
.
ER Editor: More than ever, we insist it’s a movie. Nobody but nobody governs in this way. “Listen to what we did to you and why.” German Economics Minister Robert Habeck, admitting to ‘testing’ the public with some nasty and destructive policies, used to be a children’s writer, incidentally. Some disgusted twitter users —
Translation: BREAKING NEWS: Robert Habeck calls his scary heating law a “test” to see “how far society is prepared to go in terms of climate protection.” What worried millions of people was just a game for Habeck.
BREAKING NIUS: Robert Habeck nennt sein gruseliges Heizgesetz einen “Test” , um auszuprobieren, “wie weit die Gesellschaft bereit ist, Klimaschutz zu tragen.” Was Millionen Menschen besorgt hat, war für Habeck nur ein Spiel. https://t.co/nwMYL3x3Og pic.twitter.com/NmDihuH3VJ
— Julian Reichelt (@jreichelt) May 25, 2024
Translation: Fairytale Minister Robert #Habeck admits that he only deliberately deceived the degenerate civil society in order to find out how loyal and obedient the “German Michel” is to #Klima politics. He is deliberately making politics against the German people
Märchen-Minister Robert #Habeck räumt ein, die degenerierte Zivilgesellschaft lediglich vorsätzlich getäuscht zu haben, um herauszufinden wie loyal und obrigkeitshörig der „deutsche Michel“ gegenüber der #Klima-Politik ist.
Er macht absichtlich Politik gegen das deutsche Volk‼️ pic.twitter.com/zmDUebFPe6— Dr. Toni (@MrDavidTreets) May 25, 2024
Translation: Now that it didn’t work, I can tell you that the heating law was just a test. I wanted to know how stupid you are when it comes to climate protection. Greetings Robert
Jetzt wo es nicht geklappt hat kann ich es euch ja sagen, das Heizungsgesetz war nur ein Test. Wollte wissen wie doof Ihr schon seid, wenn es um Klimaschutz geht.
Gruß Robert pic.twitter.com/zZM8sOeLVs— Wirtschaftsminister Parody Robert Habeck (@HabeckPress) May 25, 2024
********
German Minister admits ruinous home heating ordinances were merely a “test” to determine “how far society is prepared to go in terms of climate protection”
We are governed by crazy lunatics, Part 2,436,502,345.

Yesterday, at a town hall event, somebody asked Habeck about the GEG, and he responded by saying that the first and most ruinous draft of the law was a test, to see how much the people would put up with:
Many of you will remember that we went as far as we could go in the buildings sector – at least that’s what I would say for myself – without risking the complete collapse of climate policies. The debate about the Building Energy Act, that is how we will heat in the future, was honestly a test of how far society is prepared to go in terms of climate protection when it becomes a reality. And I went too far. You could see that the reaction was immediately there, so to speak, and it would have been a reaction that would probably have ended up knocking the entire climate protection programme off its feet.
The pandemic really did inaugurate a new era in politics.
As the vile Neil Ferguson said some years ago, “People’s sense of what is possible in terms of control changed quite dramatically between January and March [2020],” and the pandemicists were not the only ones watching and learning. From lockdowns, mass vaccination hysteria and the rest of it, our technocratic betters drew a terrible lesson, namely that they could go much further than they ever imagined possible. In the post-pandemic era it remained merely to find out where the new boundaries were. Habeck discovered that immiserating millions of Germans with climate protection legislation that will do nothing about emissions is not quite within his powers. But if it were, he would’ve done it. And then he would’ve tried to do the next even more extreme thing.
In this and in all other areas, you get not the reasonable interventions or the correct measures or the policies most likely to achieve the stated ends, but the maximal policies – the most our rulers can do given the political will and the ambient public hysteria at their disposal. These are very dangerous people, made even more dangerous by a complacent and inattentive citizenry.
In its current, modified form, the GEG is projected to reduce German carbon emissions over the next six years by the same amount as China emits on a single day. We have this law not for saving the climate, and not for any other concrete purpose, but merely because this is the maximum that Habeck could enact.
This pointless exercise in political power has introduced substantial uncertainty into the housing market, and it will cost taxpayers and many ordinary Germans billions of Euros in the coming decades. All for nothing.
Source
************
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply