Merck Vaccine Fraud Exposed by Two Merck Virologists; Company Faked Mumps Vaccine Efficacy Results for Over a Decade, Says Lawsuit

Breaking news: According to two Merck scientists who filed a False Claims Act  complaint in 2010 — a complaint which has just now been unsealed — vaccine  manufacturer Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test data, spiked blood  samples with animal antibodies, sold a vaccine that actually promoted  mumps and measles outbreaks, and ripped off governments and consumers who bought  the vaccine thinking it was “95% effective.”

See that False Claims Act  document at:

According  to Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, both former Merck virologists, the  Merck company engaged in all the following behavior:
• Merck knowingly  falsified its mumps vaccine test results to fabricate a “95% efficacy  rate.”
• In order to do this, Merck spiked the blood test with animal  antibodies in order to artificially inflate the appearance of immune system  antibodies. As reported in
Merck also added animal  antibodies to blood samples to achieve more favorable test results, though it  knew that the human immune system would never produce such antibodies, and that  the antibodies created a laboratory testing scenario that “did not in any way  correspond to, correlate with, or represent real life … virus neutralization  in vaccinated people,” according to the complaint. (
• Merck then used the falsified trial results to swindle the U.S. government out  of “hundreds of millions of dollars for a vaccine  that does not provide adequate immunization.”
• Merck’s vaccine fraud has  actually contributed to the continuation of mumps across America, causing more  children to become infected with mumps. (Gee, really? This is what NaturalNews  has been reporting for years… vaccines are actually formulated to keep the  outbreaks going because it’s great for repeat business!)
Merck  used its false claims of “95 percent effectiveness” to monopolize the vaccine  market and eliminate possible competitors.
• The Merck vaccine fraud  has been going on since the late 1990’s, say the Merck virologists.
• Testing of Merck’s vaccine was never done against “real-world” mumps  viruses in the wild. Instead, test results were simply falsified to achieve the  desired outcome.
• This entire fraud took place “with the knowledge,  authority and approval of Merck’s senior management.”
• Merck scientists  “witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck  engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine’s efficacy findings,” according to  court documents (see below).

US government chose to ignore the 2010 False Claims Act!

Rather than  taking action on this false claims act, the U.S. government simply ignored it,  thereby protecting Merck’s market monopoly instead of properly serving justice.  This demonstrates the conspiracy of fraud between the U.S. government, FDA  regulators and the vaccine industry.

Chatom Primary Care sues Merck for Sherman Act monopolization, breach of  warranty, violation of consumer protection laws

Following the unsealing of  this 2010 False Claims Act, Chatom Primary Care, based in Alabama, smelled  something rotten. Three days ago, Chatom filed a lawsuit against Merck. That  lawsuit record is available here:

It  alleges, among other shocking things:

[Merck engaged in] …a  decade-long scheme to falsify and misrepresent the true efficacy of its  vaccine.

Merck fraudulently represented and continues to falsely  represent in its labeling and elsewhere that its Mumps Vaccine has an efficacy  rate of 95 percent of higher.

In reality, Merck knows and has taken  affirmative steps to conceal — by using improper testing techniques and  falsifying test data — that its Mumps Vaccine is, and has been since at least  1999, far less than 95 percent effective.
Merck designed a testing  methodology that evaluated its vaccine against a less virulent strain of the  mumps virus. After the results failed to yield Merck’s desired efficacy, Merck  abandoned the methodology and concealed the study’s  findings.

…incorporating the use of animal antibodies to artificially  inflate the results…

…destroying evidence of the falsified data and  then lying to an FDA investigator…

…threatened a virologist in  Merck’s vaccine division with jail if he reported the fraud to the  FDA…

…the ultimate victims here are the millions of children who  every year are being injected with a mumps  vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection. And  while this is a disease that, according to the Centers for Disease Control  (‘CDC’), was supposed to be eradicated by now, the failure in Merck’s vaccine  has allowed this disease to linger, with significant outbreaks continuing to  occur.

Chatom Primary Care also alleges that the fraudulent Merck  vaccine contributed to the 2006 mumps outbreak in the Midwest, and a 2009  outbreak elsewhere. It says, “there has remained a significant risk of a  resurgence of mumps outbreaks…”

This investigation is only beginning

NaturalNews has only begun to  investigate this incredible breaking news about Merck and the vaccine industry.  We are pouring through the court documents to identify additional information  that may be relevant to this case, and we plan to bring you that information  soon.

For the record, Merck denies all allegations. Is anyone  surprised?

Sources for this article:

NaturalNews wishes to  thank for its coverage of this story. Original article at:

Chatom  Lawsuit against Merck

2010 False Claims Act  against Merck, by two Merck virologists

Announcement  of the lawsuit in the media:…

See original here:

9 Comments on Merck Vaccine Fraud Exposed by Two Merck Virologists; Company Faked Mumps Vaccine Efficacy Results for Over a Decade, Says Lawsuit

  1. Hi. Page 7 from the False Claims Act is missing and an important part of the trial findings appear to be there. Could you upload a complete version?

  2. Very interesting – NASDAQ appears to have “pulled” their article from the web. The class action appears to be a result of the FDAs refusal to pursue the fraud – effectively protecting the criminal actions of the manufacturer. The only way this can be brought to the surface is by what appears to be a civil class action, however, my knowledge of the legal system is not great so correction is welcomed if this is not the case.

  3. THANK YOU for being a media outlet with the guts to run this piece. This came out quite awhile ago but NO ONE had the bravery to publish the truth. As the parent of a vaccine injured child, I thank you.

  4. I have long ago arrived at the inevitable conclusion that vaccination is an organised criminal enterprise dressed up as disease prevention by means of junk science.

    If we lived in a sane society, the entire vaccine industry would be shut down for good to keep us and our children safe.

    I invite readers to visit our ‘Vaccination Information Network – VINE’ on Facebook.

  5. With Obama hiring Taylor (ex..?) Monsanto, as chief of the FDA, expect your worst night mare to be reality.
    As long as sheople religiously believe that the corruptible bureaucratic law system equals JUSTICE, we’ll have these corrupt career bureaucrats misleading the way.

  6. Nothing does surprise me anymore regarding the incestuous relationship between the Big Pharma and the FDA – supposedly regulatory agency of US Government established for our protection… I think that’s the hope & change for you!

  7. Yet another reason not to have vaccines. A concern to me is that one does not have much of a choice when in hospital. I realise that hospitals are safe environments (I, unfortunately have been a patient in a few, and for quite a while, but not for anything that would require a vaccine (heart attacks are not vaccine-able (at the moment!)), but one doesn’t really know what is being injected. OK, I am in UK now, I spent 20 years in Australia, 2 in UAE, so have no knowledge (apart from what I have read) of what occurs in USA, but it is still a worry

4 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Celine Bag
  2. celine handbags
  3. gucci sunglasses
  4. louis vuitton outlet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.