South Dakota Joins Constitutional Carry Club
by Tom Knighton
The term “constitutional carry” is used for permitless carry for one very specific reason. That reason is that the Constitution says the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and permit systems infringe on that right. By removing the requirement for a permit, a state returns to a more constitutional setting with regard to carrying a firearm.
And now, South Dakota residents get to enjoy that more constitutional setting.
A new law effective this week in South Dakota eliminates the need for a permit to carry a concealed pistol.
South Dakota is the 14th state to enact such a law for both residents and visitors. Pennington County Capt. Marty Graves tells KOTA-TV he thinks it’s a good thing for gun owners. Graves says it will lighten the work load for his office because it will no longer issue the permits and collect the fees.
Graves is right. That frees up officers to take care of more important things like…oh, I don’t know…fighting actual crime?
Time and time again, I read criticisms of constitutional carry and how it will empower criminals. But guess what? Bad guys have been carrying guns for a long, long time. They were doing it when there was no way for private citizens to carry guns. That’s the problem here.
You see, good guys are prevented from defending themselves because of laws that create a burden for them. It doesn’t stop the bad guys from doing jack. They carry, they shoot people, and they keep doing it while the law-abiding are hamstrung by a law that makes them into targets. This means the law-abiding have two choices. One is to continue being lambs to the slaughter. The other is to disobey the law, that is unless they can get the law changed.
As noted, there are 14 states with constitutional carry laws on the books. Thus far, there’s been no signs of an uptick in violence in any of these states. Why is that?
Again, it’s because those who commit the violence are already carrying guns regardless of what the law plainly states. Why would violence increase when the rules had no impact on them?
What does happen, though, is now the good guys are going to carry more. Those who couldn’t afford permits or who couldn’t take the time to get one for whatever reason don’t have to now. They can now carry a firearm and defend themselves without the hassle or expense.
As a result, South Dakota just made its streets a great deal safer.
I don’t see South Dakota as being all that unsafe, to begin with, but no place is completely safe. It never will be. Now criminals in South Dakota have to consider the possibility that their target may also be carrying a firearm since they don’t require a permit anymore. There will be more guns in good guys’ hands, and that means the occupational hazards of criminal activity have increased.
Sounds like a fine time for them to start reevaluating their life choices.
(TLB) published this article from BEARINGARMS
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.