Sectet Emails: Health Officials Concerned with Pregnant Women JAB ‘Adverse Event Issue’
Emails obtained by legal watchdog Judicial Watch
Newly released secret emails show that U.S. health officials were concerned about pregnant women having an “adverse event issue” due to Covid mRNA vaccines as early as 2021.
According to the emails, obtained by the legal watchdog Judicial Watch, officials with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) exchanged emails in May 2021 about language about administering the Covid shots with other vaccines.
“Please let me know if you want to connect about the adverse event issue later today. Seems like work is still ongoing, but let me know,” Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, wrote to colleagues.
Dr. Amanda Cohn, chief medical officer of the CDC’s National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases, replied to the email.
“We have a meeting with Rochelle at 3:30 about if we should say anything or wait until we have more definitive information … I will let you know where we land,” Cohn wrote. Dr. Rochelle Walensky is the head of the CDC.
“I’m not sure there is a right answer,” Cohn added.
Jonathan Mogford, a medical researcher from the United Kingdom, emailed top health officials at Health & Human Services (HHS) and the FDA in December 2020 expressing concern over patients with a history of allergic reactions receiving the Covid shots.
The subject header for the email was redacted.
The emails were obtained by the nonprofit Judicial Watch, which sued the U.S. government for failing to appropriately respond to a Freedom of Information Act request for messages regarding adverse events, deaths, and/or injuries caused by the COVID-19 vaccines. Adverse events include health conditions such as arthritis or heart inflammation.
No other emails about the “adverse event issue” were included in the latest batch of emails disclosed by Judicial Watch.
The original clinical trials performed on pregnant women did not include enough information “to make conclusions about the safety of the” Covid shots manufactured by Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, according to the FDA documents.
Pfizer conducted a post-authorization trial of its vaccine in pregnant women that was labeled completed in mid-2022 but results have not been publicly reported.
“We think that part of the reason is because the results are so bad,” Linda Wastila, a professor at the University of Maryland, told The Epoch Times.
Judicial Watch remarked upon the release of the newly obtained emails.
“It again took a lawsuit for the Biden administration to hand over, albeit heavily redacted, information regarding the safety of the COVID vaccines that the public has every right to know,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “This disturbing batch of new documents have uncovered a secret confidentiality agreement tied to COVID vaccine safety issues and emails that raise new questions about the vaccines and pregnancy.”
(TLB) published this article from Becker News as compiled and written by Kyle Becker
Header featured image (edited) credit: Pregnant Women/Shutterstock
Emphasis added by (TLB) editors
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.