Court Reinstates Vaccine Mandate for Federal Workers, But White House Delays Enforcement
A federal court on Thursday upheld the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees, but the White House told federal agencies “procedural steps” need to take place before the mandates can be enforced.
By: Susan C. Olmstead
A federal appeals court on Thursday upheld the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal employees.
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals’ 2-1 ruling reversed a lower court’s Jan. 21 injunction against the mandate and also ordered the district court to dismiss the case.
Hours after the ruling, the White House told federal agencies to hold off on reinstating the mandates that would affect about 3.5 million workers.
According to The Washington Post, White House officials cautioned “there are still procedural steps that need to take place to lift the injunction, and it’s unclear when the agencies might begin enforcing the mandate.”
Biden issued the executive order on Sept. 9, 2021, when the Delta variant was dominant in the U.S.
Under the order, unvaccinated federal employees risk being fired, unless they qualify for an exemption on medical or religious grounds or have such a request under consideration.
Commenting on Thursday’s ruling, Mary Holland, president and general counsel at Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said:
“CHD regrets the 5th Circuit’s decision to reimpose President Biden’s COVID vaccine mandate for federal workers. We support the federal workers who continue to press their claim that an experimental gene therapy vaccine mandate is an illegitimate use of federal power.”
Plaintiffs’ argument rejected
Writing for the majority opinion, Judge Carl Stewart said the plaintiffs, a group called Feds for Medical Freedom, could have challenged the mandate using other channels.
Stewart said the employees could have filed a complaint with the Office of Special Counsel, working within the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA)’s provisions.
The CSRA established procedures for settling work-related controversies between federal civil service employees and the federal government.
“Under the [CSRA], certain federal employees may obtain administrative and judicial review of specified adverse employment actions,”
Judge Stewart wrote.
“The plaintiffs could have challenged [the government’s] proposed action against them before filing this suit and certainly before getting vaccinated.”
Infections among the vaccinated continue
The White House claimed on Nov. 21, 2021, that 96.5% of federal employees had already been vaccinated in accordance with the mandate. However, vaccinated people continue to become infected with COVID.
Data recently revealed through a Freedom of Information Act request showed that 70% of COVID cases among Centers for Disease Control and Prevention employees in August 2021 were in people who had been vaccinated.
“It is ironic that the appeals court is upholding an experimental product that demonstrably does not work to achieve its intent — to stop transmission of COVID,”
Holland said.
“Just yesterday, a triple-jabbed high-ranking member of Congress tested positive for COVID,”
she added.
“These products simply don’t work against the viruses currently in circulation.”
Holland said she wondered whether the continuing push to get people vaccinated has more to do with commerce — and particularly the large unused stockpile of COVID vaccines in the U.S. — than with health.
Millions of COVID vaccine doses are sitting unused, the Associated Press reported last month, leaving states with stockpiles that officials were scrambling to administer before the vaccines expired.
••••
The above article (Court Reinstates Vaccine Mandate for Federal Workers, But White House Delays Enforcement) was originally published on The Defender and is re-published here by ‘contribution’ with attribution to the author, Susan C. Olmstead and The Defender.
About the Author: Susan C. Olmstead is the assistant editor of The Defender.
ORDER TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s New Book — ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’
Image Credit: Graphic in articles Featured Image (top) – by 3D Animation Production Company from Pixabay
••••
Read more articles about COVID Mandates
••••
Read more articles by: Children’s Health Defense Team
••••
TLB Editors Note: TLB highly recommends you click on the image (the Defender) below, visit this great website, and do whatever you can to help see this vital forum succeed … for the sake of our children !!!
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
••••
Click on image below to visit site:
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply