By: David-William | TLB Staff Writer
This project, The Liberty Beacon, isn’t just a webpage. It’s a mission to awaken the sleepy masses of people to see a variety of harm and wrongs done them, by a group of foreign corporations posing here as a government. They’re abusing, and harming the people. They’re no different from any evil slave ruler in the past.
The hard facts as presented here require serious, undivided attention. This Liberty Beacon is a place and a way to reveal what it’s members and it’s readers will all benefit from in a variety of important ways. The following material provided below is for freedom oriented people to use to correct their status. It’s the beginning, but most people have no idea of what to do because they spent a lifetime steeped in deceit.
Unfortunately, almost everything taught to people throughout their youth and beyond is garbage. UNITED STATES is outed. All people are to these marauders, are cannon fodder, slaves to squeeze, and spirits to harvest for their satanic sacrifices. They are the purveyors of debt and sin, which stands as their defiance of law. This is a most horrific of crimes against humanity. They are not happy living their lives, in peace, love, and harmony with God, Earth, and man, and the living creatures among us.
One can only use their thoughts as the prime fiducial. What else is there? One can imagine only within their mind, so how else could one imagine without? My flawed, simple being can barely get things right, except to dedicate the thoughts which spring forth to a direction for the good of man and our home, in sincere honesty and selflessness. What good is life alone? What good is live alone even while with others? It’s the threshold to departure. We are here to serve each other. Please take what’s provided to correct your status. You deserve freedom, for you and your loved ones.
One should engage in an exercise in ludicrous futility by believing things are set up for the best and for the benefit of the people. Redundantly explained, the status of U.S. citizen must be corrected. Those who criticize you are of no importance other than as a threat of enslavement or death or both. In the Supreme Court case, Bond vs. UNITED STATES, things are explained very clearly. U.S. has no sovereignty. They’re not just a bankrupt DEAD entity, they’re a continuing criminal enterprise, “appearing” as the mirror image of a valid form of government of the people, but it never was, nor could ever be. The Constitution of 1789 was nothing more than a bankruptcy document/association, so as to “form a more perfect union” from the Articles of Confederation.
“CONSTITUTOR, civil law. He who promised by a simple pact to pay the debt of another; and this is always a principal obligation.”
Who are the constitutors? Us? Yes? By choice? With full and complete disclosure? In lawful, valid contract?
For a contract to be valid, it must meet the following criteria:
* Mutual agreement – (see main article offer and acceptance): There must be an express or implied agreement. The essential requirement is that there be evidence that the parties had each from an objective perspective engaged in conduct manifesting their assent, and a contract will be formed when the parties have met such a requirement. For a contract based on offer and acceptance to be enforced, the terms must be capable of determination in a way that it is clear that the parties assent was given to the same terms. The terms, like the manifestation of assent itself, are determined objectively.
* Consideration: There must be consideration (see also consideration under English law) given by all the parties, meaning that every party is conferring a benefit on the other party or himself sustaining a recognizable detriment, such as a reduction of the party’s alternative courses of action where the party would otherwise be free to act with respect to the subject matter without any limitation.
* Competent, Adult (Sui Juris) Parties: Both parties must have the capacity to understand the terms of the contract they are entering into, and the consequences of the promises they make. For example, animals, minor children, and mentally disabled individuals do not have the capacity to form a contract, and any contracts with them will be considered void or voidable. Although corporations are technically legal fictions, they are considered persons under the law, and thus fit to engage in contracts.
For adults, most jurisdictions have statutes declaring that the capacity of parties to a contract is presumed, so that one resisting enforcement of a contract on grounds that a party lacked the capacity to be bound bears the burden of persuasion on the issue of capacity.
* Proper Subject Matter: The contract must have a lawful purpose. A contract to commit murder in exchange for money will not be enforced by the courts. It is void ab initio, meaning “from the beginning.”
* Mutual Right to Remedy: Both parties must have an equal right to remedy upon breach of the terms by the other party
* Mutual Obligation to Perform: Both Parties must have some obligation to fulfill to the other. This can be distinct from consideration, which may be an initial inducement into the contract.
