Family Court, Corrupt & Complicit: This Parent Fights Back … HARD!

Court Corruption 1

Preface by: Roger Landry (TLB)

Once again a corrupt system (Family Court) steps in to redefine parental rights to suit their purpose. Once again the family unit, as it has existed for millennia, is under attack from those who stand to gain, with no conscience or little consideration of the ramifications … or the Law! Our most basic human rights are being violated on an ever increasing basis with little to no oversight.


The Family bond is the basic building block of society from which morals, loyalty, respect, conscience, compassion and the sharing of historical knowledge are derived. We are seeing the steady erosion of parental rights across this country in many scenarios from Family Courts, DCF, Common Core, medical kidnapping and more.

For those who seek wealth, power or station in this corrupt system of courts … it is this family bond that will be destroyed so they may succeed. Please read the following  article and watch the disturbing videos.

Through all you are about to read and see one fact comes through in a powerful fashion … This mother, that TLB is very proud to represent in this article, will not back down! She will fight a corrupt and illegal system with her very last breath if needed. Take Notice … Take Example and Take Heed because …

If we as a society allow the family unit to be supplanted by corrupt system of courts or an all powerful state … We can never call ourselves a free people again, and the state will in fact own our children!


Judge Commits Perjury With Her Wet Ink Signature

Contributed to TLB by: Melissa Diegel

By: Melissa Diegel and Karla Johnson

We will not tolerate the judicial system tyranny and their blatant disregard for the law anymore! We are the voice of parents all across America who have had enough of this. Our children are being ripped from our arms and we are being told “It’s not a matter of evidence Ma’am.” As stated by Judge Joan Sinclair Phoenix, Arizona, Durango Court House caught on audio January 6th 2015.

Because I, Melissa Diegel made a you-tube video on behalf of the Johnson family in order to help expose the corrupt judicial proceedings and what judge Joan Sinclair said that day, (by way of an anonymous recording that was given to me.) I am now am being charged with contempt of court along with the Johnson family. The video can be seen here:

We are both being charged with contempt of court and are now facing possible jail time!

We will be facing Judge McNally this Monday, June 29th at 2:00 pm in Phoenix Arizona at the Durango court house 2nd floor court room # 4.

Karla Johnson, a strong warrior for the cause of exposing judicial corruption, has been fighting for 6 years to get all four of her grandsons returned. Karla has helped to pave the way for so many other families and helped to expose what is really happening here in Arizona. Read more about her families journey with the Arizona judicial system here:

If you have been following (Melissa Diegel’s) personal story you may have heard that Judge McNally demanded that I turn over the names, addresses, phone numbers and e-mails addresses of all the people I had ever talked to about my daughters case or I would go to jail. Read more about that here:

The Judicial Kidnapping of Melissa Diegel’s Children

Arizona judge threatens mother with jail time for speaking out against illegal medical kidnapping

Arizona Mother Facing Jail Time for Speaking out Against Medical Kidnapping

I decided I would not comply with Judge McNally’s outlandish and unlawful request and was thankful for the support of 9000+ followers on A Miracle for Two Sisters FaceBook page, who supports families like mine and others across the nation from having their children unjustly ‪#‎TAKEN‬.

Many supporters showed up in court the day I was scheduled to be arrested and surrounded me and fortunately I was not incarcerated. (I do not have a criminal record, I am just a fierce advocate and a mom who’s kids were stolen for a drug trial by Phoenix Children’s Hospital.)

The Fight for Lilly Foundation created a petition to stop Judge McNally from gagging parents Sign Here:

Judge Colleen McNally “Stop Gagging Parents”

The Fight for Lilly Foundation also created a petition to stop Judge Sinclair from gagging parents Sign here:

Judge Joan Sinclair “Stop Gagging Parents”

What most people didn’t even know or realize though, is that Judge McNally had already issued a court order stating she had dropped all contempt charges against me as documented in the minute entry and the state had not pursued any additional charges. (Original charges where from braking my gag order over my daughters extreme weight loss and concern for her health.) Therefore, she herself personally decided to pull me back into the court room for continued harassment and threats to arrest me after I had paid contempt fees in full and had settled the matter. She then issued an additional minute entry stating I would be arrested if I did not disclose all the names etc. In addition as a second contempt charge she has vindictively and maliciously pursued myself and Karla Johnson.

