Nuke energy emerges as counterbalance to Dems’ Green New Deal
Nuclear Energy could play a growing role in America’s future energy needs. ~Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks
By
Nuclear energy is having a renaissance in the United States as an alternative to Democrats’ push to severely limit the country’s use of fossil fuel and replace it with wind, solar and more pressingly electric-powered vehicles.
Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks, a Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, recently told Just the News that nuclear has “come back to the forefront” of energy policy because it is abundant, continuously generating and has zero emissions.
The rebirth is also being attributed in large part to advances in technology that have also made nuclear safer and more cost effective – compared to the Chernobyl disaster of 1986 in Ukraine, considered the worst in terms of death toll and cost, and in which roughly 30 people died in the immediate aftermath of of nuclear reactor explosion, or the Three Mile Island nuclear reactor meltdown in 1979 in Pennsylvania.
“We want a cleaner, healthier planet,” continued Miller-Meeks, who’s also vice chairwoman of the Conservative Climate Caucus. “But we also want to be able to compete economically around the globe.”
To be sure, China, with its stronghold on the essential rare earth elements to make electric vehicle batteries, then produce and selling them to the U.S. and other nations, has advance to the forefront in the electric vehicle push.
Meanwhile, the advances in the nuclear power industry are also gaining favor in European and parts of Asia beyond China.
Wind and solar, Miller-Meeks says, cannot provide a “continual base load that will be able to provide energy and electricity if the sun’s not shining and the wind isn’t blowing. … We have enough experience with wind and solar: They don’t have the capacity.”
However, “natural gas and nuclear are two of those things” that can, and moreover, nuclear can while helping lower carbon emissions,” the Iowa lawmaker also argues.
Nuclear energy has been an integral part of U.S. energy grid for more than six decades. It’s also the nation’s largest domestic source of clean energy to date, accounting for 47% of “carbon-free electricity in 2022.”
]Democrats have long been pushing for America to ditch fossil fuels and rely fully on renewable energy.
The Obama administration in 2009 tried to advance the country’s efforts on so-called sustainable energy by signing a $535 million loan for the California-base solar-energy technology company Solyndra that filed for bankruptcy two years later.
And in 2019, upstart freshman Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez attempted to highjack fellow Democrats’ first few days of retaking control of the House with her Green New Deal plan, which ultimately failed to get support, even among member of her own conference, because of its massive, estimate $39 trillion price tag.
In addition, the New York Democrat’s plan was also described by North American Electric Reliability Corps’ Robert Blohm as “likely technologically impossible,” primarily because, he said, “You can’t spontaneously increase wind or sunshine.”
Miller-Meeks also argues Europe nations’ opposition to Russia invading Ukraine showed how vulnerable at least that region is in being reliant on another country for its energy, in this case Russia.
“Relying upon Russia for oil and gas and natural gas put them at a disadvantage,” she said. “So when Germany stopped [fracking],” much of Europe found itself in trouble, but countries like France were able to stay afloat better because it gets “most of its electricity from nuclear.”
A Gallup poll released in April found that the majority of Americans view nuclear energy more favorably than they have in over a decade, with 55% feeling “strongly” or “somewhat” that it should continue to power the electric grid.
Miller-Meeks says House Republicans will continue to advance clean nuclear energy solutions and introduce related legislation in the “very near future.”
Last month, the House Subcommittee on Energy, Climate & Grid Security, led by South Carolina GOP Rep. Jeff Duncan, held a hearing titled “American Nuclear Energy Expansion.”
Responding to Germany’s energy crisis after it shut down its last three nuclear plants, Duncan argued nuclear “must be part of our energy matrix.”
“To expand the [nuclear] industry, it is vital we encourage regulatory certainty and make sure our reactor licensing processes enable the safe and broad deployment of nuclear technologies,” he said.
Duncan also said nuclear power gives America “significant geopolitical advantage and leverage” because of the “robust nuclear export market” that can enable the country to set nuclear norms around the globe.
However, rival nations are also trying to lead in nuclear development.
The New York Times recently reported that China is trending to become a “nuclear superpower,” which Duncan warned could present the U.S. with significant challenges.
“We cannot cede our global leadership to our adversaries,” he said. “We must prioritize modernizing our regulatory structure in the United States and do what is needed to encourage growth throughout the industry.”
Follow Addison on Twitter.
_________
RELATED
Investment in solar energy set to pass oil for first time, boosted largely by China: report
Rockefeller Foundation partners with WHO to tackle ‘climate-aggravated’ pandemics
House committee looks into Biden canceling $200 million to Chinese company
*********
(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News. Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News
Header featured image (edited) credit: Nuke plant/Getty Images
Emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB) editors
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply