A Brief History and Functionality of the Vaccine Legal Facade

Infant vaccineBy: Roger Landry (TLB)

Updated 10/17/2013

We at TLB are receiving an extraordinary amount of questions regarding vaccine or vaccination protocols and legal procedures. This is in great part due to the extensive research and posting our project does on this particular subject matter.

Where else can you find an entity that is proven to be Corrupt, Greedy, Complicit, Unconscionable, responsible for countless deaths over the past several generations, accused (very strongly) of conducting Eugenics and  even Genocide, BUT … Drum Roll Please … They are immune from prosecution … really? The only other entity of equally offensive attributes is Monsanto and the GMO big hitters who now also enjoy immunity… WAIT OOOPss thats gone because We The People screamed at the top of our lungs! Some would argue this is the injustice of the century as by some research they are responsible for a massive amount of failing health and death on a global scale.

Oh, I almost forgot, guess who gets to pay for the awards some fortunate victims do receive (almost $3 billion paid out so far), everyone who gets a vaccination pays a vaccines_children_injection[1]portion of that bill into the fund … again really? So they poison or kill us, we sue and win in their own court, and we who suffer pay for it! The only thing the vaccine industry needs worry about is keeping us sick … but that’s another story.

Even though TLB is knowledgeable, very aware of, and strongly supports, the Vaccine awareness movement, we are far from experts. This project covers topics from A – Z, or just about anything (real) that angers us. But we are pleased to receive your pertinent queries and provide you feedback as well as ourselves benefiting from additional knowledge. In the spirit of this endeavor, and because we have about a half dozen questions pending on this subject. attached you will find a brief history and breakdown concerning the can and cannot’s of the Vaccine Injury legal system.

No, in our opinion the system is not fair, and again always biased towards Big Pharma, but when you have more money than God and your fingers in every pie, well …

TLB Suggested reading:


Judge using his gavel

Please read more below…



Parents Can’t Sue Vaccine Manufacturers

By: Bob Egelko

Parents whose children are harmed or killed by allegedly defective vaccines can’t sue the manufacturers for damages in state court and must instead accept no-fault compensation from a national tribunal for vaccination injuries, a federal appeals court ruled.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld dismissal of a suit by a Las Vegas couple whose baby son suffered seizures and died after an immunization shot, saying such suits were precluded by a 1986 federal law.

The law established a “vaccine court” where those who claimed injuries from vaccination must file their claims. If a hearing officer determined that the harm was consistent with the vaccine’s known side effects, the victim would be awarded compensation without having to prove that the manufacturer caused the harm or acted negligently.

Vaccine makers who comply with Food and Drug Administration requirements for product ingredients and labeling are protected by the law from additional damage claims by the victim, or by the heirs of a victim who died.

The law provided “easier and more certain compensation in exchange for limited remedies within the traditional (court) system,” said Judge Sidney Thomas in the 3-0 ruling.

He said Congress passed the law after hearing testimony that vaccines harmed a very small number of people, but the resulting lawsuits were “threatening the stability of the nation’s vaccination program.”

In this case, the child’s estate received $250,000, the maximum award for a vaccine-related death, but far less than the damages typically awarded to heirs in a wrongful-death suit. Lawyers for the parents argued that the law did not apply to them, because only the child or his estate – not his heirs – can file claims in the vaccine court, but the Ninth Circuit disagreed.

Robert Murdock, a lawyer for the parents, said the ruling unfairly denies compensation to parents for the grief they suffer at the loss of a child. He said his clients, Erin and Shawn Holmes, would ask the full appeals court for a rehearing and take their case to the Supreme Court if necessary.

Nine days after the Holmes’ 1-year-old son, Jacob, was given a vaccine, manufactured by Merck & Co., for measles, mumps and rubella, he started suffering seizures and brain disorders known as encephalopathies. He died six months later, in October 2002.

In their lawsuit, the parents claimed Merck had failed to warn families about the danger of encephalopathies.


Tlb recommends you visit: www.sfgate.com for more great/pertinent articles.

See original here: http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Parents-can-t-sue-vaccine-manufacturers-3894230.php#ixzz2NqTpTSbY

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.