Mistrial? Trump ‘Hush Money’ Judge Suggests Juror May Have Had Predetermined Guilty Verdict

Trump ‘Hush Money’ Judge Suggests Juror May Have Had Predetermined Guilty Verdict

Needless to say, ‘mistrial’ is trending on X right now.

The judge in the Trump ‘hush money’ case, Juan Merchan,  just issued a very strange note to both parties indicating that a comment made on the court’s Facebook page suggests that one of the jurors may have arrived at a ‘guilty’ verdict before the end of the trial, and told a family member.

“My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted. Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!” reads the Facebook post highlighted by Merchan.

Article continues as posted by Tyler Durden

As the Conservative Treehouse speculates…

Why would Judge Merchan want to draw public attention to this?

Either something bigger is being diluted by this story, or perhaps Merchan is using it as a provocation to get Trump to talk about the jury and violate his gag order ahead of sentencing.

Or, perhaps Merchan is looking to create a mistrial to exit the case, or do it over again and extend the gag order.   Also, why not include the entire quote from the Facebook Page:

Not sure what’s going on, but something.  Something….

Suspicious Cat remains, well, suspicious.

Needless to say, ‘mistrial‘ is trending on X right now.

*********

(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled by Tyler Durden

Header featured image (edited) credit: Merchan/person yelling/material from orgl ZH pos/by (TLB) staff

Emphasis added by (TLB)

••••

••••

Stay tuned tuned…

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

1 Comment on Mistrial? Trump ‘Hush Money’ Judge Suggests Juror May Have Had Predetermined Guilty Verdict

  1. Of course THE LEFT that cannot deal in Facts, evidence, REALITY, are now all calling the “My Cousin (or whatever) was on the Jury and they new (assured) they would CONVICT despite the manure” days before Verdict other POST was made is A HOAX… OK, let us just for sake of argument say all this latest curfuffel (sp?) is based on HOAX or TROLL or whatever/whomever trying to “stir sh** up!” FACT REMAINS of countless Constitutional and other #RuleOfLaw and #Precedence issues before, during, and now after, the Case that the Case MUST BE TOSSED ENTIRELY. So, frankly my dear, don’t give a damn (yes, lame quasi movie reference)! And The Left now having their “CONVICTED FELON” bulls*** talking-point want to drag this out and if Trump Wins/Loses they will CLAIM moot – it is NOT, will not be, as I say over and over and over #PrinciplesNotPersonalities – THIS CASE MUST GO TO SCOTUS and IMMEDIATELY, nothing to do with Trump but PRINCIPLE and #RULEOFLAW and we cannot let The Left get away with this trying establish NEW PRECEDENTS then able to use against others IF allowed to stand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*