ER Editor: Dr. Richard Bartlett speaks to Del Bigtree about the clinical utility of Regeneron monoclonal antibody treatment. By way of introduction, Del raises the reasonable suspicion that if Dr. Rachel Levine, Assistant Secretary for Health, is pushing the monoclonal antibody treatment (see video), then can we trust it? Below are some notes from his discussion with Bartlett in which he answers this question based on his clinical experience.
As a MAJOR side issue in this video, it is clear that the timing of the vaccine rollout is clearly correlated with a renewed public health problem.
Vaccine rollout happened around the middle of December to January, depending on the country. Bartlett notes that after January 30, new problems started to happen after a 4-month hiatus when the virus seemed to have been beaten. He invites us to ‘think outside the box’ about this, having made not only this timeline observation, but also having revealed that 1/2 of his monoclonal patients are vaccinated. We have the impression that Bartlett is an astute communicator, who isn’t afraid of going into so-called ‘conspiracy’ territory, but who sidesteps the problem of being smeared as anti-vax.
Notes from the video:
- Heads of state have received this treatment. It’s not a new technology, it’s at least 40 years old – it’s real science. Patients get a 30-minute IV infusion. Symptoms such as chest tightness, headaches and back pain usually go away within the 30 minutes. Patients are monitored for an additional 30 minutes. ‘We’re seeing tremendous results.’
- Is it manufactured or does it come from a human being? It has antibodies that aren’t from human plasma, which carry proteins and a risk of infection. It’s a purified antibody product.
- Bartlett believes it to be a game changer.
- Anaphylaxis is a possible side effect, but it hasn’t been seen so far.
- Clinics are popping up all over TX to avoid hospitals being overrun. Ron de Santis is using this treatment in Florida.
- This is a treatment ‘in addition to’. None of the available treatments are mutually exclusive.
- It’s used as part of an early outpatient treatment protocol. There’s a lot of medical agreement on using this treatment.
- Call your local hospital and ask for the address of a monoclonal antibody clinic in your area.
- 1/2 of the patients going for monoclonal antibody treatment are vaccinated. (ER: This is a claim made by Dr. Bartlett which, in our opinion, he chooses to discuss no further, calling out the ‘virus’ as the problem.)
- (They discuss Fauci’s and the media’s false claims about ivermectin.)
- Bigtree raises the point about last summer (2020), that there were hardly any problems with ‘Covid,’ yet now it feels as if there is a problem, with a surge in cases based on people he knows having health problems. Why? Bartlett:
For 4 months in TX as of Jan 30, they had reached a flatline and seemed to have beaten Covid. “Then all of a sudden, something new appeared. Where did SARS-CoV-2 come from, Del?” … “It could be something that comes from the same place. I’ve talked to a general, a colonel, I’ve talked to congressman about this … we have to think outside the box … SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab, from a specific source, so I want people to think outside the box here …”.
(ER: he does not mention the vaccine as the possible source of ‘something new’ appearing.)
- Bigtree wraps up by thanking him for reporting the facts as he sees them and not getting involved in politicization of the topic.
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.