End All College Covid-19 Vaccination Mandates
By: Lucia Sinatra & Joni Ruller McGary
It is time to end Covid-19 vaccine mandates for college students. Colleges and universities are beginning to drop masking and testing requirements, yet they continue to mandate Covid-19 vaccines for students as a condition of matriculation.
To mandate a medical intervention is to violate the fundamental right to medical choice. Therefore, the decision to mandate must be based on nothing less than incontrovertible medical necessity. In the case of Covid-19 college vaccine mandates, that standard cannot be met based on current science and real-life experience.
In early 2021, colleges and universities started to consider how student vaccination would be part of their Covid-19 mitigation policies. Following CDC guidance, they began to strongly recommend and then mandate vaccination as a requirement of matriculation by the fall of 2021. The decision to mandate was based primarily on two main arguments: to prevent community spread in order to protect the vulnerable, and to protect students from serious illness, hospitalization, or death from infection.
The 1,000+ colleges imposing mandates did not justify this drastic measure by sharing a transparent data-driven risk-benefit analysis. Instead, they justified the mandates with mere talking points such as “safe and effective” and “crucial steps to protect vulnerable colleagues.”
No data was given on the risk to the student-aged population of severe illness from infection compared to the risk of vaccine-induced adverse events. Colleges and universities did not provide disclaimers making students aware of the known risks associated with the vaccines, or whether remedy would be available to students in the event of a vaccine injury or to their families in the event of death.
Rachel Walensky confirmed as early as July 2021 that the vaccines did not prevent infection or transmission, yet colleges and universities continue to use the falsehood that student vaccination protects the vulnerable and prevents community spread.
As early as August 5, 2021, Dartmouth College reported a “sudden rise in cases” (Delta) in “fully vaccinated students and employees,” confirming that vaccination did not offer community protection. Cornell had a surge of more than 900 cases (Omicron) in their nearly fully vaccinated student population in December. These two examples are not outliers.
In short, vaccination does not prevent community outbreak, even on campuses with greater than 95% vaccination rates. The argument that students must take the vaccine to protect others is invalid.
What about protecting otherwise healthy individual students? It turns out that this population has an extremely low risk of serious illness from Covid-19, and a near-zero risk of death, even if unvaccinated.
Students do not unequivocally need this medical intervention for their own protection and as such, it must be their choice. To require them to have it is ill-advised and unethical at best, especially when the intervention is still being administered under EUA, and when it is becoming increasingly clear that there are serious vaccine-induced risks in this population specifically.
Regarding injury and death caused by vaccines, colleges and universities would be wise to consider the Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports, recently released from Pfizer. A careful reading will show that in the first 59 days of distribution of the BNT162b2 vaccine, there were 1,232 vaccine-associated deaths reported, and 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed) of injury or side effects.
Because Pfizer redacted the number of vaccines distributed during this time, the rate of injury and death cannot be calculated. Still, the death numbers alone should be enough to immediately suspend all mandates and proceed with caution. Recall that the first mass vaccination program undertaken with the Polio vaccine was abandoned after killing 10 children.
Where there is risk, there must be choice. And there is indeed risk here.
Given that the two main justifications for violating students’ medical rights by mandating Covid-19 vaccinations are now scientifically insupportable and thus ethically dubious, why do colleges and universities continue to mandate? Not one institution has given a thorough and scientific answer to this question when confronted (with sound data) by stakeholders.
Colleges and universities cannot continue to ethically or safely continue vaccine mandates based on current science.
Therefore, they must end these mandates immediately. If they do not, they open themselves to suspicion that the push to vaccinate has been motivated by something other than student health.
Note: The issue of immunity from infection is not taken up here, because the argument is that all vaccine mandates must go. In that scenario, a student can take his immunity status into consideration appropriately. However, it should be noted that the overwhelming percentage of colleges fail to recognize natural immunity.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.