Biden’s Fumbled infrastructure rollout — who’s really in charge at the White House ?

Fumbled infrastructure rollout leaves Republicans asking who’s really in charge at the White House?

Republicans are “trying to figure out who to negotiate with at the White House — because apparently, it’s not the President United States.”  ~Rep. Jason Smith.

By Sophie Mann

What Republicans have come to understand is that this White House has handlers that control, apparently, the president’s actions and decisions,” said Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.) in an interview with Just the News.

Smith, the ranking member on the House Budget Committee, was referring specifically to President Biden’s botched rollout of the long-awaited bipartisan infrastructure plan last week.

Last weekend was a scramble for Biden to walk back a comment he made in front of the White House Thursday to announce agreement on a bipartisan framework for a $1.2 trillion infrastructure package.

“If this is the only thing that comes to me, I’m not signing it,” said the president, standing next to a working group of Democrat and Republican senators who were surprised to hear him condition his support for the deal they had just negotiated on passage of a budget-busting Democrat spending bill. That bill, which Democrats hope to pass without Republican votes in the Senate using budget reconciliation, will potentially include much of the spending that moderate Republicans (and Democrats) worked to cut from the bipartisan framework.

“It was a surprise to say the least that those two got linked, and I’m glad they’ve now been de-linked,” said Ohio Republican Sen. Rob Portman.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) called the president’s unexpected announcement an “extortion” effort by Democrats.

The promise of passing the bills simultaneously would potentially appease members of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party who feel the bipartisan infrastructure package is too small. However, that plan would evidently drive away some key Republican votes needed for the infrastructure bill to pass.

Describing Biden’s initial statement as “the worst bait and switch tactic that you could see from a politician,” Rep. Smith said: “Most Republicans have whiplash on Biden’s infrastructure plan … and, um, that Saturday statement was a classic ‘cleanup on aisle four.'”

Part of a statement of clarification from the White House released on Saturday read: “At a press conference after announcing the bipartisan agreement, I indicated that I would refuse to sign the infrastructure bill if it was sent to me without my Families Plan and other priorities, including clean energy. That statement understandably upset some Republicans, who do not see the two plans as linked; they are hoping to defeat my Families Plan — and do not want their support for the infrastructure plan to be seen as aiding passage of the Families Plan. My comments also created the impression that I was issuing a veto threat on the very plan I had just agreed to, which was certainly not my intent.”

Despite the clarification, the politics of passing the infrastructure package have only just begun, and appear to be growing messier and more complex by the day.

Republicans are wondering if negotiating with the White House in good faith is worth the time, effort and political risk, given Biden’s loose, at best, handle on the situation. And Democratic leadership must consider the realistic chances of passing the infrastructure bill without support from progressives, if leadership wants to pass the bill at all.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is reportedly not bullish on the package and isn’t likely to let it migrate through her chamber unaccompanied by a massive spending bill.

House Republicans are hoping to portray the mess as a failure of the unified, Democrat-led government in Washington — a strategy that may prevail, if the White House cannot find a way to wrangle all critical players around the infrastructure bill.

What was meant to be a shining moment of victory for the Biden agenda may have inadvertently illustrated how little control over the party the president actually has.

Republicans, meanwhile, are “trying to figure out who to negotiate with at the White House — because apparently, it’s not the President United States,” said Smith.

“I think the American people look at this and wonder who’s in charge.”





Democrats infrastructure plan would erase American suburban ‘way of life,’ former NY official says


(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News.  Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News

Some emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB)

Header featured image (edited) credit: Smith/Getty Images



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.