Common Law is based on God’s Law
Contracts must be voluntary
Under the Common Law, every contract must be entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally by both parties or it is void and unenforceable. These are characteristics of a Common Law contract. There is another characteristic – it must be based on substance. For example, contracts used to read, For one dollar and other valuable considerations, I will paint your house, etc. That was a valid contract — the dollar was a genuine silver dollar. Now suppose you wrote a contract that said, For one Federal Reserve Note and other considerations, I will paint your house.. And suppose for example, I painted your house the wrong color. Could you go into a Common Law Court and get justice? NO, you could not. You see a Federal Reserve Note is a colorable dollar, as it has no substance, and in a Common Law jurisdiction, that contract would be unenforceable.
Colorable Money-Colorable Courts
The word colorable means something that appears to be genuine, but is not. Maybe it looks like a dollar, and maybe it spends like a dollar, but it if is not redeemable for lawful money (silver or gold) it is colorable. If a Federal Reserve Note is used in a contract, then the contract becomes a colorable contract. And colorable contracts must be enforced under a colorable jurisdiction. So by creating Federal Reserve Notes, the government had to create a jurisdiction to cover the kinds of contracts that use them. We now have what is called Statutory Jurisdiction, which is not a genuine Admiralty jurisdiction. It is a colorable Admiralty Jurisdiction the judges are enforcing because we are using colorable money. Colorable Admiralty is now known as Statutory Jurisdiction. Let’s see how we got under this Statutory Jurisdiction.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE 1-207, NOW 1-308
[My note — as of the 2003 edition of the UCC, paragraph 1-207 has been removed. They have attempted to take this recourse to Common Law justice away, demonstrating evil.]
When you use without prejudice Uniform Commercial Code 1-207 in connection with your signature, you are saying: I reserve my right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND INTENTIONALLY. And furthermore, I do not accept that liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
What is the compelled performance of an unrevealed commercial agreement? When you use Federal Reserve Notes instead of silver dollars is it voluntary? No. There is no lawful money, so you have to use Federal Reserve Notes — you have to accept the benefit. The government has given you the benefit to discharge your debts. How nice they are! But if you did not reserve your rights under 1-207.7, you are compelled to accept the benefit, and therefore obligated to obey every statue, ordinance, and regulation of the government, at all levels of government – federal, state and local.
If you understand this, you will be able to explain it to the judge when he asks. And he WILL ask, so be prepared to explain it to the Court. You will also need to understand Uniform Commercial Code 1-103 – the argument and the recourse. If you want to understand this fully, go to a law library and photo copy these two sections from the Uniform Commercial Code. It is important to get the Anderson’s edition. Some of the law libraries will only have the West Publishing version and it is very difficult to understand. In Anderson, it is broken down with decimals into ten parts and most importantly, it is written in plain English.
The Rothschild Influence
When America was founded, the Rothschilds were very unhappy because it was founded on the Common Law. The Common Law is based on substance, and this substance is mentioned in the Constitution as gold or silver. America is a Constitutional Republic — that is: a union of the States under the Constitution. When Congress was working for the Republic, the only thing it could borrow was gold or silver, and the Rothschild banks did not loan gold or silver. Naturally, they did not like this new government. The Rothschilds had a deal with the King of England. He would borrow paper and agree to repay in gold. But these united States, with their Constitution, were an obstacle to them, and it was much to be the Rothschild’s advantage to get the colonies back under the King. So the Rothschilds financed the War of 1812 to bring America back under England. Of course, that didn’t work, so they had to find another way.
The Flaw in the Constitution: Two Nations in One.
It was around the time of the American Civil War that they discovered a flaw in the Constitution. The flaw was Art. I, Sect. 3, Clause 17. Remember that there are two nations called United States. What is a nation? See if you would agree to this definition: Whenever you have a governing body, having a prescribed territory containing a body of people. [this is an easy to understand restatement of how it’s presented in Black’s Law Dictionary, btw] Is that a nation? Yes. We have a governing body in the Republic – the three branch government. There are the legislative, the executive and the judicial branches, with a constitution. There is a prescribed territory containing a body of people. This is a Constitutional Republic. But, Article I, Sect. 8, Clause 17 gave Congress which is the legislative branch of the three branch government, exclusive rule over a given territory known as the District of Columbia, containing a body of people. Here we have a nation within a nation. This is a legislative democracy within a Constitutional Republic.
When Congress was part of a Constitutional Republic, it had the obligation of providing a medium of exchange for us. Its duty was to coin gold and silver. Anyone who had a piece of gold or silver could bring it in and have it freely minted into coin. This was the medium of exchange for the Republic. But in the Legislative Democracy (over Washington District of Columbia) Congress is not limited by the Constitution. Congress has exclusive rule over the District of Columbia. The legislators can make the law by a majority vote — that makes it a democracy; they have the authority to have administrative agents to enforce their own law; and they have Courts in the legislative branch of the government, to try their own law. Here we have the legislature making the law, enforcing the law and trying the law, all within the one branch of government. This is a one branch government within a three branch government. Under the three branch government, the congress passes the law which has to be in harmony with the Constitution, the executive enforces the law passed by the congress, and the judiciary tries the law, pursuant to the Constitution.
THE THREE BRANCH CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC AND THE ONE BRANCH LEGISLATIVE DEMOCRACY are both called the United States. One is the federal United States, and the other is the continental united States. Are you a United States Citizen? If you say that you are a United States citizen, which United States are you referring to? Anyone who lives in the District of the Columbia is a United States citizen. The remaining population in the fifty states is the national citizenry of the nation. We are domiciled in various sovereign states, protected by the constitutions of those states from any direct rule of Congress over us. In the democracy, anyone who lives in those states known as Washington DC, Guam, Puerto Rico, or any of the other federally held territories is a citizen of the United States (District of Columbia.) We must be careful with our choice of words — we are not citizens of the United States. We are not subject to Congress. Congress has exclusive rule over a given territory, and we are not part of that territory.
In the Uniform Commercial Code, no-interest contracts are called unconscionable contracts. The section on unconscionable contracts covers more than forty pages in the Anderson Code. The federal United States has involved the states as the accommodation party to the federal debt, and I believe we could prove this to be an unconscionable contract. We should get some litigation into the Courts before the government declares a national emergency, claiming that this state has no lawful responsibility for the national debt (of the federal United States,) because it became an accommodation party to this debt through an unconscionable contract. If we have this litigation before the Courts under International Law when the nation is declared bankrupt, the creditors would have to settle this matter first, and it would delay them. They would want the new government to appear to be legitimate, so they could not just move right in and takeover the state, because it would be in an International Court. This is very important at this time.
Did you ever consent to having no real money, or no way to actually own property because all your energy is to be stolen, as usufruct to a slavemaster, not God? Of course not. Evil creeps called Jesuits pretending to be Christians are really crypto-fake jew Satanic, Talmudic Zionists, who will call you a domestic terrorist threat because you found out that THEY’RE the domestic/foreign terrorist threat. That’s why they HATE Christians. That’s why we have a foreign, MOSSAD terrorist organization here on our land called the Southern Poverty Law Center, creating terrorist lists of all those who know they’re the terrorists, and of course as already explained, they’re Zionist, Satanic Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorneys for the Rothschild Banks. They need to be shoveled out of their headquarters, and onto a barge, and sent off to CITY OF LONDON so they can poop where THEY eat instead of on us.
u·su·fruct–ˈyo͞ozəˌfrəkt,-sə-/Submit–noun ROMAN LAW
the right to enjoy the use and advantages of another’s property short of the destruction or waste of its substance.
“Wait a minute! Why am I a corporate entity of the UNITED STATES?
Basically, when my mother and father were married, they signed a marriage contract and received a marriage certificate or license (as did yours and everyone else’s parents, and as did you when and if you were married). If you still have yours, you should get it out and read it.
It states clearly that: The product of this union belongs to the UNITED STATES…
What does this mean, “a product of the UNITED STATES”?
It means that your children are the property of the UNITED STATES. It means that your parents, their parents, your children and your children’s children are or will be a vessel of commerce that is owned by the UNITED STATES corporation. You are an indentured corporate debt slave, who is assigned as collateral for the good faith and credit of the UNTITED STATES as soon as you are born.
And when you are born, you are assigned a corporate number. Actually, because the UNITED STATES commerce laws are in Maritime Law and UCC code, you are really birthed, very much like a ship at sea is birthed into a U.S. port and assigned a number of import. Your birth certificate is that contract. It is a contract that is assigned to you as the product of the union of your mother and father, and it indoctrinates you into the UNITED STATES as collateral and assigns you a trust account in which all of your credit and debt is assigned and allotted.”
Please visit webpage here:
KILLING YOUR STRAWMAN
AFFIDAVIT OF SOVEREIGNTY
Recording Requested by, | And when recorded return to: | ____________________________ | ____________________________ | ____________________________ | ____________________________
( Space above this line for recorder’s use only )
Affidavit of Sovereignty
Equality under the law is paramount, and mandatory by law.
I, _____________, a titled sovereign, hereby declare that:
I am competent to manage all my own affairs.
All other entities are incompetent to manage any of my affairs,
and are hereby fired. A sovereign cannot be tried in their own court.
Consistent with the eternal tradition of natural common law, unless I have harmed or violated someone, or their property, I have commited no crime; and am therefore not subject to any penalty.
Thus, be it known to all, in the nature of UCC 1-207, that I reserve my natural common law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability associated with the compelled and pretended “benefit”* of any hidden or unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
As such, the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedly create obligations to perform, for persons of subject status, are inapplicable to me, and are null and void. If I have participated in any of the supposed “benefits”* associated with these hidden contracts, I have done so under duress, for lack of any other practical alternative.
Any such participation does not constitute “acceptance” in contract law, because of the absence of full disclosure of any valid “offer,” and voluntary consent without misrepresentation or coercion, under contract law. Without a valid voluntary offer and acceptance, knowingly entered into by both parties, there is no “meeting of the minds,” and therefore no valid contract. Any supposed “contract” is therefore void, ab initio.
Typical examples of such compelled and pretended “benefits”* are: 1. Birth Certificate.
The fact that a birth certificate was granted to me by a local hospital or government agency when I entered this world, is irrelevant to my Sovereignty. No status, high or low, can be assigned to another person through a piece of paper, without the recipient’s full knowledge and consent. Therefore, such a piece of paper provides only hearsay date and place information only. It indicates nothing about jurisdiction, nothing about property ownership, nothing about rights, and nothing about subject status. The only documents that can have any legal meaning, as it concerns my status in society, are those which I have signed as an adult, with full knowledge and consent, free from misrepresentation or coercion of any kind. My birth certificates (warehouse receipts) have been redeemed (accepted for value) in a UCC-1 filing, signed on date ________________, received and recorded by ________________ State Department ________________ for the Secretary of State, on date ________________, Filing Number ________________ , and therefore none hold any claim to either my straw-man nor to my natural self.
2. The use of an identification number from a government agency.
The number normally assigned to persons of subject status, I use exceptionally, under duress, only because of the extreme inconvenience of operating without one in today’s marketplace, where it is requested by banks, employers, lenders, and many other government agencies and businesses. My reason for using it is not because I wish to participate in the system, as I don’t wish to participate. Let it be known that I use the number assigned to me for information only, if at all.
- The use of fiat currency to discharge my debts.
I have used these only because in this country, there is no other widely recognized currency.
- The use of a bank account, with my signature on the bank signature card.If there is any hidden contract behind the bank signature card, my signature thereon gives no validity to it. The signature is only for verification of identity. I can be obligated to fufill no hidden or unrevealed contract whatsoever, due to the absence of full disclosure and voluntary consent.Likewise, my use of the bank account thereof is due to the absence of a bank not associated with the central bank system. In general, people have been prevented from issuing their own currencies, and such prevention is in violation of the national constitution. Were there an alternative, I would be happy to use it. To not use any bank at all is impossible or very difficult, as everyone knows, in today’s marketplace.
- Past tax returns filed.Any tax returns I may have filed in the past, were filed due to the dishonest atmosphere of fear and intimidation created by the tax collector and the local assessors’ offices; not because there is any law requiring me to do so. Once I discovered the tax agencies are lying to the public, I have felt it is my responsible duty to society to terminate my voluntary participation. Because such returns were filed under Threat, Duress, and Coercion (TDC), and no two-way contract was ever signed with full disclosure, there is nothing in any past filing of returns that created any valid contract. Therefore, no legal obligation on my part was ever created.
- The use of a driver’s license.As a free Sovereign, there is no legal requirement for me to have such a license, for travelling in my car, as technically, the unrevealed legal purpose of driver’s licenses is commercial in nature. Since I don’t carry passengers or freight for hire, there is no law requiring me to have a license to travel for my own pleasure and that of my family and friends. However, because of the lack of education of police officers on this matter, should I be stopped for any reason and found to be without a license, it is likely I would be harrassed. Therefore under duress, I carry a “license” to avoid extreme inconvenience.
- State plates on my car.Similarly, even though technically, my car does not fit the legal definition of a “motor vehicle”, which is used for commercial purposes, nevertheless, I have registered it with the state and carry the state plates on it, because to have any other plates or no plates at all, causes me the risk of police officer harrassment and extreme inconvenience.
8. Declaration of citizenship.
Any document I may have ever signed, in which I answered “yes” to the question, “Are you a _______________________ citizen?” — cannot be used to compromise my status as a Sovereign, nor obligate me to perform in any manner. This is because without full written disclosure of the definition and consequences of such supposed “citizenship,” provided in a document bearing my signature given freely without misrepresentation or coercion, there can be no legally binding contract. I make no allegiance to any earthly government, I am neutral to all.
9. Past voter registration.
Similarly, since no obligation to perform in any manner was ever revealed in print, as part of the requirements for the supposed “privilege” to vote for government officials, any such previous registration on my part cannot be legal evidence of any obligation to perform. Likewise, I have granted NO jurisdiction over me, to any political office. It is my inherent right to vote on elections or issues that I feel affect all of society; NOT because I need anyone to rule over me. On the contrary — I have used the voting process only to instruct my public servants what a Citizen and Sovereign would like done.
The acquisition of a marriage license is now being revealed as being necessary only for slaves. The act of a Sovereign such as myself obtaining such a license, through social custom and ignorance of law, has no legal effect in changing my status. This is because any such change in status, if any may be supposed to occur, could happen only through a hidden and unrevealed contract or statute. Since no hidden, unrevealed, and undisclosed information, if it exists, can be lawfully held to binding, it is null and void.
11.Childen in public school.
The attendance of my children in government-supported “public” schools or government-controlled “private” schools does not create any legal tax obligation for me, or any other legal obligation, because I never signed a contract agreeing to such obligation for the supposed “privilege” of public school attendance.
If any of my children have attended government supported “public” or controlled “private” schools, such was done under duress and not out of free will. Be it known that I regard “compulsory state education” as a violation of the natural and universal common law of freedom of choice.
12.Use of semantics.
There are some immature people with mental imbalances, such as the craving to dominate over other people, who masquerade as “government.” Just because they alter definitions of words in the law books to their supposed advantage, doesn’t mean we have to accept those definitions. The fact that they define the words “person,” “address,” “mail,” “resident,” “motor vehicle,” “driving,” “passenger,” “employee,” “income,” and many others, in ways different from the common usage, so as to be associated with a subject or slave status, means nothing in real life.
Because the courts have become entangled in the game of semantics, be it known to all courts and all parties, that if I ever signed any document or spoke any words on record, using words defined by twists in the law books different from the common usage, there can be no effect whatsoever on my Sovereign status in society thereby, nor can there be created any obligation to perform in any manner, by the mere use of such words. Where the meaning in the common dictionary differs from the meaning in the law dictionary, it is the meaning in the common dictionary that prevails, because it is more trustworthy.
*Such compelled and supposed “benefits”* include, but are not limited to, the aforementioned typical examples. My use of such alleged “benefits”* is under duress only, and is with full reservation of all my common law rights. I have waived none of my intrinsic rights and freedoms by my use thereof. Furthermore, my use of such compelled “benifits” may be temporary, until better alternatives become available, practical, and widely recognized.
It is further relevant to this affidavit that any violation of my Rights, Freedom, or Property by the federal government, or any agent thereof, would be an illegal and unlawful excess, clearly outside the limited boundaries of federal jurisdiction. My understanding is that the jurisdiction of the U.S. federal government is defined by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution, quoted as follows:
“The Congress shall have the power . . . To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such a district (NOT EXCEEDING TEN MILES SQUARE) as may, by cession of particular states and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of Government of the United States, [District of Columbia] and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock yards and other needful Buildings; And — To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers . . .”
and Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2:
“The Congress shall have the Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any claims of the United States, or of any particular State.”
The definition of the “United States” being used here, then, is limited to its territories :
- The District of Columbia
- Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
- U.S. Virgin Islands
- American Samoa
- Northern Mariana Islands
- Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands
- Military bases within the 50 states
- Federal agencies within the 50 states(including U.S. Post Offices)
It does not include the 50 states themselves , as is confirmed by the following cites:
“We have in our political system a Government of the United States and a government of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own who owe it allegiance, and whose rights, within its jurisdiction, it must protect. The same person may be at the same time a citizen of the United States and a Citizen of a State, but his rights of citizenship under one of these governments will be different from those he has under the other.” — Slaughter House Cases United States vs. Cruikshank , 92 U.S. 542 (1875)
“THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IS A FOREIGN CORPORATION WITH RESPECT TO A STATE.” Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. Section 1785: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct.1973, 41 L.Ed.287.
This is further confirmed by the following quote from the Internal Revenue Service:
Federal jurisdiction “includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.” — Internal Revenue Code Section 312(e)
In legal terminology, the word “includes” means “is limited to” .
When referring to this “District” United States, the Internal Revenue Code uses the term “WITHIN” the United States. When referring to the 50 States, the Internal Revenue Code uses the term “WITHOUT” the United States.
Dozens, perhaps hundreds, of court cases prove that federal jurisdiction is limited to the few federal territory areas above indicated. For example, in two Supreme Court cases, it was decided:
“The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government,” — Caha v. United States , 152 U.S., at 215
“We think a proper examination of this subject will show that the United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in and to the territory, of which Alabama or any of the new States were formed,” — 44 U.S., at 221
“[B]ecause, the United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty, or eminent domain, within the limits of a State or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted,” — 44 U.S., at 223
“Alabama is therefore entitled to the sovereignty and jurisdiction over all the territory within her limits, subject to the common law,” — 44 U.S., at 228, 229; Pollard v. Hagan , 44 U.S. 221, 223, 228, 229
Likewise, Title 18 of the United States Code at section 7 specifies that the “territorial jurisdiction” of the United States extends only outside the boundaries of lands belonging to any of the 50 States.
Therefore, in addition to the fact that no unrevealed federal contract can obligate me to perform in any manner without my fully informed and uncoerced consent, likewise, no federal laws apply to me or have any jurisdiction over me. I hereby affirm that I do not reside or work in any federal territory of the District “United States”, and that therefore no U.S. federal government laws have any authority over me.
My use of the United States Postal Service to receive mail is under Threat, Duress and Coersion per Federal Law which asserts that this service must be used rather than private commercial delivery services, and the receipt of mail addressed with two letter capitalized federal zone abbreviations (e.g. “HI”) or numeric federal zone designations (Zip Codes, e.g. “96746”) does not place me in any federal zone nor federal jurisdiction, for despite repeated pleas to those who send mail to me, they have been brainwashed in compulsory state brainwashing centers (“Public Schools”) and insist on cannonicalizing the format of my mailing location into a federal zone format, and in fact this process has been embodied in most computer software making it impossible to receive necessary communications at my mailing location rather than at a federal zone “address”. This is further enforced under Threat, Duress and Coersion in that the local Postal Office refuses to deliver to “General Delivery” for longer than 30 days.
Thus, be it known to all, in the nature of UCC 1-207, that I reserve my natural common law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract of adhesion that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability associated with the compelled and pretended
“benefit”* of any hidden or unrevealed contract or commercial agreement, and specifically I refuse to be included in any federal zone.
As such, the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedly create obligations to perform, for persons of subject status, are inapplicable to me, and are null and void. If I have participated in any the supposed “benefits”* associated with these hidden contracts, I have done so under duress, for lack of any other practical alternative.
REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY
Furthermore, I hereby revoke, rescind, and make void ab initio, all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, implied in law or otherwise, signed by me or anyone else, as it pertains to the government identification number previously assigned to me, as it pertains to my birth certificate, or any other licenses or certificates issued by any and all government or quasi-governmental entities, due to the use of various elements of fraud by said agencies to attempt to deprive me of my Sovereignty or property.
I hereby waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingly accept any alleged “benefit”* or gratuity associated with any of the aforementioned licenses, numbers, or certificates. I do hereby revoke and rescind all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, signed by me or otherwise, implied in law or otherwise, with or without my consent or knowledge, as it pertains to any and all property, real or private, corporeal or incorporeal, obtained in the past, present, or future. I am the sole legal owner and possess alloidal title to any and all such property, including but not limited to my physical human body.
I affirm that all the foregoing is true and correct. I affirm that I am of lawful age and am competent to make this Affidavit. I hereby affix my own signature to all the affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights and my specific common law right not to be bound by any contract or obligation which I have not entered into knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion.
THE USE OF THE NOTARY BELOW IS FOR IDENTIFICATION, AND SUCH USE DOES NOT GRANT ANY JURISDICTION TO ANYONE.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NAUGHT.
Subscribed and sworn, without prejudice, as said in the Uniform Commercial Code 1-207,
________________, Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, proceeding Sui Juris. My hand and Mark as Subscriber
Common Law Seal of Natural Person ________________________________________ Signing by Accomodation for ________________________________________
On this ______ day of _________, year ________, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for __________, personally appeared the above signed, known to me to be the one whose name is signed on this instrument, and has acknowledged to me that she has executed the same.
Signed _______________________________________ Printed Name _________________________________ Date _________________________________________ My Commission Expires ________________________
Please visit webpage here:
Our “federal government” (the foreign corporation unlawfully occupying the District of Columbia vis the Crown Temple B.A.R. Agents) has instructed our federal, state and local police agencies that everyone who purports to be a SOVEREIGN should be TREATED as a TERRORIST! (again, this propaganda is spread by the foreign, continuing criminal enterprise Crown Temple B.A.R. and their meat puppet, Zionist MOSSAD operation, the Southern Poverty Law Center, they have also brainwashed the American public into believing that being a SOVEREIGN is anti-American and unpatriotic! Perhaps this is “The POT calling the KETTLE black”?
WHAT IS SOVEREIGNTY? It is the inherent right and prerogative of a civilized people to rule itself, and to dictate all of the forms and conditions of the institutions it sets up to carry out this rule. Ironically, the U.S. SUPREME COURT agrees with those people who claim to be SOVEREIGN citizens of the American Republic!
Of course, the Satanic Zionists managed to murder Justice Scalia and attempted the same for Chief Justice Roberts for preventing their agenda.
BOND VS. UNITED STATES
- Bond vs. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334 – 2000, The Supreme Court held that the American People are in fact Sovereign and not the States or the Government. The court went on to define that local, state and federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful actions against the Sovereign People by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their actions.
- What are the implications of this 2000, U. S. Supreme Court ruling?
- 1] The delegates to the first Federal Convention prohibited the use of corporations by all governments representing the American Republic. Therefore, all of these corporate governments and their corporate laws are a usurpation of the organic Constitution of the United States of America. All State Governments are now sub-corporations of the Federal Government, making all Courts and all law enforcement personnel, corporate federal agencies or employees. [See: James Madison Journal of the Federal Convention, Vol. 2, P. 722] and [Pull up your State Code on your PC and search the Code for the words “District of Columbia” and “Federal Government.” You will receive about 1000 references linking your state to the federal government.]
- 2] The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, State Legislatures, City Councils, Municipalities and all State and Federal Courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of government.
- 3] Corporations are privately owned businesses, meaning that the Corporate United States belongs to one or more private individuals, which is always governed by a Board of Directors. The Corporate United States is privately owned by a group of European Royal and Elite individuals tied to the Federal Reserve System and the letters of incorporation are recorded in the Vatican. The President of the United States is actually the CEO of the United States and the Congress and all others are corporate employees. Everything they do is in the interest of the corporate owners! I can’t access those documents because of National Security.
