The Liberty Beacon

The Liberty Beacon





You can bet that polio vaccines will now be promoted since the Glaxo Smith Kline (accidental) dumping of live polio viruses into a Belgium lake. On the same token, you can bet that forced Ebola vaccinations are just around the corner due to fear of Ebola spreading through the U.S., but do we really want to trust an industry which already puts carcinogenic adjuvants into the vaccines used to “treat” measles, mumps, polio, rubella, cervical cancer, and more? I doubt it.

Vaccines are full of adjuvants, compounds that are meant to enhance the specific immune response against co-inoculated antigens. The word comes from the Latin word adjuvare, which means to help or to enhance. But these adjuvants don’t enhance anything but a compromised immune system.

Following are cancer-causing ingredients, neuro-toxins, and immune-destroying ‘extras’ as well as some disturbing evidence as to the true intent behind vaccines overall.

Formaldehyde – This is classified as a known carcinogen. Both the Environmental Protection Agency and the International Agency for Research on Cancer admit this is so – so what the heck is it doing in vaccines? Over one billion doses of vaccines are given annually, with many of them containing this adjuvant. The CDC says that most formaldehydes are removed from the vaccine before it is packaged, but this substance is a DNA adduct, and no injection studies on formaldehyde have ever been conducted.

Unmetabolized formaldehyde reacts non-enzymatically with sulfhydryl groups or urea, bind to tetrahydrofolate and enters the single-carbon intermediary metabolic pool, reacts with macromolecules to form DNA and protein adducts, or forms crosslinks primarily between protein and single-stranded DNA (Bolt 1987).”

Maybe this is why formaldehyde has been linked to several types of cancers, including Leukemia. Formaldehyde has been used in the Anthrax vaccine, DT, DTaP, Hib, HPV, Hep A, Hep B, Influenza, Meningitis, Polio, and more. Many of these vaccines are administered to children, and schools won’t allow your children to attend classes unless they’ve received them. 25 of the 53 vaccines listed by the CDC have this known carcinogen in them.

Aluminum – Aluminum salts are in many vaccines. For example: aluminum salts are used in DTaP vaccines, the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, and hepatitis B vaccines. Aluminum hydroxide (just one of the aluminum salts that is used) has been linked to macrophagic myofasciitis, or MMF, as well as the rising prevalence of autism.

Read: Vaccines Don’t Protect – Exposing the Vaccines for Immunity Fraud

Mercury from Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines – This adjuvant has been linked to autism, spasms, speech disorders, neurodevelopmental issues in infants, mental retardation, premature puberty, and more.

The journal Immunology & Cell Biology states the obvious. “The problem with pure recombinant or synthetic antigens used in modern day vaccines is that they are generally far less immunogenic than older style live or killed whole organism vaccines. This has created a major need for improved and more powerful adjuvants for use in these vaccines. . .”

Dr. Maurice Stroun and Dr. Philip Anker from the Department of Plant Physiology at the University of Geneva, have also accumulated evidence that the transfer of genetic information is not confined to bacteria, but can also occur between bacteria and higher plants and animals. This means that vaccines can alter your DNA.

There is also evidence that freely-circulating foreign DNA can cause malignancy. In a 1977 issue of International Review of Cytology, Volume 51, Anker and Stroun discuss the possible effects of foreign DNA causing malignant cell transformations.

There are other adjuvants in vaccines as well, many of which are not revealed until after they have been mass marketed. The Gardasil Vaccine was recently found to have recombinant DNA that persists in the environment of human blood. These vaccines are meant to alter our immune systems and make us more susceptible to viral and bacterial infection.

You might surmise that government health organizations work hand in hand with big pharmaceutical companies to get these vaccines out to the people as fast as they can, never truly revealing the intent of their plans.

“Probably as much as 75% of the medicine of sickness is unnecessary and its cost can be avoided.” ~ Ghislaine Lanctot

Read article here:

TLB recommends you read more great/pertinent articles here:



The pharmaceutical industry convinced President Gerald Ford to give them legal immunity from the Swine Flu vaccine which was rushed to market in 1976, and to lead the PR campaign to convince Americans to get the vaccine. More people died from the vaccine than from the flu.

Read this before you consider purchasing a hazmat suit to protect yourself from Ebola!

By: John P. Thomas

Are we facing an Ebola pandemic that will kill millions, or is this just a marketing plan of the pharmaceutical industry to sell more drugs and vaccines? Is the current strain of the Ebola virus a secret creation of pharmaceutical company scientists, biological warfare researchers, or the fruit of Monsanto’s product development team?

Was Ebola created, or did it just accidentally spill over into humans from an animal host such as African fruit bats?

Is the US government intentionally not taking strong action to prevent Ebola from spreading or is there really minimal risk to Americans? Are there groups that want to decrease the world population through spreading contagious diseases such as Ebola, or is this just another imaginary plan that is being reported by certain conspiracy theory groups?

Is the Ebola virus a local epidemic, a global pandemic, or a hoax? Is life in America as we have known it about to collapse into chaos and martial law, or will we be safe and secure once we take the Ebola vaccine?

Will more people die from the Ebola vaccine than would have died from the disease itself?

All these questions have been circulating through the media over the last few months. The situation with Ebola is certainly a complex muddle of contradictory facts, opposing interpretations, and political intrigue. It reminds me very much of the 1976 Swine flu hoax — commonly called the swine flu fiasco or the swine flu debacle.

The Relationship between the 1976 Swine Flu Hoax and Ebola Zaire

To better interpret what is happening with the current Ebola situation, it will be helpful to look at one of the great American examples of health policy gone awry.

For those who don’t remember the 1976 swine flu threat or weren’t living in that era of history, it will be useful to compare the past events to our current situation with Ebola.

In 1976, I was a junior in college. A friend convinced me that I should be concerned about the swine flu that was predicted to devastate the US population. Millions of people were expected to die unless we all lined up and took the flu shot. Reluctantly I gave in to my friends fear and we went and got the vaccine.

Four years later, when I was a public health graduate student, we were required to read a book about the 1976 swine flu hoax. I was shocked by what I read. I was so naive! As a 23 year old graduate student, I found it hard to believe that the system failed so badly. At that time, I truly believed that government officials, physicians, scientists, pharmaceutical companies, and of course public health agencies were all working to promote the health of Americans.

It was disturbing and shocking to learn that faulty scientific interpretations, partisan political interests, opportunities for corporate profit, and personal pride and desire for career advancement were the powerful driving forces behind the development of the 1976 swine flu program.

The whole thing began in February 1976 when an Army recruit at Fort Dix, New Jersey, fell ill and died from a swine flu virus thought to be similar to the 1918 strain, which killed an estimated 500,000 Americans. Based on a relative similarity with the 1918 swine flu, it was determined that millions might soon die unless the US government mobilized a powerful response to protect Americans. It was time to pull out all the stops and show how the public health system could effectively prevent a disaster.

During the spring and summer of 1976, pharmaceutical companies went to work making and stockpiling millions of doses of swine flu vaccine. Then the government went to work inducing sufficient fear among Americans to motivate us to roll up our sleeves and take the shot. We saw pictures of President Gerald Ford receiving his shot, and many of us did the same patriotic deed in the year of our nation’s bicentennial birthday. Taking the vaccine was in many ways advertised as an act of patriotism as well as an act of self-preservation.

Well, in retrospect, the swine flu epidemic of 1976 never developed. It wasn’t because 40 million Americans took the shot. It was because the swine flu never existed. It was nothing more than poor science, flawed judgments and wishful thinking. In short we all were part of a grand hoax.

After all the hype, and only one death and 13 cases of the swine flu, [1] the vaccination program was abruptly cancelled after 10 weeks.

The vaccine program was discontinued on December 16, 1976, because of severe adverse reactions. More than 500 people are thought to have developed Guillain-Barre syndrome after receiving the vaccine, and 25 died from the unexpected adverse reaction. [2, 3]

Guillain-Barre syndrome is a neurological condition which causes temporary paralysis that can lead to death. More people died from the flu vaccine than died from the flu.

Could Ebola be another Grand Hoax in the Making?

At this point I don’t think we can be sure the threat is real. Why would I say such a thing when we know that thousands have died in Africa from the Ebola virus?

This is what the World Health Organization (WHO) has to say about the deaths from Ebola. Please take note of the words that I emphasized with bold type. The report dated October 8, 2014 states:

The total number of confirmed, probable, and suspected cases … in the West African epidemic of Ebola virus disease reported up to the end of October 5, 2014 … is 8033 with 3865 deaths. Countries affected are Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, and the United States of America [1 man who travelled from Africa to Texas recently died from Ebola]. A confirmed case of Ebola has been reported in Spain. [4]

I highlighted the words “confirmed, probable, and suspected” in the preceding paragraph, because the number of affected persons and the number of deaths are not all based on scientific testing. The truth is that the WHO numbers simply represent a belief about Ebola incidence and fatalities. People are constantly getting sick and dying in Africa just as they are in the US. In the current situation, where Ebola is likely on the minds of every doctor and nurse in western Africa, it is natural to attribute deaths to Ebola.

Having been part of the public health system as a young person, it is clear to me that we make assumptions, even though our training cautioned us against such behavior. Just as generals in the military can’t wait for the next war so that they can go to work doing what they have spent a lifetime studying — leaders of the public health system, such as those in the World Health Organization, are eager to grab at any opportunity to find a disease threat and to eradicate it. After all, that is their job. Generals and public health officials both think in terms of the next battle to be fought. That is what they will do even when the threat is minimal or maybe does not actually exist. Are the generals of pandemic warfare at the World Health Organization making inferences and assumptions, which might just prove to be wrong?

Is Ebola Testing Accurate?

I read a series of investigate reports from Jon Rappoport which presented stunning evidence that the standard Ebola tests are anything but accurate. He quotes from a Department of Defense manual and explains the instructions concerning Ebola diagnosis. His report states:

The standard test for diagnosing Ebola is the PCR, which has many flaws that render it misleading and useless.

Therefore, “diagnosed with Ebola,” through the PCR test, means nothing. “Ebola” could be flu, could be “drinking contaminated water,” could be any number of non-Ebola conditions.

So when the authorities report there are 6000 cases of Ebola and 3000 deaths, or when they report that two patients in the US have Ebola, they’re relying on a diagnostic test that can’t confirm any of these assertions is true.

This is verified in spades by a Department of Defense manual.

The title is: “Ebola Zaire (EZ1) rRT-PCR (TaqMan®) Assay on ABI 7500 Fast Dx, LightCycler, & JBAIDS: INSTRUCTION BOOKLET” published by “Joint Project Manager Medical Countermeasures Systems.” It is dated 14 August 2014.

Under the title is the statement: “Manufactured by the Naval Medical Research Center for the US DOD.”

Here is a quote [from the Department of Defense manual]:

“[The PCR test] should not be used as the sole basis for patient management decisions. Results [of the PCR] are for the presumptive identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014).”

Translation: “The word ‘presumptive’ means ‘we’re not sure’. And that’s right. We’re not sure. Don’t rely on the PCR for a definitive diagnosis of Ebola.”

Here is the final quote:

“The definitive identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) requires additional testing and confirmation procedures in consultation with public health or other authorities for whom reporting is required. The diagnosis of Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) infection must be made based on history, signs, symptoms, exposure likelihood, and other laboratory evidence in addition to the identification of the Ebola Zaire virus (detected in the West Africa outbreak in 2014) by this [PCR] test.”

That’s the capper. It baldly states that other diagnostic tests must be run. I can tell you what those other tests should be. One, purification and direct isolation of the virus from the patient; and two, a test to determine the amount of virus in the patient—because millions and millions of active Ebola virus must be present in the patient to even begin to say he is “an Ebola case.” [5]

Do the preceding comments from Jon Rappoport disturb you? Maybe there aren’t as many true cases of Ebola as are being reported. The WHO wants us to believe there is an out of control epidemic in Africa, and they are reporting that their numbers are far below the actual cases of Ebola. We are told that African health officials are so overwhelmed that they can’t even count or report all the Ebola cases. [6]

Jon Rappoport finished his post with this statement:

Press reports are mentioning the fact that far fewer “Ebola patients” than expected are showing blood hemorrhaging. Another tip-off that the PCR test is bringing into the fold “presumptive cases of Ebola”—people who are suffering from factors that have nothing to do with Ebola. [7, 8]

Are other Diseases being Confused with Ebola?

There might be any number of diseases or health conditions that may have symptoms similar to Ebola virus disease. Acute pesticide exposure, acute chemical exposure from an unknown source, or just a common variety of flu could all be confused with true cases of Ebola. If health workers are as overwhelmed as has been reported, then confusion is likely.

An example of this confusion is provided by Jon Rappoport in another article. He states:

Take this example—a farming village in Liberia, one of the so-called epicenters of Ebola. The families manage to produce enough to get by. They live downstream from a giant Firestone rubber plantation.

For years, to no avail, the people of the village have been protesting the runoff of noxious elements into their water supply. Fish are dying. Crops are failing. That means malnutrition, hunger. That means chemical assault on their immune systems.

People are developing sores, lesions, fevers, respiratory problems, digestive problems, including diarrhea.

How easy is it to call this Ebola, in light of the current hysteria? [9]

u.s. military plane liberia Similarities Between 1976 Swine Flu Hoax and Ebola?

Is it Coincidence that the “Epidemic” and the Vaccine are Arriving Together?

I must wonder how it is that the Ebola vaccine is almost ready for distribution at the same time that we are being told to brace ourselves, because the Ebola virus is on the verge of becoming a worldwide pandemic that could kill millions of us. Here are a few facts that you might find of interest concerning this coincidence.

Major grants have been given by the US military to develop Ebola drugs for the treatment of people who might be exposed to Ebola. In 2006, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. was reported to gain $23 million over the next four years from an anti-terror drug development contract from the US Defense Department. [10] In 2010, Tekmira was awarded up to 140 million dollars to develop a drug that would prevent Ebola from being turned into a bioterrorism weapon. [11] (See also: U.S. Military Starts Producing Vaccines: New Billion Dollar Experimental Vaccine Market? and The Pentagon’s Vaccine Factories.)

Monsanto has now partnered with the Department of Defense to use a proxy third party company (Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corporation) to develop a vaccine against Ebola. The seed money began at $1.5 million. The value of the deal could grow to an estimated $86 million dollars. [12] In 2013, the Vanderbilt Vaccine Center at Vanderbilt University also received a $4.4 million grant from the US Department of Defense for Ebola vaccine development and other Ebola treatments. [13]

Is Ebola a Threat or a Hoax?

I wish I could definitively tell you whether Ebola is a real threat or a hoax. Based on what I know about the corruption in the pharmaceutical industry, conflicts of interest among political leaders, corporate influence over government agencies, and the agenda of the World Health Organization, I have to say that the truth is buried among a mountain of lies, disinformation, and rapidly changing assumptions.

Should we be concerned about Ebola? Should we be afraid? Should we do whatever we are told by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which just happens to hold the patent on this strain of the Ebola virus and all future strains of Ebola? [14]

Even if Ebola is truly a threat, I don’t recommend spending a lot of time worrying about it. I, however, do recommend taking several positive actions.

My recommendations fall into two groups.

First everyone who is concerned about any form of viral or bacterial infection needs to fortify his or her immune system. (See recommendations below.)

The second suggestion involves doing everything you can to avoid taking the Ebola vaccine when it is made available. A strong immune system is the best defense against Ebola. The vaccine will not be a true prevention, and is likely to be filled with toxic substances that will compromise your immune system.

If I am wrong, and the Ebola virus becomes a real threat, then my suggestions regarding building up your immune system will substantially lower your risk of being infected by the Ebola virus. If I am right and there really is little to worry about, then the recommendations will simply give you a stronger immune system, which is a good position to be in regardless of any known or unknown viral threats.

The bottom line is that we do not need to resign control over our health to a government agency or to a pharmaceutical company. We do not need to become helpless victims of an invisible threat if it does exist. We have strong options to lower the risk of contracting this disease and surviving it if we are infected. We have options and we do not need to live in terror of a viral menace!

Does the Conventional Medical System Have a Cure for Ebola?

Scientists from the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas, indicate that the conventional medical system does not have a curative treatment for Ebola. Even treatments that are being developed by pharmaceutical companies are described as palliative.

Palliative means partial. Thus, the new pharmaceutical drugs for treating cases of Ebola will not be a cure, but will offer partial treatment to those who contract Ebola. Pharmaceutical companies are also working on Ebola vaccines. They hope to begin selling an Ebola vaccine in 2015. [15]

All Ebola Treatments are Experimental

At this point, in October of 2014, we do not have any scientific research which can prove that any specific treatment is effective for curing people who become infected with the currently active strain of Ebola. [16]

At first glance, this might cause some people to fall into a panic about the situation. The good news is that alternative healthcare practitioners have numerous treatments that might be helpful against the Ebola virus. Of course, the herbs, vitamins, and essential oils that could be potentially beneficial, have not been proven as being effective against Ebola. Thus, the pharmaceutical companies and alternative healthcare practitioners are in the same boat. Neither group can claim that they have the cure for Ebola.

At this point, all treatments are experimental. [17] We won’t be able to identify the best treatments until people who actually have the disease are treated for it by conventional and alternative healthcare providers.

It’s Your Immune System that will Cure Ebola

Ultimately, people who contract the disease and survive will need to depend on a strong immune system for survival. The vaccine will not cure a person who already has Ebola. Pharmaceuticals and natural substances will help. But protection from Ebola, if it becomes a real threat, depends on our natural ability to resist viral diseases and the availability of very basic medical care such as proper nutrition and hydration.

USA Today reports Dr. Anthony Faucithe’s analysis of the Ebola situation. He is the longtime director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Dr. Faucithe states:

The most powerful tool against the outbreak is basic medical care. Drugs under development will not be a big part of the solution. They are too early in development for enough doses to be manufactured, even if they are shown to be safe.

The real area of focus, he said, should be setting up medical infrastructure in the affected countries to provide sick people with basic medical support such as replacement fluids and blood. That will have a much bigger effect on health than a few batches of experimental medications.

“That’s the way you help people,” he said. “The idea of ‘What are we going to do with these four treatment courses we have?’ is almost irrelevant of the big picture of the lives that you can save mainly by getting people into proper care.” [18]

Building Up the Immune System

A strong immune system is the best defense for fighting Ebola or any other viral infection. Building a strong immune system involves many factors. It begins with turning away from the standard American high sugar, high carbohydrate, low fat, and highly processed diet. This diet suppresses the immune system.

People who have been weakened by chronic poor nutrition from a standard American style diet, and who are exposed to environmental chemicals, numerous food additives such as preservatives, pesticides and highly processed food ingredients will have a much more difficult time fighting Ebola if they happen to contact the virus.

Fighting Ebola Does not Need to be Complicated

We have been led to believe that our only hope is in the magic formulas and expensive potions of the pharmaceutical industry, but this is quite far from the truth. There are many treatments, which both prevent and cure viral infections. I will discuss a few of the options in the following sections.

Ultraviolet Light from the Sun

Ultraviolet radiation from the sun can be important for Ebola prevention and treatment. The Ebola virus is inactivated when it is exposed to UV radiation. [19] UV light is contained in unfiltered natural sunlight and is available from manmade sources. The Ebola virus can survive in liquid or dried material for a number of days once it leaves the body of the host. [20] This means that hygiene is important for preventing the spread of the virus.

Health Engineers have actually developed a UV robot that can be sent into an area that might contain viruses and/or bacteria and completely disinfect the environment in 2 minutes. This means that high risk environments for Ebola transmission could be easily treated every day if needed. [21]

Vitamin D

Vitamin D is produced in the human body when our skin is exposed to direct sun light. Longtime proponent of vitamin D therapy, Dr. Joseph Mercola, reminds us that vitamin D is essential for healthy immune system functioning. He states:

Regular sun exposure will help optimize your vitamin D, which is crucial for overall robust immune function. Americans in particular may want to take that advice to heart, seeing how most are vitamin D deficient and therefore more open to infections of all kinds. [22]

Vitamin D supplementation is usually needed by people who live in northern climates and are not able to obtain adequate sun exposure.

Vitamin C

Vitamin C destroys viruses or sets them up for destruction by the immune system. Oral doses of high quality vitamin C will prevent viral infections, and intravenous (IV) vitamin C therapy can be used as a powerful cure for active cases of Ebola and other viral infections.

In an article about treating Ebola infection, Dr. Thomas E. Levy, MD, JD recently stated:

To date, not a single virus has been tested that is not inactivated (killed) by a large enough dose of vitamin C (ascorbic acid). Many other antioxidants have similar virucidal effects, but vitamin C appears uniquely to be of greatest potency and clinical efficacy, as its simple chemical structure allows for it to be disseminated throughout the body with little restriction. … Vitamin C is both very potent and optimally bioavailable in accessing any viral infection. [23]

Homeopathic Remedies for Ebola

Many people have found that homeopathic treatments for viral infections have been quite effective.

Dr. Eileen Nauman sites some of the homeopathic remedies that can be useful for treating Ebola. The excerpt from her book states:

Dr. Vickie Menear, MD and homeopath, found that the remedy that most closely fit the symptoms of the 1914 “flu” virus, Crotalus Horridus [rattlesnake venom], also fits the Ebola virus nearly 95% symptom-wise.

During the Spanish influenza epidemic of 1918, eighty percent of the people treated with allopathic drugs died. Eighty percent of the people who took homeopathic remedies, mostly Crotalus Horridus, survived. [24]

Please note: it is not a good idea to try and make your own homeopathic remedy from live Ebola virus. If you wish to use homeopathic treatments, then please consult a qualified homeopathic practitioner.


The Alliance for Natural Health provides information about Ebola and silver. They state:

Silver … has been used as an antimicrobial for thousands of years. It’s a powerful antibiotic, attacking all kinds of bacteria in a three-pronged attack. … Silver can be used as a method for disinfecting water of both bacteria and viruses. Since disinfecting contaminated environments is the most effective method of halting Ebola’s spread, silver could be a most potent weapon in the battle.

Silver has also showed great promise as an antiviral, in both attacking the virus and in inhibiting transmission. So far, silver has been tested on HIV and herpes. [25]

Red Algae

A substance manufactured in the human body and also found in red algae is useful against Ebola virus. The substance is called mannose-binding lectin. It has a powerful ability to breakdown difficult to destroy viruses such as Ebola. People who have low levels of mannose-binding lectins will have more difficulty destroying the Ebola virus if it enters their bodies. [26]

The most promising form of mannose-binding lectin is a component of the Scytonema varium red algae called Scytovirin. Another anti-viral extract was found from the New Zealand red alga species, Griffithsia sp. This protein is called Griffithsin. [27]

Naturopathic doctor Case Adams explains that red algae can be taken as a supplement against Ebola. He states:

As to whether red algae can be taken in natural form to increase immunity, there is no doubt this is the case. Prior to this antiviral research that has spiraled into biopharm research, red algae had been shown to have antiviral and anticancer effects.

So the most logical answer is “yes” – certainly consuming red algae in supplement form has been found to boost antiviral immunity, and from the available research, blood levels of mannose-binding lectins. This should in turn boost immunity and create a natural method of preventing and even treating viral infections such as Ebola, SARS, HIV and Hepatitis-C. [28]


Researchers who specialize in the study of melatonin have published a report showing that melatonin could be a valuable treatment for treating Ebola infections. Melatonin is most commonly thought of as a hormone that is essential to normal sleep, but it is also a pervasive and powerful antioxidant that protects DNA. The report indicates that melatonin can be used to address severe symptoms of Ebola infection. These include endothelial disruption, disseminated intravascular coagulation (formation of blood clots in the small blood vessels throughout the body), and multiple organ hemorrhage, which commonly occur with an Ebola infection.

They indicated that there are numerous similarities between Ebola virus infection and septic shock. Melatonin has been successfully employed for the treatment of sepsis in many experimental and clinical studies. It could be useful for Ebola as well.

They are encouraging the use of melatonin for Ebola treatment, because there are a limited number of Ebola treatments and a very limited inventory of pharmaceutical drugs for Ebola. Additionally, they are encouraging the use of melatonin, because it has a high safety profile, is readily available and can be orally self-administered. Thus, the use of melatonin would be compatible with situations where there is a large scale outbreak of this infection. [29]

Essential Oils

There are many essential oils that are known to kill viruses. Some of these oils were recognized as effective in previous historical plagues, before they were known as “essential oils,” which is a more modern term. The French perfumers in particular had special plant oils that proved to be effective against many of the historical plagues of the past.

Unfortunately, much of the online knowledge about which essential oils might be effective against Ebola were contained on websites selling these essential oils. Recently, the FDA decided to attack the two largest distributors of essential oils, and force them to remove this information. (See: FDA Targets Essentials Oils: Sees EOs as Threat to New Ebola Drugs?).

The best place to find this information today is probably via books on the subject. If you have the ability to search the Internet in other languages, you might want to try searching in Mandarin Chinese, as the Chinese have a strong herbal and essential oil history.

Pure plant oils are a direct threat to pharmaceutical products, and it appears that the government has used the “Ebola crisis” to finally go after distributors of these essential oils and force them to remove all health claims from the Internet. For an overview on the health benefits of essential oils see my previous article: Using Essential Oils to Cure Disease. We will soon be offering all of my articles on this topic together in an eBook format.

Combining Ebola Treatment Strategies

Dr. Brownstein is a well-known alternative healthcare physician who has done extensive research to help his patients use natural substances to prevent and overcome illnesses. His most recent recommendations, published last week, will help you build up your immune system and respond to the Ebola virus if you encounter it. His recommendations include dosages, which could help you and your healthcare provider use safe alternatives if you need treatment for Ebola virus infection. Dr. Brownstein states:

I say, if you become ill with a viral illness, do the basics to help optimize your immune system. I will show you the four most important items you can use to aid your immune system to fight any illness.

The most important item is vitamin C. Humans are not able to manufacture vitamin C. Either we get enough vitamin C from our diet or the immune system will not function optimally and we will be more prone to becoming ill with various infections, Ebola included. Throughout the medical literature there are many case histories of vitamin C curing viral and other infectious illnesses. Vitamin C activates the immune system so that it can fight any infection.

How much vitamin C should you take? I would suggest taking at least 5,000 mg of vitamin C on a daily basis. If you become ill with any infectious agent, take more as the body’s requirements dramatically increase when it is confronted with an infectious agent.

Intravenous vitamin C should be given to all Ebola patients. Though it has not been studied, I have no doubt that IV vitamin C would be a great benefit to any patient suffering not only from Ebola but from any infectious agent. In my practice, I have used IV vitamin C for over 20 years. Anytime the body is stressed, vitamin C requirements are elevated. IV vitamin C achieves a much higher serum level as compared to oral vitamin C. IV vitamin C should be a standard-of-care treatment for all Ebola patients.

What else can you take to prevent a viral infection? I would suggest taking vitamin A. Vitamin A is integral for the maintenance and functioning of the immune system. In acute viral illnesses, I have found short courses of vitamin A (not beta carotene) very helpful. From 10-100,000 U of vitamin A per day for a few days to a few weeks can stimulate the immune system to fight viral infections.

Vitamin D is also important. Over 80% of patients are deficient in vitamin D. Maintaining adequate vitamin D levels helps lead to a strong immune system. For most patients, I suggest taking 2-6,000 U of vitamin D3 per day. In times of acute illnesses, 50,000 U of vitamin D3 per day for a few days has proven extremely helpful.

Iodine is essential. No virus, bacteria, or parasite has been shown to be resistant to iodine. Iodine levels have fallen over 50% during the last 40 years. Maintaining iodine sufficiency is one of the most important things you can do to help your immune system. For most patients, I have found 12-50 mg/day can supply the body with the correct amount of iodine.

I do not suggest you try taking these large doses of nutrients without seeing a health care provider knowledgeable about natural agents. A competent health care provider can order the appropriate tests and guide you in which therapy is best for you. [30]

Conclusion: Fear May be More Toxic than Ebola

I think there is a high possibility  the mainstream media will soon be reporting that the people of the United States are in very serious danger from Ebola, and we must take precautions. We may be told that millions will likely die unless every last American takes the Ebola vaccine. We may be under strong pressure from government leaders, business leaders, religious leaders, and civil authorities to take the vaccine.

According to public health data, it appears that 50% to 90% of people who are infected with Ebola will die even with conventional medical help. As stated earlier, we cannot be sure that the number of deaths that are attributed to Ebola is accurate, thus, the death rate from Ebola could be lower than is claimed.

There are quite a few natural approaches to Ebola prevention and treatment. We do not have to hide in our homes in fear or put on a hazmat suit to go out into public.

It is advised that we clean up our diet, build up our immune system, and send away the fear demons who want us to fall into a hopeless state of despair, so that we will do whatever we are told. Regardless of whether the threat from Ebola materializes in the US, we do not have to become helpless victims. We do not need to fall prey to fear.

This is important, because people are increasingly becoming more and more fearful as news reports fan the flames of an approaching epidemic. When people do not understand a disease such as Ebola, the natural reaction is fear. If people feel there might not be any help for them and their families if they get the disease, the natural reaction is fear. Sustained fear suppresses the immune system. [31] Unrelenting fear can actually contribute to the likelihood of developing Ebola disease if the virus is contacted. In this sense, fear can help spread the disease in a community by lowering the functioning of our immune systems.

A discussion of Ebola or any other threat of epidemic disease would not be complete without mentioning the existence of God and the power of prayer. Those who have a relationship with God will be empowered to enter into His peace and to live under His protection. Those who lack such a relationship may find themselves doing battle with fear, and its friends panic and terror.

If we expect to see Ebola spread through America and we fear for our lives and the lives of our families, then we are putting ourselves under stress. Fear is a tricky fellow. It doesn’t work to tell yourself, “I will not be afraid.” What does work is to prayerfully live in relationship with God who can relieve us of our fear and allow us to live day by day under His care. Those who live in the way of His peace know where they are headed and will be able to trust in Him regardless of what happens.

About the Author

John P. Thomas is a health writer for Health Impact News. He holds a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Michigan, and a Master of Science in Public Health (M.S.P.H.) from the School of Public Health, Department of Health Administration, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.


[1] Gaydos JC1, Top FH Jr, Hodder RA, Russell PK.; “Swine influenza a outbreak, Fort Dix, New Jersey, 1976,” Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Jan, PMID: 16494712.

[2] “Swine flu ‘debacle’ of 1976 is recalled,” Shari Roan, Los Angeles Times, April 27, 2009, Retrieved 10/10/14.

[3] “Reflections on the 1976 Swine Flu Vaccination Program,” David J. Sencer and J. Donald Millar, Emerging Infectious Disease journal – CDC, Volume 12, Number 1—January 2006, Retrieved 10/10/14.

[4] “WHO: Ebola Response Roadmap Situation Report,” World Health Organization, PDF Retrieved 10/10/14.

[5] “Dept. of Defense Ebola manual: smoking guns,” Jon Rappoport,, October 9, 2014, Retrieved 10/10/2014.

[6] “WHO: Ebola Response Roadmap Situation Report,” World Health Organization, PDF Retrieved 10/10/14.

[7] “Dept. of Defense Ebola manual: smoking guns,” Jon Rappoport,, October 9, 2014, Retrieved 10/10/2014.

[8] “Ebola,” Jon Rappoport’s Blog, entries about Ebola,

[9] “Death doesn’t =someone’s opinion about death,” Jon Rappoport, October 8, 2014, Retrieved 10/10/14.

[10] “Grant Gives Alnylam $23M For Anti-Ebola Virus Work,” Randall Osborne, BioWorld, September 29, 2006, Retrieved 10/10/14.

[11] “Tekmira Nails $140M Defense Contract to Make RNAi Drug for Ebola,” Luke Timmerman, Xconomy, July 15, 2010, Retrieved 10/10/14.

[12] “The Monsanto Sponsored Ebola Vaccine Will Kill More People Than the Ebola Itself,” Dave Hodges, The Common Sense Show, August 4, 2014, Retrieved 10/10/14.

[13] “DoD may send personnel to Africa to help fight Ebola epidemic,” Navy Times,, August 1, 2014, Retrieved 10/14/14.

[14] “The CDC, NIH & Bill Gates Own the Patents On Existing Ebola & Related Vaccines: Mandatory Vaccinations Are Near,” Dave Hodges, The Common Sense Show, September 17, 2014, Retrieved 10/10/14.

[15] Tan DX1, Reiter RJ, Manchester LC.; “Ebola virus disease: Potential use of melatonin as a treatment,” J Pineal Res. 2014 Sep 27, PMID: 25262626.

[16] IBID.

[17] “Episode 6: Antiviral herbal medicines vs. Ebola and other viral pandemics,” Mike Adams, Health Ranger,  –, Reference to a video teaching session, Retrieved 10/9/14.

[18] “Fauci: New drugs not the best answer for Ebola,” Karen Weintraub, USA Today, August 6, 2014, Retrieved 10/14/14.

[19] “Infectious Disease Index – Ebola virus,” MSDSonline, Retrieved 10/14/14.

[20] IBID.

[21] “Ultraviolet light robot kills Ebola in two minutes; why doesn’t every hospital have one of these?” Mike Adams,, 10/11/14, 2014, Retrieved 10/14/14.

[22] “Should You Worry About an Ebola Outbreak in the US?”, August 19, 2014, Retrieved 10/14/14.

[23] “Ebola virus can be destroyed naturally without side effects,” Thomas E. Levy, MD, JD, Natural Health 365, August 3, 2014, Retrieved 10/14/14.

[24] “CURE FOR EBOLA VIRUS,” Dr. Eileen Nauman, Retrieved 10/14/10.

[25] “Ebola: WHO Turns To Experimental Drugs, But Not Proven Natural Remedies,” Alliance for Natural Health, September 2, 2014, Retrieved 10/14/14.

[26] “Red Algae Extract Treats Ebola … and HIV, SARS and HCV,” Case Adams, Naturopath, GreenMedInfo, October 9, 2014, Retrieved 10/14/14.

[27] IBID.

[28] IBID.

[29] Tan DX1, Reiter RJ, Manchester LC.; “Ebola virus disease: Potential use of melatonin as a treatment,” J Pineal Res. 2014 Sep 27, PMID: 25262626.

[30] “What Can You Do to Prevent/Treat Ebola and Other Viral Infections,” Dr. Brownstein, October 10, 2014, Retrieved 10/14/14.

[31] “Natural Treatments for Ebola Virus Exist, Research Suggests,” (Page 2), Sayer Ji, GreenMedInfo, August 1, 2014, Retrieved 10/14/14.


TLB recommends you visit Health Impact News for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:


Dane Wigington

The “Alzheimer’s Association” has recently refused to allow  to sponsor their fundraising event scheduled in Northern California for October 18, 2014. I tried to support their cause by purchasing an information booth for the standard $500 dollar donation they ask of all sponsors, but in my case they refused to allow this donation. Thus, the “Alzheimer’s association” has tried to block our efforts to raise awareness of the primary source of aluminum contamination in the overall environment. Even more astounding, the “Alzheimer’s Association” flatly denies any link between aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease.

My message to Suzanne Watroba of the Alzheimer’s Association is below.

From: Dane Wigington
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:32 PM

 Re: Redding Walk to End Alzheimer’s

Hello Suzanne,
Our group has one goal, to expose the ongoing climate engineering known as “solar radiation management” (SRM) and “stratospheric aerosol geoengineering” (SAG). A primary element used in the climate engineering programs is aluminum. We have done about 70 lab tests of precipitation in Northern California over the last ten years, aluminum has shown up in very significant amounts in all tests. Our goal is to force disclosure of the climate engineering issue to the general population as the mounting human health effects of the toxic heavy metal exposure due to the climate engineering fall out are now exponential. Aluminum exposure has been cited in peer reviewed research to be connected with Alzheimer’s and autism. Our web site and our organization does not sell anything, we only spend our own funds in the attempt to educate the population about what is happening in our skies and the health effects that are connected to it.
Dane Wigington
On Oct 8, 2014


 From: Suzanne Watroba
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 4:53 PM

 Re: FW: Redding Walk to End Alzheimer’s

Thank you for your email.  I forwarded it to my corporate office, and my supervisor believes your company does not fit our sponsorship guidelines.  The Alzheimer’s Association does not support the claim that aluminum causes Alzheimer’s disease, and therefore we feel that your participation in our event would not be an appropriate match for our constituents.  I apologize for any confusion this may have caused, and appreciate you reaching out to us.

Thank you,


There are huge and very powerful interests in the aluminum industry, which of course included the climate engineering cabal. Their power goes right down the ladder and clearly includes controlling the flow of information through organizations that claim to exist for the common good. The people within these organizations seem to have lost any sense of honor and will do whatever their paymasters instruct them to do. Clearly the “Alzheimer’s Association” does not want anyone to talk about the connection between aluminum and the epidemic disease they claim to be fighting. Clearly the “Alzheimer’s Association” also does not want anyone to raise awareness on the horrific amounts of aluminum raining down on us all from the ongoing climate engineering programs. So, I ask, is the “Alzheimer’s Association a total fraud that exists only for its own purposes? If all available information is examined, I think the answer is clear. Alzheimer’s Association branches around the country should be contacted and given data on climate engineering (and the aluminum contamination related to it) so that they have no excuse for their denial of the facts. Peer reviewed study now proves the link between Alzheimer’s and aluminum, why is the Alzheimer’s Association still denying this?

Geoengineers discussing the spraying of aluminum into the atmosphere


“It can no longer be argued that aluminum does not have a role in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s—the evidence is very clear and growing. It really should not be surprising that people with aluminum toxicity display many of the same symptoms as those with dementia, Parkinson’s, ADHD, autism, and other neurological diseases, because aluminum targets exactly these areas of your brain and nervous system”.

Studies support link between aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease

By Joe Graedon, M.S., and Teresa Graedon, Ph.D. | June 7, 2013 | Updated: June 7, 2013 5:02pm

“Aluminum is found in higher concentrations in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients (Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease online, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2013). There is growing concern that aluminum is involved in the development of this devastating condition (Clinical Biochemistry, January 2013).”


Read article here: http: //

TLB recommends you read more great pertinent articles here:



By: Derrick Broze

Over 2000 pages of emails released under a Freedom of Information Act request have uncovered an apparent conflict of interest between the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Dental Association (ADA) regarding water fluoridation. The emails also contain an admission by the CDC that those with kidney issues will likely be adversely affected by the substance.

From September 5th to the 8th the Fluoride Action Network held the 5th Citizens Conference on Fluoride in Washington D.C. At the conference, Dan Stockin, MPHreleased the emails and declared that “These documents make it abundantly clear….. the ADA and CDC Oral Health Division are the tweedledum and tweedledee of fluoridation promotion. They work hand in hand (often at taxpayers’ expense) to spin the message in favor of fluoridation.”

The 2500 pages contained emails from 2011 between employees at the Oral Health Division of the CDC (the only division at the CDC that deals with fluoridation) and the ADA, as well as communications from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

The Nidel Lawfirm helped in the efforts to get the emails released. A statement from Nidel states that, These documents raise questions about the objectivity of individuals within these agencies and indicate a need to get to the true motivations behind the lack of objectivity in these organizations.”

Attorney Paul Beeber, President of the New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc (NYSCOF), said the ADA, CDC, and the Pew Foundation are “ monitoring what NYSCOF and other groups who oppose fluoridation are doing and writing instead of allowing us to attend their meetings or participate directly in their email discussions.” The Pew foundation is a non-governmental organization that lobby’s to serve the public interest by “improving public policy, informing the public, and stimulating civic life.” 

Within the emails William Maas of the Pew Foundation says “There is a lot of uncertainty,” when it comes to fluoride’s effects on kidney patients. Maas, himself a former CDC Oral Health Division Director, is writing to ADA Director of Congressional Affairs, Judith Sherman. 

Also included in that email is William Bailey who was at the time the Director of CDC’s Oral Health Division. Bailey confirms what many critics of fluoride (aka hydrofluorosilicic acid) have said.  Fluoride affects the kidneys.

“End stage renal disease may be another issue. Since the body excretes fluoride through the kidneys, it is reasonable to assume that people with end stage [renal] disease may experience a buildup of fluoride.”

Also among the emails were communications between the ADA and the HHS. Writing about former Atlanta Mayor Andrew Young and his opposition to water fluoridation, officials of the HHS worry that the issue may be “gaining traction” and want to work with the ADA to formulate a response. In 2011, Young and Rev. Gerald Durley, and Bernice King, daughter of Martin Luther King Jr, began speaking out against water fluoridation and its disproportionate affect on the black populations. The leaders began calling the fight against water fluoridation a civil rights issue.

The government officials discuss the need to reach out to African-American clergy and research scientists to counter the growing opposition. The emails also contain discussion how to handle consumer advocate Ralph Nader and his vocal opposition to water fluoridation. Nader has long been an opponent of water fluoridation but on June 3, 2011 he issued a new statement saying, “It’s way overdue for this country to have an extended and open scientific and regulatory debate on fluoridation. There should be no mandatory fluoridation without the approval of people in a public referendum preceded by full and open public debate with disclosures. There is an old Roman law adage that says, ‘What touches all should be decided by all.’”

In an another FOIA document release, an internal memo from a  U.S. Public Health Service official highlights that the CDC has known since at least 1962 that fluoride affected the black population at a higher rate. On January 10, 1962  F.J. Maier wrote “negroes in Grand Rapids had twice as much fluorosis than others.” According to the CDCs own data blacks have a higher percentage of dental fluorosis than whites (58% vs 36%) based on 99-04 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

What is Fluoride?

The substances added to municipal water supplies known by the name fluoride are actually a combination of unpurified by products of phosphate mining, namely hydrofluorosilicic acid, sodium fluorosilicate, and sodium fluoride. In the United States thousands of tons of fluorosilicic acid is recovered from phosphoric acid plants and then used for water fluoridation. During this process the fluoride ion is created.

This process of taking waste from the phosphate industry and putting it into drinking water has long been criticized for it’s effects on human health, and that of the environment. It is well known that water fluoridation has led to dental fluorosis for millions of children. This discoloring of the teeth was called “cosmetically objectionable” by the Centers for Disease Control. Beyond the cosmetic effect there have been a number of studies indicating health issues ranging from arthritisbrain problemsreduced thyroid or overactive  thyroidkidney problems and bone cancers.

While proponents of water fluoridation have long pointed to an apparent drop in tooth decay in fluoridated nations as proof of it’s validity, those claims have been proven wrong by the World Health Organization. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention has stated the fluoride in the water is directly related to better teeth quality however, the WHO released it’s own study showing that tooth decay rates have dropped in all western nations, whether fluoridated or not.

The reasons for opposing water fluoridation include: fear of a variety of health concerns; the belief that it is force medicating the population without their approval; financial waste; and environmental concerns related to phosphate mines where the chemical is found.

The Fight Against Water Fluoridation

According to the Fluoride Action Network,145 communities have rejected water fluoridation since 2010. The growing number of cities and towns questioning the safety and economic efficiency of  water fluoridation has been been sparked by community activism efforts around the world. These efforts have come as a response to a variety of studies looking at possible health dangers.

A recent study published in the Journal of Analytical Chemistry indicates that fluoride ions found in fluoridated water and toothpaste may lead to an increase in Urinary Stone Disease (USD). The study was conducted by chemists from Russia and Australia, led by Pavel Nesterenko at the University of Tasmania. The team studied 20 urinary stones from patients at a Russian hospital and discovered fluoride ions in 80% of the stones. This could be due to high levels of fluoride in patients urine, possibly from drinking water containing fluorides and ingesting fluoride toothpaste.

Another study published in the journal General Dentistry warns that infants are at risk of dental fluorosis due to overexposure from fluoride in commercially available infant foods. The researchers analyzed 360 different samples of 20 different foods ranging from fruits and vegetables, chicken, turkey, beef, and vegetarian dinners. All of the foods tested had detectable amounts of fluoride ranging from .007-4.13 micrograms of fluoride per gram of food. Chicken products had the highest concentrations of fluoride, followed by turkey. The New York State Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation (NYSCOF) reports that the fluoride levels were due to pesticides, fertilizers, soil, groundwater, and/or fluoridated water. The high levels found in the chicken and turkey can be attributed to “fluoride-saturated bone dust” involved in the process of mechanically separating the meat.

Although these studies hint at various problems governmental and health organizations continue to recommend fluoride, also known ashydrofluorosilicic acid. Earlier this year American Dental Association issued new guidelines recommending “a smear” of fluoride toothpaste for children 3 and under and a “pea-sized dab” for those aged 3 to 6.

TLB recommends Fluoride Action Network visit their site:  link:  the 5th Citizens Conference on Fluoride

Read article here: http: //

TLB Highly recommends you visit Ben’s website for more great/pertinent articles, videos, shows and information. (click on logo below to visit site)



Flu Vaccine

By TLB Contributor: Christina England

In recent months, every newspaper appears to contain at least one flu vaccine advert. In fact, I have begun to wonder, how we ever existed before flu vaccines were invented.

Everywhere you turn there is an advert. They can be found in shops, magazines, schools, doctor surgeries, gas stations and fast food outlets. However, it appears that no matter what the government does to advertise and promote this particular vaccination, the uptake remains low.

Lollipops Given With Every Vaccine

To encourage people to receive the vaccine, the latest gimmick thought up by one company is not only to give away free vaccines, but also to offer the public an incentive as a way of encouragement.

In Minnesota, the so-called ‘medical experts’ are so desperate to reach their target of providing 22,000 vaccinations this year that the Boynton Health Service decided not only to give away their flu vaccinations, but also to give away a Tootsie Pop® as an incentive.

This extra bonus is part of an advertising campaign to “protect the herd.”  Marketing manager Eric Jensen maintains that receiving the vaccine is something that everyone can do, with minimum effort. In his report for Minnesota Daily he stated:

“… come in, get your flu shots, get a sucker and then get going.” (don’t even ask) 

In my opinion, the only ‘sucker’ is Jensen himself, given the fact the the flu vaccine was reported to be ineffective at preventing the flu last year. 

Flu Vaccines Said to Cause Fevers, Vomiting and Fits

So, just why is the public so reluctant to take up this particular vaccine, even when free gifts are attached?

It may be that the flu vaccine has not received the glowing reports that world governments were expecting. If we cast our minds back to 2010, two flu vaccines manufactured by CSL Biotherapies were said to be responsible for at least 1,700 febrile convulsions, high fevers and vomiting in young children across New Zealand and Australia.

In June 2014, columnist Lawrence Solomon wrote the following statements in the Huffington Post:

“Dr. Baldwin, a popular California physician and media personality, is among the numerous physicians who consider flu shots a no-brainer, seemingly unaware of the authoritative studies – and injured men, women and children — showing the flu shot’s downsides to be all too real.”

Reporting on the 2010 situation in Australia and New Zealand, Solomon continued:

“Why did CSL’s flu vaccines of 2010 injure so many? As did other vaccine companies in making their 2010 vaccines, CSL used the World Health Organization’s recommended virus blend for 2010, which combined swine flu and two seasonal blends, along with a half dozen other ingredients. Apart from substituting WHO’s new vaccine blend for the one used in 2009, CSL used the exact same recipe as it had in 2009, and its manufacturing processes were identical to those used in 2009, when its vaccine injury rate stayed within acceptable industry standards. Yet in 2010 CSL’s vaccines harmed many more children than those from other vaccine manufacturers.”

He stated:

“Other flu shots have raised similar alarms in young children. In the 2011 flu season, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration confirmed 42 cases of seizures, 36 of them involving infants and 10 of them deemed “serious,” after vaccination with Fluzone, a vaccine made by Sanofi-Pasteur. The U.S. health authorities decided the rate of seizure was acceptable and could continue “since vaccination is the best way to prevent illness and serious complications from influenza and pneumococcal disease and nearly all children who have a febrile seizure recover quickly and have no long-term effects.” The following year a similar “increase was also observed… and this was not unexpected since the formulation from 2010-11 was not changed for the 2011-12 season.”” 

The situation became so dire that the Australian government eventually decided to suspend the vaccination right across Australia for all children under the age of five.

Flu Shots Continue to Kill and Maim Children Today

Whilst the majority of doctors continue to state that flu vaccines are safe and effective, reports from around the world are stating the complete opposite scenario.

In 2013, between 8/16/2013 and 11/15/2013, 70 vaccine cases were compensated in court and 42 of them were for injuries caused by the flu vaccine.

The injuries included neurological injury, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, encephalitis, chronic inflammatory demylinating polyneuropathy and death.

Health Impact News, reporting on the story, wrote:

“Clearly, the flu vaccine is the most dangerous vaccine in America today, but that fact is not mentioned by the mainstream media, nor is it likely to be reported to you by your doctor.”

Just reading through the list of injuries highlighted on the charts included, should be enough to put parents off from giving their child the flu vaccine, but few parents ever read these reports because they tend not to research vaccines before having their children vaccinated.

Instead, the majority of parents prefer to believe the propaganda spewed out to them by their doctors, who incidentally receive financial incentives to vaccinate children.

One UK Newspaper Tells the Truth About Nasal Sprays

One mainstream newspaper telling the truth about the nasal flu vaccine being recommended this year for younger children is the UK newspaper The Guardian.

Despite being a fan of vaccination, author Luisa Dillner decided to investigate the flu vaccination in full before having her four year-old child vaccinated with this year’s recommend flu vaccination.

To find out more, she decided to ask a leading expert on vaccinations whether or not he would recommend this year’s nasal flu vaccine for her four year-old.

She wrote :

“I’m a big fan of vaccines and feel anxious questioning any of them. But the BMJ (where I work) has published papers questioning the quality of evidence for the benefits of the influenza vaccine, and whether industry-funded trials have reported “over-optimistic” results. I ask Tom Jefferson, the lead author of the Cochrane Review on Vaccines for Preventing Influenza in Healthy Children, which looked at findings from 75 studies, if I should give my four-and-a-half-year-old the nasal vaccine spray.

“No,” he says, because the trials show a reporting bias on the harms of the live attenuated influenza vaccine (the form of vaccine delivered nasally). “Influenza vaccines are about marketing and not science,” he says. “We have few trials, and masses of very poor quality observational evidence. We have presented evidence of considerable reporting bias, which governments continue to ignore. The science is missing and so making an informed decision is very difficult.””

According to Dillner, Jefferson added that the evidence of harm may be under-reported because of a lack of standardised safety-outcome data.

I do not think that was quite the answer she had expected.

When Nurses Refuse Vaccines You Know Something is Up

Another good indication that a vaccine is unsafe is when the medical profession refuses point blank to receive the vaccination themselves.

One nurse refusing the flu vaccination this year appeared to have extremely good reasons for doing so. In her letter to the Boston Globe, she explained that in their report a few days earlier, they had failed to mention the main reason why Brigham hospital nurses were opposed to the policy of mandatory flu vaccinations.

Angered by this omission, she decided to fill in their readers with a few facts and wrote:

“The flu vaccine is only 59 percent effective and carries with it serious health risks, which are not disclosed to those receiving it. As of November 2013, the Federal Adverse Events Reporting System has received 93,000 reports of reactions, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following flu vaccinations. These include 1,080 deaths, 8,888 hospitalizations and 1,811 related disabilities.

Nurses are more aware than the general public of this data, and many do not feel that the low effective rate of the vaccine warrants the health risk.”

When stated so eloquently, one can understand why the nurses would refuse the vaccination, but her words also raise serious questions as to why the general public is not informed of the facts before being offered the vaccine.

A report published by Health Impact News stated that nurses have been prepared to lose their job rather than accept the vaccine, which is quite alarming, considering that the CDC recommends the flu vaccine for children as young as six months of age.

Health Impact News report


As governments worldwide push the flu vaccines onto younger and younger children, parents need to do their own research before considering having their children vaccinated.

It is obvious that doctors and nurses know something that we do not. The medical profession should lead by example and if they are not prepared to receive the vaccine, then why should we be expected to give the vaccine to our children?


Christina England 1About the author: Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980. For the last decade, Christina England has been investigating the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Her articles have had over 500,000 hits and she is now known worldwide for her groundbreaking journalism work.

Christina also has created a world first online resource for parents who have lost their children after vaccine injuries


TLB recommends you visit Miss Eco Glam for more great/pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:

“The only biochemical imbalances in the brains of those who see a psychiatrist … are those that are put in there by a psychiatrist”

Peter R. Breggin, Psychiatrist & MD


By: Roger Landry (TLB)

Updated October 12th, 2014

How many people do you know that are on psychiatric or psychotropic drugs of one form or another for maladies that run the gamut from depression to hyperactivity? It is estimated that well over seventy million Americans are on mind altering drugs (over 20% of the entire country’s population and some estimate it approaches 100 million) and the proof that these drugs are doing more damage to these individuals than any possible positive benefits mounts daily.

With Big Pharmaceutical paying out damages and fines that total well into the billions for prescribed drugs ranging form antidepressants to tranquilizers, anti-psychotic drugs, mood stabilizers, stimulants and more, why does this scourge on America continue … PROFIT plain and simple!

When the damages paid out are insignificant compared to the profit derived by Big Pharmaceutical, with the complicity of a bought and paid for government healthcare infrastructure who’s motto is (CDC) “Protecting lives and your health 24/7” … well you get the drift.

Deaths from legal and prescribed drugs in this country far outnumber deaths from illegal drugs, so where is the war on so called legal drugs? Our military and veterans are massively over prescribed these psychotropics to a point that their suicide rate is a serious shame on the conscience of America and yes the causality is a fact. Our children are drugged at the drop of a hat and, in a rising number of cases, against the will and wishes of their parents turning them into nonproductive Zombies manufactured by the state.

The statistics don’t and can’t lie, so lets delve a little deeper into them. Here is an excerpt from an article written By Mike Adams of Natural News (see article HERE)


Every day 290 people are killed by FDA-approved prescription drugs, and that’s the conservative number published by the Journal of the American Medical Association.

As no one seems to believe these numbers are real, I’ll quote the source: The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000, authored by Dr Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH, of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health.

That study, which is twelve years old (TLB: Now 14 years old) — and drug deaths have risen considerably since then — documents 106,000 deaths per year from the “adverse effects” of FDA-approved prescription medications (today it easily surpasses 125,000 deaths).

To reach this number from outbreaks of violent shootings, you’d have to see an Aurora Colorado Batman movie massacre take place every HOUR of every day, 365 days a year. If a massacre of people using slugs of lead is bad, why is a massacre of people using deadly chemicals perfectly acceptable?


TLB: America prides herself  with having the most advanced healthcare system on this planet … REALLY? Then explain this: out of the 783,936 annual deaths from conventional medicine mistakes (YEA I said that, see above excerpt link), WELL OVER 100,000 of those are the result of prescription drug use! Now simple math will tell you that in the past 14+ years since the publication of these findings (and using old and outdated statistics) approximately 1.5 MILLION Americans have lost their lives to this avoidable blight. What is this actual present day number on a global scale? Please remember this is only what we are aware of, or what has been reported, possibly just the tip of the proverbial iceberg, and with no real information available as to the actual scope of this massive problem today … Hmmm … WHY?

It is time for America to wake up to the Legal Massacre of Untold Innocents all in the name of PROFIT! Or is it something even more sinister … ???

What follows is a video series published by Peter R. Breggin, Psychiatrist & MD titled SIMPLE TRUTHS ABOUT PSYCHIATRY. Please take the time to watch this series … It is time very well spent and may just prove to be a lifesaver for you or a loved one.



A video series by Peter R. Breggin, MD

  1. Do You Have a Biochemical Imbalance?
  2. How Do Psychiatric Drugs Really Work?
  3. What is Medication Spellbinding?
  4. How to Help Deeply Disturbed Persons
  5. How to Help Suicidal Depressed Persons

The presentations are lively and to the point. Further information on all the topics can be found in Dr. Breggin’s many books and articles including his newest book, Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal: A Guide for Prescribers, Therapists, Patients and their Families.

See original video series and much more great/pertinent information here:


By TLB Contributor: Kari Hanks

This week a pamphlet came in the mail. It read: “Who will you protect when you get your flu shot?”

It’s an interesting question that implies that by getting vaccinated, you will protect not only yourself but those around you; that getting vaccinated is the selfless, responsible thing to do for your loved ones and society.

But is this the question we should really be asking?

Did you know?

The pamphlet asked three questions about influenza and the vaccine.

The first question in the pamphlet was:

“Did you know you can spread the flu to others even if you don’t feel sick?”

Science doesn’t back this up. Studies on influenza show that the amount of shedding (spreading the virus) correlates directly with the severity of the illness. What this means is individuals who are infected with influenza and are very sick with symptoms (especially a higher fever) are likely very contagious. But those who are infected and show no symptoms (77% of all cases are asymptomatic) are less likely to be contagious. These studies conclude that those who are infected with the flu but don’t feel sick are not an important mode of transmission.

The second question in the pamphlet was:

“Did you know that you need a flu shot every year?”

The pamphlet explains that each year, research tries to predicts which strains of influenza will be worse for that year and then the vaccine is updated to fight those predicted strains.

This is pretty self-explanatory. We don’t really know which strains of influenza will be circulating in any given year, and therefore we can’t predict how effective the flu vaccine will be. I suppose then that this statement is true- the flu shot is recommended every year because it’s pretty much a stab in the dark.

A 2011 study published in The Lancet stated:

Influenza vaccines can provide moderate protection against virologically confirmed influenza, but such protection is greatly reduced or absent in some seasons. Evidence for protection in adults aged 65 years or older is lacking.

In fact, an 8-year study concluded in 2013 looked at 7,315 people vaccinated against influenza. The study examined vaccine effectiveness for the current year in individuals who were frequently vaccinated (those who got a flu shot once a year) compared to those who had no history of influenza vaccination in the past 5 years. The results showed that for those who received a yearly flu shot, the shot was only 24% effective for the current flu season. The shot was 65% effective for those who had not previously been vaccinated against influenza for at least 5 years.

In other words, the flu shot is actually more effective if you don’t get it every year.

The conclusion of the study notes:

However, this study raises relevant questions about the potential interference of repeated annual influenza vaccination and possible residual protection from previous season vaccination that have not been considered in most trials. Further observational studies that include simultaneous assessment of immune response, both to vaccine antigens and previously circulating viruses, and clinical protection would be helpful. In addition, we believe the results of this study and others support the need for another multiseason randomized clinical trial. Although a randomized trial cannot be conducted in the United States where influenza vaccination is universally recommended, it may be feasible in countries that do not currently recommend influenza vaccination for healthy adults. This would provide valuable new information about the impact of repeated annual influenza vaccination, and it will help guide future vaccine policy recommendations.

The third question on the pamphlet was actually a statement:

“You won’t get the flu from the flu shot.”

This statement is negated by the fact that the entire point of vaccination is to “give” people the disease they are being vaccinated for. The vaccine contains weakened or killed influenza virus which is given to the person with the intent that the body will create antibodies against it as it would if it encountered the wild strain. The hope with vaccination is that the person will experience no or only mild symptoms as their body encounters and fights the virus.

I assume, though, that the intended meaning behind the statement is that people won’t get sick with the flu following their flu vaccination.

The package insert for the live influenza vaccine (the nasal mist) states the common side effects of the vaccine:

The most common side effects are

Other possible side effects include

  • decreased appetite
  • irritability
  • tiredness
  • cough
  • headache
  • muscle ache
  • chills

Let’s compare these to the symptoms of influenza virus.

Mayo Clinic says:

Common signs and symptoms of the flu include:

  • Fever over 100 F (38 C)
  • Aching muscles, especially in your back, arms and legs
  • Chills and sweats
  • Headache
  • Dry cough
  • Fatigue and weakness
  • Nasal congestion

Call it what you will…

shakespeare quote 2

Not only are immediate symptoms possible but getting the flu shot could put you at more risk of getting the flu later.

A study published in 2011 examined the 2008-09 flu season and found a significant positive association between the seasonal flu vaccine and lab-confirmed H1N1 (also known as swine flu), which means that those diagnosed with H1N1 were more likely to have been vaccinated against the seasonal flu strains that year.

So now we know that some of these commonly held beliefs about the flu shot aren’t accurate. But why wouldn’t we want to get the flu shot to at least provide ourselves some protection against the flu?

The inactivated flu vaccine still contains thimerosal.

Some adult formulations of the flu vaccine (including ones given to pregnant women) still contain thimerosal. Thimerosal is 49.6% ethylmercury.

Why worry about thimerosal?

The material safety data sheet for thimerosal states:

Chronic Effects on Humans:
MUTAGENIC EFFECTS: Mutagenic for mammalian somatic cells. May cause damage to the following organs: kidneys, liver, spleen, bone marrow, central nervous system (CNS).

Other Toxic Effects on Humans:
Hazardous in case of skin contact (irritant), of ingestion, of inhalation.

Special Remarks on Chronic Effects on Humans:
May cause cancer based on animal data. No human data found. May cause adverse reproductive effects(female fertility – post implanation mortality, fetotoxicity)and birth defects. May affect genetic material.

Special Remarks on other Toxic Effects on Humans:
Acute Potential Health Effects: Skin: Causes skin irritation. Eyes: Causes eye irritation. May cause chemical conjunctivitis.

Inhalation: Causes respiratory tract irritation. May cause allergic respiratory tract irritation. Exposures to high concentrations may produce unconsciousness with cyanosis(a bluish discoloration of the skin due to deficient oxygenation of the blood) and cold extremities and may also affect the cardiovascular system (rapid pulse). Acute exposure to high concentrations of mercury vapors may also cause kidney damage and affect behavior/central nervous system, peripheral nervous system and autonomic nervous system, and liver and cause gastrointestinal effects (nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting).

Ingestion: Harmful if swallowed. May cause gastrointestinal tract irritation with nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, headache. Exposure to high concentrations may affect respiration and cardiovascular system which may produce unconciousness with cyanosis, cold extremities and rapid pulse. May also cause central nervous system effects and/or neurological effects, and may affect the urinary system (kidneys),and liver. Chronic Potential Health Effects: Skin: Prolonged or repeated skin contact may cause skin sensitization, an allergic reaction. Inhalation and Ingestion: Repeated or prolonged exposure may cause cause kidney damage, and may affect the liver, and bone marrow. Chronic exposure to mercury vapors behavior/central nervous system and peripheral nervous system (depression, irritability, nervousness, weakness, ataxia, fatigue, tremor, jerky gait, limb spasms, personality changes), metabolism (anorexia, weight loss) and cause gastrointestinal disturbances which is collectively referred to as “aesthenic-vegetative syndrome.” Chronic ingestion may cause accumulation of mercury in body tissues and may result in salicylism which is characterized by nausea, vomiting, gastric ulcers, and hemorrhagic strokes.

