The Liberty Beacon

The Liberty Beacon



The Mind Unleashed on 26 November, 2014 at 16:54

Cassius Methyl, MassReport | Did you know that studies showed the effectiveness of cannabis at killing cancer cells as long ago as 1974?

In 1974, a study from The Washington Post said that THC effectively “slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36%.”

The information was suppressed and people were incarcerated for up to decades for using or selling the harmless, absolutely miraculous medicine from 1974 to 1998 (and further on, as you know). In 1998, another study came out from Madrid’s Complutense University that indicated THC can cause cancer cells to die, and unlike chemotherapy the THC kills nothing but the cancer cells, leaving the brain of course completely unharmed.Just think about all of the people who died of cancer, or were paralyzed or injured in whatever way from chemotherapy.Aren’t we so much more collectively awake now? Our desire for prosperity and good health, and the frustration we should feel with the establishment and federal government for criminalizing cannabis and keeping secret this information is such a powerful fuel for the total legalization of cannabis in America.With the idea that knowing this is fuel to motivate us to push for total cannabis legalization, please share this information with absolutely as many people as possible.

Read article here:

TLB recommends you read more great/pertinent articles here:


Preface by: Roger Landry (TLB)

What has happened to parental rights in America? Why is this government overstepping their boundaries to mandate vaccines against a parents wishes, and without their knowledge? And why does the word of a professional outweigh the wants and wishes of said parents?

The family unit is under attack in America in a fashion none of us would ever have guessed a scant generation ago. Children are being removed from the family unit at an astounding rate today for something as minor as a parent disagreeing with a doctors recommendation, or for simply asking for a second opinion, something we as a society were encouraged to do not so long ago.

Today if a child suffers an adverse reaction, or dies shortly after a round of vaccinations, it is the parents who suffer the scrutiny or wrath of the state, with minimal to no credence being afforded to the possibility of vaccine injury. This persists even if the vaccine has a long and documented history of such occurrences. It is now up to the parents to fight for the truth with every fiber of their love and compassion for that child and (in a lot of cases) every penny in their pocket … WHY?

In a country vaccinated more than any nation on this planet, why are the vaccine manufacturers never the first point of contention or investigation? Why does a state instantly pounce on parental abuse or neglect? Have we not seen the plethora of studies and historical papers written on the documented cases of adverse reactions to these very vaccines? Why does Big Pharmaceutical always get a free pass, and parents, the scrutiny and accusations? If this does not scream complicity … what does?

Once again TLB Staff Writer Christina England gives you the answers, the facts and the history on a level you will never get from a corrupt or complicit state. It is due to outstanding and caring authors and researchers like Christina that we are afforded both sides of these heart wrenching stories. Please read more …


Vaccine-Injured Child Stolen by the State and Her Caring Mother Accused of Child Abuse

By TLB Staff Writer: Christina England

On November 4, 2014, the website Medical Kidnap told the tragic story of four month-old Kathryn Hughes, who was stolen by Child Protective Services (CPS) after she suffered an adverse reaction to a vaccine.

Kathryn was a fragile baby, suffering from a wide range of complex medical needs. Born with Pierre Robin Sequence, a condition in which an infant has a smaller-than-normal lower jaw, a tongue that falls back in the throat and breathing difficulties, Kathryn certainly has had her fair share of problems.

Despite her daughter’s problems, Lorie, her mother, had always trusted the doctors and tried to do the best that she could for her daughter.

Baby is Vaccinated Without Her Mother’s Permission

Due to her own problems with vaccinations, Lorie requested when Kathryn was born that her daughter would only receive the vitamin K injection. Sadly, her requests were ignored and Kathryn was vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine. A few weeks later, Kathryn began suffering seizures, a common side effect of the vaccine. [1]

Medical Kidnap reported:

“On September 4, baby Kathryn had an ALTE (acute life threatening event) where she stopped breathing. Her family took her to the local hospital, where they airlifted her to UMC in Lubbock. That is where mother and baby would spend the next two weeks. It was determined that they would do surgery to insert a gbutton in order to insert a long-term feeding tube into her stomach. It would remain until she could have surgery to correct the cleft palate.” [2]

(Note: G-button or Gastrostomy Button is a tube placed directly into the stomach of a child who needs supplemental feeding or who has difficulty swallowing. This allows feeding to be given directly into the stomach.) [3]

The surgery went well, and despite the many tests, medications and wires, Kathryn remained a happy and secure little girl. However, despite her apparently happy disposition and the constant love and attention given to her by her mother, the reasons behind her seizures remained a mystery.

Before leaving the hospital, the nurses instructed Lorie how to give Kathryn the correct dosage of medications, via the G-button, and they returned home on Thursday, September 18.

Sadly, their happiness was short lived and just two days after returning home from the hospital Kathryn seizures returned and she was rushed back to the UMC.

Medical Kidnap stated:

“The next day, CPS and the staff at UMC informed Lorie that they were taking custody of Kathryn over the medical condition. She was only out of the hospital’s care for two days between September 4th and the 21st. Her mother had to beg to be able to at least say goodbye.

Lorie was stunned and devastated as they literally took baby Kathryn out of her arms, accusing her of not giving her the medications. She insists that she followed their instructions on how to give it to a T, detailing every step of the complicated process to me. The basis for the accusation was simply a test that showed that the level of phenobarbital in her bloodstream was 9.5 mg, but it should have been at least 10 mg.”

Since her kidnap by the CPS, the state of Texas has been trying to terminate all parental rights and they have reduced Lorie’s contact to just twice a month.

Lorie is reported to be distraught by their decision. On October 19, 2014, she wrote this heart-wrenching post on Facebook:

“Can’t sleep. Everyone is asleep but me and all I can think about is my baby girl. Just have this gut wrenching heart twisting feeling something is wrong … don’t know why but I just do. And I know she is crying extremely bad I can feel it in my breasts … still every cry and severity of cry I feel … and feel milk fill up … Even though there is very little milk left …

Miss her and love her so much and would do anything to comfort her and hold her skin to skin on my chest and let her listen and relax to my scent my touch the sound of my heartbeat!!!!

Please pray that she is okay! That God keeps his protecting arms wrapped around her and heals her!!!!!”

Sadly, Kathryn is now a ward of court and that doctors have asked the judge in her case to grant permission to vaccinate her fully, against her parents’ wishes, which, as we understand, also includes participation in an experimental ebola vaccine trial.

Given her medical conditions, I feel that her life is now in danger.

Did Kathryn’s mother fail to care for her daughter by failing to give her the medications prescribed as suggested, or was there something else behind Kathryn’s continued ill health and seizures?

What Really Happened to Baby Kathryn?

If we look at the history of this case, there is one detail that jumps out and that is the fact that Kathryn was vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine against her mother’s wishes. The hepatitis B vaccine can cause seizures.

In a lengthy report on the hepatitis B vaccination and possible adverse reactions, the Vaccination Liberation Army wrote:

“After many newborns died or suffered seizures, brain swelling and permanent brain damage following their hepatitis B injections, the dangers of the vaccine were brought to public attention by a documentary on ABC’s 20/20. Finally in July, 1999, the CDC reversed its ill-advised mandate on giving the hepatitis B vaccine to newborns.. Nevertheless, despite a decade of problems, and virtually no clinical control studies proving safety or efficacy, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices once again recommends in its 2002 immunization schedule that newborns be injected with the hepatitis B vaccine.” [3]

Their paper is full of facts and includes information written by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

In 2000, the AAPS became concerned that children were being vaccinated with too many mandated vaccines that they felt were unnecessary. One of the vaccines mentioned in their report was the hepatitis B vaccine. They wrote:

“’Our children face the possibility of death or serious long-term adverse effects from mandated vaccines that aren’t necessary or that have very limited benefits,’ said Jane M. Orient, MD, AAPS Executive Director.

‘This is not a vote against vaccines,’ said Dr. Orient. ‘This resolution only attempts to halt blanket vaccine mandates by government agencies and school districts that give no consideration for the rights of the parents or the individual medical condition of the child.’

Forty-two states have mandatory vaccine policies, and many children are required to have 22 shots before first grade. On top of that, as a condition for school attendance, many school districts require vaccination for diseases such as hepatitis B — primarily an adult disease, usually spread by multiple sex partners, drug abuse or an occupation with exposure to blood.”

They continued:

“And yet, children under the age of 14 are three times more likely to suffer adverse effects — including death — following the hepatitis b vaccine than to catch the disease itself.” [4]

Their report had little effect.

CDC Called Liars For Stating That the Hepatitis B Vaccine is Safe

In 1999, obviously shocked by what he had discovered, Michael Belkin, a former quantitative strategist at Salomon Brothers and Director of the Hepatitis B Vaccine Project of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) wrote:

“The NVIC has studied Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act covering the last nine years on hepatitis B vaccine adverse events — and in 1996 there were more than three times as many reported serious adverse reactions as reported cases of the disease in the 0 to 14 age group. Of the total 2,424 adverse event reports made between 1990 and October 1998 in children under age 14 who only received hepatitis B vaccine, there were 1,209 serious events and 73 deaths. Thus, one half of the reports for children under age 14 who received only hepatitis B vaccine were for serious events that required an emergency room visit, hospitalization, or caused life-threatening health problems or permanent disabilities.

As a UC Berkeley graduate and advisor to some of the largest financial institutions in the world, I am qualified to analyze and make conclusions about statistics. Based on that experience, I am astonished that the scientists on this Committee would disregard or cover up data showing the number and severity of adverse reactions to this vaccine. Science is observing and learning from what is observed. The assertions of the CDC that the many reported adverse reactions to this vaccine do not exist or are a coincidence violates the basic principle of science, which is rooted in the observation and analysis of data.”

Mr. Belkin concluded by stating:

“At the NVIC, we are overwhelmed following up constant new reports of deaths, seizures and autoimmune reactions following hepatitis B vaccination. Because the CDC refuses to acknowledge this large number of serious adverse reactions, hospitals and doctors who have been misled about the risks continue to administer the vaccine and then deny any vaccine connection when children die, get ill or have seizures within hours or days. CDC officials tell parents they have never heard of hepatitis B vaccine reactions.

That is a lie. For this government to continue to insist that hepatitis B vaccine adverse reaction reports do not exist is negligent, unethical — and is a crime against the children of America. It is a sad day for the US when the nation’s children need protection from the official medical authorities who are charged with protecting them from disease.” [5]

Yet Another Professional Speaks Out

Registered nurse Patti White became so concerned over the growing number of babies and young children being damaged by the hepatitis B vaccination, she wrote a letter to the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources of the Committee on Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives, asking them to reconsider their decision to vaccinate newborns with the hepatitis B vaccine. She wrote:

“For the past three or four years our school district has noted a significant increase in the number of children entering school with developmental disorders, learning disabilities, attention deficit disorders and/or serious chronic illness such as diabetes, asthma and seizure disorders. Each of the past four years has been worse than the year before. There is only one common thread we have been able to identify in these children: they are the children who received the first trial hepatitis B injections as newborns in the early 1990s.”

She continued by adding the following two very powerful and worrying paragraphs:

“As the hepatitis B compliance rate in newborns has gone up in our community, so has the percentage of damaged children. This is very alarming. Because of having so many damaged children we have tried to find the long-term clinical trials that ruled this vaccine “safe and effective”. We discovered through an exhaustive Medline search that the FDA based its decision to approve hepatitis B vaccine for administration in the first hours of a newborn baby’s life upon clinical trials and upon post-marketing surveillance studies in which patients and their doctors were asked to report any adverse effects they noticed within 4-5 days after each injection [4 days for SmithKline, 5 days for Merck].

The problems being reported in increasing numbers as occurring after hepatitis B vaccination appear to be autoimmune and neurological in origin. Such problems take weeks to months to produce noticeable symptoms, and cannot be spotted in a 4-5 day observation period. These are the only clinical studies that have been done by Merck or SmithKline. There is not one long-term study that we could find.”

In other words, she believed that the vaccine damage suffered by these children fell into two categories: it was either autoimmune or neurological in origin, and, through its very nature, was unlikely to show up for several weeks or months after the vaccination.

Nurse White continued with possibly one of most damning and worrying paragraphs in her letter. She wrote:

“The CDC and FDA have no idea what the long-term effects will be on the newly developing neurological and immune systems of the infants who are injected with this vaccine. They seem to only be concerned with denying the connection between these damaged children and the hepatitis B shot they received within a few hours of birth. The CDC even admits the lack of study and states they do not even know how long the vaccine will be effective. We found this amazing since the vaccine was developed for a population at risk for hepatitis B: IV drug users, high-risk medical professionals and those who are involved in high risk sexual practices.” [6]

If White’s statement is true, and there is no reason to suggest that it is not, there is evidence to suggest that new born babies are being vaccinated with a vaccine that has not been fully tested for its safety or its long-term efficacy.
Looking back at the number of professionals raising concerns over this vaccine, one has to wonder whether or not Kathryn should have been vaccinated in the first place. After all, Kathryn had already had her fair share of medical problems and a mother who had reacted adversely to vaccinations.


For many years, I have been writing about such cases. There are now a growing number of parents who have been falsely accused of harming their vaccine-damaged children. Sadly, this case is yet another example.

Loving, caring parents are having their children taken away from them because the majority of health care professionals and social workers are burying their heads in the sand and choosing to ignore the fact that no vaccine or medication is one hundred percent safe. All vaccines have the potential to cause adverse reactions.

When you have such groups as the AAPS stating, “And yet, children under the age of 14 are three times more likely to suffer adverse effects — including death — following the hepatitis b vaccine than to catch the disease itself,” you have to wonder what on earth is going on.

This story highlights the need for reform and the need for change. It is highly unlikely that this mother harmed her baby, and in my opinion, this baby should be returned to her mother as soon as possible.

If readers would like to help Baby Kathryn be returned to her mother, her family has found a competent lawyer and they need to raise $20,000. Please see the GoFundMe campaign titled Bring Baby Kathryn Home and consider giving as generously as you are able.You can also like and share the Facebook page Bring Baby Kathryn Home or follow Kathryn’s story on Twitter.Please sign the petition asking Governor Rick Perry and Governor-Elect Greg Abbott to intervene on Baby Kathryn’s behalf.



Mississippi ranks last among states in the U.S. with the highest infant mortality rate at 10 deaths per 1000 live births. Sources: America’s Health Rankings, Kaiser Family Foundation.

News Editor:

Lindey Magee of Mississippi Parents for Vaccine Rights recently commented on an article published in Mississippi’s Clarion Ledger on their front page:


Image from Be The Voice: Mississippi Parents for Vaccine Rights

Mississippi has the highest rate of childhood vaccination because it is one of only two states in the U.S. that does not allow parents a choice regarding vaccines, as a requirement for attending school. Only a medical doctor can provide an exemption, as religious and philosophical exemptions are not allowed.

The Clarion Ledger was obviously proud of their vaccination rates, and many around the country want to follow their model and remove vaccine choice from parents and families.

Lindey Magee, however, does not think Mississippi should be so proud of their vaccination rates, given the fact that Mississippi ranks last in the U.S. with the highest infant mortality rates, and very low scores in other key health figures for children:

To be clear, ranking as the most highly vaccinated state is NOT something to be proud of.

More educated states are seeing more and more parents opt out of some of the 49 doses of vaccines administered to our children before kindergarten. Ranking first in vaccination compliance only indicates that Mississippi families are being exploited for its reputation of ignorance and lack of education.It is an embarrassment, not a badge of honor.

As citizens of this state, it is time we take notice of our state’s archaic vaccine law. As it is now, the state of Mississippi requires children first be vaccine-injured before a parent can begin the uphill, long battle to secure said injured child from further damage. That is barbaric! Meanwhile, forty-eight other healthier states provide religious and/or philosophical vaccine waivers.

While we have the highest vaccination rates, Mississippi also has the highest infant mortality rate in the U.S. Keep in mind that the U.S. is the most highly vaccinated country in the world; now consider that as a nation, our infant mortality rate falls below 27 other wealthy countries-some of which do not even mandate vaccines at all!

Mississippi has the most highly vaccinated pediatric population IN THE WORLD!

Why then are we the LEAST healthy?

Yes, poverty and crap food, etc. plays a part, but too many vaccines too soon cannot be ignored.

I implore those who buy into this “vaccines must be mandated” notion that uses seriously dangerous diseases like polio and smallpox to sell 30+ doses of vaccines to all babies by six months to reexamine the topic. I was born in 1979 and received 10 doses of vaccines by high school. Where will it end? Mandated medicine is a slippery slope and is affecting a generation of over-vaccinated children!



Learn more at: Mississippi Parents for Vaccine Rights


TLB recommends you visit HEALTH IMPACT NEWS for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article here:


15 Of The Best Quotes and Statements On Why Chemotherapy and Conventional Cancer Treatment Kills People

By: Dave Mihalovic

The cancer industry tells us some of the most magnificent lies about the safety of toxic chemotherapy treatments and long-term survival rates related to the poisonous practice. Few doctors and scientists will put their reputations on the line to expose this fraudulent source of disease called a treatment. We will one day look back on the practice of “cut, burn or poisoning” cancer as perhaps the most barbaric and one of the largest failures of mainstream medicine. We’ve been warned, but the message is still not getting through.


First some convincing facts from decades past on the corruption of conventional cancer treatment (“from Reclaiming Our Health: Exploding the Medical Myth and Embracing the Source of True Healing by John Robbins):

  • “Percentage of cancer patients whose lives are predictably saved by chemotherapy – 3%
  • Conclusive evidence (majority of cancers) that chemotherapy has any positive influence on survival or quality of life – none.
  • Percentage of oncologists who said if they had cancer they would not participate in chemotherapy trials due to its “ineffectiveness and its unacceptable toxicity” – 75%
  • Percentage of people with cancer in the U.S. who receive chemotherapy – 75%.
  • Company that accounts for nearly half of the chemotherapy sales in the world – Bristol-Meyers Squibb.
  • Chairman of the board of Bristol-Meyers – Richard L. Gelb.
  • Mr. Gelb’s other job: vice chairman, board of overseers, board of managers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, World’s largest private cancer treatment and research center.
  • Chairman, Memorial Sloan-Kettering’s board of overseers, board of managers – John S. Reed.
  • Reed’s other job – director, Philip Morris (tobacco company).
  • Director, Ivax, Inc., a prominent chemotherapy company – Samuel Broder.
  • Broder’s other job (until 1995) – executive director, National Cancer Institute.
  • radiation-induced secondary cancers have exploded in the last two decades due to radiation treatment
  • 90% of chemotherapy patients die 10-15 years after treatment and the causes is never attributed to treatment
  • patients who undergo chemo are 14 times more likely to develop leukemia and 6 times more likely to develop cancer of the bones, joints, and soft tissues than those patients who do not undergo chemotherapy
  • chemotherapy drugs directly damage DNA
  • chemotherapy boosts cancer growth
  • 68% increase in chemo drugs since 2003
  • 75% increase in cancer projected by 2030

15 of the Most Notable Quotes and Statements on Conventional Cancer Treatment

1) “He said, “I’m giving cancer patients over here at this major cancer clinic drugs that are killing them, and I can’t stop it because they say the protocol’s what’s important.” And I say, “But the patient’s not doing well.” They say, “The protocol’s what’s important, not the patient.” And he said, “You can’t believe what goes on in the name of medicine and science in this country.”
(Gary Null)

2) “According to medical associations, the notorious and dangerous side effects of drugs have become the fourth main cause of death after infarction, cancer, and apoplexy”
(Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998)

3)97 percent of the time chemotherapy does not work. So why is it still used? There’s one reason and one reason only…money.”
(Peter Glidden, N.D)

4) “We have a multi-billion dollar industry that is killing people, right and left, just for financial gain. Their idea of research is to see whether two doses of this poison is better than three doses of that poison.”
(Glen Warner, M.D. oncologist)

5) “My clinical experience is that in America, when people die from cancer, they are NOT actually dying from cancer, but instead, they are dying from the medical TREATMENT itself. They are dying from the chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. AGAIN: They are NOT dying from the cancer–they are being killed by the medical doctors and their medical treatment!”
(Richard Shulze, N.D., M.H.)

6)“In the end there is no proof that chemotherapy in the vast majority of cases actually extends life.” “The great success stories of chemotherapy were always in relatively obscure types of cancer. Childhood leukemia constitutes less than two percent of all cancers and many of chemotherapy’s other successes were in diseases so rare that many clinicians had never even seen a single case (Burkitt’s lymphoma, choriocarcinoma, etc.)”
(Dr Ralph Moss, Ph.D.)

7) “Many oncologists recommend chemotherapy for almost any type of cancer, with a faith that is unshaken by the almost constant failures”.
(Albert Braverman, MD, “Medical Oncology in the 90s”, Lancet, 1991, Vol. 337, p. 901)

8) Since the 1950s, evidence has steadily accumulated that surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are far less effective than the public is being led to believe. Investigative journalist Daniel Greenberg, writing in the Columbia Journalism Review in 1975, produced the first widely reported expose showing that cancer survival rates since the 1950s had not progressed, and that improvements from 1930 to 1950 were mainly a consequence of improved hospital nursing care and support systems. Greenberg found that even the valid improvements were very, very small, and that there had been no significant advancements in treating any of the major forms of cancer.
(When Healing Becomes a Crime –Kenny Ausubel, 2001)

9) “If you can shrink the tumour 50% or more for 28 days you have got the FDA’s definition of an active drug. That is called a response rate, so you have a response..(but) when you look to see if there is any life prolongation from taking this treatment what you find is all kinds of hocus pocus and song and dance about the disease free survival, and this and that. In the end there is no proof that chemotherapy in the vast majority of cases actually extends life, and this is the GREAT LIE about chemotherapy, that somehow there is a correlation between shrinking a tumour and extending the life of the patient.”
(Dr Ralph Moss, Ph.D)

10) “The majority of the cancer patients in this country die because of chemotherapy, which does not cure breast, colon or lung cancer. This has been documented for over a decade and nevertheless doctors still utilize chemotherapy to fight these tumors.”
(Allen Levin, MD, UCSF, “The Healing of Cancer”, Marcus Books, 1990).

11) “As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incromprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good.”
(Alan Nixon, Ph.D., Past President, American Chemical Society)

12) “If I were to contract cancer, I would never turn to a certain standard for the therapy of this disease. Cancer patients who stay away from these centers have some chance to make it.”
(Prof. Gorge Mathe, “Scientific Medicine Stymied”, Medicines Nouvelles, Paris, 1989)

13) “After all, and for the overwhelming majority of the cases, there is no proof whatsoever that chemotherapy prolongs survival expectations. And this is the great lie about this therapy, that there is a correlation between the reduction of cancer and the extension of the life of the patient”.
(Philip Day, “Cancer: Why we’re still dying to know the truth”, Credence Publications, 2000)

14) “The majority of publications equate the effect of chemotherapy with (tumor) response, irrespective of survival. Many oncologists take it for granted that response to therapy prolongs survival, an opinion which is based on a fallacy and which is not supported by clinical studies. To date there is no clear evidence that the treated patients, as a whole, benefit from chemotherapy as to their quality of life.”
(Dr. Ulrich Abel.1990)

15) “Doctor Ulrich Able, a German epidemiologist of the Heidelberg Mannheim Tumor Clinic, has exhaustively analyzed and reviewed all the main studies and clinical experiments ever performed on chemotherapy…Able discovered that the comprehensive world rate of positive outcomes because of chemotherapy was frightening, because, simply, nowhere was scientific evidence available demonstrating that chemotherapy is able to ‘prolong in any appreciable way the life of patients affected by the most common type of organ cancer.’ Able highlights that rarely can chemotherapy improve the quality of life, and he describes it as a scientific squalor while maintaining that at least 80 per cent of chemotherapy administered in the world is worthless. Even if there is no scientific proof whatsoever that chemotherapy works, neither doctors nor patients are prepared to give it up.
(Lancet, Aug. 10, 1991).

Related articles:

-The Man Who Defied Odds, Turned Down Chemotherapy and Drugs and Outlived All His Doctors

- 97 Percent of The Time, Chemotherapy Does Not Work And Continues To Be Used Only For One Reason

- The Latest Lie From The Cancer Industry: ‘Don’t Worry About Chemotherapy During Pregnancy, It’s Perfectly Safe’

- Naturopathic Doctor Uses Nutrition To Cure 8-Year Old of Cancer After Surgery, Chemotherapy and Radiation Failed


TLB recommends you visit Prevent Disease for more great/pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here:

Vaccine pollBy: Roger Landry (TLB)

I’m not sure how far this has spread or how pertinent it is to many people. But since it is the first TLB has heard or seen of it, we feel it pertinent that we make it available to you …

Ever had a day when everything you do and say, seems wrong?

Where everything you try to communicate … blows up in your face?

Where even what you strongly believe to be true, suddenly becomes false?

Well this seems to be the case in a huge fashion for this Pro Vaccine blogger! His rhetoric is in line with the false paradigm spouted by so many ignorant or bought vaccine shills or trolls. His short article is pretty well written (if a bit crass) even if based totally on lies and misconceptions (check out the active links). But the responses he gets in his comments, and his expected results of the article, are I’m sure, totally different than he counted on!

So what is the big hoopla …

This is a ProVax blog running an active (still ongoing) poll.

Now I’m about to do something I never thought I would do … Ask you to visit this site and take this poll. I ask you to participate in this poll because this is the only way you can see the results. And I will state with NO RESERVATIONS you really do want to see the results of this poll !!!

This has almost (sorta, maybe) been enough to make me feel sorry for this individual … again almost!

When you have finished with the poll please take the time to read through the comments as they are almost as entertaining as the results of the poll itself. In the comments this individual comes across as crass, disrespectful and arrogant beyond belief, when by all rights, with his stated stance on vaccines, he is both ignorant of even the most basic of facts and any type of social interaction.

But I digress … So here is the link, and please comment below (both here and on the site you visit) on your thoughts. Lets see if TLB can handle them with slightly more decorum and respect and Certainly a lot less Hostility!

UPDATE: This poll has stood for days with the scenario going like this, approximately 83 – 85% stating “No I wont get a flu shot it is dangerous” and the other approximately 15% spread out over the remaining choices. This is what prompted me to write this article in the first place (I watched it over a 2 day period). But almost immediately after I published this article I looked in to see a very rapid shift had begun in what seemed like a dead poll (read the authors comment history on the site to see this). In less than 2 hours the numbers have shifted to about 56% (and dropping very rapidly) saying “No” and the “Absolutely” selection is ramping up (just as quickly) … all of a sudden … after no substantial shift for days …  and I can literally watch this happening in real time at high speed. Poll numbers don’t normally shift this fast … REALLY ??? I will make no concrete accusations (because I cannot prove them) but there is a smell of something rotten drifting in from Denmark!

Maybe we need to make our votes count …

Please go here: Did you get your flu vaccination?–2014 version


Roundup is found in 75% of air and water samples.  Many farmers drench crops with Roundup right before harvest. About 100 million pounds are applied to U.S. farms and lawns every year, according to the EPA.

Monsanto claims that Roundup is totally safe, and can be dumped on everything without problem.

Is it true?

In reality, Roundup is linked to a number of diseases. And the ingredients in Roundup are deadly to human cells.

A study from the Journal of Organic Systems includes the following 12 charts which show the correlation between Roundup (technically known as “glyphosate”) and disease:

 (click on charts to enlarge)

























Read article here:

TLB recommends you read more great pertinent articles here:



HPV Vaccine 1

Preface by: Roger Landry (TLB)

It seems more so every day that our struggle to keep our loved ones, especially our children, safe from medical harm is a losing battle. It also would appear that those who are tasked specifically with our protection, are a main player in this struggle … and NOT to our advantage. Medicines and Vaccines with a proven history of dangerous and even deadly side affects are approved and in some cases mandated for use, regardless of their proven dark history.

The HPV vaccines must surely appear high on this list. With a known history of results ranging from paralysis to death, and a growing mountain of research blatantly indicating their lack of effectiveness … why are these dangerous and ineffective vaccines still in use, and in the process of expanded use to young boys and even infants?

When profit drives a corrupt corporation to put us in harms way via mechanisms of known harm, we can chalk this up to greed. But when Government agencies mandated with the public’s safety show blatant complicity, well you must conclude the deck is seriously stacked against us.

Isn’t the CDC’s motto “24/7: Saving Lives, Protecting People”? With the plethora of peer reviewed proof of the dangers associated with vaccines, and in this specific case, the HPV vaccine, can you possibly find a bigger misrepresentation of the truth (lie)?

It is well past time to join our voices in unified protest and once and for all, put a stop to this needless suffering and death! These are our loved ones and our children … this does not have to be!

As usual I follow my rant with the level headed reporting of one of TLB’s most prolific and gifted writers who will bring the facts to you as only she can.

Please read on …


HPV Vaccines Proven to Be Dangerous and Ineffective, So Why Are They Still Being Recommended For Our Children?

By: TLB Staff Writer: Christina England

In 2008, Judicial Watch examined the FDA’s HPV vaccine records and issued a report outlining their concerns. Their report titled the Judicial Watch Special Report: Examining the FDA’s HPV Vaccine Records, detailed the approval process, side effects, safety concerns and the marketing practices of a what they called a large-scale public health experiment.

Judicial Watch stated:

“Analysis of the records shows:

• Gardasil is a prophylactic, preventative vaccine and will not treat pre-existing HPV infection. It is not a cancer vaccine or cure.

• Gardasil is marketed as a vaccine that prevents cancer, but it “ . . . has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity or genotoxicity.”

• Gardasil is not 100% effective against all HPVs. It is designed to protect against only four strains of HPV, even though there are over thirty strains including at least fifteen that can cause cancer.

• While Gardasil is the most expensive vaccine ever to be recommended by the FDA, its long-term effectiveness is unknown and could be as brief as only two to three years.

• During testing, an aluminum-containing placebo was used. Aluminum can cause permanent cell damage and is a reactive placebo, unlike most standard saline placebos. This means that tests of Gardasil may not have given an accurate picture of safety levels.

• Although some states are considering making it mandatory for young girls to get the Gardasil vaccine, it has only been tested with one other vaccine commonly given to children. There are ten commonly administered adolescent vaccines.

• Gardasil is still in the testing stages, and will not be fully evaluated for safety until September 2009. VAERS reports show that as many as eighteen people have died after receiving Gardasil.”

Their report, which was extremely worrying, highlighted several cases from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) website, including young women who developed warts, Guillian-Barre Syndrome, miscarriages and fatal blood clots after receiving the vaccine.

Judicial Watch stated:

“The fact that blood clotting is responsible for almost a fourth of all deaths involving Gardasil is extremely concerning, especially since most birth control drugs increase one’s risk of developing blood clots. Many girls and young women who receive Gardasil will already be taking birth control by the time they are vaccinated, and therefore the possibility that Gardasil may add to risk of blood clots is a serious issue that deserves attention.”

Their report indicated that there was no evidence to confirm whether or not the HPV vaccine could protect women against cervical cancer in the long-term and stated:

“There is proof that Gardasil will prevent about half of the high-grade precursors of cancer, but half will still occur. Hundreds of thousands of women who are vaccinated with Gardasil and get yearly Pap testing will still get high-grade dysplasia (cell abnormalities). Gardasil has been shown to prevent precancerous lesions, but it has been impossible to ascertain whether it will actually prevent cancer because the testing period has been so short. While young women occasionally get cervical cancer, it is far more common in women in their late forties. The average age of a cervical cancer patient is forty-eight years. Keeping this in mind, it could easily be decades before anyone truly knows if the Gardasil vaccine prevents cervical cancer.”

They continued:

“Even without Gardasil, cervical cancer deaths have decreased drastically in the past several decades. The American Cancer Society estimates that deaths from cervical cancer declined 74% between 1955 and 1992, and that the rate continues to decrease by about 4% each year. Also, most cases occur in women in their forties. With these statistics in mind, one might ask whether Gardasil vaccination is absolutely necessary, especially for children. At this point in time, we do not know if it will prevent cancer, or whether it will have unforeseen consequences. The American public must ask themselves if Gardasil is really worth the risk. Fast-tracking drugs and vaccines before their safety has been fully evaluated is unethical and dangerous, and until more tests have been completed on Gardasil no vaccination mandates should be established.”

And they concluded that:

“Gardasil has not been tested thoroughly enough to know whether it will be safe or effective in the long term.

• Even if it shown that the Gardasil vaccine is effective, it is still unknown how long the vaccine lasts or if there will be a need for booster shots.

• Regardless of its potential to help prevent HPV and cancer, Gardasil should never be administered without a prescreening for HPV since it has the potential to make existing cases worsen.

• It is important that people remember that this vaccine will not eliminate the need for regular Pap screening. No vaccine is 100% effective, and Gardasil is designed to protect against only four strands of HPV.

• While Gardasil may be an important medical advance, it is unwise to compromise the health and safety of the American public, especially children, by mandating or marketing it before sufficient tests are concluded.”

Despite their report being issued six years ago, HPV vaccines have continued to be marketed around the world, with devastating consequences.

Using Placebos Containing Aluminum Could Result in False Positives

As highlighted in the above report, HPV vaccines were tested against subjects vaccinated with a placebo containing aluminum, meaning that both of the vaccines contained aluminum, this giving a false positive if both groups suffered the same adverse reactions.

It has been well-documented that aluminum used in vaccinations can lead to a wide range of side effects and many people are now questioning the reasons behind the manufacturer’s decision.

Canadian scientists Professor Christopher Shaw and Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic have studied the effects that aluminum can have on the human body for many years. In 2013, they published a paper titled Aluminum in the Central Nervous System: Toxicity in Humans and Animals, Vaccine Adjuvants, and Autoimmunity.

Their paper revealed that during a 17-year period, the rates of autism increased significantly in countries that had the most vaccinations containing the adjuvant aluminum.

The two scientists compared the number of vaccines recommend by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the period from 1991 – 2008 and noted the changes in the autism rates during these years. They stated:

“The data sets, graphed against each other, show a pronounced and statistically highly significant correlation between the number vaccines with aluminum and the changes in autism rates. Further data showed that a significant correlation exists between the amounts of aluminum given to preschool children and the current rates of autism in seven Western countries. Those countries with the highest level of aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines had the highest autism rates.”

They continued:

“There are other links between aluminum exposure/toxicity and ASD. These include the following: A pilot study showed higher than normal aluminum levels in the hair, blood and/or urine of autistic children; children are regularly exposed to higher levels of aluminum in vaccines per body weight than adults; practically, nothing is known about the pharmacokinetics and toxicodynamics of aluminum in vaccines in children; and aluminum in vaccines has been linked to serious neurological impairments, chronic fatigue and autoimmunity.”

This is extremely worrying, especially when you consider that all of the following vaccinations contain aluminum, as listed by the CDC:

BCG (Tuberculosis)
DTaP (acellular Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis)
DtaP-IPV (acellular Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis and Polio)
DtaP-HepB—IPV (acellular Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Hepatitis B and Polio)
DtaP-IPV/Hib (acellular Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Polio and haemophilus influenzae type b )
Hepatitis B
DPT (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus)
Hib (haemophilus influenzae type b)
Hib/Hepatitis B
Hepatitis A
Hepatitis A/Hepatitis B
Japanese Encephalitis
PCV (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine)
IPV (polio vaccination)
HPV (human papillomavirus)
Td (Tetanus, Diphtheria)
Tdap (acellular tetanus, diphtheria)

If the manufacturers of the above vaccinations also used placebos containing aluminum, this could mean that none of these vaccinations have ever been tested accurately.

Leslie Botha Outlines Adverse Reactions Caused by HPV Vaccines

In 2013, women’s health educator Leslie C. Botha noted that the following adverse reactions had been reported to the VAERS website following HPV vaccination:

Deaths: 140
Disabled: 952
Did not recover: 6,032
Abnormal pap smear: 531
Cervical dysplasia: 214
Cervical cancer: 64
Life-threatening: 562
ER visit: 10,557
Hospitalized: 3,065
Extended hospital stay: 234
Serious: 4,091
Adverse events: 30,352

She wrote:

“It is estimated that only 1 to 10% of the HPV vaccine-injured are reporting. So start adding zeros on to the reports of 140 deaths. And then ask yourself – are the HPV vaccines deadly? For 140 families they are. And that’s just what is being reported.”

Considering that these figures are now over a year old, we can only begin to estimate how many innocent lives have been lost since then and destroyed by this vaccine.

Japan Becomes Concerned

A report written by Tomomi Kinoshita, Ryu-ta Abe, Akiyo Hineno, Kazuhiro Tsunekawa, Shunya Nakane and Shu-ichi Ikeda titled Peripheral Sympathetic Nerve Dysfunction in Adolescent Japanese Girls Following Immunization with the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine, published in 2014, examined the cases of 44 girls who were said to be suffering adverse reactions after receiving the HPV vaccine.
They stated that 31 of the girls were vaccinated with the Cervarix vaccine and 13 were vaccinated with Gardasil.

The authors stated that four of the girls examined were proven to be suffering from non-related conditions, leaving 40 girls aged between 11 and 17 in the study.

The researchers stated:

“Clinical manifestations of the 40 girls included headaches (n=28, 70%), general fatigue (n=21, 53%), coldness of the legs (n=21, 53%), limb pain (n=20, 50%), limb weakness (n=19, 48%), difficulty in getting up (n=19, 48%), orthostatic fainting (n=17, 43%), a decreased ability to learn (n=17, 43%), arthralgia (n=17, 43%), limb tremors (n=16, 40%), gait disturbances (n=16, 40%), disturbed menstruation (n=14, 35%) and dizziness (n=12, 30%). Headaches and general fatigue were more prominent in the morning, frequently leading to difficulty in getting up, while persistent fatigue required a long period of sleep. The most common combination of symptoms was limb coldness, pain, tremors and a gait disturbance. Less frequent but noteworthy complaints included the following: polyarthralgia, primarily involving the wrist, knee and ankle joints, that lasted for several days and subsided spontaneously, although it occasionally recurred; menstrual abnormalities, including amenorrhea for a few months after immunization; a decreased ability to learn associated with reduced memory and concentration at school and/or while doing homework, thus resulting in a poor school record.”
The team concluded that the symptoms that they had observed in the study could be explained by abnormal peripheral sympathetic responses and stated that the most common previous diagnosis in the studied girls was psychosomatic disease.

A large number of the side effects that these scientists identified have been echoed by professionals worldwide for many years, in particular menstrual abnormalities and amenorrhea.

Showing their commitment to protecting women, Japan held an international symposium in February 2014 and invited leading professionals from around the world to discuss their findings. The following professionals presented evidence outlining their findings regarding HPV vaccines, during the symposium, two public press conferences and a government-sponsored public hearing:

  • Sin Hang Lee, MD – Former Associate Professor at Yale University and currently pathologist of Milford Hospital
  • Jerome Authier, MD – Universite Paris XII, Systeme Hospital Henri Mondor de Paris
  • Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD – University of British Columbia
  • Mirna Hajjar, MD – Neurologist, Bangor, ME

See SaneVax for more information on this topic and much more regarding HPV vaccinations and their dangers,

Professionals Link HPV Vaccines To Premature Menopause

In 2012, the British Medical Journal published a paper by Dr. Deidrie Little titled Premature Ovarian Failure 3  Years After Menarche in a 16 Year-Old Girl Following Human Papillomavirus Vaccination, in which Dr. Little detailed the case of a sixteen year-old girl suffering from premature menopause after receiving the HPV vaccine Gardasil. The summary of the paper stated:

“Premature ovarian failure in a well adolescent is a rare event. Its occurrence raises important questions about causation, which may signal other systemic concerns. This patient presented with amenorrhoea after identifying a change from her regular cycle to irregular and scant periods following vaccinations against human papillomavirus. She declined the oral contraceptives initially prescribed for amenorrhoea. The diagnostic tasks were to determine the reason for her secondary amenorrhoea and then to investigate for possible causes of the premature ovarian failure identified.

