(TLB) ed: After the Justice Department moved to drop the case against former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn last week, the judge in the case said in a filing he will allow outside parties to file “amicus” filings, also known as “friend-of-the-court” filings, which allows a non-party to a case to weigh in.
The Judge, Emmet Sullivan, denied this type of third party intervention 24 times during the case – yet has suddenly changed his mind after an activist group which calls itself the “Watergate Prosecutors” moved to file an amicus brief.
‘Travesty of justice’: Flynn lawyer opposes judge’s invitation for outside opinions after DOJ moves to dismiss case
The Washington Examiner
The legal team for retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn criticized the judge’s openness to considering “amicus” filings in the case following the Justice Department’s motion to drop the charges against the former Trump national security adviser.
Sidney Powell, a former federal prosecutor who took over representation for Flynn last summer, expressed her displeasure with Judge Emmet Sullivan’s Tuesday order, which indicated his willingness to review friend-of-the-court filings from interested outside parties as he decides what to do next rather than allowing the Justice Department to dismiss the case as it has requested.
She filed a six-page motion Tuesday evening opposing any outside intervention in the case, stating that a group that dubbed itself “Watergate Prosecutors” had moved to file an amicus brief on Monday. She said, “This Court has consistently — on 24 previous occasions — summarily refused to permit any third party to inject themselves or their views into this case.” Powell argued that “the proposed amicus brief has no place in this Court.”
“No rule allows the filing, and the self-proclaimed collection of ‘Watergate Prosecutors’ has no cognizable special interest,” Flynn’s team said. “Separation of powers forecloses their appearance here. Only the Department of Justice and the defense can be heard.”
Powell told the Washington Examiner that the judge had denied all previous third-party interventions “until DOJ moves to dismiss and begins to expose the wrongdoing of the Obama administration.”
Flynn’s lawyers have touted recently released FBI records as being exculpatory evidence that was concealed from the defense team. The documents suggest that now-fired FBI agent Peter Strzok and the FBI’s “7th floor” leadership stopped the bureau from closing its investigation into Flynn in early January 2017, even though investigators had uncovered “no derogatory information,” after intercepts of Flynn’s communications with a Russian envoy emerged. Emails from later that month show Strzok, along with then-FBI lawyer Lisa Page and several others, sought out ways to continue investigating Flynn, including by deploying the Logan Act.
In his Tuesday order on the court’s online docket, Sullivan said that “given the current posture of this case, the Court anticipates that individuals and organizations will seek leave of the Court to file amicus curiae briefs.” He quoted Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who presided over the case against Trump associate Roger Stone, saying that “while there may be individuals with an interest in this matter, a criminal proceeding is not a free for all.” Sullivan said that “accordingly, at the appropriate time, the Court will enter a Scheduling Order governing the submission of any amicus curiae briefs.”
The move appears to be a departure from how Sullivan has treated amicus brief requests in the Flynn case prior to this. In December 2017, Sullivan denied multiple motions for leave to file various friend-of-the-court filings.
Powell told the judge that “this travesty of justice has already consumed three or more years of an innocent man’s life” and that “no further delay should be tolerated.” She said the case should be dismissed immediately.
Related from The Liberty Beacon:
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.