Here’s How Biden’s Regulatory Agenda Stacks Up To Obama’s After 30 Months On The Job

Here’s How Biden’s Regulatory Agenda Stacks Up To Obama’s After 30 Months On The Job

Daily Caller News Foundation logo

NICK POPE CONTRIBUTOR

President Joe Biden’s regulatory agenda has proven to be even more costly than that of former President Barack Obama through the first 30 months of their respective presidencies, according to data released Monday by the American Action Forum (AAF), a policy analysis group that promotes free market solutions to policy issues.

Biden’s regulatory state has implemented 620 final rules totaling an estimated $395.5 billion in costs and 232.4 million paperwork hours, according to AAF’s data. Through two and a half years as president, Obama had issued 926 final regulatory rules amounting to approximately $222.4 billion and 145.6 million paperwork hours.

“President Biden wants changes so large, there’s no way that they would get through congress,” Diana Furchtgott-Roth, director of the Center for Energy, Climate and Environment at the Heritage Foundation, told the Daily Caller News Foundation, adding that Biden “has to turn to the agencies to get these massive changes through.” The administration is attempting to leverage “administrative, executive branch overreach to do what Congress will not pass,” she concluded.

(RELATED: Supreme Court Rolls Back Biden EPA’s Expansive Water Regulation)

AAF published its data just weeks after the Foundation for Government Accountability released a report which concluded that the Biden administration is imposing the most expensive regulatory agenda of any administration in American history.

By comparison, the costs of final rules implemented by the Trump administration through Trump’s first 30 months in office reached $36.3 billion and 54.5 million paperwork hours.

Just last week, the Biden administration issued 16 new rulemakings adding up to $19.3 billion in total costs and 4.4 million annual paperwork hours, according to AAF’s data.

The Biden administration has used regulatory action to crack down on gas-powered appliances, internal combustion engine vehicles and coal-fired power plants in pursuit of its “whole-of-government approach” to countering the perceived effects of climate change.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) unveiled a new proposal [last] Friday which would impose tight fuel economy standards on American auto manufacturers and make vehicles up to $1,000 more expensive for consumers if finalized. That proposal followed a previous attempt by the Environmental Protection Agency to impose new emissions standards on heavy-duty trucks, which Senate Republicans managed to overturn despite not having control of the chamber.

The White House did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

*********

(TLB) published this article from The Daily Caller with permission and our appreciation for this report and perspective

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Obama & Biden/org. Daily Caller article

Emphasis added by (TLB)

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*