Although the cause is unknown in 90% of cases, the remaining chief identifiable causes of this condition were excluded. Premature ovarian failure was then notified as a possible adverse event following this vaccination. The young woman was counselled regarding preservation of bone density, reproductive implications and relevant follow-up. This event could hold potential implications for population health and prompts further inquiry.”

As the BMJ charges a fee to read their articles, interested readers can find a report about the case on the Weekly Briefing of the Population Research Institute’s website. The report stated that Dr. Little said that before the sixteen year-old received the vaccine Gardasil during the fall of 2008, her menstrual cycle was perfectly normal. However, by January 2009, her cycle had become irregular, and over the course of the next two years, her menses (bleeds) had become increasingly irregular. By 2011, she had ceased menstruating altogether.

The Weekly Briefing stated:

“In the Australian case, after testing the levels of numerous hormones, and the function of various internal organs, the girl was diagnosed by Dr. Little as having “premature ovarian failure”, which is defined as “the presence of menopausal gonadotrophin levels in association with over 3 months of amenorrhoea or oligomenorrhoea before age 40 years.”

Further testing confirmed that all of her eggs—every last one—were dead. She was and is totally and irrevocably infertile.”

The Weekly Briefing article has since been removed, but a complete copy of the article can be found on several websites, including Population Research Institute.

In 2013, scientists, Serena Colafrancesco, Carlo Perricone, Lucija Tomljenovic, and Yehuda Shoenfeld wrote a paper titled Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine and Primary Ovarian Failure: Another Facet of the Autoimmune/Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants.

The scientists studied the medical history of three young women who presented with ovarian failure after receiving the HPV vaccination. They stated that:

“All three patients developed secondary amenorrhea following HPV vaccinations, which did not resolve upon treatment with hormone replacement therapies. In all three cases sexual development was normal and genetic screen revealed no pertinent abnormalities (i.e., Turner’s syndrome, Fragile X test were all negative). Serological evaluations showed low levels of estradiol and increased FSH and LH and in two cases, specific auto-antibodies were detected (antiovarian and anti thyroid), suggesting that the HPV vaccine triggered an autoimmune response. Pelvic ultra- sound did not reveal any abnormalities in any of the three cases. All three patients experienced a range of common non-specific post-vaccine symptoms including nausea, headache, sleep disturbances, arthralgia and a range of cognitive and psychiatric disturbances. According to these clinical features, a diagnosis of primary ovarian failure (POF) was determined which also fulfilled the required criteria for the ASIA syndrome.”

It is interesting to note that the post-vaccination symptoms mentioned in this study are exactly the same adverse reactions that Judicial Watch highlighted in their review in 2008.


Professionals have been voicing their concerns regarding the safety of the HPV vaccinations for the past six years. Despite their growing unease, these vaccinations are still being recommended worldwide today. Growing increasingly concerned about the safety of HPV vaccinations, this year Japan took the leading role in the protection of young women and withdrew government recommendation for the administration of the vaccine.

Isn’t it about time other governments joined Japan and investigated these vaccines further, instead of allowing more and more injuries to occur every day? After all, they owe our children that much, surely?

If it were not for organizations like the CMSRI who fund and support many of the above scientists, helping them to carry out such important work, then the public would remain unaware of the truth surrounding the dangers of vaccinations.



Christina England’s work is supported by CMSRI.

TLB asks that you to please visit this site for some outstanding/pertinent information. Be a part of something great … (Click on image to visit site)




By: Sylvia Booth Hubbard

A Johns Hopkins scientist has issued a blistering report on influenza vaccines in the British Medical Journal (BMJ). Peter Doshi, Ph.D., charges that although the vaccines are being pushed on the public in unprecedented numbers, they are less effective and cause more side effects than alleged by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Further, says Doshi, the studies that underlie the CDC’s policy of encouraging most people to get a yearly flu shot are often low quality studies that do not substantiate the official claims.

Promoting influenza vaccines is one of the most visible and aggressive public health policies in the United States, says Doshi of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Drug companies and public officials press for widespread vaccination each fall, offering vaccinations in drugstores and supermarkets. The results have been phenomenal. Only 20 years ago, 32 million doses of influenza vaccine were available in the United States on an annual basis. Today, the total has skyrocketed to 135 million doses.

“The vaccine may be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and the threat of influenza seems to be overstated,” Doshi says. Mandatory vaccination polices have been enacted, often in healthcare facilities, forcing some people to take the vaccine under threat of losing their jobs.

The main assertion of the CDC that fuels the push for flu vaccines each year is that influenza comes with a risk of serious complications which can cause death, especially in senior citizens and those suffering from chronic illnesses. That’s not the case, said Doshi.

When read carefully, the CDC acknowledges that studies finding any perceived reduction in death rates may be due to the “healthy-user effect” — the tendency for healthier people to be vaccinated more than less-healthy people. The only randomized trial of influenza vaccine in older people found no decrease in deaths. “This means that influenza vaccines are approved for use in older people despite any clinical trials demonstrating a reduction in serious outcomes,” says Doshi.

Even when the vaccine is closely matched to the type of influenza that’s prevalent, which doesn’t happen every year, randomized, controlled trials of healthy adults found that vaccinating between 33 and 100 people resulted in one less case of influenza. In addition, says Doshi, no evidence exists to show that this reduction in the risk of influenza for a specific population — here in the United States, among healthy adults, for example — extrapolates into any reduced risk of serious complications from influenza, such as hospitalizations or deaths, among seniors.

“For most people, and possibly most doctors, officials need only claim that vaccines save lives, and it is assumed there must be solid research behind it,” says Doshi. Unfortunately, that’s not the case, he says.

Although the CDC  implies that flu vaccines are safe and there’s no need to weigh benefits against risk, Doshi disagrees. He points to an Australian study that found one in every 110 children under the age of five had convulsions following vaccinations in 2009 for H1N1 influenza. Additional investigations found that the H1N1 vaccine was also associated with a spike in cases of narcolepsy among adolescents.

Doshi’s concerns echo those of Dr. Russell Blaylock, a neurosurgeon and author of “The Blaylock Wellness Report” who has deep concerns over the safety and efficacy of the flu vaccine.

Not only is the vaccine not safe, Dr. Blaylock tells Newsmax Health, it doesn’t even work. “The vaccine is completely worthless, and the government knows it,” he says. “There are three reasons the government tells the elderly why they should get flu shots: secondary pneumonia, hospitalization, and death. Yet a study by the Cochrane group studied hundreds of thousands of people and found it offered zero protection for those three things in the general community. It offered people in nursing homes some immunity against the flu — at best one-third — but that was only if they picked the right vaccine.”

A study released in February found that the flu shot was only 9 percent effective in protecting seniors against the 2012-2013 season’s most virulent influenza bug.

What’s even worse is that small children who are given the flu vaccine get no protection from the disease. “The government also says that every baby over the age of six months should have a vaccine, and they know it contains a dose of mercury that is toxic to the brain,” says Dr. Blaylock. “They also know the studies have shown that the flu vaccine has zero — zero — effectiveness in children under five.”

For most people, says Dr. Blaylock, flu vaccines don’t prevent the flu but actually increase the odds of getting it. The mercury contained in vaccines is such a strong immune depressant that a flu shot suppresses immunity for several weeks. “This makes people highly susceptible to catching the flu,” he says. “They may even think the vaccine gave them the flu, but that’s not true — it depressed their immune system and then they caught the flu.

”Mercury overstimulates the brain for several years”, says Dr. Blaylock, and that activation is the cause of Alzheimer’s and other degenerative diseases. One study found that those who get the flu vaccine for three to five years increase their risk of Alzheimer’s disease 10-fold.

Doshi asserts that influenza is a case of “disease mongering” in an effort to expand markets. He points to the fact that deaths from flu declined sharply during the middle of the 20th century, long before the huge vaccine campaigns that kicked off the 21st century.

Why do drug companies push the flu vaccine? “It’s all about money,” says Dr. Blaylock. “Vaccines are a pharmaceutical company’s dream. They have a product that both the government and the media will help them sell, and since vaccines are protected, they can’t be sued if anyone has a complication.”

Doshi’s article “is a breath of fresh air,” says Dr. Blaylock. “This article exposes in well-defined and articulate terms what has been known for a long time — the flu vaccine promotion is a fraud.

“Here’s the bottom line,” says Dr. Blaylock. “The vast number of people who get the flu vaccine aren’t going to get any benefit, but they get all of the risks and complications.”

TLB recommends you visit Real farmacy for more pertinent articles and information.


Tuesday, November 18, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

(NaturalNews) The total insanity of over-medication in America has reached a new low as Arizona State University has installed a prescription drug vending machine called InstyMeds.

American college students — who are already the most over-medicated population on the planet — now have an even easier way to pollute their brains with SSRI drugs, antidepressants, antipsychotics and prescription “speed” amphetamines which are routinely abused by students for final exam cram study sessions.

“School officials didn’t specify exactly what kind of drugs will be available in the machine, but said it would contain 50 medications that are most commonly prescribed to college students,” reports CBS News. [1]

“You know, the things that you’d like to have right now to feel better,” said InstyMeds Vice President Bob Bang, according to CBS News.

No doubt if cocaine were somehow patented by Glaxo Smith Kline, there would also be cocaine vending machines on college campuses by now, too, and marketed as a “performance booster” for students.

I don’t assign any particular blame to the InstyMeds machine company, by the way. The machine looks like a competent invention to bypass the usual inefficiencies found in most pharmacy operations. The real problem with medications in America is found across the culture, in the quack science corruption and criminality of the drug industry, the “give me a pill, doc!” patient mindset, and the “quick fix” mentality where people think they can pop a pill to solve a problem.

Check out the Instymeds website for information on their invention, which technically could be used to dispense all sorts of things that are far more useful for student health — such as vitamin D! Why don’t universities install nutritional products vending machines to actually support cognitive function and immune function among students?

Big Pharma to sweep through universities

Big Pharma has already infiltrated and dominated medical schools and “science” journals. Drug company interests also completely dominate the mainstream media and government health care decision makers. Now they’re going to get their hooks into college campuses all across the country where students can be trained to believe that life isn’t complete without a prescription medication in their hands.

These pharma drugs are so safe that students can be dosed with three, five or even ten at a time, we’re told. And yet the drugs are so dangerous that “the medication is secure in the 1,500-pound, ‘vault-like machines’ that have remote alarms in response to any tampering,” reports ABC. Wouldn’t want any students looting the machine and selling those drugs on their own, you see. That would be “drug dealing.”

When a student sells amphetamines to another student, that’s a felony crime, you see. But when a vending machine sells amphetamines to the same exact student by prescription, that’s called “evidence-based medicine.”

Arizona State University is the second university in America to install the prescription drug vending machine, and many more are in the works. Seriously, is “easier access to more meds” really the answer to student health?

“Serving the health-care needs of our students is still our highest priority,” remarked Allan Markus, director of ASU Health Services, when the campus closed its pharmacy. And yet, I’m willing to bet nobody at ASU Health Services ever bothered to tell students why they need to boost their intake of vitamin D.

In fact, if a vitamin vending machine were installed on campus, it would no doubt generate outrage and complaints from all the drug company reps and the doctors they routinely bribe to keep pushing their poisons onto students, pregnant women, babies and the elderly.

More information and links to this article:

corruption and criminality of the drug industry

* Instymeds website

*  the doctors they routinely bribe

Read article here:

TLB recommends you read more great/pertinent articles from NaturalNews




NEW YORK - MAY 29:  U.S. sailors march in the Little Neck/Dougla

Editor Comments

Need proof that the seasonal flu vaccine is not effective? Look no further than the CDC’s own publication admitting the fact: Influenza Outbreak in a Vaccinated Population.

Earlier this year (2014) the CDC published a report documenting an influenza outbreak which occurred among fully vaccinated navy personnel aboard the USS Ardent, a U.S. Navy minesweeper moored in San Diego, California while conducting training.

Surprisingly, the CDC admits this is a common occurrence:

The current U.S. Department of Defense influenza vaccination policy mandates that all uniformed personnel receive seasonal influenza vaccination, unless medically exempt, or face punishment under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The policy specifically directs all Navy operational units to be at least 90% vaccinated. However, despite vaccination measures, influenza outbreaks can still occur in highly vaccinated military populations.

In the references section of the study, they list two other studies that showed the exact same thing happened in the past, in 2001 and 2009:

  • Earhart KE, Beadle C, Miller LK, et al. Outbreak of influenza in highly vaccinated crew of U.S. Navy ship. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:463–5.
  • Cosby MT, Pimental G, Nevin RL, et al. Outbreak of H3N2 Influenza at a US Military Base in Djibouti during the H1N1 pandemic of 2009. PLoS One 2013;7:e82089.

What does this say about the rationale of mandatory flu vaccines for school children, or mandatory flu vaccines for healthcare workers in healthcare facilities?


Influenza Outbreak in a Vaccinated Population — USS Ardent, February 2014


TLB recommends you visit Health Impact News for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article and read comments here: