By: TLB Staff Writer | David-William
August 10, 2016
There are matters before you, which are every bit as important as your political status, and tangent to your status. There is a situation that requires the general population to abandon the two ugliest beasts housed within their minds; intellectual dishonesty; intellectual laziness. If one is too lazy to read, they’re already cooked. If they’re too dishonest to think, they’re extra crispy. If one suffers (“suffer” per their own will) from both, they’re prime slave material. Nothing is more useful to the captors of this land than willful ignorance.
UNITED STATES is not a bloody country, land mass, nation, or anything, other than a pirate vessel, a bankrupt, private, foreign corporation occupying the Territory of Columbia, and of course, the minds of all the stooges who think they’re U.S. citizens. A U.S. citizen is a superior slave, by their own consent. U.S. citizens haven’t the mind to think free, much less act free. Whenever confronted with the subject of political status correction, almost every time, from their mouths; “But what about my benefits?” What model prisoners! Every rat trap comes with free cheese.
Prison inmates get to enjoy the benefits of jail. They have a place to sleep, three meals per day, a shower, clean clothes, someone to tell them what to do and when to do it, guards to force them into submission, and Bubba. This description is none other than UNITED STATES, or U.S. If in fact U.S. is not a nation or land mass, then how can one “reside” “in” the “U.S.?” Mentally, of course.
Who or what is UNITED STATES? It’s not a nation or land mass, because CORPORATIONS are DEAD entities. They can control only that which they create. U.S. didn’t create man, because men created it. U.S. can control it’s EMPLOYEES. Who are the EMPLOYEES of the U.S. CORPORATION? The answer is, U.S. citizens! Oh, they didn’t tell you that you signed up to be an EMPLOYEE? Certainly, you didn’t sign onto a lawful contract. What status do you “maintain” as U.S. citizen? That answer is DEBT SLAVE.
What your legal guardians or parents sign on your behalf, the BIRTH CERTIFICATE, is legally binding FOR EVER, unless and until YOU VOID that after you become an adult.
Consider how intelligent a U.S. citizen is, in comparison to how intelligent they claim to be. If they claim to be a U.S. citizen, they just proved they don’t read history, law, or anything outside of entertainment, and they proved the most important of all, they don’t even know what U.S. actually is, therefore they cannot comprehend who or what a U.S. citizen actually is. This isn’t you, right!?! Let’s see!
Citizens (Federal) and Persons vs. People
“A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)
“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
“Therefore, the U.S. citizens [citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an “individual entity.” Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773.
CITIZENS. Citizens are members of a political community who, in their associated capacity, have established or submitted themselves to the dominion of a government for the promotion of their general welfare and the protection of their individual as well as collective rights.—U.S. v Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542—
Persons vs. People
What a person is not:
” ‘in common usage, the term ‘person’ does not include the sovereign people, and statutes employing the (word person) are normally construed to exclude the sovereign people.’ Wilson v Omaha Tribe, 442 US653 667, 61 L Ed 2d 153, 99 S Ct 2529 (1979) (quoting United States v Cooper Corp. 312 US 600, 604, 85 L Ed 1071, 61 S Ct 742 (1941). See also United States v Mine Workers, 330 US 258, 275, 91 L Ed 884, 67 S Ct 677 (1947)” Will v Michigan State Police, 491 US 58, 105 L. Ed. 2d 45, 109 S.Ct. 2304 b)
“The sovereign people are not a person in a legal sense” In re Fox, 52 N. Y. 535, 11 Am. Rep. 751; U.S.v. Fox, 94 U.S. 315, 24 L. Ed. 192.
“A corporation is not a citizen within the meaning of that provision of the Constitution, which declares that the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States. Special privileges enjoyed by citizens in their own States are not secured in other States by this
provision such as grants of corporate existence and powers. States may exclude a foreign corporation entirely or they may exact such security for the performance of its contracts with their citizens as, in their judgment, will best promote the public interest.” [Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall (U.S.) 168; 19 L.Ed 357 (1868)]
What a person is:
Blacks Law Dictionary, 5th Edition, page 1028
Person. In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may include a firm, labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. National Labor Relations Act, § 2(1).
Bankruptcy Act. “Person” includes individual, partnership, and corporation, but not governmental unit. Sec. 101(30).
Corporation. A corporation is a “person” within meaning of equal protection and due process provisions of United States Constitution. Allen v. Pavach, Ind., 335 N.E.2d 219, 221; Borreca v. Fasi, D.C.Hawaii, 369 F.Supp. 906, 911. The term “persons” in statute relating to conspiracy to commit offense against United States, or to defraud United States, or any agency, includes corporation. Alamo Fence Co. of Houston v. U. S., C.A.Tex., 240 F.2d 179, 181.
Foreign government. Foreign governments otherwise eligible to sue in U.S. courts are “persons” entitled to bring treble-damage suit for alleged anti trust violations under Clayton Act, Section 4. Pfizer, Inc. v. Government of India, C.A.Minn., 550 F.2d 396.
Illegitimate child. Illegitimate children are “persons” within meaning of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68, 88 S.Ct. 1509, 1511, 20 L.Ed.2d 436; and scope of wrongful death statute, Jordan v. Delta Drilling Co., Wyo., 541 P.2d 39, 48.
Interested person. Includes heirs, devisees, children, spouses, creditors, beneficiaries and any others having a property right in or claim against a trust estate or the estate of a decedent, ward or protected person which may be affected by the proceeding. It also includes persons having priority for appointment as personal representative, and other fiduciaries representing interested persons. The meaning as it relates to particular persons may vary from time to time and must be determined according to the particular purposes of, and matter involved in, any proceeding. Uniform Probate Code, § 1-201(20).
Municipalities. Municipalities and other government units are “persons” within meaning of 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. Local government officials sued in their official capacities are “persons” for purposes of Section 1983 in those cases in which a local government would be sue able in its own name. Monell v. N.Y. City Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611. See Color of law.
Protected person. One for whom a conservator has been appointed or other protective order has been made Uniform, Probate Code § 5-101(3).
U.S. Supreme Court decisions regarding the sovereign American people, filing fees and/or their free access to the courts.
The courts must realize the sovereign people, are not bound to pay filling fees as the sovereign people are not a person, or persons. The use of the word person is the reason the sovereign American people have been tricked into paying for filing fees. It is the use of the word person in law, and the confusion, the word person creates for the average sovereign people, when used in law.
A person is a corporation, so that’s why the courts are not supposed to be falsely charging the sovereign American people to pay filing fees. When the courts state that Title 28 U.S.C. sec 1914 requires a person or persons to pay fees, that does not apply to sovereign American people. The CODE only applies to a person or persons, which are corporations. The sovereign American people require their lawful right to free access, without fees as ordered by the U.S. Supreme Court. UNITED STATES and/or “STATE OF…” can control only that which it creates.
If one is established as a “people”, individually or collectively, then one is entitled to all the rights, which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am.Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7.
A people may do anything he or she wishes to do so long as it does not damage, injure, or impair the same Right or property of another individual. 10 Pick. 9; United States Exp. Co. v. Henderson, 69 Iowa, 40, 28 N. W. 426; Greenl. Ev. 469a quoted in Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906). A people owes no duty to the state or the public as long as he does not trespass.
Lansing v. Smith 21 D. 89. people of a state are entitled to all rights which formerly belonged to the king by his prerogative……….2. Citizens – United States citizenship does not entitle citizen to rights and privileges of state citizenship.
Citizenship of the United States does not entitle citizen to privileges and immunities of citizen of the state,since privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other. Tashiro v. Jordan S.F.1234G. S.C.C. 5-20-1927 “Both before and after the “14th” Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state.” Crosse v. Board of Supervisors of Elections (1966) 221 A.2d 431 p.4
These rulings & statutes make it clear the Residents or U.S. Citizens are Government Employees, who have no constitutional protection, like the citizens of the several States, therefore Affiant cannot be a part of the body politic, and Affiant further swears that Affiant is not a part of any body politic, nor has Affiant ever promised to abide by the body politic.
” ‘In common usage, the term ‘person’ does not include the sovereign people, (citizens of several states) and statutes employing the (word person) are normally construed to exclude the sovereign people.’ Wilson v Omaha Tribe, 442 US653 667, 61 L Ed 2d 153, 99 S Ct 2529 (1979) (quoting United States v Cooper Corp. 312 US 600, 604, 85 L Ed 1071, 61 S Ct 742 (1941). See also United States v Mine Workers, 330 US 258, 275, 91 L Ed 884, 67 S Ct 677 (1947)” Will v Michigan State Police, 491 US 58, 105 L. Ed. 2d 45, 109 S.Ct. 2304 b)
“The sovereign people (citizens of the several states) are not a person in a legal sense” In re Fox, 52 N. Y. 535, 11 Am. Rep. 751; U.S.v.Fox, 94 U.S. 315, 24 L. Ed. 192.
___
Admiralty Maritime Courts presume that you are a U.S. citizen, so your contract with U.S. is where you surrendered your rights for benefits, right? Wasn’t that when you checked that box, after your mother sold you into slavery when she abandoned you to the STATE OF.. by signing that Birth Certificate? So those are courts, right? Or are they?
A judge tells you that the constitution doesn’t apply in his courtroom. What argument can you make that he won’t recover from? “Under what authority do you presume to act? If Article III of the Constitution does not apply in this courtroom, then this is NOT court and you are NOT a Judge.“
“Where constitutions speak, statutes should remain silent.” Switzer v. State, 103 Ohio St. 306; 113 N.E. 552
“Local laws or ordinances enacted by a city must be consistent with the state constitution.” Bell v. Vaughn 155 Fla. 551; 21 So.2d 31; Evans v. Berry, 262 N.Y. 61; 186 N.E. 203
“Judicial decisions, however numerous, are subject to correction by the constitution itself.” State v. Buente, 256 Mo. 227; 165 S.W. 340
“What the constitution grants, no statute can take away.” State ex rel. Hoel v. Brown, 105 Ohio St. 479; 1 Ohio L. Abs. 230; 138 N.E. 230
♦♦♦
Since U.S. is not a nation or a land mass, then whose banner is that we see everywhere? The Stars and Stripes with the gold fringe around the edge certainly isn’t the American Flag. It’s an Executive Administrative Military Banner. It’s the sign that the captors have assumed command. The Crown – Vatican – Swiss Banking Cabal has seized control of all commerce, waterways, and mineral rights of this land. U.S. is a U.N./I.M.F. entity. The tough part isn’t finding out, but it’s what you do when you do find out. Now that you know about what U.S. really is, what mechanism allows you to accept your self-fulfilling fate as a U.S. citizen? It’s time you think about what you’re doing and why. Are you one of the people, or are you merely a SLAVE/PERSON/DEBTOR?
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10834
President Dwight David Eisenhower signed Executive Order 10834 on August 21, 1959. It is printed in the Federal Register at 24 F.R. 6865, pursuant to law, and says: “A military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a yellow fringe border on three sides.”
Every nation in the world accepts The Law of the Flag. Basically, it designates the rights under which a ship owner who sends a vessel into a foreign port functions and provides notice to those who enter into contracts with the ship master that he will use the Law of the Flag he flies to regulate contracts. The Law of the Flag regulates the laws under which contracts entered into will be governed. (See Ruhstrat v. People.)
In other words, Admiralty Law says that when a ship flies a Spanish flag, if you sign a contract with the Captain of that ship, any agreements or contracts the Captain signs will fall under Spanish law
unless otherwise specified.
Further, there is a doctrine called “four cornering” a flag.According to usatherepublic.com, “By the doctrine of ‘four cornering’ the flag establishes the law of the country that it represents. For example, the embassies of foreign countries, in Washington D.C., are ‘four cornered’ by walls or fencing, creating an ‘enclave.’ Within the boundaries of the ‘enclave’ of the foreign embassy, the flag of that foreign country establishes the jurisdiction and law of that foreign country, which will be enforced by the Law of the Flag and international treaty. If you enter an embassy, you will be subject to the laws of that country, just as if you board a ship flying a foreign flag, you will be subject to the laws of that flag, enforceable by the ‘master of the ship’ (Captain).”
So, when you enter your local courtroom and find a yellow-fringed flag, you may want to seriously question under what laws people who appear in that courtroom are being tried: The U.S. Constitution? Or, the U.S. Military? Or, Maritime Law? Or, the Uniform Commercial Code (corporate law)?
Admiralty law tells us that when you see a flag, you need to understand that in areas where a flag is “four cornered,” you are being told which laws dominate that space. We are governed by the laws of the country the flag represents. According to President Eisenhower, gold-fringed flag tells us we are under the rules and regulations of the military force that flies the flag.
FLAG Martial Law; “Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides. The president of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief.
FLAG Martial law; “Ancient custom sanctions the use of the fringe on regimental colors and standards, but there seems to be no good reason or precedent for its use on other flags.” The Adjutant General of the Army, March 28, 1924, (1925); 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 483, 485.