- 4] In order to promulgate and enforce Criminal Laws to govern the SOVEREIGN public, government must be SOVEREIGN too, which is an accepted RULE of LAW derived from the, Ancient Law of Kings. Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real; they are a fiction and only exist on paper.Bond vs. UNITED STATES 1 of 2
- 5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do!
- 6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations?
- Citations and Complaints are contracts but they lack transparency because you were never told what might happen to you if you agree to contract, and that you had a right to refuse the accommodation!
- 7] Do any of Americas Courts have Jurisdiction over a SOVEREIGN? Yes … but only by your consent to be judged by the Court. Can they compel (Summon or Subpoena) you to appear or participate in their process? No … they can’t compel you and Yes … they can ask but you can reject the accommodation in writing and nothing can be done about it because you have refused to give the court jurisdiction over you!
- 8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
- 9] There being no Constitutional Criminal Laws or Transparency in the American Justice System, everyone arrested, convicted and sentenced to prison under these CIVIL LAWS are in prison by CONSENT and therein, all American Jails are actually DEBTORS PRISONS!
- 10] Most of the County and State Prisons and all of the Federal Prisons are privately owned corporate businesses for profit, which kick back to the sentencing Judges. The Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch provides general oversight, for these institutions. So if you are convicted in these Courts, you can expect to serve some jail time! Now you know why America has such high prison populations!
- 11] Can the State Government and Courts take Custody of your children? Only with your consent, otherwise their agents and officers can be held personally liable for their actions! Orphans are a different matter and can become wards of the Court until emancipated.
- Corporate governments are a usurpation of the organic American Constitution and this corporatist onslaught in America has since its creation, been an ANTI-SOVEREIGN and TERRORIST REGIME and are in fact the real TERRORIST and TRAITORS to the American Republic.
Blessings, Judge Dale, retired
Please visit webpage here:
Please visit webpage here:
USUFRUCT REMEDY-12 USC 95a(2)
Judge Navin Chandrea Naidu explains how your Certificate Of Live Birth can get you financial independence.
This program is available to all people throughout the world. It does not matter what country you are in, you can sign up for the newsletter as well as the program.
It is designed for the common person who knows something is seriously wrong with this world.
Learn how to obtain the resources to solve your problems. Then you will have time to learn in detail what is wrong and work in your community to help fix it and improve everybody’s life.
Learn how our program works. Enter your email address in the form to your right. You will be emailed a short essay on how Commercial Paper works. Next you can
Sign up as a member, no charge.
Go to the Contact Us page to join our Facebook and Skype groups. (You will get those links in your welcome email)
In those groups you can discuss this extensively with others.
Please visit webpage here:
Please see video here:
MONETIZE YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE-IT’S WORTH MILLIONS
YOUR LEGAL FICTION STRAWMAN ID – The Great Government MONEY and CREDIT SCAM
Strawman money credit logo
Giving your Straw Man I.D. Legal Fiction Name Back with full use…
under USUFRUCT, a civil law that is the right of enjoying a thing, the property of which is vested in another, and to draw from the same all the profit, utility and advantage which it may produce, provided it be without altering the substance of the thing.
2. The obligation of not altering the substance of the thing, however, takes place only in the case of a complete usufruct.
3. Usufructs are of two kinds; perfect and imperfect. Perfect usufruct, which is of things which the usufructuary can enjoy without altering their substance, though their substance may be diminished or deteriorated naturally by time or by the use to which they are applied; as a house, a piece of land, animals, furniture and other movable effects and your Government held Strawman, Straw Man trust reserve account. Imperfect or quasi usufruct, which is of things which would be useless to the usufructuary if he did not consume and expend them, or change the substance of them, as money, grain, liquors. Civ. Code of Louis. art. 525, et seq.; 1 Browne’s Civ. Law, 184; Poth. Tr. du Douaire, n. 194; Ayl. Pand. 319; Poth. Pand. tom. 6, p. 91; Lecons El. du Dr. Civ. Rom. 414 Inst. lib. 2, t. 4; Dig. lib. 7, t. 1, 1. 1 Code, lib. 3, t. 33; 1 Bouv. Inst. Theolo. pg. 1, c. 1, art. 2, p. 76.
Please visit webpage here:
STRAW MAN MONEY CREDIT