Thimerosal exposure has been linked to neurological conditions (including autism).

Thimerosal can also potentially impair fertility and causes fetal deaths in rats and mice when exposed through inhalation. Ethyl mercury given orally to albino rats prior to mating affected fertility for three generations.

Children vaccinated against influenza are more likely to be hospitalized for flu.

A Mayo Clinic study reported that children vaccinated with the inactive influenza vaccine are three times the risk of hospitalization for flu:

The inactivated flu vaccine does not appear to be effective in preventing influenza-related hospitalizations in children, especially the ones with asthma. In fact, children who get the flu vaccine are more at risk for hospitalization than their peers who do not get the vaccine, according to new research that will be presented on May 19, at the 105th International Conference of the American Thoracic Society in San Diego.

The nasal spray vaccine sheds.

The CDC notes that the nasal vaccine (which contains live virus) can shed to contacts. Children can spread the virus up to three weeks following vaccination. Transmission of flu to others from the shedding is rare.

Influenza vaccination is linked to severe side effects.

The June 2014 Report from the Department of Justice reports 64 cases of vaccine injury compensated from February 2014 to May 2014.

Of the 64 settlements from February to May 2014, 45 of them were for injuries or death related to the flu vaccine. Injuries include Guillain-Barré Syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (a progressive nerve-damaging, weakening condition- 30% of sufferers end up wheel-chair bound), rheumatoid arthritis, shingles, narcolepsy, and more.

influenza 2014 compensations

Aside from cases compensated by the government, which have to be meticulously proven, other side effects have been linked to the flu vaccine as well. Studies have shown a positive association between the influenza vaccine and narcolepsy. A 2013 study published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) confirmed a link between the 2009 H1N1 vaccine and narcolepsy in Scandinavian countries and England. Reports of vaccine-induced narcolepsy also increased the same year in the U.S., Canada, France and Hong Kong.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome has also been linked to the flu vaccine.

What about the flu vaccine during pregnancy?

The inactivated flu shot is now routinely recommended for pregnant women. All available flu shots are listed as either Category B or Category C drugs for pregnancy. The package insert for each shot notes that testing has not been done on pregnant women and the flu shot should only be given to a pregnant woman “if clearly needed”. Not only that, several of the vaccine manufacturers (as noted in the package inserts) are using pregnant women given the flu shot for a “pregnancy exposure registry to collect data on pregnancy outcomes and newborn health status following vaccination”.

If the flu shot were 80% effective, researchers estimate that 1 to 2 hospitalizations during the flu season (an average of 2.5 months) could be avoided per 1,000 pregnant women vaccinated with the flu shot. But the flu vaccine is on average less than 60% effective. In fact, a 60% reduced risk of a doctor visit is considered “substantial protection” when it comes to the flu shot, as noted by the CDC this year:

A second report in this week’s MMWR showed that influenza vaccination offered substantial protection against the flu this season, reducing a vaccinated person’s risk of having to go to the doctor for flu illness by about 60 percent across all ages.

A study published in 2012 compared miscarriage and stillbirth reports to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) following influenza vaccine in the 2008/09 season when both the seasonal influenza and H1N1 were given. The study found a rise in the rates of miscarriage and stillbirth compared to previous flu seasons.

The real question…

As you can see in the graph below, nearly two-thirds of all cases brought before the U.S. federal vaccine court (called the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, or VICP) are dismissed, and most cases take years to go through the court system.

1988-March 2014 compensations

I strongly encourage you to watch this 45-minute video of the Congressional Briefing on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The video sheds light on how difficult it is to navigate the vaccine injury system.

Families with vaccine injuries are most often left to deal with the consequences on their own: emotionally, physically and financially.

The real question, then, is this:

Bill Gates Ebola 1

By TLB Contributor: Dave Hodges

My friend and broadcast colleague, John Moore, attempted to reach me today by phone. Unfortunately, I was not able to call Mr. Moore back.  I was unable to hear Mr. Moore’s message until after he would have retired for the evening as I am two time zones behind him. As I listened to John’s groundbreaking broadcast of his morning show during the wee hours of the morning, I know why John reached out to me.

This morning, I received a message that I was to meet a familiar party at a familiar location where “many previously held secrets would be revealed”.  I was not allowed to take my cell phone to the meeting which is why I did not receive John’s message in a timely fashion. The meeting consisted of four people, one of which, has been a primary source of information for me on a variety of national security issues covering the last several years. This source has never been wrong.

What I learned from the meeting is that 0ver the next several days, the public is going to see several journalists revealing both classified and non classified material l related to the Ebola outbreak, and the subsequent deliberate spreading of Ebola through governmental inaction. The American people are also going to hear about operational details about how the government plans to deal with the Ebola outbreak.

John Moore’s Radio Show

Below is John Moore’s morning broadcast, from October 9, 2014,  in which he details the unreported spread of Ebola across this country and a subsequent media cover-up. John’s show reveals the fact that it is highly likely that an Ebola pandemic is underway in the United States.

John reported that Ebola is presently in 9 states. I was told that within two weeks, Ebola will be diagnosed in at least 40 states and the media cover-up will likely still be in play by this time and then the American people will be hit with shock and awe media coverage designed to frighten every American into compliance in terms of receiving a series of mandatory vaccines.

In the first few minutes of his show, John Moore revealed the following information:

1. Both military and civilian personnel at MacDill AFB  in Florida have told him that “frantic” preparations are being made in regard to efforts to try and respond to an impending attack upon the United States.  

This information has not been revealed to me. What I suspect is that someone on the base uncovered information and the base is acting accordingly.

2. John Moore’s sources have told him that an Urgent Care clinic in Frisco, Texas, has been closed and subsequently quarantined.

3. John Moore also revealed that an entire floor at a Galveston, TX.  hospital has been isolated and is to be used for anticipated Ebola patients.

With regard to items #2 and #3, I have some confirmation of these events, but on a much larger scale. I was told, and have reported, that containment facilities are being prepared in a variety of venues including sports facilities and shopping malls. Isolation and quarantine facilities have been prepared on certain military bases (e.g. Lackland AFB) and old abandoned bases are being retrofitted for isolation and are designed to quarantine persons with active Ebola.

I was also informed that some state officials will no doubt play by the CDC’s timetable for the eventual release of information with regard to a formal announcement of a pandemic within the United States. In fact, Dannel Malloy, Governor of CT., may be the first state official to publish quarantine guidelines within the country.

“In response to the epidemic of the Ebola virus currently affecting multiple countries in western Africa, and in order to provide the Commissioner of Public Health and other appropriate officials with all authorities necessary to prevent any potential transmission of the Ebola virus within the State of Connecticut, I hereby declare a public health emergency for the State, pursuant to the Connecticut General Statutes Section 19a-131a, for the duration of the epidemic. Specifically, in accordance with Connecticut General Statutes Section 19a-131b, I authorize the Commissioner of Public Health to Order the isolation or quarantine, under conditions prescribed by the Commissioner of Public Health, of any individual or group of individuals whom the Commissioner reasonably believes to have been exposed to, infected with, or otherwise at risk of passing the Ebola virus.”
Governor Dannel P. Malloy, October 7, 2014

Governor Malloy has clearly been briefed on what is coming because he could not have issued this order based upon sheer rumor and innuendo. The effect of this order, The CT. State of Public Health Emergency, allows bureaucrats to detain and forcibly vaccinate people without informed consent or any semblance of due process.


sheep-forwardAs previously stated,  I was told the same and when the virus reaches “critical mass” we will see a media blitz like we have never seen before in this country. Most of the sheep will be frightened into turning to the government for help. They will willingly comply with the new vaccine requirements.

The rest of us, who are presumably awake, will be forced to take the vaccine, or we will eventually be isolated where we will not be allowed to spread our anti-CDC rhetoric. Multiple vaccines, not just the Ebola vaccine, will be required. Ebola will be the excuse to impose mandatory vaccinations but this madness will not stop with this deadly virus.

Gates has announced that he plans to vaccinate every child in the third world with multiple vaccines, which could result in a dramatic population reduction of 10-15%. Do you realize the enormous profits that can be realized by vaccinating every child in the third world? If we apply Gates’ penchant for investing in causes which produce a hefty “return on investment” (ROI) then one could reasonably suspect that Gates is positioning himself to profit on the $560 million he has invested in the Ebola cause which conveniently includes the CDC, the holder of the patent for Ebola.The NIH presently holds all patents on Ebola vaccines. Vaccinations have two goals, depopulation and making money!

Bill Gates

When an unsuspecting public is finally told of the existence of an completed Ebola vaccine, the Global Fund will be in charge of the distribution of the vaccine. Interestingly, Bill Gates has donated a total of $560 million dollars to the Global Fund. The Global Fund has also positioned themselves to be in charge of the distribution of the “newly developed”, and not yet announced vaccines for TB and HIV.  Since the goal is the vaccination of every man, woman and child on the planet with multiple vaccines, Gates’ $560 million contribution to the Global Fund is chump change compared to the expected ROI. However, on deck is the Ebola virus.

I was also told by my sources that the polio vaccine will be a part of the vaccination cocktail. When I asked how many vaccines are we talking about, I was told as many as two dozen vaccines will be required and forcibly administered by various levels of government. The easiest place to enforce the mandatory vaccines will be through the schools and it will include all schools, both public and private. My sources told me about pending and recently passed legislation in several states which are requiring mandatory vaccinations. In the brief time I have had to process this information, I have found enough confirming information to publish the fact that this undeniably true.

Mandatory Vaccines Will Commence In the Schools

One out of six Americans, 50 million total, enter a school on a daily basis. Mandatory vaccines are going to begin in schools and then the requirement will be expanded to daycare employees and healthcare workers. Right now, required vaccines are a part of the 2014 State legislative agenda across the country. I was told that an executive order will expand all mandatory vaccine requirements to include Ebola, TB, HIV and about two dozen, in total, vaccines.

In the 12 hours I have had to process this information, I have found solid confirmation of what I was told by my sources.

