PCR Test Deception & The Human Cost

PCR Test Deception & The Human Cost

By TLB Contributing Partner: Christina England, BA, Hons

Recently, several leading websites, including The Liberty Beacon, reported that, as of the end of 2021, permission to use the faulty PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test had been withdrawn throughout the USA, by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), because it had failed to differentiate between the flu and the COVID-19 virus.

As usual, their reports were met with opposition from mainstream media who, along with other pro-government websites, stated that these facts were untrue.

However, on careful research, it appears that their reporting was spot on because The CDC clearly stated on their website that:

“… CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season. Laboratories and testing sites should validate and verify their selected assay within their facility before beginning clinical testing.” (Own emphasis)

In fact, according to one report on The Liberty Beacon, the head of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky, has publicly admitted that, based on the fact that PCR tests were producing massive amounts of false positives, the CDC has decided to cut COVID isolation times in half.

However, despite these statements by the CDC, many pro-government websites, such as the Full Fact, refuse to accept that we have all been deceived and continue to remain in denial.

They stated that:

“An alert from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in America announcing that it will withdraw the request for emergency authorisation of a PCR test has been widely shared on social media in the UK, and claimed to be evidence that the tests have “failed their full review”, and that PCR tests are “meaningless”, “fraudulent”, “not fit for purpose”, or unable to distinguish between influenza and Covid-19. This is not true.”

I hate to burst their bubble, but facts are facts, and here is another one: in a 78 page document titled CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel – For Emergency Use Only – Instructions for Use, published in July 2021, the CDC clearly stated that the PCR test was not capable of distinguishing between any of the numerous Coronaviruses … i.e. the common cold, influenza A & B and/or SARS-cov-1 or SARS-cov-2 (COVID-19).

They stated that:

“Results are for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. SARS-CoV-2 RNA is generally detectable in upper and lower respiratory specimens during infection. Positive results are indicative of active infection with SARS-CoV-2 but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all results to the appropriate public health authorities.

Negative results do not preclude SARS-CoV-2 infection and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or other patient management decisions. Negative results must be combined with clinical observations, patient history, and epidemiological information.” (Own emphasis)

Amazingly, it appears that the UK government have not caught up with the CDC’s revelations, because they are still basing their evidence on these faulty tests.

In fact, they even recommend these tests to anyone wishing to travel to the UK from other countries.

In a document titled Guidance – Coronavirus (COVID-19) testing before you travel to England, updated on January 7, 2022, the UK government stated that:

“Type of test

The test must meet performance standards of ≥97% specificity, ≥80% sensitivity at viral loads above 100,000 copies/ml.

This could include tests such as:

• a nucleic acid test, including a PCR test

• a LAMP test

• an antigen test, such as an LFD (lateral flow device) test

You must check with your test provider that the test meets the standards. You may not be able to travel if it does not.

The test could be either:

• a face-to-face or in-person test

• a self-administered test”

What is even more shocking is that, according to reports, the PCR tests are not the only tests that are failing to identify the SARS-cov-2 (COVID-19 virus).

Lateral Flow Tests Also Fall Short

According to former G.P. Dr. Vernon Coleman, lateral flow tests are useless, and if you think about what he has stated on a recent video, he has a valid point.

Speaking about a letter written by a head teacher, which he had recently seen, he stated that:

“The head buffoon starts by announcing that during their first day in school healthy students will undertake a lateral flow test for covid-19 at the school’s test centre. This, of course, is entirely pointless because the biggest scientific study I’ve ever seen showed that asymptomatic spread of covid-19 does not occur. If you think about it, this makes sense. Like all varieties of the flu this disease is spread by coughing and sneezing. If you’re not coughing or sneezing…”

Dr. Coleman has a valid point because, according to a study titled, Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China, after screening nearly ten million citizens for COVID-19, it was discovered that only 300 of them were carrying the virus without any symptoms.

However, what makes this study stand out from any other study is the fact that when researchers traced 1174 of their close contacts, each and every one of them tested negative, proving that the COVID-19 virus cannot be contracted by close contact alone.

Researchers stated that:

“The screening of the 9,865,404 participants without a history of COVID-19 found no newly confirmed COVID-19 cases, and identified 300 asymptomatic positive cases with a detection rate of 0.303 (95% CI 0.270–0.339)/10,000. The median age-stratified Ct-values of the asymptomatic cases were shown in Supplementary Table 1. Of the 300 asymptomatic positive cases, two cases came from one family and another two were from another family. There were no previously confirmed COVID-19 patients in these two families. A total of 1174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19. There were 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19 cases who participated in the screening. Of the 34,424 participants with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive again, giving a repositive rate of 0.310% (95% CI 0.423–0.574%).” (Own emphasis)

Realistically, this study should have made headline news, especially as it was published in 2020. However, like many other factual studies, it has been hidden from plain sight by government fact checkers.

Sadly, this is not the only piece of vital information that has been hidden from us, by government spies.

On 2 January, 2022, Before It’s News reported that a powerful film, titled Harm, was deleted from YouTube within hours of its release. They stated that:

“Harm, a Powerful Banned Documentary on Fraudulent PCR Tests Instantly Went Viral Before Being Deleted

Film producer Rai Gbrym reached out to me last week about a new documentary he had just produced that exposes the fraud of the PCR test.

He had just posted it on YouTube and it already had thousands of views. I immediately downloaded the video so that I could view it when I had some time.

When I went to watch it, it was already banned on YouTube, and no longer available.’

After viewing it now, I can see why Big Tech doesn’t want you to watch this, and why Google banned it on YouTube. If one can prove that the PCR Test used to detect COVID-19 is a fraud, then the entire “pandemic” is a fraud as well.”

Here is the film for anyone brave enough to watch it. I am sure that you will all agree, shocking is putting it mildly.

••••

Read more articles by Christina England

••••

Image Credit:

Featured Image (top) – Photo by Maskmedicare Shop on Unsplash

In Article image #1 – “Preparation of the RT-PCR Reaction (05811008)” by IAEA Imagebank is licensed under

In Article image #2 – “Testes para detecção da Covid-19” by Senado Federal is licensed under CC BY 2.0

In Article image #3 – The PCR Test Truth Rally & March, Jan 30, 2021 by GoToVan is licensed under CC BY 2.0

••••

About the Author: Christina England, BA Hons, Research Journalist and Author

Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. She left school to work in a children’s library, specialising in storytelling and book buying. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980.

After taking an A Level in Psychology and a BTEC in Learning Support, Ms. England spent many years researching vaccines and adverse reactions. She gained a Higher National Diploma in Journalism and Media Studies in 2010 and in 2016 she gained a BA Hons degree in Literature and Humanities. She currently writes for VacTruth, Health Impact News, GreenMedInfo, The Liberty Beacon, Vaccine Impact and Medical Kidnap on immunisation safety and efficacy.

She has co-authored the book – Shaken Baby Syndrome or Vaccine Induced Encephalitis – Are Parents Being Falsely Accused? with Dr. Harold Buttram and Vaccination Policy and the UK Government: The Untold Truth with Lucija Tomljenovic PhD, which are sold on Amazon. She also compiled the book Shattered Dreams: The HPV Vaccine Exposed

Her website is Parents and Carers Against Medical Injustice

Image Credit: Photo in Featured Image (top) –  by Çiğdem Onur from Pixabay

••••

Click on image below to visit site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.