Student-loan forgiveness is dead but Biden’s got an even WORSE plan

Student-loan forgiveness is dead but Biden’s got an even WORSE plan

NEW YORK POST

The Biden administration’s reckless, regressive, and unlawful student-loan cancellation effort is dead. Hurrah.

The Supreme Court just stopped his Department of Education’s attempt to sneak through a one-time pre-election gift to college-educated voters.

The pandemic emergency, the legal pretext for cancellation is now officially over.

And, to top it all off, a majority of Congress, including some Democrats, formally repudiated Biden’s actions in a resolution.

This should restore faith in our democratic institutions and illustrate the importance of the separation of powers.

One branch went too far, and the others intervened.

Nevertheless, now is the time to panic about student-loan forgiveness.

While everyone’s focus has been on the administration’s outrageous cancellation stunt, the DOE has been working tirelessly to accomplish an even more disastrous policy: a new Income-Driven Repayment rule.

Protesters were advocating for the cancellation of student debt stand in front of the United States Supreme Court in Washington, DC. Protesters advocating for the cancellation of student debt stand in front of the United States Supreme Court in Washington, DC. Shutterstock


The U.S. Supreme Court building.

The Supreme Court struck down President Biden’s program writing off hundreds of billions of dollars in federally held student loan debt.  Getty Images

The federal student-loan policy is obscenely complex, but under the Higher Education Act, Congress created a variety of programs to help borrowers who struggle to pay their loans.

Those include Income Contingent Repayment and Income-Based Repayment programs.

With varying terms, these programs limit borrowers’ monthly payments to a percentage of their income. IBR also includes a forgiveness provision after a borrower has made payments for 20 years.

Supporters of student loan forgiveness check for news on United States Supreme Court decisions outside the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on Friday, June 30, 2023. Under the Higher Education Act, Congress created several programs to help borrowers pay their loans. Polaris

The decision to enact these plans was Congress’ to make, so, regardless of whether it was a good idea, that ship has sailed.

The problem is that Congress gave away control over the terms of the various repayment plans.

The HEA delegated to the DOE the power to establish “criteria” for the various plans, including the “annual repayment amounts based on the income of the borrower,” and even the “period of time” a borrower must pay before their loans are forgiven.

And while Congress set out maximum repayment periods, it didn’t set minimums.

CONTINUE READING

Header featured image (edited) credit:  Biden/USA Today screen shot

Emphasis added by (TLB)

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

 

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*