Dems: Oil Ban is in Navajo Tribe’s best interest – Leaders say Otherwise
The Navajo people feel that they are not being heard, and that their fears for their livelihoods are not being addressed ~ Buu Nygren, Navajo Nation President
By
Residents of New Mexico’s Navajo Nation tribe are outraged following President Biden’s ban on oil and gas drilling in their area, but House Democrats dispute this and continue to insist the move is in the tribe’s best interest.
Last month, Biden ordered a 20-year moratorium on oil and gas drilling within a 10-mile radius of Chaco Canyon’s National Historical Park. The decision drew outrage from many Navajos, prompting some to blockade an entrance to the park, keeping Biden’s Interior Secretary, Deb Haaland, from reaching an event to celebrate.
Opponents and supporters of the buffer zone around Chaco Canyon clashed today after Navajo allottees blockaded the road to the park in preparation for Interior Secretary Deb Haaland’s planned visit. The allottee protestors did not let cars into the park. pic.twitter.com/ZCnxA02bBv
— Hannah Grover (@hmgrover) June 11, 2023
On Thursday, the House Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee held a hearing on a recently introduced bill by Arizona Republican Congressmen Eli Crane and Paul Gosar to “nullify” the ban. Several Navajo Nation council members, including President Buu Nygren, argued the rule harms surrounding communities’ livelihoods that “rely heavily” on the leasing.
But despite Navajo disapproval, Democrats in the hearing claimed the ban was in their best interest. New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (pictured below) said the ban helps “protect Chaco Canyon from further fossil fuel development.”
The ban was enacted to preserve the “integrity of sacred sites in and around” Chaco, AOC claimed, adding she is “strongly” against the bill to reverse the moratorium.
In his opening remarks, President Nygren appeared to rebut AOC’s argument, saying Navajos “take our role as stewards of Chaco Canyon very seriously.”
“We have preserved and protected Chaco Canyon since our ancestors’ time, well before the park was created,” and the Navajo Nation government is in the “best position to know what is best” for its citizens.
Nada Wolff Culver, who serves as Biden’s Deputy Director of Policy and Programs for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), also spoke at the hearing in support of the ban. In her testimony, she argued the Biden administration has been consulting with tribes in the area going back to 2021.
Nygren, however, claimed the rule was finalized “without meaningful consultation, and fails to honor the Navajo Nation’s sovereignty.”
The Navajo Nation tried to “compromise” with Biden, but was “rejected with inadequate explanation from the administration.”
“I heard directly from the Navajo people who feel that they are not being heard, and that their fears for their livelihoods are not being addressed.”
The buffer zone, he added, “negatively affects” tens of thousands of allottees.
Delora Hesuse, a Navajo tribal member, alleged Sec. Haaland “promised to listen” to their concerns and give them a “stronger role” in rule-making, but “did not listen” nor “consult with” them on a compromise, which she said involved reducing the 10-mile radius to a 5-mile one.
Tribal members, including herself, have had their “sole means of modest income from oil and gas payments … de facto stripped away” by the public land order, Hesuse went on to claim.
Navajo Allottee Spokesperson Mario Atencio dissented from his Navajo colleagues, however, and argued the order is necessary to preserve Chaco’s environment.
Rep. Crane, who represents over half the Navajo tribes, which extend to Arizona, lamented in the hearing that “all private landowners and Navajo Allottees” are “effectively” barred from leasing areas, and claimed dire economic consequences would follow.
***
Follow Addison on Twitter.
*********
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News. Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
Header featured image (edited) credit: Interior Secretary Deb Haaland /
Emphasis and Twitter feed content added by (TLB)
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Nygren, however, claimed the rule was finalized “without meaningful consultation, and fails to honor the Navajo Nation’s sovereignty.”
THIS, is all that needs to be said.
The crime syndicate federal corporation has no authority to interfere in the Navajo Nation’s private right to contract. Also known as Restraint of Trade, a very serious violation of public office, with dire consequences.