ER Editor: What a brilliant question to pose. And why is no-one in the medical profession trying to answer it, given that honest answers to the question would highlight what was really going on in those hospitals back in 2020 and 2021.
This is not an attack on ivermectin, far from it, but a serious question as to what these hospitalized, so-called ‘Covid’ patients really had. As well, it is another indictment against ‘truther’ docs like McCullough and Kory. Readers of this site know we don’t buy the virus theory (rather, the myth). McCullough is a big defender of Pharma, so it’s hardly surprising he goes along with an (as yet) unproven theory which gives justification for yet more pharma products. Kory was denying reality in that he didn’t believe anti-bacterials were necessary when it became clear that people were dying of secondary bacterial pneumonia. Kory was also accepting of the fact that extraordinary amounts of sedatives (Midazolam) were being used in the UK. Good grief.
Kudos as ever to Charles Wright.
********
What Exactly did Ivermectin Cure in Hospitalized “COVID” patients?
CHARLES WRIGHT
MAY 14, 2024
I think I’ve asked this question a few times. Let’s look at some “virus” guys. You know them.
McCullough, Leake, November 17, 2022:
“I have always been impressed with the absence of bacterial superinfection, and micro- and macro-thrombosis being features that separate COVID-19 from influenza and other viral syndromes.”
Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake
Electron Cryotomography of SARS-CoV-2 Virions
The endless frustrations of the SARS-CoV-2 crisis and pandemic response has led some to push back denying existence of the virus altogether. Laboratory methods in virology are well accepted and utilize a series of experiments to demonstrate cellular invasion, replication, transfer and repeated infection. Whole genomic sequencing has aided in identifi…
Also note Dr. Sam Bailey’s reply to their “it was a virus” article, November 20, 2022:
McCullough claimed in the Substack post that an electron cryotomography study provided evidence of ‘SARS-CoV-2’. He disingenuously implied to his readers that this kind of “evidence” has never been dismantled before. The methods section of the cited paper reveals that the authors simply asserted they started with “viral strains” in some obtained specimens. Then, these were mixed with Vero monkey kidney cells and after the cells broke down 4-5 days later, they were prepared for imaging. Various particles were imaged amongst the cellular debris and these were declared to be “virions.” (There was no control experiment of course.) Oh dear! They have fallen for one of virology’s oldest tricks: what we call the “point and declare” scam.None of these imaged particles have ever been shown to be replication-competent or disease-causing in nature. And none of them have been characterised to see what, if any, genetic material they contain.
Dr Sam Bailey
Dr. Peter McCullough Says He Has Seen A Picture Of A Virus Up Close
On their “Courageous Discourse” Substack, Dr Peter McCullough & John Leake recently posted a short article titled, “Electron Cryotomography of SARS-CoV-2 Virions”. According to the authors: “The endless frustrations of the SARS-CoV-2 crisis and pandemic response has led some to push back denying existence of the virus altogether…
“It was a viral induced pneumonia, no antibacterials were indicated in the majority, and so many in care homes died from a viral pneumonia quickly, that I don’t find it that weird that total antibiotic use dropped. ‘Secondary bacterial pneumonia certainly occurred, but it was relatively rare, even in the ICU! To suggest that everyone was dying of a secondary bacterial pneumonia (like in 1918 Spanish Flu where a bacterial pneumonia actually was the proximate cause of most deaths) is absurd.”
Pierre Kory’s Medical Musings
A Contrarian Opinion Regarding The Massive Increase In The Use of Sedatives And Opiates In UK Nursing Homes In Early 2020
I am not disturbed by the data or reports of massive increases in the use of sedatives and opiates in the UK and elsewhere in early 2020. I believe people are interpreting these data malevolently, which is uncalled for and frankly, in my opinion, this shows an astounding amount of ignorance as to how those medicines are used in real life situations…
Secondary bacterial infection of the lung (pneumonia) was extremely common in patients with COVID-19, affecting almost half the patients who required support from mechanical ventilation. By applying machine learning to medical record data, scientists at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine have found that secondary bacterial pneumonia that does not resolve was a key driver of death in patients with COVID-19, results published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Bacterial infections may even exceed death rates from the viral infection itself, according to the findings. The scientists also found evidence that COVID-19 does not cause a “cytokine storm,” so often believed to cause death.
Ouch.
But you know what makes me sick? (Anybody remember Earl Pitts, Real American) (link)?
What really makes me sick is that no matter how many times I ask this question, not one Doctor in the United States will answer this question. What the Hell did Ivermectin cure in the hospitalized patients who were administered Ivermectin under Court Order? If they got it, they lived. If not, they died. It’s not complicated.
From my perspective, Ivermectin cured bacterial pneumonia and maybe ventilator-induced blood clots. And who knows what else. But who am I? I’m not a Doctor. Doctors won’t even bother to answer the question. How pathetic is that? Please, someone review these cases that were reported by Dr. Mary Bowden, or at least offer an opinion. Anyone.
ER: We highly recommend reading the brief piece below on Dr. Mary Bowden, who explains the startling rate of survival of hospital patients who obtained ivermectin by court order and those who didn’t, and how legal success in obtaining it went strictly along political party lines of the judges. It’s stark and not a little shocking.
REFERENCE
The Statement of Dr. Mary Bowden on the Mortality Rates of Hospitalized COVID Patients who were and were not Administered Ivermectin under Court Order
CHARLES WRIGHT
·
17 DECEMBER 2023
From Twitter, February 27, 2023. I reconnected w/ (Beth Parlato) over the weekend…hero lawyer who represented Jason Jones and his wife. She and co-counsel Ralph Lorigo filed 189 cases for hospitalized patients trying to get ivermectin. 80 cases went to hearings/trial. They won about 40 and lost about 40.
Featured image, ivermectin, source: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/hospitals-refused-prescribe-ivermectin-threats-lockdowns-followed-rcna7330
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply