ER Editor: To see Hungary ploughing its own furrow, see this story we recently published, titled
German ‘Do As We Say’ vs. Hungarian ‘We’ll Do It Our Way’
As for Hungary cutting deals with China, we have often run into the notion that China is playing the IMF game of indebting countries to kingdom come through its Belt and Road Initiative. Would Hungary face this problem? It seems that this is just another myth put out there about China. Such accusations are noticeably absent from analysis of the BRI venture by historian Matthew Ehret, who emphasizes the creative nature of the BRI project versus the Western zero-sum game of economic domination and destruction. Geopolitical analyst Thierry Meyssan tackles the myth head on:
China, which is presented by the West as a seller of junk that sends its prey into a spiral of debt, has just cancelled most of the debts owed to it by 13 African states.
Every day we hear the noble Western speeches and accusations against Russia and China. But every day we also see, if we look at the facts, that the reality is the opposite. For example, the West tells us without proof that China is a “dictatorship” and that it has “imprisoned a million Uyghurs”. Although we do not have recent statistics, we all know that there are fewer prisoners in China than in the USA, even though the US has four times less population. Or we are told that homosexuals are persecuted in Russia, while we see bigger gay discos in Moscow than in New York.
Orban has been around the political block during his lifetime. We’re guessing he can figure this out. He’s also pushing on with getting his country’s energy supplies from Russia.
We also need to add that the China is not all one thing, and that the CCP does not represent it. To the question of whether Xi is a black hat or white hat, those that tackle this question prefer the latter.
********
Hungary and China. Mutually Beneficial Cooperation. Undermines the Globalist Agenda
KONRAD REKAS
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
***
The American colonies have not stopped criticising the Hungarians for their rational approach to the war in Ukraine and yet another reason for an anti-Magyar (ER: anti-Hungary) hate campaign appears. As a predictable country, not adventurous and going on about its own business, Hungary has become a leading European centre of cooperation with China.
China’s necessity for Europe
Contemporary Amperex Technology Ltd (CATL), China’s largest producer of electric car batteries recently announced that it will locate its main European plant in Hungary. The investment value is estimated at EUR 7.34 billion, but its importance is primarily strategic. China is a leader in renewable energy technologies (RE), thanks to its dominant position on the rare earth elements (REE) market and the largest share in the production of components for i.a. advanced magnetic wind turbines and car batteries.
One can notice the importance of REE: examples of the embargo imposed by China on REE export to Japan in 2010, the Sino-American conflicts caused by subsidising solar panels production in 2012/2013, dispute about subsidies for the wind turbine producers, and previous controversies about customs tariffs for REE within China-USA and China-EU trade relations.
There is also the threat of supply shocks of REE used in the production of hybrid electric vehicles and some types of wind turbines, caused by assumed increase in demand on neodymium (forecasted a 7% increase) and dysprosium (even 2,600% increase!) in the next 25 years. Demand for lithium used in battery cells is expected to grow by 674% by 2030.
This makes Beijing an absolutely indispensable partner for energy transformation in Western Europe, covered by the ‘Climate Change’ pretext. The pandemic turmoil, as well as the recent anxiety caused by the Taiwanese crisis, make European-Chinese relations extremely fragile. Another slowdown or disruption of the global supply chain would not only blow up the entire Western energy transition but would also hit the consumer model of capitalism at the time when nations are not yet ready to reject it immediately.
In this context, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), as well as direct Chinese investments on the European side of Eurasia, constitute a potential emergency solution and Beijing’s indication of future regional centres of power. And Budapest wants to take advantage of it.
Realism favours investments
Hungarians were the first in Europe to sign a memorandum of understanding with the Chinese on joint ventures within the RDI (ER: we’re not sure what RDI stands for). As a result, only in 2021 did bilateral trade increase by 34.5%. China has become Hungary’s third in general and largest non-EU trade partner. In May 2021 Hungary’s largest 100 MW solar power plant was commissioned, CMC Kaposvar Solar PV Park, built by China National Machinery Import & Export. In June 2022, the first European factory of the LENOVO concern was opened in Budapest, hiring over 1,000 local employees.
As is typical for Chinese politics, these are calm, even slow and non-ostentatious operations, but clearly determined to increase China’s own presence and soft influence. Another example is growing flow of Chinese students sent to Hungary. Of course, 2,700 of them on the Hungarian universities is still not much of a number compared to the crowds studying in developed countries of the West, but it clearly indicates Chinese interest in Central Europe. The Hungarians themselves also see the partnership with Beijing as promising, and despite attempts to shake the mood during the COVID (“Chinese pandemic”) period, 51 percent of respondents are optimistic about Chinese activity in their country.
Globalists and Imperialists
Of course, Hungarian profits achieved thanks to good relations with China constitute “annoyance” for:
- the liberal-globalist, precisely or not, but personified by Hungarians in George Soros,
- and the Anglo-Saxon military-industrial complex, aimed at eliminating the Chinese threat even with a global war.
So, from the one side there are standard voices of condemnation that Budapest hesitates over – “numerous violations of human rights in China”, while the Americans keep pointing out the Hungarian “Trojan horse”, still in the hope that it is possible to discipline Victor Orbán.
The Carnegie Endwoment for International Peace, one of the significant globalist think-tanks recommends:
“The United States should not shy away from pushing the EU and key member states (especially Germany, which is Hungary’s most important trading partner) to impose greater pressure on Orbán, including the potential use of sanction mechanisms against officials and businessmen engaged in local corruption schemes involving China. Brussels should consider applying the EU’s rule of law conditionality regime”.
Washington officially recognises that Chinese progress in Europe is not yet very dangerous, and the Sino-Hungarian relations are not overwhelming in absolute numbers, but at the same time they urge that this is the best or even the very last moment to blackmail the Hungarian prime minister.
Budapest would be faced with a threat of complete cut-off from European financing in case of further cooperation with Beijing. Well, the typical friendly manner within Euro-Atlantic, ‘democratic and liberal alliances’…
The New Global Game of Thrones and how to earn on it
Then, the most important question for Eastern Europe is whether Western European funds and Anglo-Saxon diplomatic-military supervision could be replaced by Chinese loans and direct investments, like in Africa and South America. (ER: We suppose this involves Hungary signing onto the BRICS organization.)
That is also the Globalists’ and Atlanticists’ most horrifying nightmare. Russia’s attractiveness for Europe is limited to its position of energy supplier, which should be dealt with by the Western ‘Climate strategy’. However, China, with its capital surplus and dominant industrial position, is a viable alternative to the financial capitalism of the New World Order. The competition of global centres will therefore accelerate and the wise, even small ones, will be able to benefit from it.
************
Source
Konrad Rękas is a renowned geopolitical analyst and a regular contributor to Global Research.
Featured image: China’s rare earths (Source: asiafinancial.com)
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply