Intro by Boudicca
We cannot stress enough the importance of the phenomenon covered in this article: the suppression of known, workable remedies (in this case, Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine) for Covid 19.
The result (and this in our view was the intention) has been:
- far more deaths from this alleged virus than would have been the case. If you factor in the fraudulently inflated fatality stats presented by the government (discussed elsewhere) with the withholding of effective treatments you are looking at fatalities that could well have been a fraction on their declared numbers.
- a much higher IFR (infection-fatality ratio) than would otherwise have been the case.
- these factors have been key in portraying the fake narrative of a deadly killer epidemic for which there is “no cure” and from which our “only way out” is some experimental biochemical agents marketed as “vaccines”.
In our opinion, the UK government has, in its determination to convey this fake narrative through the suppression and/or ignoring of treatments (among other things) probably killed more UK citizens than the supposed virus.
Put it another way: the incumbent government, its PM, Heath Minister, Chief Medical Officer, their coterie of mass psychology experts and other “advisors” have all stood by and knowingly allowed thousands of their own citizens to suffer, be hospitalised and in many cases die.
So much for “saving lives”.
This crime is being committed in real time in service of a political or money-grubbing agenda and for this alone, regardless of the other crimes, the perpetrators must stand trial.
Why Are Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin Being Officially Suppressed?
Had the FDA and Anthony Fauci’s National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Disease (NIAID) started approving existing clinically-proven and inexpensive drugs for treating malaria, parasites and other pathogens at the start of the pandemic, millions of people would have been saved from experiencing serious infections or dying from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Why federal health officials never followed this strategy is a question the mainstream media refuses to ask.
Another question that the medical establishment, let alone our compliant media, is why have they failed to ask whether there are reliable studies in the peer-reviewed literature and testimonies from thousands of day-to-day clinical physicians worldwide who treat Covid-19 patients with these drugs, in particular hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Ivermectin. In most nations, there has been enormous success in treating Covid patients at the early and moderate stages of infection. However, in the US, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, the FDA and our institutional medical leaders have categorically denied their use. In fact they are quick to erect obstacles to prevent them from being prescribed.
When these questions are posited as a general argument for advocating expedient measures to protect public health during this pandemic, would it not have been wise to have prioritized HCQ, Ivermectin, and other remedies with a record of curtailing Covid, such as the antibiotic azithromycin, zinc, selenium, Vitamins C and D, and melatonin as a first line of defense? There was absolutely no need to have waited for experimental vaccines or experimental drugs such as Remdesivir before the pandemic became uncontrollable. But this is what Fauci and Trump permitted to happen.
If this strategy of medical intervention had been followed, would it have been successful? The answer is likely an unequivocal “yes”. Both HCQ and, even better, Ivermectin have been prophylactically prescribed by physicians working on pandemic’s front lines with enormous success. Yet those American physicians struggling to get this urgent message out to federal health officials are being marginalized and ridiculed en masse. Only in the US, the UK, France, South Africa and several other developed nations has there been a stubborn hubris to deny their effectiveness, and where there have been concerted efforts to undermine these cheaper alternative remedies. The World Health Organization recommends Ivermectin for Covid-19 so why not the US and these other nations? Under oath, multiple physicians and professors at American medical schools have testified before Congress to present the scientific evidence supporting HCQ and Ivermectin. These are otherwise medical professionals at the very heart of treating Covid-19 patients.
Today, American journalism is in shambles. In fact, it is a disgrace. The American public is losing its trust in the media. Whether it is CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post, NPR or PBS, they each have unlimited resources to properly investigate the federal and institutional machinery behind the government health policies being thrust upon us. Yet no mainstream journalist has found the moral compass to bring this truth to the public.
In the meantime, we are allowing millions to die, and countless others to be seriously affected from a severe infection because of professional medical neglect and a healthcare system favoring the pharmaceutical industry’s frantic rush to develop expensive novel drugs and experimental vaccines. The incentive by the drug makers is to take every advantage available within the FDA’s emergency use loopholes to get their products approved as quickly as possible. The primary advantage is that these novel drugs and vaccines can then leap over regulatory hurdles, which otherwise would require them to conduct lengthy and thorough clinical trials to prove their efficacy and safety. The consequence is that none of the new pharmaceutical Covid-19 interventions have been adequately reviewed.
On the other hand, HCQ and Ivermectin have an established legacy of prior research and have been on the market for decades. Worldwide, it is not unreasonable to claim that billions of people have been treated with these drugs.
Below is a breakdown of the studies conducted so far for HCQ, Ivermectin and Vitamin D specifically for combatting the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
- 291 studies, 218 peer-reviewed have been conducted specifically for Covid-19
- 241 have been clinical trials that involved 3,875 scientists and over 366,000 patients
- 33 were randomize controlled trials
- 65% improvement in 26 early treatment trials
- 72% improvement in 11 early stage infection treatment mortality results
- 22% improvement in 164 late stage infection treatment trials (patients in serious condition)
Full list of HCQ studies and details here.
- 92 studies, 52 peer-reviewed have been conducted specifically for Covid-19
- 54 have been clinical trials that involved 442 scientists and over 17,600 patients
- 27 were randomized controlled trials
- 85% improvement in 14 prophylaxis trials
- 80% improvement in 20 early stage infection treatment trials
- 47% improvement in 20 late stage infection treatment trials
- 74% improvement in 20 mortality results
Full list of Ivermectin studies and details here.
- 74 studies conducted by over 650 scientists
- 52 sufficiency studies with 12,000 patients
- 23 treatment trials with 23,000 patients
- 53% improvement in 23 treatment trials
- 53% improvement in 52 sufficiency studies
- 63% improvement in 14 treatment mortality results
Full list of Vitamin D studies and details here.
Please share this information. The inept policies and measures being taken by our federal health officials and by both the former Trump and present Biden administrations are unparalleled in American healthcare history. And never before has the media been so willing to self-censor and been so grossly irresponsible to hide the published science and the truth.
Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic industries.
Dr. Gary Null is the host of the nation’s longest running public radio program on alternative and nutritional health and a multi-award-winning documentary film director, including The War on Health, Poverty Inc and Plant Codes.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.