Biden’s Head-spinning reversals & disconnect with Democrat platform

I was for it before I was for against being for it

Biden on policing: Head-spinning reversals, and a disconnect with Democrat platform

The Democrats’ 2020 platform rejects “overpoliced and underserved Black and Latino communities,” but in his 2017 book Biden praised the 1994 crime bill that put 100,000 more police on streets.

By Carrie Sheffield |Just the News

Just last month, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden emphatically supported shifting funds away from police, but in 2017 he called for more police on streets and claimed credit for boosting federal funding for policing in the 1994 crime bill.

In a joint interview on Friday with running mate Kamala Harris, Biden reversed his July 2020 position in favor of a stance more in line with his 2017 views — and distinctly out of step with the recently adopted official position of his party. (Biden/Harris picture/NBC screen grab)

The Democrats’ 2020 platform rejects “overpoliced and underserved Black and Latino communities,” but in his 2017 book the party’s new presidential nominee praised the 1994 crime bill that put 100,000 more police on streets and decried “fewer and fewer cops on the beat.”

In that book,”Promise Me, Dad: A Year of Hope, Hardship, and Purpose,” Biden claimed that Republicans, who traditionally embrace the principles of federalism, opposed federal funds for increased policing because they wanted such funds to be coming from state and local sources.

“And they argued that crime was uniquely local,” Biden wrote. “I had to remind my colleagues that most local crime was caused by the drug epidemic, and drugs were a federal responsibility. It took some time, but I finally got real funding written into the crime bill I authored in 1994 that provided an additional one hundred thousand local cops. And it worked.”

Yet last month, after feeling pressure from activists on his left, Biden told an interviewer he “absolutely” supported “redirecting” money away from policing. In the same interview, Biden decried the police acquisition of surplus military equipment, likening the use of armored vehicles to military invasion, saying police using such tools “become the enemy.”

Then, last week, in his first interview as the Democratic nominee for president, Biden abruptly reversed field once again, as he pivoted for the general election campaign.

“I don’t want to defund police departments,” Biden told “Good Morning America’s” Robin Roberts. “I think they need more help, they need more assistance.”

The Biden campaign did not respond to a request for comment from Just the News.

After the 2014 shooting death of two Brooklyn officers as they sat quietly in their police car, Biden said in his 2017 book that “I thought it was time to get back to the proven policy of investing in more and better-trained men and women on the beat.”

Biden wanted to invest more in police because as crime dropped following the 1994 crime bill, “community policing became a victim of its own success,” he wrote. “As crime went down, so did public pressure to focus on policing,” Biden argued, leaving voters wondering, “Why spend federal money on local police when you can lower taxes on the wealthy instead?”

Saying that he “sometimes felt like a lonely voice” in calling for more federal funding for police, Biden lamented in his book, “There were fewer and fewer cops on the beat, with the predictable consequence of increasingly strained relations between the police and the black community.”

These zigzags and inconsistencies in the Biden and Democratic Party positions on policing are likely a key reason why police unions nationwide have begun to officially endorse Biden’s fall opponent, President Trump.

The Trump campaign is signaling it plans to use “law and order” messaging to draw a contrast with Biden. That includes Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the St. Louis couple who brandished firearms to protect themselves from confrontational protesters. The McCloskeys were given a speaking slot on [] this week’s Republican National Convention.






(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News

Some emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB)

Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.