Abuses of Guardianship & Victims of Probate Court

Abuses of Guardianship & Victims of Probate Court

By TLB Contributing Writer: Terri LaPoint

No person shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” — unless, it seems, that person becomes a victim of probate or family courts. At that point, such deprivation of liberty happens more often than most of us realize.

Protected: Caddis Family — More Victims of Alabama Probate Court

It happened to Marguerite Trent Caddis of Birmingham, Alabama. A probate judge appointed a stranger as her guardian, and she was forced into a nursing home against her will. By the time the courts were finished with the Caddis estate, there was $3.76 left, to be divided equally between her three daughters.

Her story joins those of retired Alabama schoolteacher Marian Leonard and Golden Flake heiress Joann Bashinsky, each of whom were placed under court-appointed guardianships by Jefferson County Probate Judge Alan King, who has since retired. Even after the death of a loved one, the court battles don’t end. Guardianship abuse leaves grieving heirs, like Leonard’s daughter Nancy Scott and Bashinsky’s grandson Landon Ash, bearing the brunt of the financial burden and emotional heartache of desperate ongoing battles against the probate courts and guardians as they attempt to honor the wishes of their loved one. These are lives which ended, not peacefully, but embroiled in bitter legal battles that refuse to end even at the grave.

Stories like theirs, and a Netflix movie called “I Care a Lot,” are shining the spotlight on egregious abuses of power that are ongoing within the guardianship and conservatorship system.

What is happening nationwide to our elderly and disabled within the systems entrusted to protect them is very similar to the abuse that happens to children within the Child Protective System. There is often little to no due process, yet people are literally being locked away from the lives they once knew, ostensibly in the name of protecting them. The ease with which this happens is shocking.

Gretchen Rachel Hammond of the Daily Kos says:

According to state and national activists, it’s a system that has been left unchecked for decades and is now so broken that it has led to unprecedented judicial overreach and the eradication of the constitutional, civil and human rights of thousands of Americans who suffer from resulting neglect, isolation, abuse, torture and theft on a massive scale, allegedly at the hands of the same individuals assigned to protect them.

They Thought They Had Prepared

Marguerite Trent Caddis, “Trent,” spent the last 3 years of her life battling for her freedom from the bondage of guardianship under Judge Alan King and Gregory H. Hawley, the guardian appointed by King to oversee her life and finances. Hawley is the same guardian involved with Golden Flake philanthropist Joann Bashinsky.

Other names of the many attorneys who profited from Trent Caddis’ plight include Sidney Summey and Amy Adams. Readers might recognize Summey’s name as the guardian who forced Marian Leonard onto hospice care, though there was no diagnosis of any terminal illness. Adams was involved with the Joann Bashinsky story as the attorney brought in by Hawley who used “scare tactics” to try to persuade her to hire her. When she refused, guardian Hawley hired her anyway. It was hours after damning recordings of the conversation were published that Judge King suddenly announced his retirement.

Trent Caddis was born and raised in Birmingham. She married her high school sweetheart Charles Owings Caddis. Together they raised 3 daughters.

Marguerite Trent Caddis – June 30, 1943 – December 29, 2015 Photo from obituary.

In her early 40s, Trent was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, but it did not stop her. She lost her husband in 1997. Charles Caddis had taken steps to ensure that his wife’s needs would be met. They had a lovely home in a great neighborhood. He had set up family trusts to see her soundly through the future, even appointing one of their sons-in-law as trustee over one of the trusts.

They surely thought it was enough. They could not have foreseen how wrong things could go when the family tried to enlist help from what should have been a neutral third party.

Petition for Help Goes Terribly Wrong

In February of 2013, when Trent Caddis was 69 years old, her two oldest daughters filed a petition in Judge Alan King’s Probate Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, to have their mother placed under the care of a guardian.

According to court documents, the daughters expressed concerns that their mother was unable to live alone. Though the family trusts contained a couple million dollars, the oldest Caddis daughters told the court that they were concerned that she might exhaust her assets; thus, they requested the court to appoint someone to oversee their mother’s affairs.

Not long after, Caddis’ youngest daughter filed a subsequent petition for guardianship, asking that, if the court felt it must appoint a guardian, it would appoint her to carry out what her mother wanted.

Judge Alan King

In a perfect world where outside entities would not profit financially from a judge’s decision, and where ONLY the true best interests of the person in question, including that person’s own wishes, were considered, this might have been a prudent move. However, as the Caddis family was about to learn, this is not such a perfect world.

No matter how noble their intentions were, their petitions to the Alabama probate court opened the door to a world of heartache. In the end, there would be no winners in the Caddis family guardianship case, except for the army of lawyers involved on all sides of the dispute, and those working with them who profited financially from the ensuing years of legal wrangling.

Though the original petition alleged that Trent Caddis suffered from confusion and impaired memory, she was ultimately never determined to be incompetent. Everything that happened to her throughout the years of legal battles, the loss of her rights and freedom, happened with her being named only as an “alleged” incapacitated person. There was never a finding of incompetency.

Despite this, Mrs. Caddis was removed from her home and sent to live in a nursing home, a move to which she was very much opposed. She wanted more than anything to stay in her own home. She was paying for round-the-clock sitters and healthcare providers whom she trusted; she wanted to keep it that way.

Lawyers Battle It Out, Both Sides Using Her Money

She hired the law firm of Trimmier, Kudulis, and Reisinger LLC to fight against her being forced into a nursing home, and to protect her rights to keep her own healthcare providers and be able to exercise control over her assets as she saw fit.

Rather than appointing any of the daughters, or anyone else that Mrs. Caddis knew and trusted, Judge King appointed Michael G. Trucks, Esq., as her Guardian ad Litem, and Gregory H. Hawley as her Temporary Guardian, a role that he filled until her death.

Attorney Gregory H. Hawley

Judge King also ordered that Trent Caddis’ son-in-law Patrick Hubbard, husband of her youngest daughter, be removed as trustee over the family trust, to be replaced by Gregory H. Hawley. Hubbard fought back, stating that Caddis wished for him to remain as trustee, and that the court lacked the jurisdiction to remove him. Ultimately, Hawley replaced Patrick Hubbard as trustee on the trust set up by Trent Caddis’ late husband.

Trent Caddis remained under the “care” of her guardian Gregory Hawley until she passed away just after Christmas in 2015, after several years of legal battles.

In what seems to be a nationwide pattern in guardianship abuse stories, Mrs. Caddis’ money was used to pay for lawyers on both sides of the legal battles. Her estate paid for the attorneys fighting for her freedom. Because her money was under the control of the court-appointed guardian and conservator, her estate also paid for the lawyers fighting to keep her under the guardianship and in the nursing home.

It is a pattern that Boston Broadside editor Lonnie Brennan calls, “Isolate, Medicate, Liquidate.” The ward’s estate is whittled away by attorneys and guardians until there is nothing left. This is what happened to Marvin Siegal’s estate, once worth more than $6 million. By the time the system was finished with him, his estate was largely liquidated, leaving his daughters a mere pittance of his hard-earned wealth to inherit.

After hundreds of thousands of dollars were allocated in the final settlement to all the lawyers, including Greg Hawley as Conservator, Guardian, and Trustee of The Charles O. Caddis Family Trust, there was almost nothing left for her daughters, the heirs she and her late husband had intended to inherit their estate.

In a guardianship case that lasted just under three years from the original petition until the death of Trent Caddis, three dollars and 76 cents was all that remained, to be divided between the children of Charles and Trent Caddis.

This kind of predatory behavior is what masquerades as “guardianship” in many of our probate courts in America. The word “guardian” means “a defender, protector, or keeper.” “Keeper” here was never intended to be a pun where the guardian gets to “keep” what is found within the ward’s assets or estate. Judges, guardians, and social workers are called to protect, yet some of them abuse their power to exploit the elderly, disabled, or children. They fail the very people they are appointed to serve.

How many more Alabamians have fallen prey to such schemes, often hidden behind closed doors or shrouded in secrecy? How many more Americans have been stripped of their money, their freedom, and their lives, all in the name of “protecting” or “guarding” them? More importantly, when will it stop?


To learn more about guardianship abuse, see:


Real News Spark – Real News that sparks people to Make a Difference!

Support the work of Real News Spark!

Real News Spark investigates and reports news stories impacting families, freedom, and life. These are often stories that mainstream media ignores. We seek to expose injustice as well as inspire hope with the goal of inspiring readers to get involved and make a difference. We invite you to help make this work possible. If you believe in what we are doing, please consider visiting us and supporting us with a donation.


The above article (Protected: Caddis Family — More Victims of Alabama Probate Court) was originally created and published by REAL NEWS SPARK and is republished here by contribution with attribution to author Terri LaPoint and website realnewsspark.com.


Read more great articles by Terri LaPoint



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

2 Comments on Abuses of Guardianship & Victims of Probate Court

  1. Florida is a huge reprobate court for profit too. Maybe there are few guardianship attorneys, because they must do what the reprobate court says without argument.
    The court takes kids away from parents, based on anonymous tip, and keeps them in foster care. It does as this article describes, targets well-to-do elderly, puts them under guardianship, and then puts them away.
    And there are those cases where someone is injured and gets a settlement that must be controlled forever by the courts. They say they are following the law and its the state legislators’ fault, but I read the law.

    Does anyone understand the simple idea that if a law states its intent, then using any part of the law to the contrary is lawless? For example, the law provides that the court must determine that a person is incapacitated. Instead of using the testimony of doctors, friends, family, and other people who are fully acquainted with the situation, the court appoints three people to come “talk” with the person; in our case, our daughter was in a state of coma, about a #3 on the rancho scale. (She’s since come to a level #4 and improving!) Then the court charged HER estate $875. Now we see a use for that law, but in this situation it violates the intent of the law by exploiting her resources. A lot of stuff. The examiners never talked with our daughter, and that was the letter of the law. I don’t think the lawyers can stand to read the law, because they are faced with the fact that the court is false in its application of the lay.

    The letter of the law can violate the intent – purpose – spirit of the law, and when it does, it takes the back seat; it’s like the scale of justice with mercy & truth, etc.

    I think the court has weeded out attorneys who will fight for their clients, and left those just happy to chew the meat off the bones of we carrion at the side of the road. I know this is badly written, but I am so tired even though its a new day. We take care of our 24-year-old daughter 24/7.

  2. Great article & completely ACCURATE!! This is happening across the US in every state as the Britney Spears case shows up, NO ONE IS IMMUNE!!

    This is happening to my father in California. We have many others here in Northern California that are being victimized by these disgusting predators. Thank you so much for helping to expose the atrocities being perpetrated on society’s most vulnerable by the very people entrusted to protect them under the guise of guardianship/conservatorship.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.