According to many Internet sites espousing expertise involving Flags, courtrooms that display fringed flags behind a judge is a military courtroom. Such a courtroom tries cases on the basis of military law,
not constitutional law, not common law, not civil law, and not statute law. According to Army Regulations, (AR 840-10, Oct. 1, 1979.) “the Flag is trimmed on three sides with Fringe of Gold, 2 1/2 inches wide,” and “such flags are flown indoors, ONLY in military courtrooms.”
The gold-fringed flag only stands inside military courts that sit in summary court martial proceedings against civilians. These courts are partially governed by local rules, but more especially by “The Manual of Courts Martial”, U.S., 1994 Ed., at Art. 99, (c)(1)(b), pg. IV-34, PIN 030567-0000.
A judge who sits ‘under’ a gold or yellow fringe flag becomes the ‘captain’ or ‘master’ of that ship or ‘enclave’ – or courtroom? That judge has the absolute power to make the rules as he goes. The gold or yellow fringe flag warns that you are leaving your constitutional rights outside the four walls in the room where such a flag is “cornered.”
Is this why so many judges are appointed and not elected by the people? Federal judges are appointed by the President, the national military commander in chief. State judges are appointed by Governors, the state military commanders. Are judges appointed because the courts are military courts and civilians do not ‘elect’ military officers?
Under martial law, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent. That would certainly explain many court decisions, wouldn’t it?
Article IV, section 3, of the Constitution of the United States of America says “…no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State.” So – why have the judges of State and Federal courts been allowed to erect foreign ‘enclaves’ within our public courthouses under a foreign flag with yellow fringe? The soil on which these courtrooms are built belongs to each of our states. Does this make sense to you? It doesn’t to me. It only makes sense if the states are viewed as territories, rather than states.
There are other theories – that Maritime Law gives the legal system the right to treat people as corporate assets, for example – but all of the theories come to the same conclusion: Any courtroom with a fringed flag behind the judge should be highly suspect relative to the law under which people are tried.
Your job on Monday (“should you accept it” – for Mission Impossible fans): Visit your local courtrooms and take a picture of the flag in each. Be sure the pictures document where the flag is located – is it behind the presiding judge? The odds are very high that the flags in your courtrooms are fringed with gold. Is this an indication that the courts in your state function under Maritime Law? Probably. I have
for years looked for reason in the decisions coming from American courtrooms – and as strange as it sounds, this makes a lot of sense and explains a lot of crazy decisions that have nothing to do with constitutional law.
This opens doors of lawful activity for Tea Party Groups… for all citizens, actually. Rather than protest – or sit quietly by doing nothing – take pictures of your courtrooms. Visit the links provided regarding flags and what they mean. Raise enough money to place a full-page ad in your local newspaper and publish the photos with a story. Educate the rest of the electorate as to why our courts allow corporate
and government fraud and why the law seems to be interpreted differently for individuals than it does for people like Jeffrey Imelt, GE, and the politicians who support scumbags like him.
When you add judges whose Oaths of Office are not properly filed (see my NewsWithViews article) as constitutionally required by the state and the federal government, you will understand why taxpayer rape is being condoned by our legal system.
And here’s the second project for you – should you accept it, of course. Find the names of your judges – city, county and state. Call your county clerk and ask where the Oaths of Office for city and county judges can be found. Call your Secretary of State to find where each state judge’s filed Oath of Office is located (including the state supreme court). These are public documents. You are entitled to copies of them. When you find a judge whose Oath of Office is not on file, ask for a signed statement to that
effect.
Bear in mind that when judges do not have a legitimately FILED Oath of Office, every decision that person has made while on the bench is illegitimate. Most state constitutions say a public official without a FILED (not just taken, but legally filed) Oath of Office is viewed as if the office requiring the Oath has been “vacant.” Find the exact wording of your state’s constitution (look under Oaths of Office) regarding filed Oaths. Publish in your advertisement about court flags what the Constitution says along with the names of any judges who do not have one on file. Remember, district attorneys and federal judges and prosecutors take Oaths of Office, too.
___
GET THAT GOLD FRINGE OFF MY FLAG
http://shatteringthematrix.com/group/thetruthrevealed/forum/topics/a-gold-fringe-flag#.V6u6gmWZNvU
♦♦♦
___
THE THREE FLAGS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
https://johnhenryhill.wordpress.com/2015/04/25/the-three-flags-of-the-united-states-of-america-2/
_____________________
JOIN The Liberty Beacon Project! Be a member!
