KEN’S CORNER: Liberty & Mandated Vaccination

KEN’S CORNER: Liberty & Mandated Vaccination

Where there is Love there is life.” – Mahatma Gandhi

Commentary by TLB Contributing Writer: Ken LaRive

Let us study the idea/concept of a mandated vaccination in a Constitutional Republic. It isn’t an easy task. As always, to get to the truth, one must hit that ball back and forth, and when the dust settles, hopefully the truth will not only be visible, but we will have the ability to recognize it when seen.

One might think the argument a simple matter to consider, and yet there is a powerful triangulation that stymies most all civility, and the truth of this matter is covered in both fear, and outright lies. If you want to know the truth, which is not always evident in the world of men, follow the paper trail. If corporate profit is made, and a parent challenges it, the question must be asked: Was there a standard moral compass for both sides? Is a moral compass necessary? You see, corporations are structured to protect themselves from this scrutiny. Corporations are a shell game, with one protected by another in a variety of ways… They are compartmentalized just for that purpose… Individuals in one division have no idea what the hand of another division is doing? Even those who are supposed to be calling the shots from the pinnacles, are one of hundreds of vice presidents, and all have a different job description, responsibilities, and not privy to what other company men are doing. This way, very few feel responsible for any negative outcome that a corporation might produce. Since they have no control over the collective, they can relinquish all moral responsibility.

And so, if love and fear is the primary motivator of an individual who refuses a vaccine, there must be a counter moral equivalent from the corporate side, something beyond a black bottom line. If there is not, there is no use debating it… And that is the rub, isn’t it? And surely, as we throw this ball back and forth, there must be exceptions, but I challenge you to find one.

Why would a company say that they do not buy lumber from the rain-forests, advertise that they are not open on Sunday because their employees need a day with family, or promote that they follow the teachings of Jesus Christ, so they can be trusted, if there was even the remote possibility it would harm their profit margin. Feel uncomfortable asking that question? No, that determination was considered, before the statement was promoted publicly. Its kinda like a group of similar corporations and bankers, who have grown so powerful they can actually crush a country, and out of the dust they impose a puppet dictator instead of a Constitutional Republic, with civil liberties said to be inspired by God? And each division, only knows that the company stock is going up, that their retirement plan is matched, and the yearly bonus has grown faster than inflation…

On one side is a parent protecting their children, and the other a conglomerate mandate that all children be required, by pain of fine and or imprisonment, be vaccinated without due process, consideration, self determination or civil liberty… Out of love and fear a parent might risk the virtual forfeiture of any further participation inside of that society, branded publicly, marked so that they will be identified everywhere they travel, and will be forever labeled as immoral and irresponsible, unless of course, they resend…if they do not resend, there is the distinct possibility that the Government will take their children from them.. it is the price paid for dissonance on one hand, and an unquestioned and dominating authority on the other…. Civil Disobedience, the Constitution, our civil liberties, freedom, Liberty from tyranny, all morality and ethics, Love and joy, all civility, all politeness, all of science, all of history and our future, everything both artful or speculated by scientific hypothesis, and our undeniable imagination… all in question by a parent guarding their children… a parent who emphatically says no… and it is well known that they would do anything, anything at all… out of selfless love.

And Big Pharma knows this… and that is where the paper trail both begins and ends…

Big Pharma is even bigger then the Military Industrial Complex, and Government whats to control that… oh, really? And what is big government? Well, that is the classic definition of an oligarchy.

It is a collection of Pharmaceutical corporations with a singular mindset, working in conjunction… and by the use of media, and corporate lawyers, they pay billions for their drug adds, at the same time lobbying congress to support them in their monetary-big-Parma endeavors. Lobbying is not a plea for help; it is bought and paid for…It may or may not surprise you to know that “Obamacare…” …you know the one that had to pass so that we could see what was inside? Well, now the thousands of pages are found to be full of doublespeak, and convoluted lawyer loop-holes, and has a Big Brother Parma-fingerprint on every page. They finally had enough for both sides to vote it in, and what prey-tell changed their minds, not actually knowing what was in it? What could change the mind of a man who is bought and paid or?

So lets hit the ball back for a moment…

Why would a loving woman take a stand against another loving woman, unless her mind is filled with something else, like fear. And where would she get this fear? From a long ago teacher? An inner voice of reason? What if, is it at all possible, that media propaganda played a part? And who controls this media, corporations do, and what is their primary objective? Is it a cure for cancer? Is it a free drug that cures diabetes? No, no more so does a surgeon want to tell you that a topical cream will get rid of a planter’s wart. Cutting it out will be far more effective, I’m told, and they sleep very well justifying that it is…

Wait, lets bounce it back again…

Isn’t Anti-vaccination parents deemed by Pro-vaccinated parents to be dangerous and irresponsible? And that without a particular vaccination, as all others are required by law to do… that they… individually, along with their entire family, will be scorned as irresponsible to the collective needs of our civilization, and the decision to withdraw from the system irresponsible. Some, but not all, who are Pro-Vaccination, say the chance is worth the risk, even in the wake of admitting that the increase in autism is not readily understood. Thought to be about a one in thousand chance a generation ago, it is now about one in a hundred chance a child will develop autism, and though is looks to be escalating, the trigger is not known. Is it as simple as one person not being able to put their feet in another person’s shoes? Surely, you would think differently, question the official narrative more closely, if your child contracted autism, and on the very day you got a shot… and in your studies, found that some statistics said that one child in every on hundred children might get autism, and another stating there was a one in a hundred chance. Throwing the dice is not the same as a solid statistic, but that is precisely what confuses truth… and without truth you are nothing but a slave with no future you can call your own.