Judge McNally is One of Two Top Presiding Judges in Arizona and has a Great Deal of Power

Karla Johnson and I prepared two motions that we recently submitted to the court:

Disclosure and Discovery and a Motion to Strike and Dismiss these fraudulent charges.

However In Order to Falsely and Maliciously Prosecute the Two of Us:

The court has decided not let us submit our audio as evidence. Yet they are using audio displayed on our You-tube as evidence against us in court. Therefore, we are submitting our audio to you, our Facebook and You-tube followers to share away, in order to be able to submit our evidence into court, since this seems to be the only way to get it into the record.

Judge Joan Sinclair committed fraud by placing her wet ink signature on a minute entry, stating “All attendees of the hearing are admonished by the Court from disclosing any personally identifiable information mentioned in the proceedings and that doing so shall be deemed in contempt of court.” (Both recordings are from the same day and the same hearing, It’s not a matter of evidence Ma’am”).

The audio recording from that day clearly show she did not say that. She committed fraud under her judicial oath in order to maliciously prosecute Karla Johnson and Melissa Diegel in order to stop them from continuing to speak out about the atrocities of the Arizona judicial system.

Listen to audio here, showing the judge only said she would close the proceedings next time:

I filed multiple motions for Judge McNally to recuse herself in both that case and the case of Karla Johnson and I and she has refused. Even though Arizona statue demands it when there is such a conflict as we have been able to legally show.

We have disclosed multiple judges audios to our legislatures, Sheriff Arpio, the District Attorney Bill Montgomery, and to the Attorney General’s office. There are licensed attorneys who are also legislatures and as such they would legally need to report crimes to the bar association or risk their license themselves. As far as we know they have not reported any of this fraud.

The legislatures by a 2/3 vote can vote a judge off the bench. They have refused to get involved.

We have over 6 audios of Arizona judges committing crimes.

The following is an excerpt from a motion that was filed to Dismiss the Contempt charges:

Now comes Karla Johnson and Melissa Diegel, residing in the State of Arizona with all the rights, privileges and immunities thereof, who does not knowingly or unwittingly relinquish any of our natural and constitutionally protected rights hereby submits this “Motion to Strike and Dismiss” “DCS’ Motion for an Order to Show Cause” filed by AAG J. W. H. on Feb. 3, 2015 pursuant to 16 ARCP 60 (c) “fraud and error, FRCP Rule 60 (b) (4) and pursuant to 18 USC §1028 “Fraud and False Documents” as this case exhibits a reprehensible example of this Court preying on, disrupting, harassing and victimizing Karla Johnson and Melissa Diegel.

AAG J.W.H. knowingly filed fabricated ‘contempt of court’ allegations against Johnson and Diegel based upon the fraudulent and altered Minute Entry of Jan. 6, 2015, which is contrary to the irrefutable electronic recording [Exhibit 2 Disclosure and Discovery] in addition this Court utilizes an electronic recording system for the Court’s record.

AAG J.W.H. was present at the court hearing of Jan. 6, 2015, therefore he had first-hand knowledge Judge Joan Sinclair did NOT admonish “all attendees from disclosing any personally identifiable information mentioned in the proceedings and that doing so shall be deemed in contempt of court” [Pg. 2 line 15] in violation of his professional oath of office pursuant to AZ R. of Professional Conduct ER 3.3(a) (3) “A lawyer shall not knowingly offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false….” and ER 8.4 (c) “engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation”; (d) “engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice”; (f) “knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable Code of Judicial Conduct or other law.”

Judge Joan Sinclair committed misrepresentation, fabrication and fraud when she provided her ‘wet ink’ signature attesting to the validity of the contents of the Jan. 6, 2015 Minute Entry, knowing the statement contained herein: “All attendees of the hearing are admonished by the Court from disclosing any personally identifiable information mentioned in the proceedings and that doing so shall be deemed in contempt of court” was maliciously added contrary to the irrefutable electronic recording utilized by this Court, which exhibits overt defiance violating her oath in office pursuant to the AZ Constitution Article VI Item 26; the U.S. Constitution; 28 USC §453 “Oaths of Judges” and 5 USC § 3331 “Oath of Office“. Oaths of office are a statement of loyalty to the Constitution, as well as an oath to the state… It is considered Treason, Perjury, a high crime to betray a sworn oath of office pursuant to 18 USC §1621 “Perjury”; 18 USC §2381 “Treason”; and 18 USC §2384 “Seditious Conspiracy.”

The US Supreme Court states: “Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land.” In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888) “No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. NO officer of the law may set that law in defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government….are bound to obey it.” Butz V. Economou, 98 S.CT. 2894 (1978)’; Unites States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882). “State courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law.” Stone v. Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 38, 96 S.Ct. 3037, 79 L.Ed 2d 1067 (1976).

Ms. Johnson and Mrs. Diegel stand firmly on their First Amendment right to exercise their “freedom of speech” as the First Amendment prohibits a government official from retaliating against an individual for protected speech. E.g., Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250, 256 (2006). The First Amendment prohibits retaliation taken to chill future speech. E.g., Skoog v. County of Clackamas, 469 F.3d 1221, 1232 (9th Cir. 2006).

AAG J.W.H. and Judge Joan Sinclair’s actions reveal “overt acts of obstruction of justice pursuant to 18 USC §1503″, which contains an omnibus provision directed towards “whoever** corruptly** obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice***.” Falk v. U.S., 370 F.2d 472, 476 (9th Cir. 1966). “The omnibus provision is all embracing and designed to meet any corrupt conduct in an endeavor to obstruct or interfere with the due administration of justice.” Falk, 370 F2d at 476; U.S. v. Lester 749 F.2d 1288, 1293 (9th Cir. 1984). “No fraud is more odious than an attempt to subvert the administration of justice.” Hazel-Atlas Co. v. Harford Co., 322 U.S. 238,251, 64 S. CT 997, 88 Le.d. 1250 (1944) (Roberts, J.dissenting.) Black’s Law Dictionary defines ‘corruptly’ to mean with ‘a wrongful design to acquire some pecuniary or other advantage,’ meaning the act must be done with the purpose of obstructing justice. See U.S. v. Rasheed 663 F.2d 843, 852 (9th Cir. 1981).

Wherefore, for the substantive reason detailed herein this Court must strike “DCS’ Motion for an Order to Show Cause” and dismiss this action pursuant to 16 ARCP 60 (c) “fraud and error;” FRCP Rule 60 (b) (4) and pursuant to 18 USC §1028 “Fraud and False Documents.” This Court cannot continue these proceedings using threats, intimidation and coercion to maliciously prosecute Karla Johnson and Melissa Diegel based upon misrepresentation, fabrication and fraud in violation of our Due Process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment “The State shall not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal Protection of the laws”, U.S. Constitution, XIV § 1 and other harmful treatment prohibited by state and federal statutes and codes.

We could in essence put duct tape over our mouths, crawl into the corner and be quiet and never say a word again. We could in essence let the State of Arizona gag us unconstitutionally, proceed to sit us down, shut us up and we could just take it like Woman. BUT we WON’T!

Our nation, our children and our families are at stake here and we won’t sit by and remain idle. We won’t tolerate the medical kidnappings from Phoenix Children’s Hospital or the unjust removals from the families here in Arizona – Over 17,700 children that are now in the Arizona system. Children are dying, some children are going 3 days at a time without eating while in the system and they are ignoring the facts.

No we won’t be quiet, it is time you start to listen … and it is time for some of you to go to jail because in case you hadn’t noticed fraud isn’t OK !!!

See much more on this topic here: A Miracle For Two Sisters

1 Comment on Family Court, Corrupt & Complicit: This Parent Fights Back … HARD!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.