On behalf of The Liberty Beacon Staff we cordially invite you to become a part of something special, something intended to amplify the voice and will of ‘The People’ globally … Because there is always “Strength In Numbers!”
FREE & TRULY INDEPENDENT MEDIA
THE LIBERTY BEACON PROJECT
****************
Compare the following project membership package to ANY other on-line news network, website, or agency membership, including the unique benefits we are offering and actual project participation … Then compare pricing! You will find that what we are offering is like nothing else. We like to call it … The WOW Package!
TLB Project Membership Benefit Package:
From the TLB Project Founder – You will be sent a (exclusive to members) monthly video with TLB Founder, Roger Landry, presenting all new developments within TLB and prospects for future developments.
Bi-Monthly Video Newsletter – You will be sent a (exclusive to members) bi-monthly newsletter (2 per month) in the form of a video presentation anchored by TLB staff, Susan Price and Ariyana Love. The newsletter will summarize major news and events from our global proprietary and partner websites as well as our media presentations such as TLBTV. Links will be included for easy accessibility.
E-Books – You will have up to 8 (Free, Not available to the general public, or Exclusive to TLB Members) e-books available to you. The value of one book itself pays for the yearly membership. You can choose from a variety of books relating to Global or Domestic Politics, Science, Finances and/or the Holistic Health field. You are not limited to one or two selections … you can elect to receive from zero – all as you wish! Total cost for requesting all 8 books … $00.00. Additional books will be added as time progresses (see more below).
A Valid TLB Journalist Card – You will qualify for a TLB Journalist ID card supported and backed by TLB Project LLC. The only requirement is that you contribute a minimum of one original article, written by you, in excess of 800 words, per month for TLB publication. This article (if selected for publication) will be published in your name as a TLB Project Contributing Author. The TLB Journalist ID can be used at events for journalist access and reporting. NOTE: You will be functioning as an independent Journalist providing content to TLB, Not as a TLB staff member or employee (see more below).
Quarterly Conference Call – You will be invited to listen in on our quarterly accomplishment and planning conference calls with our TLB senior staff members. Calls will be live-streamed for TLB Project Members ease of attendance, and recorded/archived for all members convenience.
Bi-Annual TLB Project Congress – All TLB Members will be invited to join our bi-annual (2 per year) Congress. You will have exclusive access to our main TLB chat room where you can listen to a live-stream staff conversation and provide chat feedback, empowering you to be an active TLB Congress member. Live polls will be conducted and votes taken on certain project goals and directions. This new platform allows your voice to be heard by our TLB Directors/staff, and encourages membership participation in selected TLB goals to help move the project forward in a democratic fashion .
On-going Exclusive On-line Video content – Media created by TLB Project staff, contributors and members (see more below). And there is much more in the wings currently under development.
Note: Anything added to this list after your membership is activated … you will automatically receive access to, in addition to what you have already selected or qualified for.
This unbeatable yearly Membership Package can be had for just …
$9.99
For so little, you can help this entire project to say so much!
Be part of something Positive, something Real,
The TRUTH … in a World of LIES!
CLICK HERE MORE INFORMATION:
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/tlb-project-membership/
U.S. is on the Territory of Columbia. Massachusetts is not D.C.
A U.S. citizen is purely a creation of the unlawful, and never ratified “14th Amendment” which was forced at gunpoint, long after Congress ended forever. Their attempt to turn State Citizens into U.S. citizens was in fact, a fraud. When the Southern States walked out of Congress in 1861, Sine Die, that was it, forever, period. The unlawful reconstruction was a coup and whoever refused to conform was overthrown. The original Constitution was breached decades before, and it had only 13 Articles or Amendment. U.S. has it’s own Corporate Charter. I recommend reading the material at annavonreitz.com
This information alone will help anyone comprehend the basis for the reasoning behind it all. All U.S. citizens are corporate DEAD entities. In order to be a U.S. citizen, one would have to renounce their State Citizen Status. All the original constitution did was create “a more perfect union” over the Articles of Confederation to bind all the individual Nation States into the bankruptcy, and the debt to the King. The King maintained control of all commerce, waterways, and many mineral rights on America, and still does to this day.
Claiming U.S. citizen status will make you obligated to be a debt slave taxpayer. That’s how the foreign Crown Temple B.A.R. U.S. Attorneys nailed Ed Brown for tax evasion, by displaying his U.S. citizen status on his U.S. passport.
U.S. citizens are corporate entities under a foreign, bankrupt, private corporation under U.N./I.M.F. organization.
“Title 28 USC 3002 Section 15A states United States is a Federal Corporation and not a government, including the Judicial Procedural Section. ”
“Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a foreign state.”
“Title 8 USC 1481 states once an oath of office is taken, citizenship is relinquished, thus one becomes a foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political subdivisions. (i.e. every single court is considered a separate foreign entity).”
The 11th Amendment states “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of a Foreign State.” (A foreign entity, agency, or state cannot bring any suit against a United States citizen without abiding the following procedure.)
Learning the difference between the Republic, New Hampshire State, and the foreign U.S. subsidiary STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE is where those unfamiliar with the matter can start. U.S. citizens are corporate entities.
Title 28 USC 1330 states that the United States District Court has to grant permission for a suit to be pursued once the court has been supplied sufficient proof that the UNITED STATES CITIZEN IS ACTUALLY A CORPORATE ENTITY.
A State Citizen is not required to pay Income Tax. A U.S. citizen is. Also explained that having a Social Security Number makes you a U.S. citizen and are thus forced to pay Income Tax and since the lower case citizen is not protected by Constitutional Rights, is not entitled to have Representation on his Taxation.
A State Citizen is a citizen of one of the several States of the United States of America and is empowered with full Constitutional Rights.
A U.S. citizen is the equivilant of being a resident in the District of Colombia (Washington DC isnt a state) and has NO Constititional Rights, only civil rights.
A U.S. Citizen has their name printed on all forms in all capital characters and is not recognized as a proper person. BOB SMITH is not Bob Smith’s name, Bob Smith with a capital upper case first character and small charaters is the proper way to spell Bob Smiths name. And that also applied to the difference between the capitalization between State Citizen where Citizen being a proper person and a State both being capitalized, where U.S. even by itself as an abbreviation is not a proper way to identify the United States which it obviously stands for but that by itself makes any forms referring to the United States as the U.S. invalid, and last but not least U.S. citizen where citizen is NOT capitalized again reinforces that the person it represents is not a proper person, or a person with Constitutional Rights. Look on any job application. Are you a U.S. citizen? It never asks are you a State Citizen. He was right about that. But also said that by so much as saying you are a US Citizen that you waive all of your constititional rights.
Who is a citizen.
Every person born or naturalized in the [federal] United States and subject to its jurisdiction is a citizen. For other rules governing the acquisition of citizenship, see chapters 1 and 2 of title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401–1459). ” [26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(c)] This area includes the District of Columbia, the territories and possessions of the United States, and the federal areas within states. If you were born in a state of the Union and are domiciled there, you are not subject to federal jurisdiction unless the land you maintain a domicile on was ceded by the state to the federal government. Therefore, you are not and cannot be a “citizen” under federal law. If you aren’t a “citizen”, then you also can’t be claiming your children as “citizens” on IRS returns either!
It is clear that citizens of states existed prior to the 14th Amd. and that those citizens were natural born white people. This was a common law right. The “United States” as a noun never had any common law nor did it have any citizens of its own before the 14th Amd. This new citizenship for the “United States” is statutory and has different privileges and immunities than that of the states of the union. Statutory citizens have statutory Civil Rights as delineated by Congress.
It could be concluded that the statutory citizen of the “United States” is inferior to that of the State Citizen in the sense that they are subject to all laws passed by Congress while State Citizens are not. One need only to read Art. 1, sec. 8, clause 17 of the federal constitution to see the difference. Keep in mind that there are “these United States” and there is the “United States.” These United States meaning the union of states, plural.
This should get you started.
David-William
Would you mind clarifying your sources please? Upon reading your sources it is unclear how you came to your conclusions. More seriously, your own conclusions are phrased in such a way as to make it seem like direct quotes from the source rather than opinion.
For example:
“A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)
Please clarify because my reading of this case explained that Hendrick DID have the right to interstate commerce and the common-law right to travel. Although Hendrick argued that he was denied those rights on the basis of being fined for failure to register his vehicle, the court found that the registration fees and consequential fines constituted “no burden on interstate commerce”.
And next:
“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)
This case was an interesting read. Can you please clarify what you based your opinion on?
Thank you-
Kaci