Sen. Chuck Schumer implicitly threatens violence against Supreme Court Justices [Video]

Chuck steps in it

Sen. Chuck Schumer implicitly threatens violence against Supreme Court Justices

By Andrea Widburg

On Wednesday, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D. N.Y.) did something no American Senator has ever done: He implicitly threatened Supreme Court justices if they did not rule his way on an abortion case. Chief Justice Roberts sharply reprimanded him, but that doesn’t change the fact that this is an escalation of the simmering civil war in America ever since Roe v. Wade.

In 1857, the Supreme Court decided Dred Scott v. Sandford, which excluded blacks from American citizenship, denying them any rights and privileges under the Constitution. Four years later, America was fighting a civil war that killed roughly 655,000 Americans.

In 1973, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, holding that various unarticulated penumbras and emanations in the Constitution created a constitutional right to abortion. That decision resulted in the deaths of 61,781,600 individuals who would have been Americans, given a chance.

Like Dred Scott before it, the Roe v. Wade decision also led to civil war, although a peculiarly low level one. One side has killed 61,781,600 babies under color of law. The other side has mostly held its fire. In the 47 years since Roe v. Wade, seven people chose to use violence as an anti-abortion statement, leading to eleven deaths. Otherwise, the anti-abortion side has used legislation and persuasion to slow abortions in America.

The primary battlefield has been the place in which this Second Civil War began: the Supreme Court. Over the years, the Court has articulated a test that says state laws cannot impose an “undue burden” on women. For example, in 2016, the Court held that it was an undue burden on Texas women to require that abortion clinics have health and safety standards equal to outpatient surgical centers and that abortionists have admitting privileges at local hospitals.

The Supreme Court will soon hear June Medical Services v. Stephen Russo, regarding Louisiana legislation requiring abortionists to have admitting privileges to a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion clinic. Democrats are worried because the Court currently has four constitutional conservatives (Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh), four activists (Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, Breyer), and one squish (Roberts). Democrats are frantic lest the conservatives take the lead, resulting in the Supreme Court placing limitations on abortions.

It was in this context that Schumer, while speaking at a Planned Parenthood rally outside of the Supreme Court, abandoned the accepted practice of criticizing the justices’ intelligence or impartiality and, instead, implied a call for violence against Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh:

Chief Justice John Roberts, who tries to stay above the fray, was compelled to weigh in:

Schumer’s remarks were so inflammatory that even Laurence Tribe, a reliable leftist and fanatic Trump hater, called him to account:

Through his spokesman, Schumer attempted to defend himself by blaming Donald Trump:

Schumer points at the Supreme Court as he makes his threat (YouTube screen grab)

Schumer’s spokesdrone was referring to the fact that, in February, Trump accused Sotomayor and Ginsburg of making statements showing they were biased against him, which Trump contended justified their recusing themselves. Requesting a recusal is a universe away from Schumer’s statement which, intentionally or not, sent a message to Antifa, the armed branched of the Democrat Party in this Second Civil War, to use violence to affect a political outcome.

The President was appropriately outraged and completely correct in both his diagnosis of Schumer’s appalling action and the price he should pay:

There can be few things worse in a civilized, law abiding nation, than a United States Senator openly, and for all to see and hear, threatening the Supreme Court or its Justices. This is what Chuck Schumer just did. He must pay a severe price for this!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 5, 2020

Sen. Josh Hawley (R. Mo.) has already announced that on Thursday he will introduce a motion to censure Schumer:

Josh Hawley@HawleyMO

I would call on Schumer to apologize, but we all know he has no shame. So tomorrow I will introduce a motion to censure Schumer for his pathetic attempt at intimidation of #SupremeCourt

To a man like Schumer, who’s now a hero to the pro-abortion party for his rhetoric, censure is meaningless. He’s already achieved his goal: For the first time in America, a Senator has threatened Supreme Court justices with violence if they do not support his political views. He’s unleashed the hounds and taken the Second Civil War to an entirely new plane.


(TLB) published this article from American Thinker with our appreciation for the availability.

Articles & Blog Posts by Andrea Widburg

Related articles from The Liberty Beacon:

After Failing To Take Down Kavanaugh, Democrats Smear The Supreme Court Itself: WSJ

Supreme Court Issues Decision in Planned Parenthood Case

Supreme Court Abortion Agenda May Crystallize in Coming Weeks



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.