GOP Rep. roasts pro-TikTok Dem for “Swag” Rant
Dem Rep. Jamaal Bowman said Republicans seeking to ban platform ‘ain’t got no swag’
By
Texas Republican Rep. Troy Nehls rebuked Rep. Jamaal Bowman for being flippant about the dangers TikTok poses to youth mental health after the New York Democrat attributed Republican support for a ban on the popular, Chinese-owned video sharing platform to a lack of “swag.”
Currently, many Republicans in Congress and a growing number of Democrats are in favor of a nationwide ban on TikTok, for reasons ranging from national security and user data privacy to the targeting of the young with harmful content.
During a protest outside the Capitol Wednesday, Bowman, a progressive Democrat opposed to the ban, impugned the motives of ban advocates in the familiar terms of identity politics, urging Congress to “not be racist towards China and express our xenophobia when it comes to TikTok.”
Bowman also took another, somewhat head-scratching, swipe at his opponents.
“Republicans ain’t got no swag, that’s why they want a ban,” he declared.
Asked for a response Thursday, Nehls ripped Bowman for trivializing a serious issue.
Rep. Nehls/Twitter screen shot
“Give me a break,” Nehls retorted. “What are we teenagers? What is this high school? … Is this a popularity contest? Am I running for class president? This is serious stuff.
Nehls continued, alluding to a mother who sued TikTok last year, alleging her daughter died from imitating a dangerous stunt that the app’s demographic targeting algorithm curated for her. “How would Bowman feel if we get the mother of the 10-year-old that committed suicide?” Nehls asked. “You think he’s going to look her in the eyeballs like I’m looking at you and say, ‘I want to talk to you a little bit about swag’? Give me a break. This is serious business.”
Nehls is in favor of banning TikTok, in part, because it is owned by ByteDance, the Chinese company which has access to personal data related to the platform’s millions of users.
“We have to act responsibly,” Nehls said. “We have to put the American people first and their children. We must do it today. I don’t see the fight here. I don’t see the arguments. I don’t see the argument other than the guy in the White House. He’s owned by China.”
Nehls rejected the First Amendment argument.
“You can’t justify keeping it,” he said. “Don’t tell me this is a First Amendment thing. People here in the states that want to have TikTok, oh, go to a different app. There’s a lot of great apps out there.”
Nehls said Chinese President Xi Jinping wouldn’t allow him to bring an American app to China. Currently, U.S.-based apps like Facebook are banned in China.
*********
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News. Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
Header featured image (edited) credit: Bowman/Yahoo News screen shot
Emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB) editors
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
update….
THERE CAN BE A #SLIPPERYSLOPE with just as #THEPATRIOTACT NOW TWISTED TO USE AGAINST AMERICAN PATRIOTS the banning of a Private company App like this can set a VERY DANGEROUS PRECEDENT — that would be the discussion and reason to oppose; based on FREEDOM PRINCIPLES (and why many Conservatives are opposing based upon that/those Principles (but there is ZERO REASON it cannot be banned on ANY/ALL GOVERNMENT BOUGHT/PAID-FOR DEVICES))!!!
The RESTRICT Act, like The Patriot Act before it, GOES WAY TOO FAR and would be used by FASCICRATS to shutdown Conservative Platforms. They have been BEGGING for Internet control via the fake NET NEUTRALITY Act manure.
related: https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/brace-yourself-im-about-to-agree-with-a-democrat-sort-of/
Is idiot AOC actually RIGHT about something? If so, of course, for the WRONG REASONS!!!
AOC and other Leftists have (of course) gotten TIK TOK MONEY so they oppose banning it. HOWEVER, she is Right in that we have to TREAD LIGHTLY on this as THERE CAN BE A SLIPPERY SLOPE with just as THE PATRIOT NOW TWISTED TO USE AGAINST AMERICAN PATRIOTS the banning of a Private company App like this can set a VERY DANGEROUS PRECEDENT — that would be the discussion and reason to oppose; based on FREEDOM PRINCIPLES (and why many Conservatives are opposing based upon that/those Principles (but there is ZERO REASON it cannot be banned on ANY/ALL GOVERNMENT BOUGHT/PAID-FOR DEVICES))!!!