The International Courts of Justice: Nicaragua vs Germany (Guess Who Wins)

The International Courts of Justice: Nicaragua vs Germany (Guess Who Wins)

Not everyone has learned their lessons from history


TNT Radio host Patrick Henningsen speaks with political commentator Benjamin Rubinstein about the case in the International Courts of Justice (ICJ) being brought by Nicaragua against Germany over Berlin’s support for Israel genocide of the native Palestinian population in Gaza.

It turns out, not everyone, least of all Germany, has learned their lessons from history. Watch: 


▶️ TUNE-IN LIVE to TNT RADIO for the Patrick Henningsen Show M-F 4pm-6pm (NEW YORK) | 9PM-11PM (LONDON):


(TLB) published this report from 21WIRE




Header featured image (eeited) credit: Henningsen/org. 21W post

Emphasis and editing added by (TLB)



Stay tuned tuned…


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

1 Comment on The International Courts of Justice: Nicaragua vs Germany (Guess Who Wins)

  1. While all eyes and media are on Palestine (and for good reasons) and Ukraine, here what is happening in stealth mode: a global coup d’etat, using again the WHO and the “health” alibi to implement their takeover:

    International Health Regulations and the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.”

    The International Health Regulations are existing, legally-binding international law. If the proposed amendments are presented to the 76th World Health Assembly, they could be adopted by a simple majority of the 194 member nations. According to the already agreed upon rules of the IHR, if the proposed amendments are adopted, the the member nations would not need to take any additional actions. The United States Senate would not be required to provide a two-thirds vote to give their “advice and consent.” No signatures by national leaders would be needed.

    Please report on this issue A.S.A.P.

    SOURCES: The Proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations:

    100 Reasons To #StopTheAmendments

    The proposed amendments would:

    1. Change the overall nature of the World Health Organization from an advisory organization that merely makes recommendations to a governing body whose proclamations would be legally-binding. (Article 1)

    2. Greatly expand the scope of the International Health Regulations to include scenarios that merely have a “potential to impact public health.”

    3. Seek to remove “respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of people.” (Article 3)

    4. Give the Director General of the WHO control over the means of production through an “allocation plan for health products” to require developed states parties to supply pandemic response products as directed. (Article 13A)

    5. Give the WHO the authority to require medical examinations, proof of prophylaxis, proof of vaccine and to implement contact tracing, quarantine and TREATMENT. (Article 18)

    6. Institute a system of global health certificates in digital or paper format, including test certificates, vaccine certificates, prophylaxis certificates, recovery certificates, passenger locator forms and a traveller’s health declaration. (Articles 18, 23, 24, 27, 28, 31, 35, 36 and 44 and Annexes 6, 7 and 8)

    7. Redirect unspecified billions of dollars to the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex with no accountability. (Article 44A)

    8. Allow the disclosure of personal health data. (Article 45)

    9. Greatly expand the World Health Organization’s capacity to censor what they consider to be mis-information and dis-information. (Annex 1, page 36)

    10. Create an obligation to build, provide and maintain IHR infrastructure at points of entry. (Annex 10)

    The 76th World Health Assembly is scheduled to occur from Sunday May 21, 2023 to Tuesday May 30, 2023.

    They make noise, a lot of noise to deflect our attention while they implement their coup.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.