Italian PM Meloni Embroiled in ICC Complaint, Complicity in Gaza Genocide

Despite Meloni’s nervous reaction, the move is not unexpected, given that comparable actions have already been taken throughout Europe. In Germany, legal actions have been filed with the ICC and local courts targeting government officials and arms manufacturers for their alleged involvement in supporting Israel’s military actions in Gaza. Furthermore, more than 100 lawyers in France have officially requested the ICC to look into France’s potential complicity in genocide concerning Gaza.

In her July 2025 report, Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Palestinian Territories, indicates that eight states and at least 1,650 companies, including Italian manufacturer Leonardo S.p.A., contribute to the manufacturing and distribution of components and parts for the Israeli F-35 fleet, which Israel customizes and maintains in partnership with US defense contractor Lockheed Martin and local companies. INVESTIGATE, a project run by Action Center for Corporate Accountability of the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), which exposes corporate complicity in state violence, issued a comprehensive report regarding Leonardo S.p.A., Italy’s largest weapons manufacturer and its dealings with Israel.

DOCUMENT: Profile of Leonardo S.p.A by INVESTIGATE. CLICK HERE FOR DOC>>>>(Source: Investigate)

As per information from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Italy was among just three nations that exported “major conventional arms” to Israel between 2020 and 2024. However, it is noteworthy that the United States and Germany accounted for a staggering 99 percent of the exports in the broader category of larger weaponry, which encompasses aircraft, missiles, tanks, and air defense systems.

Furthermore, the Jurists and lawyers for Palestine organization (GAP) formally cautioned the Italian government on September 24, urging it to “take all necessary measures to genuinely safeguard the Global Sumud Flotilla and its participants.” With civilian ships trying to breach the Israeli naval blockade and provide humanitarian assistance to Gaza being intercepted and their crew members detained, legal proceedings are being contemplated to assess the potential accountability of the Italian government regarding the actions of the Israeli Navy. It is generally recognized that the Israeli military’s recent actions against the Global Sumud Flotilla are deemed illegitimate, as they took place in international waters where Israel lacks the legal right to intervene, intercept and abduct its passengers against their will, making such actions a potential act of piracy.

In accordance with the recommendations issued by the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ), all state parties the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court—which Italy ratified on July 26, 1999—are required upon learning of, the existence of a serious risk that genocide will be committed, to implement reasonable measures within their power to prevent genocide. However, according to GAP, Meloni’s Government has not only refrained from doing so but, to the contrary, contributed to Israel wae crimes against the Palestinians.

According to GAP’s lawyer, the Italian government’s liability hinges on two key factors:

Firstly, demanding compliance to the Israeli blockade and thus deeming it legitimate amounts to complicity in the crime. The blockade is integral to Israel’s criminal actions, whether they be war crimes or genocide, as it plays a role in perpetuating the offensive within the Gaza Strip and employs starvation as a weapon.

The second factor pertains to the choice to withdraw the Navy vessel that was only briefly sent to escort the Global Sumud Flotilla. Withdrawing and consequently denying assistance signifies a failure to fulfill the duty of protection and, once again, inadvertently aids in the perpetration of a crime.

In March 2024, Italy’s Minister of Defense, Guido Crosetto, informed parliament that only previously signed orders were being fulfilled after verifying that the weaponry would not be used against civilians in Gaza. According to Italian law, arms exports are prohibited to nations engaged in warfare and those identified as violating international human rights. Crosetto stated that in light of the surge in violence in Gaza, UAMA, the Italian authority responsible for Export Control of Armament and Dual-Use Materials, had halted the approval of arms transfers to Israel.

Nevertheless, on March 12, 2024 data released by the Italian statistics agency ISTAT revealed that the country exported 2.1 million euros ($2.30 million) worth of arms and munitions to Israel during the final three months of 2023. In December 2023 alone, Italy’s arms exports amounted to 1.3 million euros, which was three times higher than the same month in 2022. Crosetto defended these arms shipments to Israel by describing them as existing contracts, while Francesco Vignarca, the leader of a national pacifist disarmament network, expressed concerns about the lack of transparency regarding arms sales and criticized the recent attempts to amend Italy’s export laws.

In March 13, 2024, italian outlet Altreconomia published a report, casting a grim light on Italy’s arms export to Israel, particularly weapons and ammunition, as well as aircraft components originating from the province of Varese, where Alenia Aermacchi (Leonardo group) is based.

In light of the recent massive protests in Italy, where millions have taken to the streets to voice their opposition to the ongoing mass killings in Gaza, the Palestinian advocacy group that filed the complaint with the ICC is urging the court to consider the potential for launching a formal investigation into the allegations of genocide against the Italian prime minister and her accolytes…

IMAGE: Pro-Palestinian demonstrators hold placards of Meloni reading ‘Accomplice to genocide’ at a protest against Israeli forces intercepting the Global Sumud Flotilla, in Milan on Friday (Source: Stefano Rellandini/AFP)

The Eastern Herald’s European Desk reports…

Giorgia Meloni says ICC complaint alleges her complicity in Gaza genocide

A complaint in The Hague draws Rome into a test of law, export controls, and street politics.

Rome — Italy’s prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, said this week that a complaint filed at the International Criminal Court accuses her of complicity in genocide for her government’s support of Israel during the war in Gaza, a sharp escalation that drags Rome’s policy into an expanding fight over accountability. In a televised interview, she said she had been “denounced” to prosecutors in The Hague and named Defense Minister Guido Crosetto and Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani as co-targets, adding that Roberto Cingolani, the head of the state-linked defense and aerospace group Leonardo, might also be included. Reuters captured the thrust of her disclosure and the political framing around it in real time through a televised disclosure on RAI.

The filing, according to coverage synthesizing AFP and Italian accounts, is dated October 1 and signed by roughly fifty people, including law professors, lawyers, and public figures. It asks prosecutors to assess whether there are grounds to open a formal investigation into genocide complicity tied to Italy’s support for Israel during the campaign in Gaza. Al Jazeera’s readout details both the date and the signatories’ core argument. Ms Meloni countered that Italy has not authorized new arms shipments to Israel since October 7, 2023, a point she and Mr Crosetto have stressed while noting deliveries under prior contracts.

The legal backdrop matters. The court’s Palestine docket already features arrest warrants for Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and former defense minister Yoav Gallant on allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity tied to Gaza, including starvation as a method of warfare. Those warrants remain live, which is part of why any complicity theory has immediate political bite in Europe. For readers who track the procedural path of those warrants, The Eastern Herald’s earlier coverage of appellate developments remains relevant; see our report on live warrants in The Hague. The court’s own pages set out the history and documents in the situation, including the Palestine situation overview and filings recorded in May and July 2025.

At the center of the complaint is a pair of facts about Italy’s role in the global arms market and the law that governs it at home. Public data compiled by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute show that in 2019 through 2023, Italy accounted for under one per cent of Israel’s imports of major arms, mostly light helicopters and naval guns, and that Italy participates in the F-35 program through component manufacturing. SIPRI’s backgrounder sets out those details plainly, a concise profile of Italy’s share and items, along with the arms transfers database and the 2024 trend sheet summarizing exporter and importer shares.

Italian officials draw a bright line between new authorizations and legacy contracts. Mr Crosetto and Mr Tajani have told Parliament and reporters that any shipments after October 7 flowed from licenses granted before the war, and that Rome sought assurances on lawful use. The distinction is politically crucial in Rome and will be probed by prosecutors if the complaint advances. Reuters set out that distinction in coverage of Italy’s parliamentary exchanges and public statements, noting deliveries tied to older orders and the government’s evolving language about proportionality. See the context on how officials framed legacy contracts rather than new authorizations.

Questions about individual criminal responsibility at the ICC turn on the Rome Statute, particularly Article 25, which sets out aiding and abetting and contribution to crimes by a group with a common purpose. The text of the statute is the starting point for any complicity analysis. Readers can consult Article 25 in the court’s consolidated statute for the precise language on purpose, knowledge, and contribution thresholds that a prosecutor would have to consider when evaluating actions by elected officials or corporate executives far from the battlefield.

The courtroom route is slow by design. The ICC receives many communications from individuals and groups each year. Only a fraction moves forward, often after months of quiet assessment. Even an open preliminary examination is no guarantee of charges. Jurisdiction, complementarity with national processes, and the feasibility of gathering proof about knowledge and purpose all shape prosecutorial discretion. Italy’s own law, which requires an annual report to Parliament on military export licenses, makes the paper trail more visible than in many countries. The government’s English courtesy translation of Law 185 of 1990 is available on the foreign ministry’s site, see the controlling statute on export oversight.

IMAGE: The ICC headquarters in The Hague, the tribunal that received the complaint naming Italy’s leadership. (PHOTO: HRW)

Domestic politics can be a catalyst. Crowds in Italy have surged across several cities in recent weeks, fueled by anger over a civilian aid flotilla intercepted at sea and by the scale of destruction inside Gaza. As news of the interception spread, unions called a nationwide strike, and thousands poured into piazzas. That social pressure is a factor in every capital handling Gaza policy. The Associated Press captured the scale of the mobilization that followed the sea episode. The Associated Press reported on a general strike that filled piazzas.

Italy’s navy briefly shadowed the Global Sumud Flotilla, according to officials, then pulled back as Israeli forces intercepted boats in international waters and detained hundreds of activists. The episode placed Rome in an awkward posture, neither endorsing the maritime convoy nor confronting Israel’s enforcement of its blockade, a policy that has drawn sustained scrutiny from maritime lawyers and humanitarian agencies. For a narrative chronology and legal context, see our sea coverage on the sea convoy saga and the day-by-day rundown in our flotilla chronology. Wire services documented the new interdiction on October 8, including an on-water sequence captured by Reuters and Associated Press accounts of the boarding and expected deportations.

IMAGE: A flotilla vessel photographed before interception, central to Italy’s sea-policy quandary. (Source: Novara Media)

What might investigators look for if they choose to test the complicity claim? Prosecutors tend to triangulate open source reporting, export records, and diplomatic correspondence when available, then map those facts to the statute’s mental elements. Italy’s annual license reports can show timing and destination. SIPRI’s databases can show categories of deliveries. Critics argue that parts and platforms are fungible in wartime, and that assurances about humanitarian law compliance become weak guardrails once systems enter a conflict. Supporters of the government’s approach reply that legacy contracts create obligations that cannot be canceled without legal exposure and supply chain harm. The argument is not abstract. In Gaza, hospital managers and surgeons have said for months that oxygen plants and generators run on thin margins of diesel and predictable delivery windows. Our reporting has returned to that clinical reality repeatedly.

See our focus on oxygen plants inside hospitals, and the broader humanitarian ledger in a Gaza toll analysis.

The moral pressure rises with each new sea scene. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition says a second convoy was intercepted on October 8 in international waters as it attempted to carry medicines, respiratory equipment, and nutritional supplies to Gaza’s hospitals. Israel says those aboard were safe and would be deported. The episode built on protests that had already filled city squares across Italy, including outside sports facilities where activists sought to link public spectacle to policy. The pattern is familiar in Europe, where legal vocabulary now spills easily into everyday politics.IMAGE: Crowds in Rome during a nationwide day of action linked to Gaza, a backdrop to Italy’s heated debate. (Source: Al-Jazeera)

Meloni’s political test is twofold. She is trying to maintain alignment with Washington and Brussels, expand Italy’s Mediterranean portfolio, and shield households from inflation. At the same time, she faces unions that have shown they can still mobilize millions, and an opposition that has found in Gaza a rallying point that cuts across traditional cleavages. Her ministers have gradually shifted language about proportionality and civilian protection, but the government has not recognized a Palestinian state. Inside the European debate, recognition moved in other capitals first. For the record of that drumbeat, readers can consult our coverage of Britain’s pivot and Paris signals that followed.

The international law landscape is also shifting in ways that touch this case. The International Court of Justice, which hears disputes between states, declined to proceed with provisional measures against Germany in a case brought by Nicaragua that alleged aiding genocide through arms transfers. That order underscored how high the bar remains for state responsibility and how distinct the ICJ’s remit is from the ICC’s focus on individual accountability. The ruling is summarized on the court’s page for the case, see the order from April 30, 2024, and in the UN’s explanatory note summarizing the decision.

Leonardo sits at the hinge of politics and production. Its factories and engineering teams are threaded through European and American supply chains, including components for the F-35 fighter. Mr Cingolani has dismissed assertions of corporate complicity as a “serious frame-up,” and any criminal allegation that ensnares a senior executive would ripple far beyond Rome’s ministries. Investors would ask about disclosure and risk. Export control agencies would revisit compliance routines. Unions would press for clarity on jobs within multinational programs. Those are the kinds of second-order effects that make this complaint a market story as much as a legal file.

The flotilla episodes sharpened a different set of questions. When governments send naval vessels to shadow civilian convoys, then stand off as another state boards in international waters, what signal do they intend to send? In Italy’s case, the choreography suggested a desire to show vigilance to activists at home while avoiding a confrontation with an ally at sea. Our earlier analysis of sea law and negotiation templates, including verification ladders and inspection lanes, remains pertinent as Cairo tries to shape a ceasefire architecture. See our report from Egypt on deadline diplomacy and verification ladders.

For now, the formal record is brief. The ICC has not confirmed receipt of the Meloni complaint, which is routine at this stage. If prosecutors decide the communication merits further assessment, the initial steps will be mostly invisible. They would likely cross-check Italian license reports, SIPRI transfer data, and government statements against the Rome Statute’s mental elements and contribution thresholds. They would weigh whether domestic processes in Italy are capable of addressing the alleged conduct, which affects complementarity analysis. And they would consider feasibility, from witness access to documentary trails that can be tested in court.

None of this says how a case would end. It does say how a European democracy must think about its own laws when a war nearby refuses to become distant. It says something about where responsibility begins along a supply chain, and about how quickly legal language can enter the evening news when a protest wave crests. Ms Meloni’s defense rests, for now, on a line many European leaders have tried to draw. Italy, she says, has not greenlighted new arms to Israel since the war began, and any post-October 7 deliveries are the tail of earlier deals. Activists will try to prove that the tail still wags the dog. The next procedural beats may be quiet. The politics will not be.

(TLB) PUBLISHED THIS REPORT FROM 21WIRE

SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA – BECOME A MEMBER @21WIRE.TV  &  VISIT OUR TELEGRAM CHANNEL

Header featured image (edited) credit: Org. pot content. Emphasis added by (TLB) editors

••••

••••

Stay tuned…