ER Editor: Readers may also be interested in this piece by JAM News (warning: anti-Russian bias) which reveals that Russia contributes 10% of the Council of Europe’s budget. Hence, upon being deprived of its voting rights over Crimea in 2014, it withheld its payments as of 2017. See “The shame of European diplomacy” – why PACE membership was returned to Russia.
We remind readers that the coup d’etat in Ukraine back in 2014 was a US neocon ploy causing a hideous civil war; Crimea voters wanted to return to Russia, expressing their preference in a referendum.
Predictably, Ukraine and Estonia are protesting the decision. Given France’s poor economy and that of the Eurozone in general, France and Germany would be dumb not to develop better relations with Russia on any number of levels and stop being Washington’s stooges, which is costing the EU economy dearly.
Council of Europe: Parliamentarians favor return of Russian delegation
The parliamentarians of the Assembly of the Council of Europe have voted in favor of the return of the Russian delegation.
Russia has been deprived of the right to vote since 2014, after Crimea voted in a referendum to join Russia.
After nine hours of deliberation on the night of 24 to 25 June, parliamentarians from Council of Europe member states voted to allow the Russian delegation to participate again in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE – see image), an international organisation created in 1949 and now comprising 47 countries, including the 28 member countries of the EU.
To encourage the return of Russia, PACE has thus adopted a text allowing a country to present a delegation during the year, and excluded the possibility of depriving the country of its main voting rights.
After the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014, PACE sanctioned Moscow by depriving the Russian delegation of its voting rights in the parliamentary body of a non-binding institution whose purpose is to “protect human rights and democracy”.
In response to the sanctions against Russia, Moscow then responded with a boycott, repeatedly threatening to leave the Council of Europe. The possibility that the Russians would be deprived of access to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR, legal arm of the Council of Europe) ended up “convincing the majority of countries that it was better with Russia than without it, “AFP reported.
Ukraine, supported by the Baltic countries and the United Kingdom, believes that “the reopening of the door to the Russians is comparable to a first breach in the sanctions imposed on Moscow for annexing Crimea”.
In the Council of Europe hemicycle in Strasbourg, 118 parliamentarians voted in favor of the text, 62 were against it and ten abstained.
Even before the vote, Moscow had sent a delegation to Strasbourg, said the vice-speaker of the Russian Parliament, Piotr Tolstoy, as quoted by the agency Ria Novosti, anticipating in advance the resistance of “a healthy majority of ‘spirit’ to ‘the hysteria of a small minority’”.
This latest development comes in a context of several European countries expressing a willingness to cooperate with Russia. On June 24, the leaders of the French and Russian governments met in Le Havre, stressing that their respective countries had never broken off dialogue or cooperation, especially on economic issues.
Despite some differences between France and Russia, Edouard Philippe and Dmitry Medvedev (pictured) both expressed their desire to continue to work together. “What we sometimes hear in France is the idea that France and Russia should not talk to each other,” said French Prime Minister Edouard Philippe, during a press conference with his Russian counterpart.
However, the head of the French government stressed that this “music” did not correspond to anything real. Even if certain differences remain between France and Russia on international issues such as Ukraine or Syria, this has not not affected the continuity of exchanges.
Edouard Philippe reiterated that the economic relations between the two countries remained important, despite the economic sanctions taken by the European Union against Russia. The French Prime Minister said French companies were the first foreign companies to look towards Russia.
A strong presence of French business leaders were present to greet the Russian leader: “Thirty very large [French] companies, which represent millions of dollars, are involved in our market and we appreciate this involvement,” said Dmitry Medvedev, adding that 500 French companies are present in the country.
France is “one of the largest foreign investors in Russia and that we appreciate,” he said.
“I am convinced that there are still opportunities to improve these exchanges, including involving the business community,” said Dmitry Medvedev. He mentioned the fields of energy, nuclear and aeronautics, among others, in which cooperation is already particularly developed.
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Click on the image below to visit TLB Project on twitter …