Texas Sheriffs, Federal Police Foundation sue Biden, feds over immigration policy

Texas Sheriffs, Federal Police Foundation sue Biden, feds over immigration policy

Lawsuit alleges Biden order “commands ICE officers to violate the specific terms of federal immigration law.”

By Bethany Blankley

Several Texas sheriffs and the Federal Police Foundation sued President Joe Biden on Thursday for what they say is his administration’s “unlawful and unconstitutional” policies related to removing criminal illegal immigrants from the country.

The counties and their sheriffs filing the lawsuit include Kinney County Sheriff Brad Coe, Montgomery County Sheriff Rand Henderson, Edwards County Sheriff J.W. Guthrie, McMullen County Sheriff Emmett Shelton, Hudspeth County Sheriff Arvin West, Galveston County, and the Federal Police Foundation-ICE Officers Division. More counties are expected to join the lawsuit.

They filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District, Galveston Division, represented by Kris Kobach, the former attorney general of Kansas, with Alliance for Free Citizens, Kinney County Attorney Brent Smith, and Chris Hajec with the Immigration Reform Law Institute.

In addition to Biden, they sued U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Tae Johnson, ICE, and Troy Miller, a senior officer performing the duties of the Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

The lawsuit is in response to a Feb. 18 order from Johnson that plaintiffs say “commands ICE officers to violate the specific terms of federal immigration law.” The interim guidelines revise how federal officers are to arrest, detain, and deport illegal immigrants.

“The relief we are seeking is that the court order ICE and the Department of Homeland Security to simply follow the law,” Kobach said in Galveston Thursday. “To follow the specific laws … that require them to detain and deport certain illegal aliens.”

They allege that “many extremely dangerous illegal aliens who would have been detained prior to the February 18 Memorandum are now not being detained – against the wishes of the ICE officers seeking to detain them, and in violation of federal statutes requiring their detention and/or removal.”

Instead of following immigration law established by Congress, Johnson directed ICE officers to only focus on three types of people who enter the U.S. illegally: those who pose a national security threat, including known or suspected terrorists; those who illegally crossed the border after Nov. 1, 2020; and those who have already been convicted of aggravated felonies or are gang members.

Part of ICE’s job is to find and remove roughly 672,000 fugitives who have already been ordered to be deported by a federal immigration judge and are still residing in the U.S. illegally, which is not one of the three priorities listed.

Johnson’s new directive also instructs ICE agents to first get clearance from their supervisors if they encounter illegal immigrants who aren’t convicted criminals. However, ICE officers have been “rarely granted preapproval for enforcement actions against non-priority aliens,” the lawsuit states. “The time-consuming paperwork and the low probability of preapproval being granted have caused many ICE officers not to even attempt seeking preapproval.”

As a result of the new policy, ICE reported a record-low 2,962 deportations in April, compared to an average 8,634 deportations per month during fiscal 2020.

ICE officers also say in sworn affidavits that they were forced to release known criminals into the U.S., including multiple deported child rapists and criminals convicted of sexual battery against a child, among others, according to the lawsuit.

ICE management denied officers’ requests to detain and deport these individuals, according to the lawsuit.

Either agents follow federal law they were sworn to uphold or follow Johnson’s memorandum, the complaint states: “Plaintiffs fear that they will be disciplined or will lose their jobs if they follow the law.”

Because of ICE’s policy, which plaintiffs argue threatens the lives of Americans, the sheriffs say they are “no longer able to present illegal aliens arrested for criminal activities to ICE for removal and expect them to be removed.”

As a result, “The detention costs, crime response costs, crime investigation costs, and related costs experienced by the Plaintiff sheriffs and counties have consequently increased dramatically.”

In fiscal 2020, ICE removed roughly 186,000 individuals, the majority – 92% – already had criminal convictions or pending criminal charges.


(TLB) published this article with permission of John Solomon at Just the News.  Click Here to read about the staff at Just the News

Some emphasis and pictorial content added by (TLB)

Header featured image (edited) credit: Migrants/U.S. Border Patrol / Joe Raedle/Getty Images



Stay tuned to …



The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.