Some proposed legislation this year goes so far as to require schools to provide vaccine education programs for children and parents, which is effectively turning our schools into marketing departments for vaccine manufacturers.  AL  SB 75 (Alabama) and NY A 3703/S 2070 (New York) would require schools to provide meningococcal vaccine education/promotion, while GA HB 162 requires schools in Georgia to educate the parents of sixth-graders about why their children should get HPV vaccine…Several states are proposing to set up school- based vaccination clinics, including Pennsylvania (PA SB 251) where state health officials would be authorized to give flu vaccines to kids while they are attending school and SC HB 3236 (South Carolina) that will give the green light to state health officials to give the HPV vaccine to girls entering  seventh grade while in school…want to require schools to post their vaccination rates in the town square. Vermont Senator Kevin Mullin, who unsuccessfully attempted to remove the state’s philosophical vaccine exemption in 2012, is proposing a bill (VT S 194) to require schools and child care facilities to publicly post their specific vaccination rates…Health care workers, teachers, daycare employees and students in NINE states are targets of new legislation that proposes to force children and adults to get federally-recommended vaccines or suffer economic and other sanctions –  from denial of employment and education to denial of parental rights to be informed if a minor child has NOT received one or more vaccines for sexually transmitted diseases…Health care workers in Illinois (Il SB 1610) and Massachusetts (H 1975) may be required to get flu shots every year in order to keep their jobs. If either of the Vermont bills pass (VT H 114 or VT S 103), Vermont would become the first state in the country with pertussis containing vaccine mandates for teachers that could result in teachers being fired for declining vaccination (daycare workers in Vermont are also being required to get pertussis vaccines in these bills). Legislation has been introduced in Illinois (HB 4406) that would require day care centers in the state to mandate all day care workers get federally recommended vaccines”.  This represents the tip of the iceberg of what I have found.

Vaccine Cards

Americans are going to be required to obtain a vaccine card which demonstrates that they have complied with the federal list of vaccines. DHS is lobbying to have the information to be included on one’s drivers license and it will be a pre-requisite to obtaining a drivers license. Admittance to movie theaters, sporting events, to make a purchase at a grocery store or a mall will soon require the showing of one’s card. I was lightheartedly told that a person will not even be able to get a pizza delivered to their home without giving their vaccination card number over the phone.

Does the marginalization of the people who do not have a vaccination card remind you of any other group in world history?

J Stamp

The vaccination card will only be the beginning of the incremental practice of mass vaccinations in which my sources believe will leave much of the population in a debilitated condition. At one time, these allegations would have been considered to be lunacy. However, when one considers how Ebola is being allowed to spread by keeping both the borders open and our airports open to travelers from West Africa,  these allegations are very conservative.

The mandatory vaccine cards will be a pre-requisite for all employment, much like an I-9 card was intended to be.

As I have already reported, healthy people, in an impact zone (i.e. the term being used for a pandemic outbreak) will be assigned and relocated until such time as they have taken the soon-t0-be mandatory GSK Ebola vaccine.

vaccine roadblocksAs both Greg Evensen and myself have revealed, there will be vaccine roadblocks designed to arrest and transport, for detainment, individuals who refuse to be vaccinated. I was told that the lion’s share of the work will be performed by the militarized local police. However, integrated within the roadblock forces will be DHS personnel along with “UN observers” and foreign troops (i.e. Russian and Chinese military). Their presence at these roadblocks will be for the purposes of habituation only. In other words, the globalists want the American people to get conditioned to the idea of seeing UN troops on American soil.

I have 12 pages of notes to process and I have not been to bed for 27 hours. Subsequently, there will be a Part Two.


About the Author

Dave Hodges is the host of the popular radio talk show, which airs from 9 PM to Midnight (Central). The show can be heard by clicking the following icon in the upper right hand corner of The Common Sense Show.

© 2014. The Common Sense Show. The Logo and Articles are protected by U.S. Copyright Laws, and are not to be downloaded or reproduced in any way without the written permission of Dave Hodges. Copyright 2014. Dave Hodges. All Rights Reserved

TLB recommends you visit Dave here:


See featured article and read comments HERE

Autism and Vaccines

By: Roger Landry (TLB)

When I have discussions with those who are far from stupid but still pro-vaccine, or are totally reliant on their absolute trust in their doctors and health professionals, I see a very disturbing trend. I find a vast majority of those I ask about vaccines have two big misconceptions. The first being that thimerosal has been removed from vaccines (it is still used in several batch doses of vaccines given to our children including the yearly flu shot), and the second being that if they are aware of thimerosal, they firmly believe ethylmercury (about 50% of the volume of thimerosal) is metabolized harmlessly by the body (poppycock).

These misconceptions are either ignored or in a lot of cases perpetuated by healthcare professionals today, encouraging many to wrongly believe that the scourge of thimerosal is either a tin foil hat myth and does not exist anymore, or never did exist.


Thimerosal is broken down by the body in the following fashion, the ethylmercury is first metabolized by the body into toxic methylmercury, which is then metabolized into inorganic mercury … YES I said inorganic Mercury! The most deadly and toxic naturally occurring substance known to exist on this planet to the human physiology and second only to Ionizing Radiation.

Here is a link to a comprehensive review explaining exactly how Thimerosal is metabolized by the human body:

Scientific Information Regarding the Use of Thimerosal As a Preservative in Vaccines

So lets break this down a little further and get BLATANT …

The EPA has set standards for the maximum exposure to mercury any individual should receive in a given day … anything exceeding this exposure is considered toxic. Please look at the chart below and see we are all seriously overexposed to mercury with the flue shot. BUT pay special attention to the fetus allowable exposure, and then look at the dosage the pregnant mother receives when she trustingly acquiesces to the flu shot.


Yes you read it right … the fetus with no discernible blood brain barrier to protect it, receives (via it’s mothers blood) 2,500 times the maximum exposure allowed by the EPA of the most toxic naturally occurring substance on this planet! You will have heard in the above video and may see in other publications that the EPA overage for a fetus is 250 times … do the math yourself because 25mcg divided by .01mcg = 2,500 not 250 making this a HUGE issue.

So can vaccines containing toxic thimerosal cause autism? Lets run a little comparison test here

What are the symptoms of Autism in children

  1. Loss of speech
  2. Social withdrawal
  3. Reduced eye contact
  4. Repetitive behavior
  5. Hand flapping
  6. Toe walking
  7. Temper tantrums
  8. Sleep disturbances
  9. Seizures

Now lets list the symptoms of Mercury poisoning in children

  1. Loss of speech
  2. Social withdrawal
  3. Reduced eye contact
  4. Repetitive behavior
  5. Hand flapping
  6. Toe walking
  7. Temper tantrums
  8. Sleep disorders
  9. Seizures

If you don’t believe this comparison … Check it out for yourself !!!


This is either a massive coincidence or one of the most heinous crimes against humanity is being perpetrated on a colossal scale. Is it also coincidence that the rise in Autism almost perfectly matches the rise in the number and scope of vaccinations we are inundated with? The EPA even states that one of the hazards of mercury exposure is BRAIN DAMAGE!

But hey we where told by the CDC a decade ago that Thimerosal had all but been removed from our vaccines and after all isn’t their motto “Protecting our health and well being 24/7”.

Again lets put this into perspective. In the mid to late 1950′s vaccinations were few and far between and the autism rate was almost nonexistent, occurring at a rate of WELL OVER 1 in 20,000, with most doctors never having seen a single case in their entire practice. Yet a scant three generations later autism occurs in one out of 28 male children. Today our children are inundated with about 50 vaccines and about 100 vaccinations (there are almost 400 new vaccines in the pipeline). Also consider up until about a decade ago Thimerosal was more prevalent in our vaccines (and is again becoming more prevalent today regardless of the lies being told).

395 new vaccines being developed for infectious diseases: PhRMA

Simple math shows an increase in the autism rate of well over 700 fold in less than three generations, yet has anyone seen this government push the panic button as they did with Polio, Measles, Mumps or Cancer? Do you see massive government programs and spending to get to the bottom of this catastrophic issue ? WHY NOT? Could it be that they are already fully aware of the catalyst behind this fiasco? Where does coincidence leave off and it’s a fact pick up?

At least three of the vaccinations your child will receive are laced with Thimerosal (do the research) … up from the low of one, and others are listed as containing trace amounts (what does “trace” mean?) Is this signifying the return of thimerosal to vaccines in a much larger fashion? Do you still believe the LIE?

Mercury In Vaccines Making a Comeback

Just how many lies will it take to wake the population of this country up to what can only be described as … The Most Destructive Lie ever Told …

And now the final note … the complicity! Wouldn’t it be very convenient to be able to change or remove official documents from public scrutiny, at will, that can tie you (or your organization) directly to actions and decisions, to facilitate your avoidance of  responsibility for catastrophic mistakes or to hide obvious complicity?

Due to the microscope the CDC is now under because of the recent whistleblower saga, you would think they would settle in and behave for a while … NOPE …  it appears that they have been up to their old tricks again. When the CDC website was checked recently, sure enough, their thimerosal fairy has waved her magic wand over the vaccine ingredients on their listings.

Question for the CDC – Where Has All The Thimerosal Gone?



This article is loosely based on the TLB article Thimerosal & Autism: The Most Destructive Lie ever Told. It has been revised, updated, added to and republished.


By Brandon Smith

I remember years back when I was still writing for my original website,, we came across a then little known video of airtight “coffin liners”, hundreds of thousands, stacked in a field in the middle of Madison, Georgia in close proximity to Atlanta and the home of the CDC. We helped break that story which immediately swept through independent media circles .

Owners of the property leased to store the hermetically sealing plastic coffins stated that it was the CDC that had rented the land for storage of the coffins.  Confirmation from the CDC has not been forthcoming.

I have been keeping my eyes open for any mention of these kinds of coffins since that story was released, knowing that one day, they would suddenly be touted by the government as if they had always been in use.  It appears that day is close at hand…

In a story for Yahoo Newsthe CDC says that in the event of an Ebola outbreak in the U.S., bodies of the deceased would be required to be buried within “hermetically sealed caskets”, which would prevent the escape of microbes during funerals.

An administrator of the Dallas Institute Of Funeral Service interviewed in the article states that he has never come across any such caskets in his industry, meaning, hermetically sealed coffins are NOT common in the slightest for burial.

The CDC coffins in Madison, Georgia, though, ARE designed to prevent spread of infection. In fact, the patent for these coffins confirms that they are meant for the burial or cremation of bodies exposed to infectious diseases.

You can read the patent here:

This would suggest that the CDC has stockpiled such coffins in places like Madison, Georgia specifically in preparation for a viral outbreak. Meaning, the CDC has been expecting the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans due to infection for at least the past six years. That is a LONG period of preparation. Such preparation requires certainty, not hypothesis, especially where the federal government is involved.

Our government was so certain of a viral catastrophe they purchased fields full of sealing coffins to be ready for it; not to prevent it, but to have the means to clean up after it.  Let that thought settle for a moment, and then read my latest article, ‘An Ebola Outbreak Would Be Advantageous For Globalists’to understand the bigger picture…

You can contact Brandon Smith at: Alt-Market, where this article first appeared, is an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for mutual aid and defense. Join today and learn what it means to step away from the system and build something better.

Read article here:

TLB recommends you read more great/pertinent articles here: