose reality for the sake of the common good. The six minute video below is exceptional and well worth the time to view. Take note of the aerosol sprayed skies in the background of this video, this is the elephant in the room that overshadows ALL other environmental issues. Though the message from Prince Ea is extremely important, we should all reach out to Prince and the foundations he represents to inform them that they are omitting the single most environmentally destructive factor of all, global climate engineering. Richard has a massive following, he would be an extremely important ally in the battle to expose and halt climate engineering if we could wake him up to this issue. His contact is HERE , I hope all will take the time to pen an articulate and sincere message to Richard about the ongoing geoengineering nightmare in our skies. Let’s all keep sounding the alarm.

Read article here:

TLB recommends you visit Dane at GeoEngineering Watch for more great/pertinent articles.


By Allegra Kirkland

A new documentary reveals how the $770 billion chemical industry is pumping dangerous substances into our lives.

Back in 1974, the agricultural multinational Monsanto developed a class of herbicides using glyphosate as the key ingredient. By the 1990s, the company had created corn, soy and cotton seeds genetically altered to resist glyphosate herbicides, meaning farmers could kill weeds without fearing for the health of their crops. Today, Monsanto’s Roundup is the most widely used weed-killer in the world.

One problem: we now know with certainty that glyphosate is carcinogenic to humans and animals. Though Roundup has been plagued by controversy for years, a report released this March by scientists affiliated with the World Health Organization definitively linked the herbicide to increased risks for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, as well as DNA and chromosomal damage in mammals.

Roundup is only one of tens of thousands of chemicals we encounter every day in our food, clothing, furniture, electronics and cosmetics. Over 84,000 chemicals are used in U.S. commerce, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, most of which have never been tested for potentially toxic effects on human and wildlife health and the environment. The Human Experiment, a new documentary narrated by Sean Penn and directed by journalists Dana Nachman and Don Hardy, takes a wide-angle view on the health risks perpetuated by the chemical industry, and demonstrates how in their eyes we’re all just guinea pigs available for testing.

The documentary uses three case studies to provide a sampling of the potential health consequences of sustained chemical exposure. Marika Holmgren is an active, non-smoking Bay Area woman with no family history of cancer who receives a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer at age 37; Jenn Canvasser is a healthy young woman who discovers she has polycystic ovarian syndrome and endures several difficult, expensive rounds of IVF treatments as she and her husband try to conceive; and Hannah Cary, whose brother is severely autistic, is an advocate at the Autism Society of America. The subjects and filmmakers make the case that chemicals in the environment are responsible for these health conditions, and there is plenty of unnerving science to back up their fears.

Many of the professors and scientists interviewed in the film point to rising rates of cancer, learning disorders and infertility that cannot be fully explained by genetic drift or changes in diagnostic criteria. Breast cancer rates have gone up more than 30 percent in both men and women since 1975. Rates of asthma have increased by 80 percent in the last 45 years, and ADHD has increased by 53 percent. As Sean Penn narrates, these conditions “are all on the rise since the dawn of the chemical revolution.”

But correlation and causation are not the same thing, as any scientist (or journalist) knows. In the case of women like Jenn Canvasser, there could be many other environmental and genetic factors at play. Like 6.5 million other women in the U.S., Canvasser has trouble conceiving. When she finally gives birth to twins after multiple rounds of IVF treatments, both are plagued by health problems and one eventually dies after a few short, hospital-ridden months. Her story is heartbreaking, but at no point is her or her sons’ condition explicitly linked to chemical exposure. Instead, the filmmakers say “Numerous studies associate adverse pregnancy outcomes with toxic chemicals including pesticides, DDT, PCBs and BPA.” Again and again, they hammer home the connection between rising rates of disease and chemical usage, but the strongest language they use is “linked to” or “associated with.”

Still, consumers and health advocates undoubtedly have cause for concern, as the Roundup controversy shows us. Over the past several decades, the chemical industry has repeatedly demonstrated a blatant disregard for public health. Existing and new chemicals are supposed to be monitored by a 1976 law known as the Toxic Substances Control Act. But loopholes in its language mean that companies don’t have to test chemicals before including them in consumer products and make it very difficult for the EPA to pull hazardous chemicals from the market. Sixty-two thousand chemicals, including toxic substances like asbestos, were grandfathered in under the law, assumed safe because they were already in use. Essentially, the TSCA functions as little more than a long list of known chemicals, and consumers have no way of knowing which products contain flame retardants, formaldehyde, cadmium, or other chemicals that can be toxic to humans and animals.

As David Rosner, a professor at Columbia’s Mailman School of Public Health, says in the film, there have been “real mistakes, major mistakes where we allowed these industries to get away with murder.”

The lack of available information about the linkages between chemicals and disease is partly the design of the $770 billion chemical industry. Dow, Exxon and other major firms spend millions each year lobbying Washington for favorable legislation and funding the campaigns of industry-friendly representatives. In the late 1990s, bisphenol A, an endocrine-disrupting chemical that mimics estrogen and can lead to health problems ranging from obesity to infertility, was discovered to be in many hard plastics. These everyday products included everything from baby bottles to Tupperware. During the ensuing public outcry, chemical industry trade groups released a rash of bunk studies, insisting that BPA is safe for humans at the levels to which we’re exposed.

A great deal of work needs to be done to combat the industry’s influence, and The Human Experiment tracks the difficult, mundane efforts being made by health advocates, families and legislators to obtain stricter consumer protection laws. But this is only one angle pursued in the sprawling film, which tries to cover far more ground than its hour-and-a-half run time allows. By taking on the “chemical industry” as a whole, the filmmakers can only spend a few minutes discussing a particular chemical, or case study, before moving on to the next. This overly sweeping approach, paired with a lack of hard research connecting specific chemicals to specific health problems, can make the film somewhat juvenile at times, a documentary that basically boils down to the thesis “chemicals are dangerous.”

Yet despite this broad focus, there are notable absences in the film. With the exception of Maria Cruz, a housecleaner who immigrated from Mexico with her two children, almost all of the interview subjects are middle-class white people who have the financial resources to afford needed medical care and combat ineffective legislation. Little mention is made of the disproportionate effects of toxic chemicals on minorities and the working class, or of heavily polluted areas like Louisiana’s Cancer Alley, where the wastes pumped out by surrounding petrochemical refineries have caused high rates of miscarriages, cancer and other diseases.

The real takeaway of the film is one that aligns quite closely with the values of middle-class white America: learning how to be a better consumer. Jenn Canvasser and Marika Holmgren now both work as consumer protection advocates, warning people of the dangers of toxic chemicals in their makeup and home furnishings. Consumer protection efforts are certainly admirable, but after gaining even a cursory understanding of the public health risks perpetuated by the chemical industry, learning how to make more educated decisions about which bar of soap to purchase isn’t exactly an inspiring rallying cry.

The Human Experiment – Trailer from FilmBuff on Vimeo.


Read article here:

TLB recommends you visit ALTERNET for more great/pertinent articles.


1021045003.jpg 460


Sputnik International | April 17, 2015

In what some are calling a “game-changer” in cancer treatment, scientists at Imperial College in London have discovered a “turbo-charging” protein that boosts the immune system enough to fight off chronic illnesses – and the ability for them to come back.

Researchers have started to develop a gene therapy treatment based on the protein, called Lymphocyte Expansion Molecule (LEM), with the hopes of beginning human trials in about three years.The protein, a previously unknown molecule, facilities a massive energy boost in the body that causes an increase in T cells, which help fight off cancer cells, and which the cancer can not fight back. It also causes an increase in so-called memory cells, the T lymphocyte (white blood cells) that are able to recognize tumors and viruses they’ve previously encountered so there is a reduced chance of disease returning once the body has fought it off.