Your child had a slight fever, some had no symptoms at all, and that is enough to show that each individual reacts differently to the shot! If there are differing reactions, who would not concede that some people may be more susceptible than others?

The nurses, practitioners of many kinds, and doctors that I know, some in my family, and some who I see professionally, overwhelmingly agree that vaccinations are a powerful force for good. Now this may be entirely true, or not… shouldn’t we consider that the primary reason for this strong supportive stance might be that they have, for their entire career, believed that vaccinations are a power for good, and that even the mere suggestion that it is not is an affront not only to their intellect, their professionalism, but a moral and ethical affront as well? Who, with so much education, making daily life and death decisions, would readily admit the remote possibility that they have been duped. Surely, a doctor three hundred years ago would look at how medicine is being practiced today as magic. And surely, without a doubt, with computer compilations having the ability to save all data, making it easily accessible to all those working on similar projects, that we are doubling our store of knowledge in most all of the sciences, every 2.2 years? Could there be, Lord forbid, something that might curb this expansion of knowledge? Perhaps a reluctance to relinquish power, control, and a black bottom line.

Those who are questioning these vaccines, are not doing it for any other reason but that they love their children, and fear for their safety. It is glaringly noticeable that only a few men are taking up this issue, from the media to the courts, and that is the rub. Both sides should be seen to have the same general motivation, a love for our children and a need to see them safe. And one might think that would be enough to work together, but it is not.

Points to consider…

  1. There is the trust issue. Both big corporations and government, all modern governments, work together for a common cause. Some corporations in Russia feel competitive with some Western corporations, and central banks too. Do you think that Western inventions are protected by law beyond the borders of China, Russia, or India? International law? Ever wonder why our country is so opposed to being under the jurisdiction of a system of international law? No, it has nothing to do with your right to bear arms, but of arms and drug trafficking. If you really want truth, do a bit of homework using this question: “What does Afghanistan Poppy, Medicinal Marijuana, Benghazi, Iran, Saudi and Israel, Cuba and North Korea, have in common?” Want a hint? Its Profit. Corporate profit.

  2. If you vaccinate your children, and it works, then they surely must be safe from those who are not vaccinated. Unless, of course, the vaccination did not work. So what moral justification does one woman have over the other? Both are loving and caring, responsible parents, who want to do what is right. If there are no guarantees, why then is the argument so cut and dry?

  3. Read the Public Health Service Act (PHSA). And how it deals with something they term “Quarantine.” Any resistance, as they can proclaim martial law, is futile, with unconstitutional draconian enforcement backed by the military. Yes, we trust them. We trust everything that is said on the black box too. They have never lied to us! Out of manufactured fear, one woman would destroy another woman for taking a stand on this issue, for the love she holds for her kids.

Note: I know a woman in Crowley, LA, who has been raising a child who was normal the same day it was inoculated, over forty years ago. “While we were driving home, I saw the change in her. I saw her alert, with sparkling eyes who saw me and reacted to me, and I watched them turn dull and without light before we got home. She didn’t die that day, only her future did, because she is still four years old. There is no way anyone can tell me that shot had nothing to do with it. It can’t be proved, so they told me, but I live with it every day, and I know damned well the shot did it.” This year she will be 48. She still plays with the same teddy bear, has never learned to read, and is barley potty trained. She can not be trusted alone, and has to be monitored from the time she wakes up till she is bathed and put to sleep. She is diagnosed with having autism, and no one can explain how or why. Don’t we have an obligation to ask these questions? Any loving and responsible parent would.

It is said that we will be required to have the Covid Vaccine. That we will be required to have a certificate to travel by plane, to attend school, to eat in a restaurant, to go to a ball game, to get married, by penalty of law.

I do not agree with a word that you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” – Voltaire


Read more COVID-19 Vaccine related articles


Read more great articles by Ken LaRive


Ken LaRive

From the Author, Ken La Rive – We in the Liberty movement have been fighting to take back this country for more than a decade, peacefully and with the love of God and country in our hearts. Our banner has been trampled on and displaced by a multitude of distractions, further eroding our nation and the cause for Liberty. And so, as we are pulled by forces we cannot fathom, powerful entities with unlimited resources stolen from our future, unaccountable trillions printed out of thin air and put on our backs as debt, we must formulate the most pitiful of all questions any patriot might ask in the final hour: Are we going to fight for our master’s tyranny, or are we going to demand the return of our civil liberties and Constitution? Are we going to choose The Banner of Liberty, or the shackles of voluntary servitude? Will it be a war for corporate profit, or a war to regain our ability to self govern, as the blood and toil of our forefathers presented to us, their children, as a gift? I fear that decision is emanate. I fear that any decision will be a hard one, but my greatest fear of all is that the decision has already been made for us.



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.