House Passes Fuel Price-Gouging Bill — Lets Biden declare an “Energy Emergency”

House Passes Fuel Price-Gouging Bill

“This Should Set Off Alarm Bells Across All Industries”

Post by Tyler Durden | Written by Natahan Worcester via The Epoch Times

The House of Representatives passed the Consumer Fuel Price Gouging Prevention Act, by a vote of 217-207 on May 19, taking the country closer to greater government involvement in energy markets as gasoline prices soar to new heights.

The bill, H.R. 7688, would let President Joe Biden declare an “energy emergency.”

Such an emergency would empower the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to target people who sell fuel at a price judged “unconscionably excessive” or that “indicates the seller is exploiting the circumstances related to an energy emergency to increase prices unreasonably.”

That presidential emergency proclamation would last 30 days but could be renewed indefinitely “as the president deems appropriate.”

The bill also prioritizes FTC enforcement actions against firms with $500 million or more in annual wholesale or retail consumer fuel sales.

While 217 Democrats voted for the bill, 203 Republicans and four Democrats voted against it.

During the debate, Democrats and Republicans clashed over the causes of record-high gasoline prices.

While the GOP emphasized new regulations and decisions against domestic energy under the Biden administration, Democrats pointed out that record-breaking energy prices have been accompanied by billions in profit for oil and gas firms.

“Our residents are so fed up with corporate greed,” said Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), a supporter of the bill.

Tlaib spoke in front of a large poster listing the 2021 profits of various large oil companies, including Shell and Chevron.

Meanwhile, Republican John Joyce (R-Pa.) stood beside a poster illustrating the long lines of cars at gas stations during the 1970s, when the United States implemented price controls in an attempt to deal with rising gas prices caused by OPEC’s oil embargo.

The poster was labeled, “Socialist Price Fixing.”

“Instead of creating price controls that would lead to less production and massive gas shortages, we need to rely on the energy that lies beneath the feet of my constituents in Pennsylvania,” Joyce said.

Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.) ran through a laundry list of Biden administration actions he said contributed to the rise in gas prices.

These included the cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s climate-related disclosure proposal.

As Armstrong noted, the Biden administration already pushed the FTC to investigate rising gas prices late last year.

Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) argued that House Republicans were mischaracterizing the scope of the legislation.

“We’re not giving the FTC the authority to set the price,” he said.

Yet the bill itself defines violations in terms of “unconscionably excessive” prices, raising questions about how the benchmark for such a judgement would be set, and by whom.

Pallone also claimed that “the problem is oil companies don’t want to increase production.”

“You cannot ask oil and gas companies, particularly onshore companies, to increase production when the infrastructure doesn’t exist to get that product to market,” Armstrong argued during his own testimony, citing the Duke pipeline and other pipeline projects that have been scuttled in recent years.

Bruce Westerman (R-Ak.) attempted to recommit the bill to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, addressing concerns raised by that committee’s ranking member, Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wa.).

His motion failed by a vote of 220-201.

The House also passed two amendments to the bill.

The first, introduced by Rep. Val Demings (D-Fla.), would mandate an FTC investigation into alleged price gouging, including through cuts to refinery capacity. It passed 217-205.

The second, introduced by Chris Pappas (D-N.H.), creates a new FTC unit to monitor fuel markets. It passed 214-207.

The Sierra Club, an environmental organization aligned with the Democratic Party, praised the bill on social media, tagging their Tweet with the hashtag #blamebigoil.

Tim Stewart, president of the U.S. Oil & Gas Association, argued that the bill’s language is vague, setting a troubling precedent.

“The poorly written bill gives the president discretion to declare that gasoline or diesel fuel is ‘unconscionably excessive’ and to determine if your neighborhood gas station is guilty of exploiting an ‘energy emergency.’

“None of these terms are defined so they can mean whatever the president says, and these price controls can be continued indefinitely,” he told The Epoch Times.

“This should set off alarm bells across all industries and markets because while today might the price of gasoline, but tomorrow’s ‘unconscionably excessive’ pricing might apply to anything from the price of wheat, to health care, to airfare, to housing.”

Prominent Democratic economists, including Harvard professor Larry Summers and former Obama administration economist Jason Furman, have also voiced concerns about the bill, with Furman describing it as “dangerous misguided nonsense” on Twitter.

The Epoch Times has reached out to Sen. Joe Manchin (R-W.V.) and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (R-Ariz.) to see how they intend to vote on any Senate version of the bill.


(TLB) published this article as posted by Tyler Durden and written by Natahan Worcester via The Epoch Times

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Service Station Price Sign/orginal article from Tyler Durden & The Epoch Times

Emphasis added by (TLB) editors



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.