The new treatment could eventually be used as an alternative to highly toxic drugs and harsh chemotherapy sessions.

Rather accidentally, the research team, whose work was published in the journal Science, discovered LEM while examining mice with genetic mutations. The animals produced ten times the number of cancer-fighting T cells, preventing infections and showing resistance to cancer.  The mice that  had an increased immunity to cancer produced high levels of this previously unknown protein that is also found in humans. The gene therapy the researchers are developing looks to increase the total number of T cells by injecting the protein back into the body.

“This is exciting because we have found a completely different way to use the immune system to fight cancer,” said Professor Philip Ashton-Rickardt, from the Section of Immunobiology in the Department of Medicine at Imperial, who led the study.“It could be a game-changer for treating a number of different cancers and viruses. This is a completely unknown protein. Nobody had ever seen it before or was even aware that it existed. It looks and acts like no other protein,” he continued.

“The discovery of a protein that could boost the immune response to not only cancer, but also to viruses, is a fascinating one,” said Dr. Mike Turner, Head of Infection and Immunobiology at The Wellcome Trust.

“Further investigation in animal models is needed before human trials can commence, but there is potential for a new type of treatment that capitalises on the immune system’s innate ability to detect and kill abnormal cells.”



See article here:


TLB recommends that you read other great pertinent articles at:

Sputnik International 



by Christina Sarich

Another example of Roundup carcinogenicity

About 30 years of research regarding non-Hodgkin lymphoma (cancer) and its correlation with occupational exposure to 80 agricultural pesticides and 21 chemical groups has linked glyphosate, the main ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup, with cancer of the lymph tissue.

In a paper published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 44 papers representing studies in high-income countries found that there was a “striking increase” in the incidence of non-Hodgkin’s type lymphomas in the last 30 years.

The paper explains that farmers have high cancer rates, overall, and agrochemical exposure is likely the culprit, even among a group that normally has low across-the board mortality rates.

Among the pesticides studied, glyphosate exposure was found to be positively associated with a particular type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma – called B cell lymphoma. This best-selling toxin distributed primarily by Monsanto is just the tip of the iceberg, as pointed out by  Sayer Ji of GreenMedInfo.

The inactive ingredients in Roundup have also been found to be carcinogenic even in the parts per trillion range, so the study brings attention to a phenomenon which was already coming to light in the scientific community.

The fact is, human blood is not ‘Roundup Ready.‘ As mentioned, the ‘inactive’ ingredients in Roundup are just as harmful, making ‘RoundUp Ready’ chemicals a toxic blood-venom none of us can ignore. The background context of one study are described:

“Today, the dissemination of glyphosate in the environment increases, and humans are permanently exposed to its action. Worst case scenario provides even ten-fold increase of using a glyphosate in the following years [32].

Considering the widespread and frequent use of glyphosate throughout in world, thus the current risk assessment is important because the exposure will concern not only the users of the preparations containing glyphosate, but also those who do not have direct contact with that herbicide.”

As these chemicals are used in a slap-dash cocktail, understudied, and haphazardly applied to our crops, it is no wonder that different types of cancers are showing up in the populations most closely tied to their use – such as with farmers, their families, and even children who go to schools or playgrounds near fields that are sprayed.

Lymphomas are a special type of cancer that attack the immune system. It would only be logical that pesticides and herbicides which also attack a plant’s immune system would be adverse to our own. That they are also creating organisms that are immune to the toxicity of these concoctions should be alarming. When cancer cells are stronger than our own healthy cells, perhaps the agencies allowing GM crops to exist will finally listen.


About Christina Sarich:
Christina Sarich is a humanitarian and freelance writer helping you to Wake up Your Sleepy Little Head, and See the Big Picture. Her blog is Yoga for the New World. Her latest book is Pharma Sutra: Healing the Body And Mind Through the Art of Yoga.


Read article here:

TLB recommends you visit Natural Society for more great articles and pertinent information.

  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.