Trump’s Civil RICO Suit Against Hillary

Trump’s Civil RICO Suit Against Hillary Clinton

By: Ron Wright

President Trump filed a civil RICO suit against Hillary Clinton and her junta. From Trump’s RICO case:

The members of the Enterprise are a group of persons associated together for the common purpose of carrying on an ongoing enterprise; specifically, the Enterprise had a common, unlawful goal of dismantling the Plaintiff’s political career and/or impeding his ability to effectively govern through fraudulent, deceptive, and criminal means, including, but not limited to, falsely implicating the Plaintiff, the Trump Campaign, and the Trump Administration as colluding with Russia,” the lawsuit states, explaining its RICO case [Full complaint].

The Clinton and Biden Families are criminal enterprises – a continuation of the DC swamp’s business of organized crime activity. Laptop from Hell, written by Miranda Devine (NY Post reporter), tells all and incriminates Uncle Joe. The New York Post’s story was canceled and censored as Russian disinformation by the MSM and Big Tech that affected the 2020 Election.

Fifty former senior government intelligence officers, including former CIA Director John Brennen and DNI Director Jim Clapper, opined the laptop information was Russian disinformation. Why? To conceal the criminal actions of federal agencies, including the intelligence agencies in Hillary’s soft coup to interfere with the 2016 Election, and then, “. . . impeding his [Trump’s] ability to effectively govern through fraudulent, deceptive, and criminal means . . .” [Trump’s complaint][DOJ RICO manuals civil and criminal].

Private parties can sue civilly under RICO, but there are limitations. The Trump civil case has issues and could be summarily dismissed (See this Federalist article). The FBI and the DOJ should have initiated an investigation and filed a criminal RICO complaint a long time ago against Hillary. Why not? The FBI and the DOJ are complicit by being active participants and covering for the criminal actions of the Clintons and the Bidens – a Catch 22 dilemma.

There is the possibility that Trump’s suit could break the logjam of foot-dragging and cover-ups. Senators Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassley recently addressed the Senate on the cover-ups. The US Attorney in Delaware aappears to be on a course to indict Hunter Biden that may ensnare President Biden. Senator Johnson had these pertinent questions for President Biden.

The MSM is tepidly lying by omission now, some eighteen months later, acknowledging some of the information from Hunter’s hard drives is true, but President Biden did nothing wrong. (Be wary, though, of new files discovered by Jack Maxey as possible disinformation.) The midterm elections with a potential shift in power may force the appointment of a special prosecutor with a mandate to go far and wide to prosecute the perps.

Trump’s complaint needs to include the criminal actions of the Biden Family to fix the concerns expressed in the Federalist. The statute of limitations of civil RICO is four years from when the criminal activity is discovered. In some cases, the statute of limitations can be extended from the last overt act or act to cover up or conceal the conspiracies (John Brennan and Jim Clapper and others lying to Congress).

These ongoing criminal conspiracies extend back many years to the Obama administration. They started with the Fast and Furious, the IRS scandal, the Benghazi incident, and Hillary’s pay-to-play scheme violating US Espionage Laws. The conspiracies continue with the Russian Collusion narrative, the illegal spying on US citizens by the FBI and the CIA, the first impeachment trial of President Trump, and the election fraud of the 2020 Election. And the second impeachment of the trial of President Trump (the insurrection that wasn’t)—fixing the timing issue of the two required RICO predicate offenses. The actors throughout include many of the same members of the Executive Branch, members of Congress, the Department of State, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the CIA, and other federal agencies.

••••

The above article (Trump’s Civil RICO Suit Against Hillary Clinton) was created and published by American Thinker and is republished here under “Fair Use” (see disclaimer below) with attribution to the articles author Ron Wright and americanthinker.com.

TLB recommends you visit American Thinker for more articles and information.

About the Author: Ron Wright is a retired detective from Riverside, CA PD. has a BA in political science CSUF, M. Adm. University of Cal, Riverside. Facebook at Ron T. Cop.

Image Credit: Graphic (split) in Featured Image (top) –”Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump – Caricatures” by DonkeyHotey is marked with CC BY-SA 2.0.

••••

Related Article: Trump suing Hillary Clinton, DNC over Russia Collusion Narrative

••••

Click on the image below to visit site:

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*