COVID: The Vaccine That Wasn’t, & The Truth

Americans have lost faith in our health establishment. They’re now absolutely science deniers, if the “science” is being mandated by the CDC, NIH, or people like Anthony Fauci, who recently admitted that six foot social distancing just sort of appeared as if by magic. Despite being science itself, Fauci finally coughed up the reality there was no actual science involved. Despite long ago learning the various Covid vaccines aren’t vaccines—they don’t prevent contracting or transmitting the disease—and can cause side effects like death, the health mafia continues to claim it’s essential everyone get a never-ending series of ineffective and dangerous vaccines and boosters.

Finally, there appears to be some non-Fauci science out there. You know: the real thing:

It only took four years, the courage of a handful of independent medical experts who risked their careers by contradicting the federal government, the mainstream media, and the medical establishment, and the fact that something resembling the free press remains viable in this country, thanks largely to the internet.

Now, finally, the truth about the COVID-19 vaccine is beginning to be made known to the public. It confirms the many previous warnings such as these: here, here, and here.

It’s a research paper entitled “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign” that appeared on the internet at the Cureus Journal of Medical Science. The abstract bears your close reading and then re-reading, especially if you are one of the millions of Americans who did what public health gurus like Dr. Anthony Fauci incessantly told us to do and “followed the science.”

An enhanced summary of the abstract:

Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged.

Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards.

Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data.

The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted.

Translation: maybe we shouldn’t be forcing “vaccines” on people, particularly children, if we have no idea if they’re effective or will kill them.

Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits.

Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.

Translation: they lied, and people died. As you read the next paragraph, remember science itself—Fauci—is not a biologist, epidemiologist or biochemist, only an MD who hadn’t actively practiced medicine in decades.

The authors of this research paper are highly qualified experts, including, according to Liberty Counsel, “biologist and nutritional epidemiologist M. Nathaniel Mead; research scientist Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D.; biostatistician and epidemiologist Russ Wolfinger, Ph.D.; immunologist and biochemist Dr. Jessica Rose; biostatistician and epidemiologist Kris Denhaerynck, Ph.D.; Vaccine Safety Research Foundation Executive Director Steve Kirsch; and cardiologist, internist, and epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough.”

Science is done when theories are tested against observation, and studies—which weren’t done or were falsified—are replicated and proved correct. Hopefully, there are going to be consequences:

And change it will because, sooner or later, the families of many of the legions of victims of the COVID-19 vaccine scam are going to find smart trial lawyers who are willing to file the litigation and hold those responsible legally accountable. The jury awards that will follow will dwarf anything seen before.

Do I know enough of the relevant science to be certain the author is correct? Certainly not, but I know enough to know a “vaccine” that isn’t, but harms, even kills, people, doesn’t just happen. People pushed it on a trusting nation. We’re not trusting anymore, and actual science just might be making a comeback.